IP Library Granted Patent US 11,194,810
Granted Patent B2
US 11,194,810 · App. 16/266,528 · Granted Dec 7, 2021

System and method for comparing and utilizing activity information and configuration information from multiple device management systems

Inventors: Steven I. Butler (Chicago, IL); Todd M. Dunsirn (Shorewood, WI); Douglas E. Frede (Mequon, WI); Nancy G. Hedlund (Libertyville, IL); Thomas F. Polonus (Evanston, IL); Steven J. Pregulman (San Jose, CA); Torrance J. Ramaker (Libertyville, IL); James E. Tillery (Auburn, AL); Mary Kaye Van Huis (Orland Park, IL)
Assignee: ICU Medical, Inc.
G06F16/2455G06Q10/06G06Q10/10G16H10/60G16H40/20G16H40/63G16H40/67
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 11,194,810
App. No.
16/266,528
Granted
Dec 7, 2021
Kind
B2
Abstract

A method of aggregating and using medical device data from a plurality of remote institutions. The system and method electronically receives at a central computer system a plurality of established medical device data, each of the plurality of established medical device data being received from a respective medication delivery system, each of the respective medication delivery systems having a respective plurality of medical devices within the respective remote institution, such as medication delivery pumps, associated therewith and utilized therein. The system and method electronically combines and stores the plurality of established medical device data from each of the plurality of remote institutions within a memory, and electronically provides a remote client computer access to at least one of a central reporting application adapted for providing summary information to the remote client computer about the medical device data, and/or other applications.

Claims (29)

1. A method of monitoring activity or configuration library information for a medical device, comprising:

receiving medical device activity or configuration library information from an institution, the institution being associated with a peer group;

storing the received medical device activity or configuration library information to a database;

comparing the medical device activity or configuration library information received from the institution with medical device activity or configuration information received from at least one or more other institutions in the same peer group, wherein the peer group comprises institutions that are logically grouped according to at least one of: institution type, number of beds, medical device type, medical device manufacturer, clinical care area, or service line;

determining that the medical device activity or configuration library information received from the institution is within one or more pre-defined thresholds; and

transmitting the configuration library information to the medical device, wherein the configuration library information is for configuration of the medical device within the institution.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the one or more pre-defined thresholds are selected by the institution.

3. The method of claim 1 , wherein the one or more pre-defined thresholds are selected by a system administrator for the at least one or more other institutions.

4. The method of claim 1 , wherein the one or more pre-defined thresholds are based on the comparison with the one or more other institutions in the same peer group.

5. The method of claim 1 , wherein the one or more pre-defined thresholds is based on one or more standard deviations in separation of the institution from the at least one or more other instructions in the same peer group.

6. The method of claim 1 , wherein the one or more pre-defined thresholds comprises a percentage of edits of total programs.

7. The method of claim 1 , wherein the one or more pre-defined thresholds comprises a number of hard or soft limits.

8. The method of claim 1 , wherein the at least one or more other institutions in the same peer group requires a minimum number of institutions before automatic comparisons are allowed.

9. The method of claim 1 , wherein the comparison is performed automatically and periodically.

10. A method of monitoring activity or configuration library information for a medical device, comprising:

receiving medical device activity or configuration library information from a plurality of institutions;

storing the received medical device activity or configuration library information to a database;

organizing the medical device activity or configuration library information received from each institution from the plurality of institutions into peer groups, wherein each peer group comprises institutions logically grouped according to at least one of: institution type, number of beds, medical device type, medical device manufacturer, clinical care area, or service line;

comparing the medical device activity or configuration library information received from one institution, the one institution associated with a peer group, with medical device activity or configuration information received from other institutions in the same peer group;

determining that the medical device activity or configuration library information received from the one institution is within one or more pre-defined thresholds; and

transmitting the configuration library information to the medical device, wherein the configuration library information is for configuration of the medical device.

11. The method of claim 8 , wherein the one or more pre-defined thresholds are selected by each institution.

12. The method of claim 1 , wherein the one or more pre-defined thresholds are selected by a system administrator for the plurality of institutions.

13. The method of claim 1 , wherein the one or more pre-defined thresholds are based on the comparison with the one or more other institutions in the same peer group.

14. The method of claim 1 , wherein the one or more pre-defined thresholds comprises a percentage of edits of total programs.

15. The method of claim 1 , wherein the one or more pre-defined thresholds comprises a number of hard or soft limits.

16. The method of claim 1 , wherein the one or more pre-defined thresholds is based on one or more standard deviations in separation of each institution from other institutions in the same peer group.

17. The method of claim 1 , wherein the other institutions in the same peer group requires a minimum number of institutions before automatic comparisons are allowed.

18. The method of claim 1 , wherein the comparison is performed automatically and periodically.

Assignments (1)
SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Mar 31, 2022
From: ICU MEDICAL, INC.
To: WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
Reel/Frame 059618/0412 →
Cited By (14)
US 12,205,702 US 12,303,464 US 12,337,142 US 12,370,125 US 12,380,982 US 12,380,997 US 12,395,429 US 12,414,899 US 12,420,009 US 12,431,238 US 12,458,749 US 12,562,268 US 12,592,305 US 12,640,275