IP Library › Granted Patent US 12,415,981
Granted Patent B2
US 12,415,981 · App. 16/347,104 · Granted Sep 16, 2025

Automated collection of a specified number of cells

Inventors: Steven C. Gebhart (Durham, NC); Robert W. McClellan (Apex, NC); Nicholas C. Trotta (Durham, NC); Nancy L. Allbritton (Chapel Hill, NC); Peter Joseph Attayek (Durham, NC); Paul Michael Armistead (Durham, NC)
Assignees: Cell Microsystems, Inc; The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
C12M41/48C12M23/12C12M41/36C12M47/04C40B30/06C40B50/06C40B60/14G01N15/0612G01N15/1433G01N15/1434G01N21/6408G01N21/6428G01N21/6452G01N21/6458B01J2219/00308B01J2219/00317B01J2219/00743C40B60/12G01N2015/1006G01N2015/1447G01N2015/1452G01N2021/6439G01N2201/129
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,415,981
App. No.
16/347,104
Granted
Sep 16, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

Embodiments of the disclosed subject matter provide an automated method and system to isolate and collect cells using computerized analysis of images of cells and their surroundings obtained from a digital imaging device or system. Embodiments of the disclosed subject matter make use of a “microwell array,” which can comprise a formed, elastomeric grid of indentations or “wells.” Many, most, or all of the wells in a microwell array can contain a releasable, microfabricated element, which can be referred to as a “raft.” Embodiments of the disclosed subject matter provide a system and method for cell collection that includes computerized identification and collection of rafts with isolated single cells or a specific group or groups of cells, eliminating the need for continuous human identification and selection.

Claims (35)

1. An automated system comprising:

a computer system comprising at least one processor and memory;

an imaging device, comprising at least one imaging sensor, configured to obtain images of a microwell array, the microwell array comprising a plurality of cell rafts; and

an actuator configured to be controlled by the at least one processor, the actuator comprising a linear actuator or an autofocus motor of the imaging device, the linear actuator or the autofocus motor being configured to release cell rafts from the microwell array by actuating a release probe configured for individually releasing cell rafts from the microwell array;

wherein the automated system is configured for automated imaging and cell release, including the at least one processor being configured to:

obtain one or more images of the microwell array using the imaging device;

analyze the one or more images of the microwell array to identify a selected cell raft from among the plurality of cell rafts, wherein identifying the selected cell raft includes the at least one processor being further configured to count, for each cell raft, a number of cells depicted in a sub-image of the cell raft and identify at least one cell raft bearing a single isolated cell; and

control the actuator to release the selected cell raft from the microwell array.

2. The automated system of claim 1 , comprising one or more motors configured to move the imaging device or the microwell array or both, wherein the computer system is configured to obtain the one or more images of the microwell array by performing an array scan, including the computer system configured to:

divide the microwell array into a plurality of fields of view such that the fields of view, collectively, include each of the cell rafts; and

for each field of view, control the one or more motors to orient the imaging device with the field of view of the microwell array and control the imaging device to obtain a respective image at the field of view.

3. The automated system of claim 2 , comprising a microscope objective for the imaging device, and wherein, to obtain the one or more images of the microwell array, the computer system is further configured to, for each field of view, autofocus the microscope objective using one or more focus positions from at least one neighboring field of view.

4. The automated system of claim 3 , wherein to autofocus the microscope objective, the computer system is further configured to sample a plurality of sample images at a plurality of sample focus positions and interpolate a current focus position from focus scores of the sample images.

5. The automated system of claim 1 , wherein to determine the number of cells depicted in the sub-image, the computer system is further configured to:

apply an intensity threshold to the sub-image to create a binary image;

identify unique objects in the binary image; and

count the number of identified unique objects.

6. The automated system of claim 1 , wherein to identify the single-cell raft, the computer system is configured to determine a confidence score indicating a degree of confidence in the determination that the single-cell raft houses the single isolated cell.

7. The automated system of claim 1 , wherein to identify the selected cell raft, the computer system is configured to assign the selected cell raft to a mapped location of a collection plate.

8. The automated system of claim 7 , further comprising a mechanical cell raft collector, wherein the at least one processor of the computer system is configured to send a first control signal to the mechanical cell raft collector to collect the selected cell raft after release from the microwell array and configured to send a second control signal to the mechanical cell raft collector to deposit the selected cell raft at the mapped location of the collection plate.

