IP Library Granted Patent US 12,327,613
Granted Patent B2
US 12,327,613 · App. 15/781,228 · Granted Jun 10, 2025

De novo antibody design

Inventors: Terence Seward Baker (Slough, GB); Xiaofeng Liu (Slough, GB); Jiye Shi (Slough, GB); Richard David Taylor (Slough, GB)
Assignee: UCB BIOPHARMA SRL
G16B15/00G06F30/20G16B20/30G16B20/50
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,327,613
App. No.
15/781,228
Granted
Jun 10, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

Computer-implemented methods of designing an antibody that will bind to a target epitope are disclosed. In one arrangement, the method comprises identifying one or more hotspot residues that will each bind to a corresponding one of one or more hotspot sites on the target epitope. Candidate antibody structures are selected from a database such that characteristic atoms within the antibody structure and hotspot characteristic atoms can be superimposed computationally with an averaged spatial deviation less than a predetermined threshold. A designed antibody is generated by replacing matching residues with different residues such that a predicted affinity is increased.

Claims (44)

1. A computer-implemented method, comprising:

(a) generating a residue-based triplet hash data set for each of the residue triplets from a cognate protein binder, the residues known to bind to a target epitope, each cognate protein binder residue comprising a cognate protein binder residue sub-structure comprising sub-structure characteristic atoms, the hash key set constructed using the data on the special position of by nine vertexes corresponding to the positions of nine characteristic atoms of the three residues and nine edges corresponding to the edges from the three triangles

wherein the characteristic atoms of the cognate protein binder residue sub-structure comprise any three of the following: the alpha carbon, the backbone carbon atom derived from the carboxyl group, the backbone nitrogen, the backbone oxygen, and the beta carbon of the side chain;

(b) generating a data set from a 3D database of antibody structures, the dataset comprising triplet hash data on any complementarity-determining region (CDR) residues triplet generated in the same way and the same types of atoms as in step (a);

(c) using the data set obtained in step (b) to computationally select one or more candidate antibody structures from the 3D database of antibody structures by identifying antibody scaffold triplet structures which are able to accommodate the three cognate protein binder residues in the geometrically matched positions in CDRs, by comparing the respective triplet hash key values, each candidate antibody structure comprising 3D spatial data on a first matching residue, a second matching residue and a third matching residue each comprising a matching residue sub-structure comprising 3 matching residue sub-structure characteristic atoms; and

(d) calculating a first set of distances representing separations between all possible pairings between characteristic atoms of the same type in different sub-structures of the cognate protein binder residues;

calculating a second set of distances representing separations between all possible pairings between characteristic atoms of the same type in different sub-structures of the matching residues; and

comparing the first set of distances to the second set of distances, and selecting one or more candidate antibody structures wherein the difference in the distances is within a predetermined separation threshold;

(e) outputting the one or more selected candidate antibody structures in a format suitable for use in a process for manufacturing the one or more selected candidate antibodies; and

(f) manufacturing the one or more selected candidate antibodies using, for each of the selected candidate antibodies, the 3 matching residue sub-structure characteristic atoms of each of the matching residue sub-structures for each of the first matching residue, the second matching residue, and the third matching residue.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the predetermined threshold is 2.0 Angstroms.

3. The method of claim 1 , further comprising replacing in 3D coordinates the matching residues backbone atoms 3D coordinates with the corresponding 3D coordinates of the corresponding cognate binder residue's backbone atoms.

4. The method of claim 1 , wherein the three substructure characteristic atoms are the alpha carbon atom, the backbone carbon atom, and the backbone nitrogen atom.

5. The method of claim 1 , further comprising iteratively swapping 3D coordinates of the atoms each of one or more of the CDR loops of the candidate antibody structure with 3D coordinates of the atoms of CDR loops from a database of CDR loops.

6. A non-transitory computer readable medium, comprising computer readable instructions which, when executed by a computer, cause the computer to carry out the method of claim 1 .

7. The method of claim 1 , further comprising detecting geometrical clashing by comparing 3D coordinates of the matching residues, where one or more atoms are calculated to occupy positions that are closer together than is physically possible, between one or more atoms in the candidate antibody structure when bound to the target epitope and one or more atoms in the target epitope.

8. The method of claim 7 , further comprising determining whether a detected geometrical clash is with a side chain of a residue of the candidate antibody structure and, if so, replacing the 3D coordinates of the atoms of the side chain by 3D coordinates of atoms of a side chain of another type of amino acid.

