Immune checkpoint molecular fitness profiling by mass spectrometry
The present disclosure relates generally to the analysis of immune checkpoint proteins involved in cancer. In particular, the present disclosure provides material and methods for determining abundance ratios of various immune checkpoint proteins (e.g., PD-1, PD-L1, and PD-L2) present in a biospecimen sample based on quantification of peak area using mass spectrometry analysis. The methods disclosed herein provide an alternative platform for diagnosing and treating cancer, especially in cases limited by ineffective antibody recognition.
1. A method of treating cancer in a subject in need thereof, the method comprising:
quantifying peak area of two peptide fragments isolated from a biospecimen from the subject corresponding to at least two of programmed cell death 1 (PD-1), programmed cell death 1 ligand 1 (PD-L1), and programmed cell death 1 ligand 2 (PD-L2) using combined mass spectrometry analysis;
calculating an abundance ratio based on the quantified peak area of the two peptide fragments corresponding to the at least two PD-1, PD-L1, and PD-L2; and
administering an anticancer agent comprising one or more of an anti-PD-1 antibody, an anti-PD-L1 antibody, or an anti-PD-L2 antibody to the subject based on the calculated abundance ratio.
2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the anti-PD-1 antibody is administered to the subject when the calculated abundance ratio indicates levels of PD-L1 or PD-L2 exceed levels of PD-1.
3. The method of claim 1 , wherein the anti-PD-L1 antibody or the anti-PD-L2 antibody is administered to the subject when the calculated abundance ratio indicates levels of PD-1 exceed levels of PD-L1.
4. The method of claim 1 , wherein the anti-PD-L1 antibody or the anti-PD-L2 antibody is administered to the subject when the calculated abundance ratio indicates levels of PD-1 exceed levels of PD-L2.
5. The method of claim 1 , wherein the anti-PD-L1 antibody or the anti-PD-L2 antibody is administered to the subject when the calculated abundance ratio indicates levels of PD-1 exceed the combined levels of PD-L1 and PD-L2.
6. The method of claim 1 , wherein the two peptide fragments consist of a peptide fragment corresponding to PD-1 and a peptide fragment corresponding to PD-L1.
7. The method of claim 1 , wherein the two peptide fragments consist of a peptide fragment corresponding to PD-1 and a peptide fragment corresponding to PD-L2.
8. The method of claim 1 , wherein the two peptide fragments are selected from the group consisting of:
(a) LAAFPEDR (SEQ ID NO:6) corresponding to PD-1;
(b) VNAPYNK (SEQ ID NO:1), LQDAGVYR (SEQ ID NO:3), and LFNVTSTLR (SEQ ID NO:12) corresponding to PD-L1; and
(c) TPEGLYQVTSVLR (SEQ ID NO:9) corresponding to PD-L2.
9. The method of claim 8 , wherein the two peptide fragments are glycopeptide fragments.
10. The method of claim 9 , wherein the two peptide fragments are glycopeptide fragments corresponding to PD-L1 selected from the group consisting of:
(a) DLYVVEYGSNMEIECK (SEQ ID NO:18), glycosylated at position N35;
(b) LFNVTSTLR (SEQ ID NO:12), glycosylated at position N192; and
(c) INTTTNEIFYCTFR (SEQ ID NO:16), glycosylated at position N200.