9. The automated system of claim 1 , wherein the computer system is configured to determine an orientation or type of the microwell array based on the one or more images; and

wherein the computer system is to control the actuator to release the selected cell raft from the microwell array based on the orientation or type of the microwell array.

10. The automated system of claim 9 , wherein the computer system is configured to determine the orientation or type of the microwell array based on an indicia coded into a specified corner of the microwell array.

11. The automated system of claim 1 , wherein the automated system includes a gantry assembly comprising a second linear actuator configured to move a magnetic wand to collect the selected cell raft after release.

12. The automated system of claim 11 , wherein the gantry assembly comprises a brightfield light emitting diode (LED) for illuminating the microwell array while the imaging device obtains images thereof.

13. The automated system of claim 1 , further comprising:

a second linear actuator configured to move a magnetic wand to collect the selected cell raft; and

an automated stage to hold a collection plate to receive the selected cell raft from the magnetic wand, wherein the automated stage is a motorized stage configured to move the collection plate for receipt of the selected cell raft;

wherein the collection plate includes a collection magnet positioned underneath, the collection magnet having a polarization opposite that of the magnetic wand to repel a magnet in the magnetic wand and pull the selected cell raft to a bottom of the collection plate.

14. The automated system of claim 1 , further comprising a microscope objective for the imaging system, wherein the release probe is aligned with an optical path of the microscope objective.

15. The automated system of claim 1 , further comprising a microscope objective for the imaging system, wherein the release probe is offset from an optical path of the microscope objective such that the release probe does not intersect a field of view of the microscope objective.

16. The automated system of claim 15 , wherein the offset is calibrated to be between a center of the field of view of the microscope objective and a puncture location of the release probe on the microwell array.

17. The automated system of claim 1 , further comprising:

an automated stage to hold a collection plate to receive the selected cell raft from a magnetic wand of the automated system, wherein the automated stage is a motorized stage configured to move the collection plate for receipt of the selected cell raft;

wherein the collection plate includes a collection magnet positioned underneath, the collection magnet having a polarization opposite that of the magnetic wand to repel a magnet in the magnetic wand and pull the selected cell raft to a bottom of the collection plate.

