IP Library Granted Patent US 10,936,396
Granted Patent B2
US 10,936,396 · App. 16/284,585 · Granted Mar 2, 2021

Systems and methods for validation of test results in network testing

Inventors: Marc Rondeau (Québec, CA); Michael Proctor (Montreal, CA)
Assignee: EXFO Inc.
G06F11/0766G06F11/0709G06F11/0793G06F11/2273
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 10,936,396
App. No.
16/284,585
Granted
Mar 2, 2021
Kind
B2
Abstract

A network testing system includes one or more test devices each including a media-specific testing module and a processing device with a network interface, wherein the processing device is configured to test a network with the media-specific testing module; one or more servers configured to receive test results from the test of the network either directly from the one or more test devices or an intermediate data source communicatively coupled to the one or more test devices; and a validator module executed on the one or more servers configured to perform automated post-processing on the test results to compare the test results to a pre-defined Method of Procedure (MOP), to auto-correct one or more errors in the test results, and to provide a report based on the comparison.

Claims (33)

1. A network testing system comprising:

one or more test devices each comprising a media-specific testing module and a processing device with a network interface, wherein the processing device is configured to test a network with the media-specific testing module, wherein the test is implemented by following a pre-defined Method of Procedure (MOP) specifying testing requirements for the network and using the media-specific testing module;

one or more servers configured to receive test results from the test of the network either directly from the one or more test devices or an intermediate data source communicatively coupled to the one or more test devices; and

a validator module executed on any of the one or more servers and the one or more test devices, and configured to perform automated post-processing on the test results to compare the test results to the pre-defined Method of Procedure (MOP), to auto-correct one or more errors in the test results, and to provide a report based on the comparison,

wherein the system is further configured to issue a digitally-authenticated pass stamp for the test results that are in compliance with the requirements of the pre-defined Method of Procedure (MOP).

2. The network testing system of claim 1 , wherein the test is performed by a contractor on the network owned by a customer which defines the MOP and the test results are provided by the contractor to the customer subsequent to the post-processing and the auto-correct by the validator module.

3. The network testing system of claim 2 , wherein the customer has a pool of licenses and utilizes a plurality of contractors for testing the network, and wherein the contractor utilizes a license from the pool of licenses during the test and the license is reassigned back to the pool of licenses after the contractor completes the test.

4. The network testing system of claim 1 , further comprising:

a mobile device executing an application and communicatively coupled to the one or more test devices, wherein the mobile device is configured to buffer the test results from the one or more test devices when connectivity is unavailable for the one or more test devices.

5. The network testing system of claim 1 , wherein the one or more servers, subsequent to the automated post-processing, are configured to provide a notification to corresponding test personnel performing the test with issues such that the test personnel address the issues while on site.

6. The network testing system of claim 5 , wherein the notification is provided to both a corresponding test device and a mobile device associated with the test personnel.

7. The network testing system of claim 5 , wherein the issues include threshold crossings indicative of poor tests and the notification includes information regarding remedial actions to address the threshold crossing prior to a retest.

8. The network testing system of claim 1 , wherein the one or more errors in the test results are related to identification of parties or location, identifiers of items in the network, and test parameters.

9. The network testing system of claim 1 , wherein the one or more errors relate to one or more of test thresholds and test settings, wherein incorrect test thresholds are corrected and the test results are analyzed by the validator module for any threshold crossings based on the corrected test thresholds, and wherein incorrect test settings are corrected in the one or more test devices for rerunning the test.

10. A validation system comprising:

a network interface that is one of i) communicatively coupled to one or more test devices each comprising a media-specific testing module and a processing device and ii) included in the one or more test devices, each of the one or more test devices is configured to test a network with the media-specific testing module, wherein the test is implemented by following a pre-defined Method of Procedure (MOP) specifying testing requirements for the network and using the media-specific testing module;

a processor communicatively coupled to the network interface; and

memory storing instructions that, when executed, cause the processor to

obtain test results from the one or more test devices from the test of the network, execute a validator module for automated post-processing on the test results to compare the test results to the pre-defined Method of Procedure (MOP), and to auto-correct one or more errors in the test results, and

provide a report based on an output of the validator module for the test results, wherein the system is further configured to issue a digitally-authenticated pass stamp for the test results that are in compliance with the requirements of the pre-defined Method of Procedure (MOP).

11. The validation system of claim 10 , wherein the test is performed by a contractor on the network owned by a customer which defines the MOP and the test results are provided by the contractor to the customer subsequent to the post-processing and the auto-correct by the validator module.

12. The validation system of claim 10 , wherein the network interface is further communicatively coupled a mobile device associated with a user performing the test, wherein the mobile device executes an application and is communicatively coupled to the one or more test devices, and wherein the mobile device is configured to buffer the test results from the one or more test devices when connectivity is unavailable for the one or more test devices.

13. The validation system of claim 10 , wherein the memory storing instructions that, when executed, further cause the processor to subsequent to the automated post-processing, provide a notification to corresponding test personnel performing the test with issues such that the test personnel address the issues while on site.

14. The validation system of claim 13 , wherein the notification is provided to both a corresponding test device and a mobile device associated with the test personnel.

15. The validation system of claim 13 , wherein the issues include threshold crossings indicative of poor tests and the notification includes information regarding remedial actions to address the threshold crossing prior to a retest.

16. The validation system of claim 10 , wherein the one or more errors in the test results are related to identification of parties or location, identifiers of items in the network, and test parameters.

17. A network testing method comprising:

in a processing device having a network interface that is one of i) communicatively coupled to one or more test devices each comprising a media-specific testing module and ii) included in the one or more test devices, each of the one or more test devices is configured to test a network with the media-specific testing module, obtaining test results from the one or more test devices from the test of the network; wherein the test is implemented by following a pre-defined Method of Procedure (MOP) specifying testing requirements for the network and using the media-specific testing module;

executing a validator module for automated post-processing on the test results to compare the test results to the pre-defined Method of Procedure (MOP), and to auto-correct one or more errors in the test results; and

providing a report based on an output of the validator module for the test results, wherein the method further comprises issuing a digitally-authenticated pass stamp for the test results that are in compliance with the requirements of the pre-defined Method of Procedure (MOP).

18. The network testing method of claim 17 , wherein the test is performed by a contractor on the network owned by a customer which defines the MOP and the test results are provided by the contractor to the customer subsequent to the post-processing and the auto-correct by the validator module.

19. The network testing method of claim 17 , further comprising: subsequent to the automated post-processing, providing a notification to corresponding test personnel performing the test with issues such that the test personnel address the issues while on site.

20. The network testing method of claim 17 , wherein the one or more errors in the test results are related to identification of parties or location, identifiers of items in the network, and test parameters.

Assignments (3)
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Aug 21, 2026
From: EXFO INC.
To: NATIONAL BANK OF CANADA
Reel/Frame 075739/0885 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Feb 26, 2019
From: PROCTOR, MICHAEL
To: EXFO INC.
Reel/Frame 048439/0843 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Feb 25, 2019
From: RONDEAU, MARC
To: EXFO INC.
Reel/Frame 048427/0814 →
Continuity (2)
Provisional Application 62685259 · Jun 14, 2018
Related Publication 20190384664A1 · Dec 19, 2019
Cited By (1)
US 12,603,825