Systems and methods for monitoring a power-generation module assembly after a power-generation module shutdown event
Embodiments are directed to providing a user interface (UI) that streamlines and simplifies the process of monitoring critical power-generation module (PGM) parameters after a PGM assembly is shutdown. The UI displays, in real-time, indicators corresponding to one or more post-shutdown PGM parameters. The UI provides indications of whether the post-shutdown PGM parameters meet post-shutdown criteria of the PGM assembly. When a post-shutdown PGM parameter does not meet the post-shutdown criteria, a user alert is provided to the user. A protocol may additionally be provided to the user. In some embodiments, the protocol may enable the user to return the PGM assembly to a condition that satisfies the post-shutdown criteria. The protocol may be a safety protocol and/or an asset protection protocol.
1. A nuclear reactor power generation module (PGM) safety monitoring system comprising:
a plurality of PGMs, each PGM associated with diagnostic monitoring sensors arranged to measure parameters of the respective PGM;
a plurality of displays, each display associated with a particular PGM;
a computer system in communication with the diagnostic monitoring sensors of each of the PGMs and in communication with the plurality of displays, the computer system including a non-transitory computer readable storage medium storing instructions that, when executed by at least one processor, cause the at least one processor to perform operations comprising:
receiving, from the diagnostic monitoring sensors, sensed data representing measured parameters associated with each of the PGMs;
detecting an event corresponding to a shutdown of a first PGM of the plurality of PGMs; and
in response to detecting the event corresponding to the shutdown of the first PGM:
parsing sensed data associated with the first PGM into post-shutdown PGM categories, each category representing data related to monitoring a different safety aspect of PGM shutdown; and
generating a shutdown monitoring user interface (UI) for display on a first display of the plurality of displays, the first display being associated with the first PGM, wherein the shutdown monitoring UI includes a first window portion and a second window portion, and wherein sensed data associated with a first post-shutdown PGM category is displayed in the first window portion and sensed data associated with a second post-shutdown PGM category is displayed in the second window portion.
2. The system of claim 1 , wherein the operations further comprise for each post-shutdown PGM category:
analyzing the sensed data associated with the first PGM to determine whether a PGM parameter related to the safety aspect represented by the respective post-shutdown PGM category is outside of a threshold associated with the parameter; and
in response to determining that all of the PGM parameters related to the safety aspect are within respective thresholds, providing a graphical indicator representing a summary status of the sensed data associated with the respective category, the graphical indicator representing that all of the PGM parameters related to the safety aspect are within respective thresholds.
3. The system of claim 1 , wherein the operations further comprise for the first post-shutdown PGM category:
analyzing the sensed data associated with the first PGM to determine whether a PGM parameter related to the safety aspect represented by the first post-shutdown PGM category is outside of a threshold associated with the parameter; and
in response to determining the PGM parameter related to the safety aspect represented by the first post-shutdown PGM category is outside of a threshold, providing a graphical indicator representing a summary status of the sensed data associated with the first category, the graphical indicator representing that at least one PGM parameter of the first post-shutdown PGM category is outside of a safe range.
4. The system of claim 3 , wherein the operations further comprise, providing, for display in a third window portion of the shutdown monitoring UI, a safety protocol associated with correcting the PGM parameter related to the safety aspect represented by the first post-shutdown PGM category.
5. The system of claim 1 , wherein the first post-shutdown PGM category is reactivity control.
6. The system of claim 1 , wherein the first post-shutdown PGM category is core cooling.
7. The system of claim 1 , wherein the first post-shutdown PGM category is containment isolation.
8. The system of claim 1 , wherein the shutdown monitoring UI includes a third window portion, wherein the sensed data associated with a third post-shutdown PGM category is displayed in the third window portion.
9. The system of claim 8 , wherein the first post-shutdown PGM category is containment isolation, the second post-shutdown PGM category is reactivity control, and the third post-shutdown PGM category is core cooling.
10. A computer-implemented nuclear reactor power generation module (PGM) safety monitoring method executed by one or more processors, the method comprising:
receiving, from diagnostic monitoring sensors associated with each of a plurality of PGMs, sensed data representing measured parameters associated with each of the PGMs;
detecting an event corresponding to a shutdown of a first PGM of the plurality of PGMs; and
in response to detecting the event corresponding to the shutdown of the first PGM:
parsing sensed data associated with the first PGM into post-shutdown PGM categories, each category representing data related to monitoring a different safety aspect of PGM shutdown; and
generating a shutdown monitoring user interface (UI) for display on a first display of a plurality of displays, the first display being associated with the first PGM, wherein the shutdown monitoring UI includes a first window portion and a second window portion, and wherein sensed data associated with a first post-shutdown PGM category is displayed in the first window portion and sensed data associated with a second post-shutdown PGM category is displayed in the second window portion.