Assignments (3)
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Jun 30, 2026
From: CELL MICROSYSTEMS, INC.
To: TELEGRAPH HILL PARTNERS IV, L.P.
Reel/Frame 075139/0230 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded May 20, 2019
From: GEBHART, STEVEN C.; MCCLELLAN, ROBERT W.; TROTTA, NICHOLAS C.
To: CELL MICROSYSTEMS, INC.
Reel/Frame 049222/0265 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded May 20, 2019
From: ALLBRITTON, NANCY L.; ATTAYEK, PETER JOSEPH; ARMISTEAD, PAUL MICHAEL
To: THE UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHAPEL HILL
Reel/Frame 049222/0394 →
Continuity (5)
Provisional Application 62526177 · Jun 28, 2017
Provisional Application 62430094 · Dec 5, 2016
Provisional Application 62416775 · Nov 3, 2016
Provisional Application 62416773 · Nov 3, 2016
Related Publication 20190256817A1 · Aug 22, 2019
References Cited (105)
US 7796815B2 · Muschler et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 8068670B2 · Muschler et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 9041791B2 · Zahniser · 2015 [cited by examiner]
US 9068155B2 · Allbritton et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 10564172B2 · Muschler et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20130065795A1 · Allbritton et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20150251151A1 · Allbritton et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20200080046A1 · Gebhart et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
CN 1556854A · 2004 [cited by applicant]
CN 1650169A · 2005 [cited by applicant]
CN 1745179A · 2006 [cited by applicant]
CN 101923037A · 2010 [cited by applicant]
CN 104884605A · 2015 [cited by applicant]
EP 3535441 · 2019 [cited by applicant]
JP 2020524480A · 2020 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2011103143A1 · 2011 [cited by examiner]
WO WO2017151582A1 · 2017 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2018017892A1 · 2018 [cited by applicant]
Ogunniyi, Adebola O et al. “Screening individual hybridomas by microengraving to discover monoclonal antibodies.” Nature protocols vol. 4,5 (2009): 767-82. doi:10.1038/nprot.2009.40 (Year: 2009). [cited by examiner]
Wu, Xiaoqiang, et al. “Autofocus methods for automated microscopy.” Biomedical Photonics and Optoelectronic Imaging. Vol. 4224. SPIE, 2000. (Year: 2000). [cited by examiner]
Japanese Office Action (English Translation) Corresponding to Japanese Patent Application No. 2019-545711 dated Aug. 30, 2021. [cited by applicant]
Kwee et al., “Integrated Colony Imaging, Analysis, and Selection Device for Regenerative Medicine.” SLAS Technology, vol. 22(2), pp. 217-223 (2017). [cited by applicant]
Mantripragada et al., “Automated in-process characterization and selection of cell-clones for quality and efficient cell manufacturing.” Cytotechnology, vol. 72, pp. 615-627 (2020). [cited by applicant]
Gillet et al. “The Clinical Relevance of Cancer Cell Lines,” Commentary, JNCI, vol. 105, Iss. 7, pp. 452-458 (2013). [cited by applicant]
Jinek et al. “A Programmable Dual-RNA-Guided DNA Endonuclease in Adaptive Bacterial Immunity,” Science, vol. 337, pp. 816-821, 2012. [cited by applicant]
Kovarik et al. “Micro Total Analysis Systems for Cell Biology and Biochemical Assays,” Author manuscript, pp. 1-49, 2013 [published in final edited form as: Anal. Chem. vol. 84, No. 2, pp. 516-540, 2012]. [cited by applicant]
Sterneckert et al. “Investigating human disease using stem cell models,” Nature Reviews Genetics, vol. 15, pp. 625-639 (2014). [cited by applicant]
Varadarajan et al. “A high-throughput single-cell analysis of human CD8+ T cell functions reveals discordance for cytokine secretion and cytolysis,” The Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 121, No. 11, pp. 4322-4331… [cited by applicant]
Wilding et al. “Cancer Cell Lines for Drug Discovery and Development,” Cancer Research, vol. 74, No. 9, pp. 2377-2384 (2014). [cited by applicant]
Altman et al., “Phenotypic Analysis of Antigen-Specific T Lymphocytes,” Science, vol. 274, Iss. 5284, pp. 94-96 (1996). [cited by applicant]
Appay et al., “The assessment of antigen-specific CD8+ T cells through the combination of MHC class I tetramer and intracellular staining,” J Immunol Methods, vol. 268, Iss. 1, pp. 9-19 (2002). [cited by applicant]
