IP Library Granted Patent US 12,558,438
Granted Patent B2
US 12,558,438 · App. 16/315,401 · Granted Feb 24, 2026

Imaging systems and methods for particle-driven, knowledge-based, and predictive cancer radiogenomics

Inventors: Michelle S. Bradbury (New York, NY); Cameron Brennan (Haworth, NJ); Mithat Gonen (New York, NY); Mohan Pauliah (New York, NY); Ulrich Wiesner (Ithaca, NY)
Assignees: Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Cornell University
A61K49/0002A61B1/000094A61B5/0035A61B5/0042A61B5/055A61B5/1072A61B5/1075A61B5/4842A61B5/4848A61B6/03A61B6/037A61B6/481A61B6/501A61B6/5217A61B6/5247A61K49/1818A61K51/082A61K51/088A61K51/1244G01R33/481G01R33/4812G01R33/4814G01R33/5601G01R33/56341G01T1/1642G01T1/2985G06T7/0012G06T7/40A61B6/4417A61B8/085A61B8/4416A61B8/481A61B8/5223A61B8/5261G06T2207/10072G06T2207/10088G06T2207/30096
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,558,438
App. No.
16/315,401
Granted
Feb 24, 2026
Kind
B2
Abstract

Described herein are particle-driven radiogenomics systems and methods that can be used to identify imaging features for prediction of intratumoral and interstitial nanoparticle distributions in cancers (e.g., in low grade and/or high-grade brain cancers (e.g., gliomas, e.g., primary gliomas)). In certain embodiments, the systems and methods described herein extract and combine quantitative multi-dimensional data generated from structural, functional, and/or metabolic imaging. In certain embodiments, the combined multidimensional data is linked to intratumoral and interstitial nanoparticle distributions. For example, this linked data can be used to determine quantitative functional-metabolic multimodality particle-based imaging features and to predict treatment efficacy. These techniques provide an improved quantitative ability to measure treatment response and determine tumor progressions compared to traditional size-based imaging methods.

Claims (51)

1 . An in vivo method for determining an intratumoral and/or interstitial nanoparticle distribution within a tumor and/or a tumor interstitium of a subject, the method comprising the steps of:

administering to the subject a single probe species that consists of a plurality of individual silica-based nanoparticles of the same species;

following the administering step, obtaining a plurality of in vivo images of the subject;

producing, by a processor of a computing device, one or more segments from at least one of the plurality of in vivo images;

extracting, by the processor, one or more features from at least one of the one or more segments;

accessing, by the processor, functional and/or metabolic imaging data from at least one of the plurality of in vivo images and extracting and combining quantitative multi-dimensional data generated from the functional and/or metabolic imaging data; and

determining the intratumoral and/or interstitial nanoparticle distribution within the tumor and/or the tumor interstitium of the subject using the extracted one or more features and the accessed functional and/or metabolic imaging data.

2 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the tumor comprises a metastatic disease, and wherein the metastasis is in the brain.

3 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the tumor comprises a primary glioma.

4 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the tumor comprises a low-grade glioma or high-grade glioma.

5 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the nanoparticles have an average diameter no greater than 20 nm.

6 . The method of claim 1 , wherein a radioisotope is attached directly or indirectly to each nanoparticle.

7 . The method of claim 1 , wherein a therapeutic is attached directly or indirectly to each nanoparticle.

8 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the plurality of in vivo images comprises a member selected from the group consisting of a positron emission tomography (PET) images(s), X-ray images(s), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) images(s), Computed Tomography (CT) images(s), Single-Photon Emission Computed Tomography (SPECT) images(s), PET-CT images(s), and ultrasound image(s).

9 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the plurality of in vivo images comprises a combination of two or more of PET images(s), X-ray images(s), MRI images(s), CT images(s), SPECT images(s), PET-CT images(s), and ultrasound image(s).

10 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the one or more features are one or more texture features comprising Gabor edge features and/or Visually Accessible Rembrandt features.

11 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the functional and/or metabolic imaging data comprises one or more of the following: diffusion-weighted imaging data, diffusion tensor imaging data, and/or dynamic contrast enhanced T1 perfusion imaging data.

12 . A system comprising:

a single probe species that consists of a plurality of individual silica-based nanoparticles of the same species;

one or more imaging devices;

a processor; and

a nontransitory computer readable medium having instructions stored thereon, wherein the instructions, when executed by the processor, cause the processor to:

(i) produce one or more segments from at least one of a plurality of in vivo images obtained using the one or more imaging devices;

(ii) extract one or more features from at least one of the one or more segments;

(iii) access functional and/or metabolic imaging data from at least one of the plurality of in vivo images, and extract and combine quantitative multi-dimensional data generated from the functional and/or metabolic imaging data;

(iv) determine an intratumoral and/or interstitial nanoparticle distribution within a tumor and/or a tumor interstitium of a subject using the extracted one or more features and the accessed functional and/or metabolic imaging data; and

(v) link the determined intratumoral and/or interstitial silica based nanoparticle distribution within the tumor interstitium to the extracted and combined multi-dimensional data; and

(vi) cause display of a graphical representation of the intratumoral and/or interstitial nanoparticle distribution within the tumor and/or the tumor interstitium superimposed on an image of the tumor and/or tumor interstitium captured by the one or more imaging devices.

