Systems and methods for model-based analysis of damage to a vehicle
A system for capturing images of damage to an object configured to (i) store an orientation model associated with an object; (ii) receive, from a user, a request to analyze damage to the object; (iii) instruct the user to position a camera at a first position relative to the object; (iv) receive an image of the object from the camera; (v) determine whether the received image is properly framed; (vi) if the received image is not properly framed, instruct the user to adjust the position of the camera; and (vii) if the received image is properly framed, instruct the user to position the camera at a second position relative to the object. As a result, obtaining images of sufficient quality for proper processor analysis may be facilitated.
1. A computer system for capturing images of damage to an object, the computer system including at least one processor in communication with at least one memory device, the at least one processor is programmed to:
store an orientation model associated with an object;
receive, from a user, a request to analyze damage to the object;
determine a plurality of views of the object for analyzing the object and the damage based upon the orientation model;
determine a first view of the plurality of views based upon the damage and the orientation model;
determine a first position for a camera based upon the first view;
instruct the user to position the camera at the first position relative to the object;
receive an image of the object from the camera;
determine whether the received image is properly framed using the orientation model;
if the received image is not properly framed, instruct the user to adjust the position of the camera; and
if the received image is properly framed, instruct the user to position the camera at a second position relative to the object.
2. The computer system of claim 1 , wherein the request to analyze damage to the object includes at least one of: a type of the object, a model of the object, one or more identifying pieces of data about the object, and one or more identifying pieces of data about the user.
3. The computer system of claim 1 , wherein the object is a vehicle and the request to analyze damage to the object includes one or more of a make of the vehicle, a model of the vehicle, a year of the vehicle, a location of the damage on the vehicle, identification of the vehicle, and identification of the user.
4. The computer system of claim 1 , wherein the processor is further programmed to:
store a plurality of orientation models of objects; and
determine an orientation model of the plurality of orientation models associated with the object based upon the request to analyze damage to the object.
5. The computer system of claim 1 , wherein the received image is properly framed if it captures the first view, wherein the processor is further programmed to compare the received image with the orientation model to determine if the received image captures the first view.
6. The computer system of claim 5 , wherein the received image is properly framed if it captures the first view, wherein the processor is further programmed to:
determine an amount of variation between the received image and the first view; and
provide feedback to the user based upon the amount of variation.
7. The computer system of claim 1 , wherein the processor is further configured to:
store one or more damage classification models; and
determine the plurality of views of the object for analyzing the object and the damage based upon the orientation model and the one or more damage classification models.
8. The computer system of claim 1 , wherein the processor is further programmed to repeatedly receive images from the camera until the received image is properly framed.
9. The computer system of claim 1 , wherein the processor is further programmed to provide negative feedback to the user if the received image is not properly framed.
10. The computer system of claim 1 , wherein the processor is further programmed to provide positive feedback to the user if the received image is properly framed.
11. The computer system of claim 1 , wherein the processor is further programmed to continuously receive images from the camera.
12. The computer system of claim 11 , wherein the processor is further programmed to continuously provide feedback to the user about if the received image is properly framed.
13. The computer system of claim 1 , wherein the plurality of views includes at least one view of an identifier of the object, wherein the identifier includes at least one of a license plate and a vehicle identification number.
14. The computer system of claim 1 , wherein the camera is associated with a mobile computer device associated with the user.
15. A computer-implemented method for capturing images of damage to an object, the method implemented on a damage analysis (“DA”) computer system including at least one processor in communication with at least one memory device, the method comprising:
storing, in the memory device, an orientation model associated with an object;
receiving, from a user, a request to analyze damage to the object;
determining a plurality of views of the object for analyzing the object and the damage based upon the orientation model;
determining a first view of the plurality of views based upon the damage and the orientation model;
determining a first position for a camera based upon the first view;
instructing, by the processor, the user to position the camera at the first position relative to the object;
receiving, from the camera, an image of the object;
determining, by the processor, whether the received image is properly framed using the orientation model;
if the received image is not properly framed, instructing the user to adjust the position of the camera; and
if the received image is properly framed, instructing the user to position the camera at a second position relative to the object.
16. The method of claim 15 , wherein the request to analyze damage to the object includes at least one of: a type of the object, a model of the object, one or more identifying pieces of data about the object, and one or more identifying pieces of data about the user.
17. The method of claim 15 , wherein the object is a vehicle and the request to analyze damage to the object includes one or more of a make of the vehicle, a model of the vehicle, a year of the vehicle, a location of the damage on the vehicle, identification of the vehicle, and identification of the user.
18. The method of claim 15 further comprising:
storing, in the memory device, a plurality of orientation models of objects; and
determining an orientation model of the plurality of orientation models associated with the object based upon the request to analyze damage to the object.
19. The method of claim 15 , wherein the received image is properly framed if it captures the first view, wherein the method further comprises comparing the received image with the orientation model to determine if the received image captures the first view.
20. The method of claim 19 , wherein the received image is properly framed if it captures the first view, wherein the method further comprises:
determining an amount of variation between the received image and the first view; and
providing feedback to the user based upon the amount of variation.