9. The method of claim 8 , wherein the 3D coordinates of the atoms of the side chain are replaced by 3D coordinates of atoms of an alanine side chain, a glycine side chain, a valine side chain, a serine side chain, a threonine side chain, or homo-alanine side chain.

10. The method of claim 7 , further comprising calculating presence of geometrical clash is with a backbone or beta carbon atoms of any candidate antibody residue and, if so, discarding the selected candidate antibody structure and repeating the determination for a different candidate antibody structure selected from the database.

11. The method of claim 1 , wherein the method comprises additional step of generation of an index key lookup table comprising residue triplet's information for the residues of a cognate protein binder and the CDR residues of antibodies, the lookup table comprising each vertex residue types and atomic coordinates data.

12. The method of claim 1 , further comprising updating one of the candidate antibody 3D structure data for one or more of the matching residues that is an amino-acid residue of a different type compared to the cognate protein binder amino-acid residue type, the updating comprising replacing the 3D atomic coordinates the matching residue with 3D atomic coordinates of a different residue such that a calculated affinity between the resulting 3D antibody structure and the target epitope is higher than a calculated affinity between the candidate antibody structure and the target epitope.

13. The method of claim 1 , wherein manufacturing the one or more selected candidate antibodies comprises chemically synthesizing genes encoding variable regions of the candidate antibodies.

14. A method, comprising:

identifying one or more candidate antibody structures that will bind to a target epitope by:

(a) generating a residue-based triplet hash data set for each of the residue triplets from a cognate protein binder, the residues known to bind to the target epitope, each cognate protein binder residue comprising a cognate protein binder residue sub-structure comprising sub-structure characteristic atoms, the hash key set constructed using the data on the special position of by nine vertexes corresponding to the positions of nine characteristic atoms of the three residues and nine edges corresponding to the edges from the three triangles;

wherein the characteristic atoms of the cognate protein binder residue sub-structure comprise any three of the following: the alpha carbon, the backbone carbon atom derived from the carboxyl group, the backbone nitrogen, the backbone oxygen, and the beta carbon of the side chain;

(b) generating a data set from a 3D database of antibody structures, the dataset comprising triplet hash data on any complementarity-determining region (CDR) residues triplet generated in the same way and the same types of atoms as in step (a);

(c) using the data set obtained in step (b) to computationally select one or more candidate antibody structures from the 3D database of antibody structures by identifying antibody scaffold triplet structures which are able to accommodate the three cognate protein binder residues in the geometrically matched positions in CDRs, by comparing the respective triplet hash key values, each candidate antibody structure comprising 3D spatial data on a first matching residue, a second matching residue and a third matching residue each comprising a matching residue sub-structure comprising 3 matching residue sub-structure characteristic atoms; and

(d) calculating a first set of distances representing separations between all possible pairings between characteristic atoms of the same type in different sub-structures of the cognate protein binder residues;

calculating a second set of distances representing separations between all possible pairings between characteristic atoms of the same type in different sub-structures of the matching residues; and

comparing the first set of distances to the second set of distances, and selecting one or more candidate antibody structures wherein the difference in the distances is within a predetermined separation threshold;

manufacturing an antibody according to the identified one or more candidate antibody structures; and

applying a therapy using the manufactured antibody, wherein applying the therapy comprises:

the manufactured antibody achieving a desired mechanism of action based on the target epitope;

the manufactured antibody binding with high affinity to the target epitope; and

the manufactured antibody blocking cognate protein-protein interactions or capturing predicted transition states.

15. The method of claim 14 , wherein applying the therapy further comprises the manufactured antibody binding to a BTB-Kelch substrate adaptor protein.

16. The method of claim 15 , wherein the BTB-Kelch substrate adaptor protein regulates steady-state levels of a bZIP transcription factor.

17. The method of claim 16 , wherein the BTB-Kelch substrate adaptor protein regulates steady-state levels of a bZIP transcription factor in response to oxidative stress.

18. The method of claim 14 , wherein the manufactured antibody binding with high affinity to the target epitope comprises the manufactured antibody binding with an affinity of at least the low-to-mid nanomolar range.

19. The method of claim 14 , wherein applying the therapy further comprises the manufactured antibody targeting an intracellular protein.

20. The method of claim 14 , wherein applying the therapy further comprises the manufactured antibody affecting immune homeostastis.

21. The method of claim 14 , wherein applying the therapy further comprises the manufactured antibody affecting fibrosis regulation.

22. The method of claim 13 , wherein manufacturing the one or more selected candidate antibodies further comprises transfecting the chemically synthesized genes into a host cell.