Attayek et al., “An array-based platform to select, release, and capture EBV-infected cells based on intercellular adhesion,” Anal Chem., Author manuscript, available in PMC Jul. 2, 2018, pp. 1-19; published in final ed… [cited by applicant]
Betts et al., “Sensitive and viable identification of antigen-specific CD8+ T cells by a flow cytometric assay for degranulation,” J. Immunol Methods, vol. 281, Iss. 1-2, pp. 65-78 (2003). [cited by applicant]
Brent, “An Algorithm with Guaranteed Convergence for Finding a Minimum of a Function of One Variable,” Algorithms for minimization without derivatives, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, pp. 61-80 (1973). [cited by applicant]
Brochet et al., “IMGT/V-QUEST: the highly customized and integrated system for IG and TR standardized V-J and V-D-J sequence analysis,” Nucleic Acids Res, vol. 36, pp. W503-W508 (2008). [cited by applicant]
Choi et al., “Development and Optimization of a Process for Automated Recovery of Single Cells Identified by Microengraving,” Biotechnol Prog, vol. 26, No. 3, pp. 888-895 (2010). [cited by applicant]
Czerkinsky et al., “A Solid-Phase Enzyme-Linked Immunospot (ELISPOT) Assay for Enumeration of Specific Antibody-Secreting Cells,” J Immunol Methods, vol. 65, No. 1-2, pp. 109-121 (1983). [cited by applicant]
Dees et al., “Dendritic cells can be rapidly expanded ex vivo and safely administered in patients with metastatic breast cancer,” Cancer Immunol Immunother, vol. 53, pp. 777-785 (2004). [cited by applicant]
Ho et al., “In vitro methods for generating CD8+ T-cell clones for immunotherapy from the naive repertoire,” J Immunol Methods, vol. 310, pp. 40-52 (2006). [cited by applicant]
Hochberg et al., “More Powerful Procedures for Multiple Significance Testing,” Statistics in Medicine, vol. 9, pp. 811-818 (1990). [cited by applicant]
Linette et al., “Cardiovascular toxicity and titin cross-reactivity of affinity-enhanced T cells in myeloma and melanoma,” Blood, vol. 122, No. 6, pp. 863-871 (2013). [cited by applicant]
Molldrem et al., “Targeted T-Cell Therapy for Human Leukemia: Cytotoxic T Lymphocytes Specific for a Peptide Derived From Proteinase 3 Preferentially Lyse Human Myeloid Leukemia Cells,” Blood, vol. 88, No. 7, pp. 2450-2… [cited by applicant]
Mollet et al., “Computer Simulations of the Energy Dissipation Rate in a Fluorescence-Activated Cell Sorter: Implications to Cells,” Biotechnol Bioeng, vol. 100, No. 2, pp. 260-272 (2008). [cited by applicant]
Ng et al., “Masseter segmentation using an improved watershed algorithm with unsupervised classification,” Comput Biol Med, vol. 38, Iss. 2, pp. 171-184 (2008). [cited by applicant]
Ogg et al., “Quantitation of HIV-1-Specific Cytotoxic T Lymphocytes and Plasma Load of Viral RNA,” Science, vol. 279, Iss. 5359, pp. 2103-2106 (1998). [cited by applicant]
Otsu, “A Threshold Selection Method from Gray-Level Histograms,” IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, vol. SMC-9, No. 1, pp. 62-66 (1979). [cited by applicant]
Pala et al., “Flow cytometric measurement of intracellular cytokines,” J Immunol Methods, vol. 243, Iss. 1-2, pp. 107-124 (2000). [cited by applicant]
Park et al., “A simple and fast algorithm for K-medoids clustering,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 36, Iss. 2, pp. 3336-3341 (2009). [cited by applicant]
Riddell et al., “The use of anti-CD3 and anti-CD28 monoclonal antibodies to clone and expand human antigen-specific T cells,” J Immunol Methods, vol. 128, Iss. 2, pp. 189-201 (1990). [cited by applicant]
Taswell, “Limiting Dilution Assays for the Determination of Immunocompetent Cell Frequencies. III. Validity Tests for the Single-Hit Poisson Model,” J Immunol Methods, vol. 72, Iss. 1, pp. 29-40 (1984). [cited by applicant]
Wang et al., “Micromolded Arrays for Separation of Adherent Cells,” Lab Chip, Author manuscript, available in PMC Nov. 7, 2011, pp. 1-16; published in final edited form as Lab Chip, vol. 10, No. 21, pp. 2917-2924 (2010). [cited by applicant]
Warren et al., “Therapy of relapsed leukemia after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation with T cells specific for minor histocompatibility antigens,” Blood, vol. 115, No. 19, pp. 3869-3878 (2010). [cited by applicant]
Shah et al., “Dynamics and evolution of B-catenin-dependent Wnt signaling revealed through massively parallel clonogenic screening,” Integr. Biol., vol. 6, pp. 673-684 (2014). [cited by applicant]
