IP Library › Granted Patent US 11,645,511
Granted Patent B2
US 11,645,511 · App. 16/393,517 · Granted May 9, 2023

Systems and methods for simulating instantaneous attentive human responses to road hazards for improved early warning systems and fleet data harvesting

Inventor: Simon A. I. Stent (Cambridge, MA)
Assignee: Toyota Research Institute, Inc.
G06N3/08B60R21/013B60R21/01538B60W30/0956B60W50/14G06F9/542G06V10/70H04N7/185B60W2420/42B60W2540/225
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 11,645,511
App. No.
16/393,517
Granted
May 9, 2023
Kind
B2
Abstract

A system for predicting a hazardous event from road-scene data includes an electronic control unit configured to implement a neural network and a camera communicatively coupled to the electronic control unit, wherein the camera generates the road-scene data. The electronic control unit is configured to receive the road-scene data from the camera, and predict, with the neural network, an occurrence of the hazardous event within the road-scene data from the camera.

Claims (58)

1. A method for predicting a hazardous event from road-scene data, the method comprising:

providing a neural network;

inputting the road-scene data, gaze-tracking data, and physiological data into the neural network, the neural network is trained with training gaze-tracking data and training physiological data associated with road-scene training data;

predicting, with the neural network, an occurrence of the hazardous event;

determining, with the neural network, one or more salient portions of the predicted hazardous event and one or more risk-weights for the one or more salient portions based on the gaze-tracking data and the physiological data; and

outputting a graded alert corresponding to the one or more risk-weights and the predicted hazardous event.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the neural network is trained by:

a) inputting the road-scene training data to the neural network, wherein the road-scene training data includes at least one sequence of an example hazardous event occurring in a road-scene;

b) identifying, with the neural network, one or more patterns of events present in the at least one sequence of the example hazardous event within the road-scene training data;

c) updating one or more parameters of the neural network in response to identifying the one or more patterns of events; and

d) repeating steps a-c one or more times, wherein the road-scene training data input during a first iteration of training of the neural network is different than a second iteration of training of the neural network.

3. The method of claim 2 , wherein the road-scene training data includes road-scene video data captured by a camera attached to a vehicle during a high-G event.

4. The method of claim 1 , wherein the neural network is trained by:

a) inputting the road-scene training data to the neural network;

b) inputting the training gaze-tracking data associated with the road-scene training data into the neural network;

c) inputting the training physiological response data associated with the road-scene training data into the neural network;

d) evolving the neural network to determine one or more salient portions within the road-scene data based on the training gaze-tracking data;

e) evolving the neural network to determine one or more risk-weights for the one or more salient portions within the road-scene data based on the training physiological response data associated with the road-scene data; and

f) repeating steps a-e one or more times, wherein the road-scene training data input during a first iteration of training of the neural network is different than a second iteration of training of the neural network.

5. The method of claim 4 , wherein the training physiological response data includes pupillometry data.

6. The method of claim 4 , wherein the training gaze-tracking data and the training physiological response data is generated from sensor systems configured to monitor responses of one or more individuals to the road-scene training data.

7. The method of claim 1 , further comprising generating a risk-weighted saliency map based on the predicted hazardous event.

8. The method of claim 1 , further comprising outputting an alert when the neural network predicts the occurrence of the hazardous event present in the road-scene data.

9. The method of claim 8 , wherein the alert is a graded alert corresponding to a degree of the predicted hazardous event.

10. The method of claim 1 , wherein the road-scene data includes road-scene video data.

11. The method of claim 1 , wherein the neural network is trained to identify one or more patterns preceding the hazardous event.

12. A system for predicting a hazardous event from road-scene data comprising:

an electronic control unit configured to implement a neural network; and

a camera communicatively coupled to the electronic control unit, wherein the camera generates the road-scene data, and wherein the electronic control unit is configured to:

receive the road-scene data from the camera;

input the road-scene data, gaze-tracking data, and physiological data into the neural network, the neural network is trained with training gaze-tracking data and training physiological data associated with road-scene training data;

predict, with the neural network, an occurrence of the hazardous event within the road-scene data from the camera;

determine, with the neural network, one or more salient portions of the predicted hazardous event and one or more risk-weights for the one or more salient portions based on the gaze-tracking data and the physiological data; and

output a graded alert corresponding to the one or more risk-weights and the predicted hazardous event.

13. The system of claim 12 , wherein the electronic control unit is further configured to:

generate, with the neural network, a risk-weighted saliency map based on the road-scene data.

14. The system of claim 12 , wherein the graded alert corresponds to a degree of the predicted hazardous event.

15. The system of claim 12 , wherein the neural network is trained to identify one or more patterns preceding the hazardous event.

16. The system of claim 12 , wherein the neural network is trained by the steps:

a) inputting the road-scene training data to the neural network, wherein the road-scene training data includes at least one sequence of an example hazardous event occurring in a road-scene;

b) identifying, with the neural network, one or more patterns of events present in the at least one sequence of the example hazardous event within the road-scene training data;

c) updating one or more parameters of the neural network in response to identifying the one or more patterns of events; and

d) repeating steps a-c one or more times, wherein the road-scene training data input during a first iteration of training of the neural network is different than a second iteration of training of the neural network.

17. The system of claim 12 , wherein the neural network is trained by:

a) inputting the road-scene training data to the neural network;

b) inputting the training gaze-tracking data associated with the road-scene training data into the neural network;

c) inputting the training physiological response data associated with the road-scene training data into the neural network;

d) evolving the neural network to determine one or more salient portions within the road-scene data based on the training gaze-tracking data;

e) evolving the neural network to determine one or more risk-weights for the one or more salient portions within the road-scene data based on the training physiological response data associated with the road-scene data; and

f) repeating steps a-e one or more times, wherein the road-scene training data input during a first iteration of training of the neural network is different than a second iteration of training of the neural network.

18. A vehicle comprising:

an electronic control unit configured to implement a neural network; and

a camera communicatively coupled to the electronic control unit, wherein the camera generates road-scene data, and wherein the electronic control unit is configured to:

receive the road-scene data from the camera;

input the road-scene data, gaze-tracking data, and physiological data into the neural network, the neural network is trained with training gaze-tracking data and training physiological data associated with road-scene training data;

predict, with the neural network, an occurrence of a hazardous event within the road-scene data from the camera;

determine, with the neural network, one or more salient portions of the predicted hazardous event and one or more risk-weights for the one or more salient portions based on the gaze-tracking data and the physiological data; and

output a graded alert corresponding to the one or more risk-weights and the predicted hazardous event.

Assignments (2)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jun 23, 2023
From: TOYOTA RESEARCH INSTITUTE, INC.
To: TOYOTA JIDOSHA KABUSHIKI KAISHA
Reel/Frame 064045/0175 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Apr 25, 2019
From: STENT, SIMON A.I.
To: TOYOTA RESEARCH INSTITUTE, INC.
Reel/Frame 048989/0984 →
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20200342303A1 · Oct 29, 2020