IP Library Granted Patent US 11,399,060
Granted Patent B2
US 11,399,060 · App. 16/251,189 · Granted Jul 26, 2022

System and method for continuous AI management and learning

Inventor: Roger Joseph Morin (Stafford, VA)
Assignee: Phacil, LLC
H04L67/1095G06F16/901G06N5/025G06N5/045H04L41/0213H04L41/0226H04L41/142H04L41/16H04L41/22H04L43/04H04L43/065H04L63/0263H04L63/1425H04L63/1433H04L67/12H04L67/565H04W12/009H04W56/001G06N20/00H04W84/18
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 11,399,060
App. No.
16/251,189
Granted
Jul 26, 2022
Kind
B2
Abstract

A method, computer program product, and computer system for applying deductive artificial intelligence (AI) attribution and auditability to data inputs, wherein the deductive AI may account for ontologies and competing system information, and wherein the deductive AI attribution and auditability may be applied to the data inputs by vendor workflow. The data inputs applied with the deductive AI attribution and auditability may be processed via a feedback loop to align a sense-understand-decide-act (SUDA) understanding with an inductive AI understanding. The inductive AI may be automated via the feedback loop based upon, at least in part, an AI expert system processing of the data inputs. One or more policy based rules may be developed for user automation authorization based upon, at least in part, the feedback loop.

Claims (33)

1. A computer-implemented method comprising:

applying, by a computing device, deductive artificial intelligence (AI) attribution and auditability to data inputs, wherein the deductive AI attribution accounts for ontologies and competing system information;

integrating, via a feedback loop, the data inputs applied with the deductive AI attribution and auditability with the inductive AI understanding to align a sense-understand-decide-act (SUDA) understanding with the inductive AI understanding, wherein the inductive AI understanding receives the data inputs in a first format and outputs data in a second format, and wherein the deductive AI attribution receives the output data in the second format from the inductive AI;

automating, via the feedback loop, the inductive AI based upon, at least in part, an AI expert system processing of the data inputs; and

developing one or more policy based rules for user automation authorization based upon, at least in part, the feedback loop.

2. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 wherein processing the data inputs includes indexing the data inputs.

3. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 wherein processing the data inputs includes analyzing the data inputs.

4. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 wherein processing the data inputs includes organizing the data inputs.

5. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 wherein processing the data inputs includes sorting the data inputs.

6. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 wherein the competing system information includes one of cybersecurity threat information and the one or more policy based rules for user automation authorization.

7. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 wherein automating the inductive AI includes automating sensing functions of the inductive AI and understanding and decision and action functions of the deductive AI.

8. A computer program product residing on a computer readable storage medium having a plurality of instructions stored thereon which, when executed across one or more processors, causes at least a portion of the one or more processors to perform operations comprising:

applying deductive artificial intelligence (AI) attribution and auditability to data inputs, wherein the deductive AI attribution accounts for ontologies and competing system information;

integrating, via a feedback loop, the data inputs applied with the deductive AI attribution and auditability with an inductive AI understanding to align a sense-understand-decide-act (SUDA) understanding with the inductive AI understanding, wherein the inductive AI understanding receives the data inputs in a first format and outputs data in a second format, and wherein the deductive AI attribution receives the output data in the second format from the inductive AI;

automating, via the feedback loop, the inductive AI based upon, at least in part, an AI expert system processing of the data inputs; and

developing one or more policy based rules for user automation authorization based upon, at least in part, the feedback loop.

9. The computer program product of claim 8 wherein processing the data inputs includes indexing the data inputs.

10. The computer program product of claim 8 wherein processing the data inputs includes analyzing the data inputs.

11. The computer program product of claim 8 wherein processing the data inputs includes organizing the data inputs.

12. The computer program product of claim 8 wherein processing the data inputs includes sorting the data inputs.

13. The computer program product of claim 8 wherein the competing system information includes one of cybersecurity threat information and the one or more policy based rules for user automation authorization.

14. The computer program product of claim 8 wherein automating the inductive AI includes automating sensing functions of the inductive AI and understanding and decision and action functions of the deductive AI.

15. A computing system including one or more processors and one or more memories configured to perform operations comprising:

applying deductive artificial intelligence (AI) attribution and auditability to data inputs, wherein the deductive AI attribution accounts for ontologies and competing system information;

integrating, via a feedback loop, the data inputs applied with the deductive AI attribution and auditability with an inductive AI understanding to align a sense-understand-decide-act (SUDA) understanding with the inductive AI understanding, wherein the inductive AI understanding receives the data inputs in a first format and outputs data in a second format, and wherein the deductive AI attribution receives the output data in the second format from the inductive AI;

automating, via the feedback loop, the inductive AI based upon, at least in part, an AI expert system processing of the data inputs; and

developing one or more policy based rules for user automation authorization based upon, at least in part, the feedback loop.

16. The computing system of claim 15 wherein processing the data inputs includes indexing the data inputs.

17. The computing system of claim 15 wherein processing the data inputs includes analyzing the data inputs.

18. The computing system of claim 15 wherein processing the data inputs includes organizing the data inputs.

19. The computing system of claim 15 wherein processing the data inputs includes sorting the data inputs.

20. The computing system of claim 15 wherein the competing system information includes one of cybersecurity threat information and the one or more policy based rules for user automation authorization.

21. The computing system of claim 15 wherein automating the inductive AI includes automating sensing functions of the inductive AI and understanding and decision and action functions of the deductive AI.

Assignments (5)
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENTS Recorded Jul 16, 2025
From: CERBERUS BUSINESS FINANCE, LLC
To: PHACIL, INC.
Reel/Frame 072003/0040 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Jul 15, 2025
From: PHACIL, LLC
To: CSC DELAWARE TRUST COMPANY
Reel/Frame 071717/0724 →
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Aug 5, 2019
From: PHACIL, INC.
To: PHACIL, LLC
Reel/Frame 049964/0776 →
NOTICE OF GRANT OF A SECURITY INTEREST - PATENTS Recorded Apr 10, 2019
From: PHACIL, INC.
To: CERBERUS BUSINESS FINANCE, LLC, AS COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 048846/0133 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jan 18, 2019
From: MORIN, ROGER JOSEPH
To: PHACIL, INC.
Reel/Frame 048055/0331 →
Continuity (2)
Provisional Application 62756736 · Nov 7, 2018
Related Publication 20200143263A1 · May 7, 2020
Cited By (1)
US 12,566,957