IP Library Granted Patent US 10,916,259
Granted Patent B2
US 10,916,259 · App. 16/240,748 · Granted Feb 9, 2021

Extracting overall equipment effectiveness by analysis of a vibro-acoustic signal

Inventors: Gideon Genadi Kogan (Kfar Saba, IL); Amnon Hanoch Shenfeld (Herzliya, IL); Ofer Affias (Hod Hasharon, IL); Amit Ashkenazi (Hod Hasharon, IL)
Assignee: 3D SIGNALS LTD.
G10L25/51H04R29/00G05B2219/32179G05B2219/32184
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 10,916,259
App. No.
16/240,748
Granted
Feb 9, 2021
Kind
B2
Abstract

A method includes acquiring, by a vibro-acoustic sensor in a vicinity of a machine, vibro-acoustic signals due to an operation of the machine. The acquired vibro-acoustic signals are analyzed so as to estimate at least two operational parameters of the machine, selected from a group of the operational parameters consisting of an uptime factor, a production speed factor, and a production quality factor of the machine. An overall equipment effectiveness (OEE) of the machine is computed, the computed OEE including at least one of a minimum and a product of the at least two estimated operational parameters.

Claims (31)

1. A method, comprising:

acquiring, by a vibro-acoustic sensor in a vicinity of a machine, vibro-acoustic signals due to an operation of the machine;

estimating, based on the acquired vibro-acoustic signals, an uptime factor, a production speed factor and a production quality factor of the machine, wherein estimating the production quality factor comprises:

comparing a vibro-acoustic signature of a production step against a baseline of prerecorded vibro-acoustic signatures for that step;

classifying machine production quality at each compared step as being high or low based on a confidence level derived from the baseline of prerecorded vibro-acoustic signatures; and

counting production events having a vibro-acoustic signature indicative of a low-quality production step; and

computing an overall equipment effectiveness (OEE) of the machine comprising at least one of a minimum and a product of the uptime factor, the production speed factor and the production quality factor, all estimated based on the acquired vibro-acoustic signals.

2. The method according to claim 1 , wherein estimating the uptime factor comprises classifying a root mean square (RMS) of the vibro-acoustic signal emitted by the machine as being above a given threshold.

3. The method according to claim 1 , wherein estimating the production speed factor comprises demodulating the acquired vibro-acoustic signals and analyzing the demodulated vibro-acoustic signals.

4. The method according to claim 1 , wherein estimating the production speed factor comprises iteratively estimating a median of the production speed and estimating a probability density function of the production speed using the iteratively estimated median.

5. The method according to claim 1 , wherein the derived confidence level is provided in a given number of standard deviations from to a median of a statistical distribution derived from the baseline of prerecorded vibro-acoustic signatures.

6. The method according to claim 1 , wherein estimating the OEE is performed in real time while acquiring the vibro-acoustic signals.

7. The method according to claim 1 , and comprising presenting the estimated OEE to a user.

8. The method according to claim 1 , and comprising identifying and indicating that the OEE is in a declining trend.

9. The method according to claim 1 , and comprising issuing an alert when the OEE is below a given minimum.

10. A system, comprising:

a vibro-acoustic sensor in a vicinity of a machine, the vibro-acoustic sensor configured to acquire vibro-acoustic signals due to an operation of the machine; and

a processor, which is configured to:

estimate, based on the acquired vibro-acoustic signals, an uptime factor, a production speed factor and a production quality factor of the machine, wherein the processor is configured to estimate the production quality factor by:

comparing a vibro-acoustic signature of a production step against a baseline of prerecorded vibro-acoustic signatures for that step;

classifying machine production quality at each compared step as being high or low based on a confidence level derived from the baseline of prerecorded vibro-acoustic signatures; and

counting production events having a vibro-acoustic signature indicative of a low-quality production step; and

compute an overall equipment effectiveness (OEE) of the machine comprising at least one of a minimum and a product of the uptime factor, the production speed factor and the production quality factor, all estimated based on the acquired vibro-acoustic signals.

11. The system according to claim 10 , wherein the processor is configured to estimate the uptime factor by classifying a root mean square (RMS) of the vibro-acoustic signal emitted by the machine as being above a given threshold.

12. The system according to claim 10 , wherein the processor is configured to estimate the production speed factor by demodulating the acquired vibro-acoustic signals and analyzing the demodulated acquired vibro-acoustic signals.

13. The system according to claim 10 , wherein the processor is configured to estimate the production speed factor by iteratively estimating a median of the production speed and estimating a probability density function of the production speed using the iteratively estimated median.

14. The system according to claim 10 , wherein the derived confidence level is provided in a given number of standard deviations from to a median of a statistical distribution derived from the baseline of prerecorded vibro-acoustic signatures.

15. The system according to claim 10 , wherein the processor is configured to estimate the OEE in real time while acquiring the vibro-acoustic signals.

16. The system according to claim 10 , wherein the processor is further configured to present the estimated OEE to a user.

17. The system according to claim 10 , wherein the processor is further configured to identify and indicate that the OEE is in a declining trend.

18. The system according to claim 10 , wherein the processor is further configured to alert when the OEE is below a given minimum.

Assignments (2)
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded May 12, 2021
From: 3DSIGNALS LTD.
To: BANK LEUMI LE-ISRAEL B.M.
Reel/Frame 056207/0921 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jan 6, 2019
From: KOGAN, GIDEON GENADI; SHENFELD, AMNON HANOCH; AFFIAS, OFER; ASHKENAZI, AMIT
To: 3D SIGNALS LTD.
Reel/Frame 047910/0458 →
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20200219527A1 · Jul 9, 2020