11. The method of claim 10 , further comprising for each post-shutdown PGM category:
analyzing the sensed data associated with the first PGM to determine whether a PGM parameter related to the safety aspect represented by the respective post-shutdown PGM category is outside of a threshold associated with the parameter; and
in response to determining that all of the PGM parameters related to the safety aspect are within respective thresholds, providing a graphical indicator representing a summary status of the sensed data associated with the respective category, the graphical indicator representing that all of the PGM parameters related to the safety aspect are within respective thresholds.
12. The method of claim 10 , further comprising for the first post-shutdown PGM category:
analyzing the sensed data associated with the first PGM to determine whether a PGM parameter related to the safety aspect represented by the first post-shutdown PGM category is outside of a threshold associated with the parameter; and
in response to determining the PGM parameter related to the safety aspect represented by the first post-shutdown PGM category is outside of a threshold, providing a graphical indicator representing a summary status of the sensed data associated with first category, the graphical indicator representing that at least one PGM parameter of the first post-shutdown PGM category is outside of a safe range.
13. The method of claim 12 , further comprising, providing, for display in a third window portion of the shutdown monitoring UI, a safety protocol associated with correcting the PGM parameter related to the safety aspect represented by the first post-shutdown PGM category.
14. The method of claim 10 , wherein the shutdown monitoring UI includes a third window portion, wherein sensed data associated with a third post-shutdown PGM category is displayed in the third window portion.
15. The method of claim 14 , wherein the first post-shutdown PGM category is containment isolation, the second post-shutdown PGM category is reactivity control, and the third post-shutdown PGM category is core cooling.
16. A non-transitory computer readable storage medium storing instructions that, when executed by at least one processor, cause the at least one processor to perform operations comprising:
receiving, from diagnostic monitoring sensors associated with each of a plurality of PGMs, sensed data representing measured parameters associated with each of the PGMs;
detecting an event corresponding to a shutdown of a first PGM of the plurality of PGMs; and
in response to detecting the event corresponding to the shutdown of the first PGM:
parsing sensed data associated with the first PGM into post-shutdown PGM categories, each category representing data related to monitoring a different safety aspect of PGM shutdown; and
generating a shutdown monitoring user interface (UI) for display on a first display of a plurality of displays, the first display being associated with the first PGM, wherein the shutdown monitoring UI includes a first window portion and a second window portion, and wherein sensed data associated with a first post-shutdown PGM category is displayed in the first window portion and sensed data associated with a second post-shutdown PGM category is displayed in the second window portion.
17. The medium of claim 16 , wherein the operations further comprise for each post-shutdown PGM category:
analyzing the sensed data associated with the first PGM to determine whether a PGM parameter related to the safety aspect represented by the respective post-shutdown PGM category is outside of a threshold associated with the parameter; and
in response to determining that all of the PGM parameters related to the safety aspect are within respective thresholds, providing a graphical indicator representing a summary status of the sensed data associated with respective category, the graphical indicator representing that all of the PGM parameters related to the safety aspect are within respective thresholds.
18. The medium of claim 16 , wherein the operations further comprise for the first post-shutdown PGM category:
analyzing the sensed data associated with the first PGM to determine whether a PGM parameter related to the safety aspect represented by the first post-shutdown PGM category is outside of a threshold associated with the parameter; and
in response to determining the PGM parameter related to the safety aspect represented by the first post-shutdown PGM category is outside of a threshold, providing a graphical indicator representing a summary status of the sensed data associated with the first category, the graphical indicator representing that at least one PGM parameter of the first post-shutdown PGM category is outside of a safe range.
19. The medium of claim 16 , wherein the shutdown monitoring UI includes a third window portion, wherein sensed data associated with a third post-shutdown PGM category is displayed in the third window portion.
20. The medium of claim 19 , wherein the first post-shutdown PGM category is containment isolation, the second post-shutdown PGM category is reactivity control, and the third post-shutdown PGM category is core cooling.