Model-based surgical planning and implant placement
Systems and methods are provided for model-based surgical planning. A surgical planning system can include a prescreening tool configured to provide an initial classification of a set of patients according to a pelvic tilt, measured as a position of a pelvis of the patient relative to the position of a spine of the patient, in a plurality of body positions. A model constructor is configured to construct a model of a pelvis of the patient according to the initial classification of the patient. A finite element modeling component is configured to simulate relative motion of the model of the pelvis and a model of an implant. A patient classifier is configured to select at least one of a position of the implant and an orientation of the implant for the patient according to the simulated relative motion.
1. A method comprising:
providing an initial classification of a patient according to a safe zone determined from a pelvic tilt, measured as a position of a pelvis of the patient relative to the position of a spine of the patient, in a plurality of body positions;
constructing a model of a pelvis of the patient according to the initial classification of the patient;
simulating relative motion of the model of the pelvis and a model of an implant via a finite element modeling system; and
selecting at least one of a position of the implant and an orientation of the implant for the patient according to the simulated relative motion;
wherein simulating relative motion of the model of the pelvis and an model of an implant comprises repeating a series of motions for each of a number of orientations of the implant and selecting the at least one of the position of the implant and the orientation of the implant for the patient according to the simulated relative motion comprises generating a two-dimensional map for each motion of the series of motions, each of a plurality of points on the two-dimensional map representing a desirability score for an ordered pair representing an inclination and version of the implant.
2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the desirability score comprises an edge loading score that represents a contact area between various portions of the implant during the series of motions.
3. The method of claim 1 , wherein the desirability score comprises an impingement score that represents a degree of implant-on-implant impingement, implant-on-bone impingement, and bone-on-bone impingement during the series of motions.
4. The method of claim 3 , wherein the desirability score is a linear combination of the impingement score and an edge loading score that represents a contact area between various portions of the implant during the series of motions.
5. The method of claim 1 , wherein selecting the at least one of the position of the implant and the orientation of the implant for the patient according to the simulated relative motion comprises generating a linear combination of the desirability score for each point across the two-dimensional maps for the series of motions.
6. The method of claim 5 , wherein the linear combination is a weighted linear combination wherein the weights for the weighted linear combination are determined according to a frequency with which the patient is expected to perform each motion of the series of motions.
7. A method comprising:
providing an initial classification of a patient according to a safe zone determined from a pelvic tilt, measured as a position of a pelvis of the patient relative to the position of a spine of the patient, in a plurality of body positions, wherein providing an initial classification of a patient according to a safe zone determined from a pelvic tilt comprises:
measuring a pelvic tilt at each of the plurality of body positions;
assigning a multidimensional mapping to the patient for each of the plurality of body positions, representing an average safe zone for patient having a similar pelvic tilt in that body position across at least two parameters representing the orientation and position; and
combining the multidimensional mappings across the plurality of body positions to estimate a safe zone for the patient;
constructing a model of a pelvis of the patient according to the initial classification of the patient;
simulating relative motion of the model of the pelvis and a model of an implant; and
selecting at least one of a position of the implant and an orientation of the implant for the patient according to the simulated relative motion
wherein simulating relative motion of the model of the pelvis and the model of an implant comprises repeating a series of motions for each of a number of orientations of the implant and selecting the at least one of the position of the implant and the orientation of the implant for the patient according to the simulated relative motion comprises generating a two-dimensional map for each motion of the series of motions, each of a plurality of points on the two-dimensional map representing a desirability score for an ordered pair representing an inclination and version of the implant.
8. The method of claim 7 , wherein the multidimensional mapping is a two-dimensional mapping, and the at least two parameters are an inclination and version of the implant.
9. The method of claim 7 , wherein combining the multidimensional mappings across the plurality of body positions to estimate a safe zone for the patient comprises averaging corresponding values of the multidimensional mappings across the plurality of body positions.
10. The method of claim 7 , wherein combining the multidimensional mappings across the plurality of body positions to estimate a safe zone for the patient comprises generating a final map having a safe zone including only values that met a threshold value within each multidimensional mapping for the plurality of body positions.