Shah et al., “Small Sample Sorting of Primary Adherent Cells by Automated Micropallet Imaging and Release,” Cytometry Part A, pp. 642-649 (2014). [cited by applicant]
Choi et al., “Development and Optimization of a Prcess for Automated Recovery of Single Cells Identified by Microengraving,” Biotechnol. Prog., vol. 26, No. 3, pp. 888-896 (2010). [cited by applicant]
Kornyei et al., “Cell sorting in a Petri dish controlled by computer vision,” Scientific Reports, vol. 3, pp. 1-10 (2013). [cited by applicant]
Extended European Search Report corresponding to European Patent Application No. 17873404.2 dated May 18, 2020. [cited by applicant]
Gracz et al., “A high throughput platform for stem cell-niche co-cultures and downstream gene expression analysis,” Nature Cell Biology, vol. 17, No. 3, pp. 340-349 (2015). [cited by applicant]
Appay et al., “HIV-specific CD8+ T Cells Produce Antiviral Cytokines but Are Impaired in Cytolytic Function,” J Exp Med, vol. 192, pp. 63-75 (2000). [cited by applicant]
Arber et al., “Survivin-specific T cell receptor targets tumor but not T cells,” J Clin Invest, vol. 125, No. 1, pp. 157-168 (2015). [cited by applicant]
Brown et al., “Neo-antigens predicted by tumor genome meta-analysis correlate with increased patient survival,” Genome Res, vol. 24, pp. 743-750 (2014). [cited by applicant]
Cameron et al., “Identification of a Titin-Derived HLA-A1-Presented Peptide as a Cross-Reactive Target for Engineered MAGE A3-Directed T Cells,” Author Manuscript, pp. 1-24 [Published in final edited form in Sci Transl … [cited by applicant]
Carpenter et al., “CellProfiler: image analysis software for identifying and quantifying cell phenotypes,” Genome Biology, vol. 7, No. 10; Article R100, pp. 1-11 (2006). [cited by applicant]
Chapuis et al., “Transferred WT1-reactive CD8+ T cells can mediate antileukemic activity and persist in post-transplant patients,” Author Manuscript, pp. 1-25 [Published in final edited form in Sci Transl Med, vol. 5, p… [cited by applicant]
Cong et al. “Multiplex Genome Engineering Using CRISPR/Cas Systems,” Author Manuscript, pp. 1-9 [Published in final edited form in Science, vol. 339, No. 6121, pp. 819-823 (2013)]. [cited by applicant]
Dong et al., “Accurate identification of single nucleotide variants in whole genome amplified single cells,” Author manuscript, pp. 1-14 (2017). [Published in final edited form in: Nature Methods, vol. 14, No. 5, pp. 49… [cited by applicant]
Dunbar et al., “Direct isolation, phenotyping and cloning of low-frequency antigen-specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes from peripheral blood,” Curr Biol, vol. 8, pp. 413-416 (1998). [cited by applicant]
Edelstein et al., “Computer control of microscopes using μManager,” Author manuscript, pp. 1-22 [Published in final edited form in Curr Protoc Mol Biol, Chapter 14, Unit14 20 (2010)]. [cited by applicant]
Edelstein et al., “Advanced methods of microscope control using μManager software,” Author manuscript, pp. 1-18 [Published in final edited form in J Biol Methods, vol. 1, No. 2 (2014)]. [cited by applicant]
Gabrilovich et al., “Myeloid-derived-suppressor cells as regulators of the immune system,” Nat Rev Immunol, vol. 9, No. 3, pp. 162-174 (2009). [cited by applicant]
Gach et al., “Isolation and manipulation of living adherent cells by micromolded magnetic rafts,” Biomicrofluidics, vol. 5, pp. 032002-1-032002-12 (2011). [cited by applicant]
Gea-Banacloche et al., “Maintenance of Large Numbers of Virus-Specific CD8+ T Cells in HIV-Infected Progressors and Long-Term Nonprogressors,” J Immunol, vol. 165, pp. 1082-1092 (2000). [cited by applicant]
Gracz et al., “A high throughput platform for stem cell-niche co-cultures and downstream gene expression analysis,” Author manuscript, pp. 1-26 (2015). [Published in final edited form in: Nature Cell Biology, vol. 17, N… [cited by applicant]
Guillaume et al., “Fluorescence-Activated Cell Sorting and Cloning of Bona Fide CD8+ CTL with Reversible MHC-Peptide and Antibody Fab′ Conjugates,” J Immunol, vol. 177, pp. 3903-3912 (2006). [cited by applicant]
Hill et al., “Longitudinal Assessment of an ELISPOT Test for [cited by applicant]
Hunsucker et al., “Peptide/MHC tetramer-based sorting of CD8+ T cells to a leukemia antigen yields clonotypes drawn nonspecifically from an underlying restricted repertoire,” Author manuscript, pp. 1-16, Published in fi… [cited by applicant]
