IP Library › Granted Patent US 10,888,924
Granted Patent B2
US 10,888,924 · App. 15/880,931 · Granted Jan 12, 2021

Control for powder fusion

Inventors: Sergei F. Burlatsky (West Hartford, CT); David Ulrich Furrer (Marlborough, CT); Rebecca L. Runkle (Manchester, CT); Jesse R. Boyer (Middletown, CT); Christopher F. O'Neill (Marlborough, CT)
Assignee: RAYTHEON TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION
B22F3/1055B29C64/393B33Y10/00B33Y30/00B33Y50/02G05B19/4099G06F30/20B22F2003/1056B22F2003/1057B22F2203/11B22F2999/00B29C64/153G05B2219/36252G06F2119/08Y02P10/25
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 10,888,924
App. No.
15/880,931
Granted
Jan 12, 2021
Kind
B2
Abstract

A powder processing machine includes a work bed, a powder deposition device operable to deposit powder in the work bed, at least one energy beam device operable to emit an energy beam with a variable beam power and direct the energy beam onto the work bed with a variable beam scan rate to melt and fuse regions of the powder, and a controller operable to dynamically control at least one of the beam power or the beam scan rate to change how the powder melts and fuses. The controller is configured to determine whether an instant set of process parameters falls within a defect condition or a non-defect condition and adjust at least one of the beam power or the beam scan rate responsive to the defect condition such that the instant set of process parameters falls within the non-defect condition.

Claims (38)

1. A powder processing machine comprising:

a work bed;

a powder deposition device operable to deposit powder in the work bed;

at least one energy beam device operable to emit an energy beam with a variable beam power and direct the energy beam onto the work bed with a variable beam scan rate to melt and fuse regions of the powder; and

a controller operable to dynamically control at least one of the beam power or the beam scan rate to change how the powder melts and fuses, the controller configured to determine whether an instant set of process parameters falls within a defect condition or a non-defect condition and adjust at least one of the beam power or the beam scan rate responsive to the defect condition such that the instant set of process parameters falls within the non-defect condition, the instant set of process parameters including an instant temperature at an instant location of the energy beam in the work bed, and the instant temperature is based, at least in part, on an edge factor that represents an instant location of the energy beam in the work bed relative to an edge of a component being formed from the powder.

2. The powder processing machine as recited in claim 1 , wherein the instant temperature is determined based, at least in part, on a temperature of a build plate surface in the work bed.

3. The powder processing machine as recited in claim 1 , wherein the instant temperature is based, at least in part, on a temperature change due to previous energy beam passes in a current stripe.

4. The powder processing machine as recited in claim 1 , wherein the instant temperature is based, at least in part, on a temperature change due to a previous stripe.

5. The powder processing machine as recited in claim 1 , wherein the instant temperature is based, at least in part, on a temperature change due to previous powder layers.

6. The powder processing machine as recited in claim 1 , wherein the instant temperature is T 0 =T BP +ΔT 1 f+ΔT 2 +ΔT 3 , where T 0 is the instant temperature, T BP is a temperature of a build plate surface in the work bed, ΔT 1 is a temperature change due to previous energy beam passes in a current stripe, ΔT 2 is a temperature change due to a previous stripe, ΔT 3 is a temperature change due to previous powder layers, and f is an edge factor that represents an instant location of the energy beam in the work bed relative to an edge of a component being formed from the powder.

7. The powder processing machine as recited in claim 1 , wherein the defect condition and non-defect condition are based, at least in part, on at least one of an instant surface stress of a melt pool of the powder at an instant location of the energy beam in the work bed, an energy density of the energy beam and an instant cross-sectional area of a melt pool of the powder at an instant location of the energy beam in the work bed, or an instant diameter of a melt pool of the powder at an instant location of the energy beam in the work bed.

8. A powder processing machine comprising:

a work bed;

a powder deposition device operable to deposit powder in the work bed;

at least one energy beam device operable to emit an energy beam with a variable beam power and direct the energy beam onto the work bed with a variable beam scan rate to melt and fuse regions of the powder; and

a non-transitory computer-readable media comprising instructions, operable when executed, to:

dynamically control at least one of the variable beam power or the variable beam scan rate of the energy beam in the powder processing machine to change how a powder melts and fuses in the work bed of the powder processing machine, by

determining whether an instant set of process parameters falls within a defect condition or a non-defect condition, and

adjusting at least one of the variable beam power or the variable beam scan rate responsive to the defect condition such that the instant set of process parameters falls within the non-defect condition, the instant set of process parameters including an instant temperature at an instant location of the energy beam in the work bed, and the instant temperature is based, at least in part, on an edge factor that represents an instant location of the energy beam in the work bed relative to an edge of a component being formed from the powder.

9. The powder processing machine as recited in claim 8 , wherein the instant temperature is determined based on at least one of a temperature of a build plate surf ace in the work bed, a temperature change due to previous energy beam passes in a current stripe, a temperature change due to a previous stripe in the same layer, or a temperature change due to previous powder layers.

10. The powder processing machine as recited in claim 8 , wherein the instant temperature is T 0 =T BP +ΔT 1 f+ΔT 2 +ΔT 3 , where T 0 is the instant temperature, T BP is a temperature of a build plate surface in the work bed, ΔT 1 is a temperature change due to previous energy beam passes in a current stripe, ΔT 2 is a temperature change due to a previous stripe in the same layer, ΔT 3 is a temperature change due to previous powder layers, and f is an edge factor that represents an instant location of the energy beam in the work bed relative to an edge of the component being formed from the powder.