Assignments (5)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jan 21, 2025
From: BAKER, TERENCE SEWARD; LIU, XIAOFENG; SHI, JIYE; TAYLOR, RICHARD DAVID
To: CELLTECH R & D LIMITED
Reel/Frame 069960/0050 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jan 21, 2025
From: CELLTECH R & D LIMITED
To: UCB BIOPHARMA SPRL
Reel/Frame 069960/0124 →
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Jan 21, 2025
From: UCB BIOPHARMA SPRL
To: UCB BIOPHARMA SRL
Reel/Frame 069960/0212 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jul 25, 2018
From: BAKER, TERENCE SEWARD; LIU, XIAOFENG; SHI, JIYE; TAYLOR, RICHARD DAVID
To: CELLTECH R&D LIMITED
Reel/Frame 047306/0001 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jul 25, 2018
From: CELLTECH R&D LIMITED
To: UCB BIOPHARMA SPRL
Reel/Frame 046454/0557 →
Priority Claims (1)
GB 1521447 · Dec 4, 2015 · national
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20200168293A1 · May 28, 2020
References Cited (52)
US 20050277173A1 · Chin · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 20090130102A1 · Weaver et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
CN 102143977 · 2011 [cited by applicant]
CN 102170909 · 2011 [cited by applicant]
CN 102482355 · 2012 [cited by applicant]
JP 2009530422 · 2009 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2013093627 · 2013 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2014022817 · 2014 [cited by applicant]
Kannan Tharakaraman, Luke N. Robinson, Andrew Hatas, Yi-Ling Chen, Liu Siyue, S. Raguram, V. Sasisekharan, Gerald N. Wogan, and Ram Sasisekharan: Redesign of a cross-reactive antibody to dengue virus with broad-spectrum… [cited by examiner]
Li T, Pantazes RJ, Maranas CD (2014) OptMAVEn—A New Framework for the de novo Design of Antibody Variable Region Models Targeting Specific Antigen Epitopes. PLoS ONE 9(8): e105954. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0105954 (Year… [cited by examiner]
Sormanni, Pietro, Francesco A. Aprile, and Michele Vendruscolo. “Rational design of antibodies targeting specific epitopes within intrinsically disordered proteins.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 112.3… [cited by examiner]
Pantazes, R. J., and Costas D. Maranas. “OptCDR: a general computational method for the design of antibody complementarity determining regions for targeted epitope binding.” Protein Engineering, Design & Selection 23.11… [cited by examiner]
Kashmiri et al., “SDR grafting-a new approach to antibody humanization,” Methods, Academic Press, US, vol. 36, No. 1, May 1, 2005, pp. 25-34. [cited by applicant]
L N Robinson et al. Structure-guided design of an anti-dengue antibody directed to a non-immunodominant epitope. (2015) Cell 162. 493-504. [cited by applicant]
S M Lippow et al. Computational design of antibody-affinity improvement beyond in vivo maturation. (2007) Nature Biotechnology. vol 25. 1171-1176. [cited by applicant]
D Kuroda et al. Computer-aided antibody design. (2012) Protein Engineering, Design & Selection. vol 25. 507-521. [cited by applicant]
J L Jordan et al. Structural understanding of stabilization patterns in engineered bispecific Ig-like antibody molecules. (2009) Proteins. vol 77. 832-841. [cited by applicant]
G D Lapidoth et al. AbDesign: An algorithm for combinatorial backbone design guided by natural conformations and sequences. (2015) Proteins. vol 83. 1385-1406. [cited by applicant]
K.R Abhinandan et al. Analysis and improvements to Kabat and structurally correct numbering of antibody variable domains. (2008) Molecular Immunology. vol 45. 3832-3839. [cited by applicant]
B Al-Lazikani et al. Standard conformations for the canonical structures of immunoglobulins. (1997) Journal of Molecular Biology. vol 273. pp. 927-948. [cited by applicant]
S J Fleishman et al. Computational design of proteins targeting the conserved stem region of influenza hemagglutinin. (2011) Science. vol. 332. 816-821. [cited by applicant]
S Liu et al. Nonnatural protein-protein interaction-pair design by key residues grafting. (2007) Natural Academy of Sciences of the USA. vol. 104. 5330-5335. [cited by applicant]
S J Fleishman et al. Hotspot-centric de novo design of protein binders. (2011) Journal of Molecular Biology. vol 413. 1047-1062. [cited by applicant]
