IP Library Granted Patent US 10,818,022
Granted Patent B2
US 10,818,022 · App. 16/229,759 · Granted Oct 27, 2020

Material capture using imaging

Inventors: Kalyan Krishna Sunkavalli (San Jose, CA); Sunil Hadap (Dublin, CA); Joon-Young Lee (Milpitas, CA); Zhuo Hui (Pittsburgh, PA)
Assignee: ADOBE INC.
G06T7/49G01N21/55G06T3/0068G06T7/40G06T7/60G06T7/90G06T17/00G06T2200/08G06T2207/10016G06T2207/10152
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 10,818,022
App. No.
16/229,759
Granted
Oct 27, 2020
Kind
B2
Abstract

Methods and systems are provided for performing material capture to determine properties of an imaged surface. A plurality of images can be received depicting a material surface. The plurality of images can be calibrated to align corresponding pixels of the images and determine reflectance information for at least a portion of the aligned pixels. After calibration, a set of reference materials from a material library can be selected using the calibrated images. The set of reference materials can be used to determine a material model that accurately represents properties of the material surface.

Claims (52)

1. A computer-implemented method, comprising:

determining reflectance information for a surface depicted in a plurality of images;

selecting a set of reference materials representative of properties of the surface, wherein the set of reference materials have known material properties; and

outputting a material model of the surface generated using the set of reference materials.

2. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , further comprising:

aligning the plurality of images based on alignment of corresponding pixels associated with each of the plurality of images.

3. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein determining the reflectance information includes finding lighting and view directions for at least one pixel of the plurality of images.

4. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , further comprising:

determining a surface normal estimate of a pixel of corresponding pixels from the plurality of images;

determining a material coefficient abundance estimate at the pixel;

iteratively updating the surface normal estimate and the material coefficient abundance estimate at the pixel until error is reduced below a predetermined threshold.

5. The computer-implemented method of claim 4 , wherein the surface normal estimate is determined utilizing a local neighborhood search of a grid based on elevation and azimuth angles for the set of reference materials.

6. The computer-implemented method of claim 4 , wherein the material coefficient abundance estimate is determined utilizing a non-negative least squares approach based on inputting the surface normal estimate.

7. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , further comprising:

determining a surface normal estimate at a pixel of corresponding pixels from the plurality of images;

determining a material coefficient abundance estimate at the pixel;

updating the surface normal estimate and updating the material coefficient abundance estimate at the pixel in parallel until error is reduced below a predetermined threshold.

8. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein selecting the set of reference materials includes generating a sparse response curve for a library of reference materials, wherein reference materials with a response on the sparse response curve are selected as the set of reference materials.

9. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein a user can apply the material model of the material surface to a surface of a computer-generated object during rendering of the computer-generated object.

10. One or more non-transitory computer-readable storage media having instructions stored thereon, which, when executed by one or more processors of a computing device, cause the computing device to:

determine reflectance information for a surface depicted in a plurality of images;

select a set of reference materials representative of properties of the surface, wherein the set of reference materials have known material properties; and

output a material model of the surface generated using the set of reference materials.

11. The one or more non-transitory computer-readable storage media of claim 10 , further cause the computing device to:

calibrate the plurality of images, wherein calibration utilizes a grid depicted in the plurality of images to align the plurality of images and determine reflectance information for at least a portion of the aligned plurality of images;

identify the set of reference materials using the calibrated plurality of images;

determine material properties for the material surface at a selected pixel using the set of reference materials; and

output a material model of the material surface based on the determined material properties.

12. The one or more non-transitory computer-readable storage media of claim 10 , wherein the reflectance information includes lighting and view directions for at least one pixel of the plurality of images.

13. The one or more non-transitory computer-readable storage media of claim 10 , wherein instructions further cause the computing device to:

determine a surface normal estimate at a pixel of corresponding pixels from the plurality of images;

determine a material coefficient abundance estimate at the pixel;

iteratively update the surface normal estimate and update the material coefficient abundance estimate at the pixel until error is reduced below a predetermined threshold.

14. The one or more non-transitory computer-readable storage media of claim 12 , wherein the surface normal estimate is determined utilizing a local neighborhood search of a grid based on elevation and azimuth angles for the set of reference materials.

15. The one or more non-transitory computer-readable storage media of claim 12 , wherein the material coefficient abundance estimate is determined utilizing a non-negative least squares approach based on inputting the surface normal estimate.

16. The one or more non-transitory computer-readable storage media of claim 10 , wherein instructions further cause the computing device to:

determine a surface normal estimate at a pixel of corresponding pixels from the plurality of images;

determine a material coefficient abundance estimate at the pixel;

update the surface normal estimate and update the material coefficient abundance estimate at the pixel in parallel until error is reduced below a predetermined threshold.

17. The one or more non-transitory computer-readable storage media of claim 10 , wherein determining global material estimation includes generating a sparse response curve for a library of reference materials, wherein reference materials with a response on the sparse response curve are selected as the set of reference materials.

18. A computing system comprising:

means for determining reflectance information for a surface depicted in a plurality of images;

means for selecting a set of reference materials representative of properties of the surface, wherein the set of reference materials have known material properties; and

means for outputting a material model of the surface generated using the set of reference materials.

19. The computing system of claim 18 , further comprising:

means for calibrating the plurality of images; and

means for determining material properties for the material surface at a selected pixel using the set of reference materials.

20. The computing system of claim 19 , further comprising

means for determining a surface normal estimate at a selected pixel;

means for determining a material coefficient abundance estimate at the selected pixel;

means for determining a material coefficient abundance estimate at the selected pixel;

means for updating the surface normal estimate and updating the material coefficient abundance estimate at the selected pixel until error is reduced below a predetermined threshold.

Assignments (2)
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Mar 23, 2019
From: ADOBE SYSTEMS INCORPORATED
To: ADOBE INC.
Reel/Frame 050153/0991 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Mar 23, 2019
From: SUNKAVALLI, KALYAN KRISHNA; HADAP, SUNIL; LEE, JOON-YOUNG; HUI, ZHUO
To: ADOBE SYSTEMS INCORPORATED
Reel/Frame 048681/0401 →
Continuity (2)
Continuation 15589757 · May 8, 2017
Related Publication 20190130588A1 · May 2, 2019