13 . The system of claim 12 , wherein the one or more features are one or more texture features, and wherein the one or more texture features comprise Gabor edge features and/or Visually Accessible Rembrandt features.

14 . The system of claim 12 , wherein the functional and/or metabolic imaging data comprises one or more of the following: diffusion-weighted imaging data, diffusion tensor imaging data, and/or dynamic contrast enhanced T1 perfusion imaging data.

15 . The system of claim 12 , wherein the instructions further cause the processor to determine a measure of treatment efficacy using the extracted one or more features.

16 . The system of claim 15 , wherein the one or more features are functional and/or structural features.

17 . The system of claim 12 , wherein the instructions cause the processor to extract one or more features by identifying quantitative functional magnetic resonance (MR) texture features.

18 . The system of claim 12 , wherein a molecular inhibitor is attached directly or indirectly to each nanoparticle.

19 . The system of claim 15 , wherein the instructions cause the processor to determine the measure of treatment efficacy using high-dimensional data from one or more radiomic analysis of MR diffusion and/or perfusion functional images to predict inhibitor treatment efficacy.

20 . The system of claim 15 , wherein the instructions, when executed by the processor, further cause the processor to determine a measure of glioma heterogeneity using the extracted one or more features.

21 . The system of claim 12 , wherein step (i) comprises determining a multi-level overall minimizing energy criteria for characterization.

22 . The system of claim 20 , wherein the instructions cause the processor to determine a measure of glioma heterogeneity by determining hemodynamic metrics using a computation of the number of interface junctions inside a tumor region, and/or determining an MR vascular signature.

23 . The system of claim 12 , wherein the nanoparticles have an average diameter no greater than 20 nm.

24 . The system of claim 23 , wherein the nanoparticles have an average diameter no greater than 10 nm.

25 . The system of claim 12 , wherein a therapeutic is attached directly or indirectly to each nanoparticle.

26 . The system of claim 12 , wherein a radioisotope is attached directly or indirectly to each nanoparticle.

27 . The system of claim 12 , wherein each nanoparticle is a dual-modality cRGDY-PEG-C dot.

28 . The system of claim 12 , wherein the one or more imaging devices is selected from MR, PET, SPECT, CT, ultrasound, X-ray, and a combination thereof.

29 . The system of claim 15 , wherein a molecular inhibitor is attached to each nanoparticle and wherein the measure is a prediction of treatment efficacy in a low-grade glioma treated with the mutation specific inhibitor therapy.

30 . The system of claim 16 , wherein the features comprise quantitative functional magnetic resonance (MR) texture features.

31 . The system of claim 15 , wherein the instructions cause the processor to determine the measure of treatment efficacy using the extracted one or more features in addition to data regarding genetic mutations and/or disease history of the subject.

32 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising linking the determined intratumoral and/or interstitial nanoparticle distribution within the tumor and/or the tumor interstitium to the extracted and combined multi-dimensional data; and

causing a display of a graphical representation of the intratumoral and/or interstitial nanoparticle distribution within the tumor and/or the tumor interstitium superimposed on an image of the tumor and/or tumor interstitium.

33 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the one or more features are one or more texture features comprising Gabor edge features; and wherein the tumor comprises a primary glioma.

34 . The system of claim 12 , wherein the one or more features are one or more texture features comprising Gabor edge features; and wherein the tumor comprises a primary glioma.