11. The powder processing machine as recited in claim 8 , wherein the defect condition and non-defect condition are based, at least one part, on at least one of an instant surface stress of a melt pool of the powder at an instant location of the energy beam in a work bed, an energy density of the energy beam and an instant cross-sectional area of a melt pool of the powder at an instant location of the energy beam in the work bed, or an instant diameter of a melt pool of the powder at an instant location of the energy beam in the work bed.

12. The powder processing machine as recited in claim 8 , including adjusting the beam power by adjusting a time that the energy beam is on (non-zero power) and off (zero power).

13. A method for use in a powder processing machine, the method comprising:

dynamically controlling at least one of a beam power or a beam scan rate of an energy beam in a powder processing machine to change how a powder melts and fuses in a work bed of the powder processing machine, by

determining whether an instant set of process parameters falls within a defect condition or a non-defect condition, and

adjusting at least one of the beam power or the beam scan rate responsive to the defect condition such that the instant set of process parameters falls within the non-defect condition, the instant set of process parameters including an instant temperature at an instant location of the energy beam in the work bed, and the instant temperature is based, at least in part, on an edge factor that represents an instant location of the energy beam in the work bed relative to an edge of a component being formed from the powder.

14. The method as recited in claim 13 , wherein the instant temperature is determined base, at least in part, on at least one of a temperature of a build plate surface in the work bed, a temperature change due to previous energy beam passes in a current stripe, a temperature change due to a previous stripe in the same layer, or a temperature change due to previous powder layers.

15. The method as recited in claim 13 , wherein the instant temperature is T 0 =T BP +ΔT 1 f+ΔT 2 +ΔT 3 , where T 0 is the instant temperature, T BP is a temperature of a build plate surface in the work bed, ΔT 1 is a temperature change due to previous energy beam passes in a current stripe, ΔT 2 is a temperature change due to a previous stripe in the same layer, ΔT 3 is a temperature change due to previous powder layers, and f is an edge factor that represents an instant location of the energy beam in the work bed relative to an edge of the component being formed from the powder.

16. The method as recited in claim 13 , wherein the defect condition and non-defect condition are based on at least one of an instant surface stress of a melt pool of the powder at an instant location of the energy beam in a work bed, an energy density of the energy beam and an instant cross-sectional area of a melt pool of the powder at an instant location of the energy beam in the work bed, or an instant diameter of a melt pool of the powder at an instant location of the energy beam in the work bed.

17. The method as recited in claim 13 , including adjusting the beam power by adjusting a time that the energy beam is on (non-zero power) and off (zero power).

18. A method for use with a powder processing machine that is operable in an additive manufacturing process to melt and fuse a powder in a work bed by at least one energy beam emitted from at least one energy beam device along a path to form a component, the method comprising:

simulating temperature location-by-location along a perimeter of a component in an additive manufacturing process based on an instant set of process parameters, a power of the energy beam, a speed of the energy beam, and the path of the energy beam, wherein the instant set of process parameters include an instant temperature at an instant location of the energy beam in the work bed, and the instant temperature is based, at least in part, on an edge factor that represents an instant location of the energy beam in the work bed relative to an edge of a component being formed from the powder;

comparing the simulated temperature to a critical temperature criteria for formation of a defect to determine location-by-location along the path whether the simulated temperature will result in formation of the defect;

if the simulated temperature is determined to result in formation of the defect, adjusting at least one of the power of the energy beam, the speed of the energy beam, or the path of the energy beam and repeating the simulating and comparing until the simulated temperature will not result in formation of the defect; and

using the adjusted power of the energy beam, speed of the energy beam, or path of the energy beam in the additive manufacturing process to actually make the component.

19. The method as recited in claim 18 , wherein the simulating of the temperature includes geometric parameters representing the geometry of the perimeter of the component.

20. The method as recited in claim 18 , wherein the set of process parameters includes a stripe width of the path and an angle of the perimeter of the component.

Assignments (4)
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Jul 27, 2023
From: RAYTHEON TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION
To: RTX CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 064714/0001 →
CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE AND REMOVE PATENT APPLICATION NUMBER 11886281 AND ADD PATENT APPLICATION NUMBER 14846874. TO CORRECT THE RECEIVING PARTY ADDRESS PREVIOUSLY RECORDED AT REEL: 054062 FRAME: 0001. ASSIGNOR(S) HEREBY CONFIRMS THE CHANGE OF ADDRESS. Recorded Mar 4, 2021
From: UNITED TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION
To: RAYTHEON TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 055659/0001 →
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Sep 4, 2020
From: UNITED TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION
To: RAYTHEON TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 054062/0001 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jan 26, 2018
From: BURLATSKY, SERGEI F.; FURRER, DAVID ULRICH; RUNKLE, REBECCA L.; BOYER, JESSE R.; O'NEILL, CHRISTOPHER F.
To: UNITED TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 044740/0177 →
Continuity (2)
Provisional Application 62451330 · Jan 27, 2017
Related Publication 20180229303A1 · Aug 16, 2018
Cited By (2)
US 12,485,489 US 12,636,838