L A Clark et al. An antibody loop replacement design feasibility study and a loop- swapped dimer structure. (2009) Protein Engineering, Design & Selection. vol 22. 93-101. [cited by applicant]
E Soderlind et al. Recombining germline-derived CDR sequences for creating diverse single-framework antibody libraries. (2000) Nature Biotechnology. vol 18. 852-856. [cited by applicant]
B North et al. A new clustering of antibody CDR loop conformations. (2011) Journal of Molecular Biology. vol 406. 228-256. [cited by applicant]
B Kuhlman et al. Design of a novel globular protein fold with atomic-level accuracy. (2003) Science. vol 302. 1364-1368. [cited by applicant]
H J Wolfson et al. Geometric Hashing (1997). [cited by applicant]
S J Fleishman et al. RosettaScripts: A scripting language interface to the Rosetta macromolecular modelling suite. (2011) PLos One. vol 6. E20161. [cited by applicant]
C A Smith et al. Backrub like backbone simulation recapitulates natural protein conformational variability and improves mutant side-chain prediction. (2008) Journal of Molecular Biology. vol 380. 742-756. [cited by applicant]
M C Lawrence et al. Shape complementarity at protein/protein interfaces. (1993) Journal of Molecular Biology. vol. 234. 946-950. [cited by applicant]
P B Stranges et al. A comparison of successful and failed protein interface designs highlights the challenges of designing buried hydrogen bonds. (2013) Protein Science. vol 22. 74-82. [cited by applicant]
R Das et al. Macromolecular modelling with Rosetta. (2008) Annual Review of Biochemistry vol. 77. 363-382. [cited by applicant]
S C Lo et al. Structure of the Keap1: Nrf2 interface provides mechanistic insight into Nrf2 signalling. (2006) The Embo Journal. vol 25. 3605-3617. [cited by applicant]
Z Hu et al. Conservation of polar residues as hot spots at protein interfaces. (2000) Proteins. vol 39. 331-342. [cited by applicant]
A J McCoy et al. Phaser crystallographic software. (2007) Journal of Applied Crystallography. vol 40. 658-674. [cited by applicant]
E Potterton et al. A graphical user interface to the CCP4 program suite. (2003) Biological Crystallography, Acta Crystallographica, D59. 1131-1137. [cited by applicant]
M D Winn et al. Overview of the CCP4 suite and current developments. Biological Crystallography, Acta Crystallographica, D67. (2011) D67. 235-242. [cited by applicant]
B Padmanabhan et al. Structural basis for defects of Keap1 activity provoked by its point mutations in lung cancer. (2006) Molecular Cell. 689-700. [cited by applicant]
D M Shechner et al. Crystal Structure of the catalytic core of an RNA-Polymerase Ribozyme. (2009) Science vol. 326. 1271-1275. [cited by applicant]
G N Murshudov et al. Refinement of macromolecular structures by the maximum- likelihood method. (1997) Biological Crystallography, Acta Crystallography D53. 240-255. [cited by applicant]
P Emsley et al. Coot: Model-building tools for molecular graphics. (2004) Biological Crystallography, Acta Crystallographica, D60. 2126-2132. [cited by applicant]
S C Lovell et al. Structure validation by Calpha geometry: phi,psi and Cbeta deviation. (2003) Proteins. vol 50. 437-450. [cited by applicant]
R A Laskowski et al. Procheck: A program to check the stereochemical quality of protein structures. (1993) Journal of Applied Crystallography. vol 26. 283-291. [cited by applicant]
A Vaguine et al. SFCHECK: a unified set of procedures for evaluating the quality of macromolecular structure-factor data and their agreement with the atomic model. (1999) Biological Crystallography, Acta Crystallography… [cited by applicant]
X Liu et al. Shafts: A hybrid approach for 3D molecular similarity calculation. (2011) Journal of Chemistry. vol 51. 2372-2385. [cited by applicant]
A Wallace et al. Tess: A Geometric hashing algorithm for deriving 3D coordinate templates. (1997) Protein Science. vol 6. 2308-2323. [cited by applicant]
K Kaufmann et al. Practically useful: what the Rosetta protein modelling suite can do for you. (2010) Biochemistry. vol 49. 2987-2998. [cited by applicant]
Search Report on UK Application No. GB1521447.1, dated Sep. 22, 2016. [cited by applicant]
Office action on JP Application No. 2018-528602, dated Nov. 26, 2020 (translation included). [cited by applicant]
Search report on CN 201680077968.1 dated Oct. 15, 2021 (translation included). [cited by applicant]
Office action on on CN 201680077968.1 (translation included). [cited by applicant]