IPRP with Written Opinion and International Search Report corresponding to International Application No. PCT/US2017/059979 dated May 7, 2019. [cited by applicant]
Kim et al., “Analysis of the Paired TCR α- and β-chains of Single Human T Cells,” PloS one, vol. 7, Iss. 5, e37338, pp. 1-12 (2012). [cited by applicant]
Leong et al., “Correction of uneven illumination (vignetting) in digital microscopy images,” J Clin Pathol, vol. 56, pp. 619-621 (2003). [cited by applicant]
Liadi et al., Cancer immunology research, “Individual Motile CD4+ T Cells Can Participate in Efficient Multikilling through Conjugation to Multiple Tumor Cells,” vol. 3, No. 5, 473-482 (2015). [cited by applicant]
Malpica et al., “Applying Watershed Algorithms to the Segmentation of Clustered Nuclei,” Cytometry, vol. 28, pp. 289-297 (1997). [cited by applicant]
Meyer, “Topographic distance and watershed lines,” Signal processing, vol. 38, pp. 113-125 (1994). [cited by applicant]
Mills, “Regulatory T Cells: Friend or Foe in Immunity to Infection?” Nat Rev Immunol, vol. 4, pp. 841-855 (2004). [cited by applicant]
Molecular Devices Corporation, “Meta Imaging Series MetaMorph Basic Commands,” Version 7.0.15 Product Manual [online], pp. 228, 238 (2006). [cited by applicant]
Notice of Publication corresponding to European Patent Application No. 17873404.2 dated Aug. 14, 2019. [cited by applicant]
Perna et al., “Interleukin 15 Provides Relief to CTLs from Regulatory T Cell-Mediated Inhibition: Implications for Adoptive T Cell-Based Therapies for Lymphoma,” Author Manuscript, pp. 1-21, Published in final edited fo… [cited by applicant]
Rubio et al., “Ex vivo identification, isolation and analysis of tumor-cytolytic T cells,” Nat Med, vol. 9, No. 11, pp. 1377-1382 (2003). [cited by applicant]
Seitz et al., “Reconstitution of paired T cell receptor α- and β-chains from microdissected single cells of human inflammatory tissues,” Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, vol. 103, No. 32, pp. 12057-12062 (2006). [cited by applicant]
Tran et al., “Immunogenicity of somatic mutations in human gastrointestinal cancers,” Science, , vol. 350, Iss. 6266, pp. 1387-1390 (2015). [cited by applicant]
Varadarajan et al., “Rapid, efficient functional characterization and recovery of HIV-specific human CD8+ T cells using microengraving,” Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, vol. 109, No. 10, pp. 3885-3890 (2012). [cited by applicant]
Welch et al., “Selective single cell isolation for genomics using microraft arrays,” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 44, No. 17, pp. 8292-8301 (2016). [cited by applicant]
Wolfl et al., “Antigen-specific activation and cytokine-facilitated expansion of naive, human CD8+ T cells,” Nat Protoc, , vol. 9, No. 4, pp. 950-966 (2014). [cited by applicant]
Yee et al., Journal of immunology, “Isolation of High Avidity Melanoma-Reactive CTL from Heterogeneous Populations Using Peptide-MHC Tetramers,” vol. 162, No. 4, pp. 2227-2234 (1999). [cited by applicant]
Decision of Refusal corresponding to Japanese Patent Application No. 2019-545711 dated Feb. 1, 2022. [cited by applicant]
Meta Imaging Series MetaMorph Drop-in Commands, User's Guide, Molecular Devices, LLC, US, Version 4.6, pp. 1-1160 (2000). [cited by applicant]
Office Action (Restriction Requirement) corresponding to U.S. Appl. No. 16/570,673 dated Dec. 29, 2021. [cited by applicant]
Office Action corresponding to Chinese Patent Application No. 2017800817777 dated Apr. 28, 2022. [cited by applicant]
Office Action corresponding to European Patent Application No. 17873404.2-1001 dated May 18, 2022. [cited by applicant]
Office Action corresponding to U.S. Appl. No. 16/570,673 dated Aug. 16, 2022. [cited by applicant]
Chinese Office Action corresponding to Chinese Patent Application No. 2017800817777 dated Sep. 21, 2022. [cited by applicant]
Office Action corresponding to U.S. Appl. No. 16/570,673 dated Dec. 19, 2022. [cited by applicant]
Advisory Action and Interview Summary corresponding to U.S. Appl. No. 16/570,673 dated Jun. 13, 2023. [cited by applicant]
Office Action corresponding to Japanese Patent Application No. 2022-089408 dated Jun. 13, 2023. [cited by applicant]
Office Action corresponding to Chinese Application No. 201780081777.7 dated Jun. 1, 2023. [cited by applicant]
Office Action corresponding to Canadian Application No. 3,042,692 dated Aug. 18, 2023. [cited by applicant]