IP Library › Granted Patent US 11,243,317
Granted Patent B2
US 11,243,317 · App. 16/255,593 · Granted Feb 8, 2022

Optimal survey design

Inventors: Peter M. Eick (San Antonio, TX); Joel D. Brewer (Sealy, TX)
Assignee: ConocoPhillips Company
G01V1/28G01V1/003G01V1/32G01V1/3808G01V2200/14G01V2210/44
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 11,243,317
App. No.
16/255,593
Granted
Feb 8, 2022
Kind
B2
Abstract

Methods of analyzing and optimizing a seismic survey design are described. Specifically, the sampling quality is analyzed as opposed to the overall quality of the whole survey. This allows for analysis of the impact of the offsets, obstacles, and other aspects of the survey on the sampling quality, which will improve the ability to compress the resulting data and minimize acquisition footprints.

Claims (51)

1. A method comprising:

obtaining a seismic survey design specifying a plurality of source locations for a plurality of seismic sources and a plurality of receiver locations for a plurality of receivers;

generating a central midpoint space array based on responses, offsets, and azimuth relationships summed in a central midpoint space for the plurality of source locations and the plurality of receiver locations;

obtaining a filtered spectrum by applying a frequency-wavenumber filter to the central midpoint space array;

identifying any artifacts in the filtered spectrum; and

optimizing the seismic survey design by determining at least one of one or more of the plurality of receiver locations or one or more of the plurality of source locations, the optimized seismic survey design minimizing the identified artifacts.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the identified artifacts are iteratively corrected in optimizing the seismic survey.

3. The method of claim 1 , wherein determining the at least one of the one or more of the plurality of receiver locations or the one or more of the plurality of source locations includes moving the at least one of the one or more of the plurality of receiver locations or the one or more of the plurality of source locations.

4. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

obtaining a second filtered spectrum for a second central midpoint space array, the at least one of the one or more of the plurality of receiver locations or the one or more of the plurality of source locations being optimized based on a comparison of the filtered spectrum to the second filtered spectrum.

5. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

obtaining a plurality of seismic survey designs, the plurality of seismic survey designs including the seismic survey design, the seismic survey design being optimized based on a selection of the seismic survey design from the plurality of seismic survey designs, the at least one of the one or more of the plurality of receiver locations or the one or more of the plurality of source locations being optimized based on the selection.

6. One or more tangible non-transitory computer-readable storage media storing computer-executable instructions for performing a computer process on a computing system, the computer process comprising:

obtaining test seismic data collected for a seismic survey design, the seismic survey design including a plurality of source locations for a plurality of seismic sources and a plurality of receiver locations for a plurality of receivers;

generating a central midpoint space array based on responses, offsets, and azimuth relationships in the test seismic data and summed in a central midpoint space;

obtaining a filtered spectrum by applying a frequency-wavenumber filter to the central midpoint space array;

identifying any artifacts in the filtered spectrum; and

optimizing the seismic survey design by determining at least one of one or more of the plurality of receiver locations or one or more of the plurality of source locations, the optimized seismic survey design minimizing the identified artifacts.

7. The one or more tangible non-transitory computer-readable storage media of claim 2 , wherein the identified artifacts are iteratively corrected in optimizing the seismic survey.

8. The one or more tangible non-transitory computer-readable storage media of claim 1 , wherein determining the at least one of the one or more of the plurality of receiver locations or the one or more of the plurality of source locations includes moving the at least one of the one or more of the plurality of receiver locations or the one or more of the plurality of source locations.

9. The one or more tangible non-transitory computer-readable storage media of claim 2 , further comprising:

obtaining a second filtered spectrum for a second central midpoint space array, the at least one of the one or more of the plurality of receiver locations or the one or more of the plurality of source locations being optimized based on a comparison of the filtered spectrum to the second filtered spectrum.

10. The one or more tangible non-transitory computer-readable storage media of claim 2 , further comprising:

obtaining a plurality of seismic survey designs, the plurality of seismic survey designs including the seismic survey design, the seismic survey design being optimized based on a selection of the seismic survey design from the plurality of seismic survey designs, the at least one of the one or more of the plurality of receiver locations or the one or more of the plurality of source locations being optimized based on the selection.

11. A method comprising:

generating a source array based on a plurality of source locations of a seismic survey design;

generating a receiver array based on a plurality of receiver locations of the seismic survey design;

generating a filtered source array by applying a frequency-wavenumber filter to the source array;

generating a filtered receiver array by applying a frequency-wavenumber filter to the receiver array;

generating a combined filtered array by combining the filtered receiver array and the filtered source array;

identifying any artifacts in the combined filtered array; and

optimizing the seismic survey design by determining at least one of one or more of the plurality of receiver locations or one or more of the plurality of source locations, the optimized seismic survey design minimizing the identified artifacts.

12. The method of claim 11 , wherein the seismic survey design corresponds to an entire survey.

13. The method of claim 11 , wherein the identified artifacts are iteratively corrected in optimizing the seismic survey.

14. The method of claim 11 , further comprising:

obtaining a plurality of seismic survey designs, the plurality of seismic survey designs including the seismic survey design, the seismic survey design being optimized based on a selection of the seismic survey design from the plurality of seismic survey designs, the at least one of the one or more of the plurality of receiver locations or the one or more of the plurality of source locations being optimized based on the selection.

15. The method of claim 11 , wherein determining the at least one of the one or more of the plurality of receiver locations or the one or more of the plurality of source locations includes moving the at least one of the one or more of the plurality of receiver locations or the one or more of the plurality of source locations.

16. One or more tangible non-transitory computer-readable storage media storing computer-executable instructions for performing a computer process on a computing system, the computer process comprising:

obtaining test seismic data collected for a seismic survey design, the seismic survey design including a plurality of source locations for a plurality of seismic sources and a plurality of receiver locations for a plurality of receivers;

generating a source array based on the plurality of source locations of the seismic survey design;

generating a receiver array based on the plurality of receiver locations of the seismic survey design;

generating a filtered source array by applying a frequency-wavenumber filter to the source array;

generating a filtered receiver array by applying a frequency-wavenumber filter to the receiver array;

generating a combined filtered array by combining the filtered receiver array and the filtered source array;

identifying any artifacts in the combined filtered array; and

optimizing the seismic survey design by determining at least one of one or more of the plurality of receiver locations or one or more of the plurality of source locations, the optimized seismic survey design minimizing the identified artifacts.

17. The method of claim 16 , wherein the test seismic data corresponds to an entirety of the seismic survey design.

18. The method of claim 16 , wherein the identified artifacts are iteratively corrected in optimizing the seismic survey.

19. The method of claim 16 , further comprising:

obtaining a plurality of seismic survey designs, the plurality of seismic survey designs including the seismic survey design, the seismic survey design being optimized based on a selection of the seismic survey design from the plurality of seismic survey designs, the at least one of the one or more of the plurality of receiver locations or the one or more of the plurality of source locations being optimized based on the selection.

20. The method of claim 16 , wherein determining the at least one of the one or more of the plurality of receiver locations or the one or more of the plurality of source locations includes moving the at least one of the one or more of the plurality of receiver locations or the one or more of the plurality of source locations.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jan 23, 2019
From: EICK, PETER M.; BREWER, JOEL D.
To: CONOCOPHILLIPS COMPANY
Reel/Frame 048113/0449 →
Continuity (3)
Continuation 15248911 · Aug 26, 2016
Provisional Application 62210270 · Aug 26, 2015
Related Publication 20190154855A1 · May 23, 2019