Assignments (1)
CONFIRMATORY LICENSE Recorded Nov 18, 2020
From: SLOAN-KETTERING INST CAN RESEARCH
To: NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH (NIH), U.S. DEPT. OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES (DHHS), U.S. GOVERNMENT
Reel/Frame 054475/0862 →
Continuity (2)
Provisional Application 62359684 · Jul 7, 2016
Related Publication 20190231903A1 · Aug 1, 2019
References Cited (46)
US 8880146B1 · Schepkin · 2014 [cited by examiner]
US 20050215883A1 · Hundley et al. · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 20120035458A1 · Flynn · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20120121515A1 · Dang · 2012 [cited by examiner]
US 20130039848A1 · Bradbury et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20140248210A1 · Bradbury · 2014 [cited by examiner]
US 20150182118A1 · Bradbury · 2015 [cited by examiner]
US 20150343091A1 · Yoo et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150381909A1 · Butte · 2015 [cited by examiner]
US 20160129131A1 · Vitari et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20170020816A1 · Nagy · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 20170192291A1 · Shi · 2017 [cited by applicant]
CN 101001569A · 2007 [cited by applicant]
CN 105105697A · 2015 [cited by applicant]
CN 105263390A · 2016 [cited by applicant]
EP 2314218A1 · 2011 [cited by applicant]
EP 2968621B1 · 2022 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2014130736A1 · 2014 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2014145606A1 · 2014 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2014176375A2 · 2014 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2015103420A1 · 2015 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2015138385A1 · 2015 [cited by examiner]
WO WO201626434A1 · 2016 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2016100340A1 · 2016 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2016164578A1 · 2016 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2017106525A1 · 2017 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2017189961A1 · 2017 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2018009379A1 · 2018 [cited by applicant]
Yu et al., Potential Utility of Visually AcceSAble Rembrandt Images Assessment in Brain Astrocytoma Grading, Mar./Apr. 2016, Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography, vol. 40, No. 2, pp. 301-306 (Year: 2016). [cited by examiner]
Li et al., MRI Tissue Classification and Bias Field Estimation Based on Coherent Local Intensity Clustering: A Unified Energy Minimization Framework, 2009, Information Processing in Medical Imaging, vol. 5636, pp. 288-2… [cited by examiner]
Kim et al., Gliomas: Application of Cumulative Histogram Analysis of Normalized Cerebral Blood Volume on 3T MRI to Tumor Grading, 2013, PLoS One, vol. 8, issue 5, pp. 1-11 (Year: 2013). [cited by examiner]
Liu, H. et al., Application of iron oxide nanoparticles in glioma imaging and therapy: from bench to bedside, Nanoscale, 8(15):7808-7826, (2016). [cited by applicant]
Mandeville, Joseph B., Iron fMRI measurements of CBV and implications for BOLD signal, Neuroimage, Elsevier, Amsterdam, NL, 62(2):1000-1008, XP028502194, (2012). [cited by applicant]
Na, H. Y.et al., Inorganic Nanoparticles for MRI Contrast Agents, Advanced Materials, 21(21):2133-2148, XP055251674, (2009). [cited by applicant]
Phillips, E. et al., Clinical translation of an ultrasmall inorganic optical-PET imaging nanoparticle probe, Science Translational Medicine, 6(260):260ral49-260ral49, (2014). [cited by applicant]
Tran, L., et al., High-dimensional MRI data analysis using a large-scale manifold learning approach, Machine Vision and Applications, Springer Verlag, DE, 24(5):995-1014, (2013). [cited by applicant]
Wilks, M. Q., et al., Imaging PEG-Like Nanoprobes in Tumor, Transient Ischemia, and Inflammatory Disease Models, Bioconjugate Chemistry, 26(6):1061-1069, XP055283192, (2015). [cited by applicant]
Brat, D. J. et al., Comprehensive, Integrative Genomic Analysis of Diffuse Lower-Grade Gliomas, New England Journal of Medicine, 372:2481-2498, (2015). [cited by applicant]
Dang, L. et al., Cancer-associated IDH1 mutations produce 2-hydroxyglutarate, Nature, 462(7274):739-744, (2009). [cited by applicant]
Detappe, A. et al., Advanced multimodal nanoparticles delay tumor progression with clinical radiation therapy, Journal of Controlled Release, 238:103-113 (2016). [cited by applicant]
Hilderbrand, Scott and Weissleder, Ralph, Near-infrared fluorescence: application to in vivo molecular imaging, Current Opinion in Chemical Biology, 14:71-9, 2010. [cited by applicant]
International Search Report, PCT/US2017/39620, (Imaging Systems and Methods for Particle-Driven, Knowledge-Based, and Predictive Cancer Radiogenomics filed Jun. 28, 2017) issued by ISA/US, 3 pages (Sep. 15, 2017). [cited by applicant]
Van den Bent, M. J. et al., Response assessment in neuro-oncology (a report of the RANO group): assessment of outcome in trials of diffuse low-grade gliomas. The lancet oncology, 12:583-593, (2011). [cited by applicant]
Ward, P. S. et al., Identification of additional IDH mutations associated with oncometabolite R(−)-2-hydroxyglutarate production, Oncogene, 31(19):2491-2498. (2012). [cited by applicant]
Wen, P. Y. et al., Updated Response Assessment Criteria for High-Grade Gliomas: Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology Working Group, Journal of Clinical Oncology, 28:1963-1972, (2010). [cited by applicant]
Written Opinion, PCT/US2017/39620, (Imaging Systems and Methods for Particle-Driven, Knowledge-Based, and Predictive Cancer Radiogenomics filed Jun. 28, 2017) issued by ISA/US, 3 pages (Sep. 15, 2017). [cited by applicant]