User interface for evaluating the quality of geospatial data
Graphical user interfaces (GUIs) for reviewing and evaluating geospatial data are provided. A GUI may allow a user to configure a geospatial data quality assessment system by grouping feature classes into one or more categories and selecting target quality scores for the overall data set and/or one or more categories. A GUI may display one or more review areas for a user to review and allow a user to generate one or more error calls in the review areas. A GUI may display one or more scores associated with a geospatial data set. A GUI may allow a user to modify to which category one or more feature classes are assigned. In response to an adjustment of one or more feature classes between categories, the user interfaces may display one or more updated quality scores associated with one or more categories.
1. A method for evaluating a geospatial data set, comprising:
at an electronic system with a display:
displaying a quality score for a geospatial data set, wherein the quality score for the geospatial data set corresponds to an error rate of the data set;
displaying one or more categories of selectable feature classes;
displaying a quality score for each of the one or more categories of selectable feature classes, wherein the quality score a category of selectable feature classes corresponds to an error rate of feature classes associated with a category;
receiving from a user a selection of a selectable feature class associated with a first category to be moved to a second category; and
displaying an updated quality score for the first category and the second category.
2. The method of claim 1 , comprising:
receiving from a user a target quality score for the geospatial data set;
indicating whether the quality score for the geospatial data set is greater than or equal to the target quality score for the geospatial data set.
3. The method of claim 1 , comprising:
receiving from a user one or more target quality scores for one or more categories of selectable feature classes; and
for each category of selectable feature classes, indicating whether the quality score for a category of selectable feature classes is greater than or equal to the target quality score associated with category.
4. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:
displaying one or more categories of error types; and
displaying, for each of the one or more categories of selectable feature classes, an amount of errors associated with each of the one or more categories of error types.
5. The method of claim 1 , further comprising displaying an updated amount of errors associated with each of the one or more categories of error types for the first category and the second category.
6. The method of claim 1 , wherein each of the one or more categories corresponds to a level of relevance to an intended use of the geospatial data set.
7. A system for evaluating a geospatial data set, comprising:
a display;
one or more processors;
memory; and
one or more programs, wherein the one or more programs are stored in the memory and configured to be executed by the one or more processors, the one or more programs including instructions for:
displaying a quality score for a geospatial data set, wherein the quality for the geospatial data set corresponds to an error rate of the data set;
displaying one or more categories of selectable feature classes;
displaying a quality score for each of the one or more categories of selectable feature classes, wherein the quality score a category of selectable feature classes corresponds to an error rate of feature classes associated with a category;
receiving from a user a selection of a selectable feature class associated with a first category to be moved to a second category; and
displaying an updated quality score for the first category and the second category.