IP Library › Granted Patent US 11,361,599
Granted Patent B2
US 11,361,599 · App. 16/109,996 · Granted Jun 14, 2022

Vehicle damage detection

Inventors: David Michael Herman (Southfield, MI); Antonios Koumpias (Canton, MI)
Assignee: Ford Global Technologies, LLC
G07C5/0808B60K28/10B60R21/01G01C21/3453G05D1/0088G05D1/0214G07C5/085B60R2021/01013G05D2201/0213
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 11,361,599
App. No.
16/109,996
Granted
Jun 14, 2022
Kind
B2
Abstract

A damage quantifier for a vehicle component formed of composite material is determined based on vehicle sensor data. The vehicle is operated based on a mission determined according to determined damage quantifier.

Claims (36)

1. A method, comprising:

prior to deployment of a vehicle, identifying stress locations in a first vehicle component for one or more types of loading modes of the first vehicle component, based on inputting the loading modes and data describing the component to a simulation that outputs the stress location;

wherein respective types of loading modes specify directional forces to the first vehicle component when a plurality of vehicle components receive one or more forces from an impact to the vehicle;

identifying a plurality of sensor locations in the vehicle component for the plurality of sensors based on the identified stress locations in the vehicle component that specify the directional forces to the vehicle component; and

mounting the plurality of the sensors at the identified sensor locations.

2. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

upon deployment of the vehicle, determining a damage quantifier for a vehicle component formed of composite material based on vehicle sensor data; and

operating the vehicle based on a mission determined according to determined damage quantifier.

3. The method of claim 2 , wherein determining the mission includes selecting, based on the determined damage quantifier, a mode of navigation from at least one of cargo-only, cargo and passenger, move with no cargo or passenger, stop movement.

4. The method of claim 3 , further comprising selecting the mode of navigation based on a plurality of damage quantifier thresholds.

5. The method of claim 2 , further comprising predicting a change of the damage quantifier based on at least one of (a) a planned route of the vehicle including data specifying whether the planned route includes a rough road surface, or (b) environmental sensor data including at least one of a vehicle speed, an ambient temperature, and an ambient humidity.

6. A vehicle comprising:

a plurality of sensors; and

a computer, comprising a processor and a memory, the memory storing instructions executable by the processor to:

prior to deployment of a vehicle, identify stress locations in a first vehicle component for one or more types of loading modes of the first vehicle component, based on inputting the loading modes and data describing the component to a simulation that outputs the stress location;

wherein respective types of loading modes specify directional forces to the first vehicle component when a plurality of vehicle components receive one or more forces from an impact to the vehicle; and

identifying a plurality of sensor locations in the vehicle component for the plurality of sensors based on the identified stress locations in the vehicle component that specify the directional forces to the vehicle component; and

wherein the plurality of the sensors are mounted at the identified sensor locations.

7. The vehicle of claim 6 , wherein the instructions further include instructions to:

upon deployment of the vehicle, determine a damage quantifier for a vehicle component formed of composite material based on vehicle sensor data; and

operate the vehicle based on a mission determined according to determined damage quantifier.

8. The system of claim 7 , wherein the instructions further include instructions to predict a change of the damage quantifier based on at least one of (a) a planned route of the vehicle including data specifying whether the planned route includes a rough road surface, or (b) environmental sensor data including at least one of a vehicle speed, an ambient temperature, and an ambient humidity.

9. The system of claim 7 , wherein the instructions further include instructions to determine the damage quantifier based on a model that takes the received data from the sensors included in the vehicle component as input, and outputs the damage quantifier for the respective vehicle component.

10. The system of claim 7 , wherein the types of loading modes include at least one of a roof impact, a frontal impact, a rear impact, and a side impact.

11. The system of claim 7 , wherein the instructions to determine the mission further include instructions to select, based on the determined damage quantifier, a mode of navigation from at least one of cargo-only, cargo and passenger, move with no cargo or passenger, stop movement.

12. The system of claim 11 , wherein the instructions further include instructions to select the mode of navigation based on a plurality of damage quantifier thresholds.

13. The system of claim 10 , wherein the instructions further include instructions to:

select one or more types of loading modes for detection; and

identify the plurality of sensor locations based on the selected one or more types of loading modes.

14. The method of claim 2 , further comprising determining a vehicle damage quantifier based on a combination of a plurality of component damage quantifiers.

15. The method of claim 2 , further comprising training a neural network for determining the damage quantifier using ground truth data generated based on simulating an effect of the damage on physical attributes of the component or measurement data received from a lab measurement equipment including at least one of X-Ray and an ultrasound scanner.

16. The method of claim 5 , wherein predicting the change of the damage quantifier further includes predicting a first damage quantifier based on a first safety standard, predicting a second damage quantifier based on a second safety standard and determining the predicted damage quantifier based on the first and second damage quantifiers.

17. The system of claim 7 , wherein the instructions further include instructions to determine the damage quantifier based on a combination of a plurality of component damage quantifiers.

18. The system of claim 7 , wherein the instructions further include instructions to train a neural network for determining the damage quantifier using ground truth data generated based on simulating an effect of the damage on physical attributes of the component or measurement data received from a lab measurement equipment including at least one of X-Ray and an ultrasound scanner.

19. The system of claim 8 , wherein the instructions further include instructions to predict the change of the damage quantifier by predicting a first damage quantifier based on a first safety standard, predicting a second damage quantifier based on a second safety standard and determining the predicted damage quantifier based on the first and second damage quantifiers.

20. The system of claim 19 , wherein the instructions further include instructions to determine the predicted damage quantifier by determining a maximum of the first damage quantifier and the second damage quantifier.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Aug 23, 2018
From: HERMAN, DAVID MICHAEL; KOUMPIAS, ANTONIOS
To: FORD GLOBAL TECHNOLOGIES, LLC
Reel/Frame 046677/0028 →
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20200066067A1 · Feb 27, 2020
Cited By (7)
US 12,536,643 US 12,597,004 US 12,608,687 US 12,646,041 US 12,676,045 US 12,725,187 US 12,725,200