IP Library Granted Patent US 10,567,410
Granted Patent B2
US 10,567,410 · App. 15/909,958 · Granted Feb 18, 2020

Determining the maliciousness of executable files using a remote sandbox environment

Inventors: Leonid Kuperman (Tarzana, CA); Yuri Frayman (Miami, FL); Einaras von Gravrock (Redondo Beach, CA); Gabor Takacs (Gyor, HU)
Assignee: CUJO LLC
H04L63/1425G06F15/76G06F21/53G06F21/554G06N20/00H04L41/145H04L63/0236H04L63/102H04L63/1433H04L63/1466H04L41/16H04L43/026H04L43/062
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 10,567,410
App. No.
15/909,958
Granted
Feb 18, 2020
Kind
B2
Abstract

The behavior analysis engine detects malicious executable files that are being downloaded by networked devices in the local network by executing the executable files in a sandboxing environment operating on the behavior analysis engine. The network traffic hub identifies network communications that are transmitted through the local network that contain executable files. The network traffic hub sends the executable file to the behavior analysis engine and the behavior analysis engine executes the executable file in a sandboxing environment that replicates the networked device that was downloading the executable. The behavior analysis engine extracts execution features from the execution of the executable file and applies an execution model to the execution features to determine a confidence score for the executable file. The behavior analysis engine uses the confidence score to provide instructions to the network traffic hub as to whether to allow the networked device to download the executable.

Claims (32)

1. A method comprising:

receiving, at a behavior analysis engine, an executable file from a network traffic hub in a local network as the executable file is being downloaded by a networked device in the local network;

executing the executable file in a sandbox environment operated by the behavior analysis engine and configured to replicate an operating system running by the networked device that is downloading the executable file and to execute the executable file as the networked device would execute the executable file;

extracting execution features from the execution of the executable file, the execution features corresponding to characteristics of the execution of the executable file;

applying an execution model to the extracted execution features, the execution model to determine whether an executable file is malicious based on execution features of the executable file; and

transmitting processing instructions to the network traffic hub based on the determination of whether the execution file is malicious.

2. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

receiving a network communication associated with the executable file; and

extracting the executable file from the network communication.

3. The method of claim 1 , wherein the sandbox environment is configured based on device identification data received from the network traffic hub.

4. The method of claim 1 , wherein the execution model comprises a machine-learned model.

5. The method of claim 4 , wherein the execution model is trained based on execution features of a set of known-malicious executable files.

6. The method of claim 4 , wherein the execution model is trained based on execution features of a set of known-non-malicious executable files.

7. The method of claim 1 , wherein applying the execution model to the execution features comprises generating a confidence score based on the execution features, the confidence score representing a confidence of the execution model that the executable file is malicious.

8. The method of claim 7 , wherein further comprising comparing the confidence score to a threshold confidence score.

9. The method of claim 1 , further comprising, responsive to determining that the executable file is malicious, transmitting processing instructions to the network traffic hub to block the executable file from being downloaded by the networked device.

10. The method of claim 1 , further comprising, responsive to determining that the executable file is not malicious, transmitting processing instructions to the network traffic hub to allow the executable file to be downloaded by the networked device.

11. A non-transitory computer-readable medium comprising instructions that, when executed by a processor, cause the processor to:

receive, at a behavior analysis engine, an executable file from a network traffic hub in a local network as the executable file is being downloaded by a networked device in the local network;

execute the executable file in a sandbox environment operated by the behavior analysis engine and configured to replicate an operating system running by the networked device that is downloading the executable file and to execute the executable file as the networked device would execute the executable file;

extract execution features from the execution of the executable file, the execution features corresponding to characteristics of the execution of the executable file;

apply an execution model to the extracted execution features, the execution model to determine whether an executable file is malicious based on execution features of the executable file and

transmit processing instructions to the network traffic hub based on the determination of whether the execution file is malicious.

12. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 11 , further comprising instructions that cause the processor to:

receive a network communication associated with the executable file; and

extract the executable file from the network communication.

13. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 11 , wherein the execution model comprises a machine-learned model.

14. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 13 , wherein the execution model is trained based on execution features of a set of known-non-malicious executable files.

15. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 11 , wherein the instructions for applying the execution model to the execution features further cause the processor to generate a confidence score based on the execution features, the confidence score representing a confidence of the execution model that the executable file is malicious.

16. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 15 , wherein the instructions further cause the processor to compare the confidence score to a threshold confidence score.

17. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 11 , further comprising instructions that cause the processor to, responsive to determining that the executable file is malicious, transmit processing instructions to the network traffic hub to block the executable file from being downloaded by the networked device.

18. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 11 , further comprising instructions that cause the processor to, responsive to determining that the executable file is not malicious, transmit processing instructions to the network traffic hub to allow the executable file to be downloaded by the networked device.

Assignments (2)
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Jun 20, 2019
From: CUJO LLC
To: CHARTER COMMUNICATONS HOLDING COMPANY, LLC
Reel/Frame 049537/0319 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jun 5, 2018
From: KUPERMAN, LEONID; FRAYMAN, YURI; VON GRAVROCK, EINARAS; TAKACS, GABOR
To: CUJO LLC
Reel/Frame 045992/0930 →
Continuity (4)
Provisional Application 62477363 · Mar 27, 2017
Provisional Application 62477391 · Mar 27, 2017
Provisional Application 62465304 · Mar 1, 2017
Related Publication 20180253550A1 · Sep 6, 2018
Cited By (2)
US 12,615,268 US 12,739,257