IP Library › Granted Patent US 12,293,292
Granted Patent B2
US 12,293,292 · App. 16/429,856 · Granted May 6, 2025

Multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO) detector selection using neural network

Inventors: Hyukjoon Kwon (San Diego, CA); Shailesh Chaudhari (San Diego, CA); Kee-Bong Song (San Diego, CA)
Assignee: Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd
G06N3/084G06F16/285G06N3/04
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,293,292
App. No.
16/429,856
Filed
Jun 3, 2019
Granted
May 6, 2025
Kind
B2
Examiner
VO, TED T
Art Unit
2191
USPC
706/25
Abstract

A method and system for multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO) detector selection using a neural network is herein disclosed. According to one embodiment, a method includes generating a labelled dataset of features and detector labels, training a multi-layer perceptron (MLP) network using the generated labelled dataset, and selecting a detector class from a plurality of detector classes based on outputs of the trained MLP network.

Claims (39)

1. A method of using a multi-layer perceptron (MLP) network to select a low-complexity, reliable detector, the method comprising:

receiving a signal vector and a multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO) channel matrix of resource elements (REs);

extracting channel features from the signal vector and the MIMO channel matrix;

generating a labelled dataset of the channel features and detector labels for each of the RE;

training the MLP network using the generated labelled dataset;

computing a margin associated with a maximum output value from the MLP network, wherein the computed margin is determined based on a conditional probability of detector error being less than or equal to a probability threshold value;

selecting, for an RE, a detector class from a plurality of detector classes based on a difference between the maximum output value from the MLP network and a second output value from the MLP network being less than the computed margin; and

detecting symbols in the RE using a MIMO detector corresponding to the selected detector class.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the labelled dataset is generated based on a log-likelihood ratio (LLR) sign.

3. The method of claim 2 , wherein the labelled dataset is further generated based on an LLR magnitude.

4. The method of claim 1 , further comprising merging classes of the plurality of detector classes based on the generated labelled dataset.

5. The method of claim 4 , wherein merging classes further comprises merging samples in a first class of the plurality of classes into a second class of the plurality of classes, wherein the second class includes fewer samples than the first class.

6. The method of claim 1 , wherein selecting the detector class further comprises minimizing a probability of detector error.

7. The method of claim 1 , wherein the channel features include at least one of eigenvalues of a channel, diagonal values of a channel matrix, and an inner product of received signals and the channel.

8. A system using a multi-layer perceptron (MLP) network to select a low-complexity, reliable detector, the system comprising:

a plurality of detectors, each of the detectors associated with a detector class from a plurality of detector classes;

a memory; and

a processor configured to:

receive a signal vector and a multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO) channel matrix of resource elements (REs);

extract channel features from the signal vector and the MIMO channel matrix;

generate a labelled dataset of the channel features and detector labels for each of the RE;

train the MLP network using the generated labelled dataset;

compute a margin associated with a maximum output value from the MLP network, wherein the computed margin is determined based on a conditional probability of detector error being less than or equal to a probability threshold value;

select, for an RE, a detector class from the plurality of detector classes based on a difference between the maximum output value from the MLP network and a second output value from the MLP network being less than the computed margin; and

detect symbols in the RE using a MIMO detector corresponding to the selected detector class.

9. The system of claim 8 , wherein the labelled dataset is generated based on a log-likelihood ratio (LLR) sign.

10. The system of claim 9 , wherein the labelled dataset is further generated based on an LLR magnitude.

11. The system of claim 8 , wherein the processor is further configured to merge classes of the plurality of detector classes based on the generated labelled dataset.

12. The system of claim 11 , wherein the processor is further configured to merge samples in a first class of the plurality of classes into a second class of the plurality of classes, wherein the second class includes fewer samples than the first class.

13. The system of claim 8 , wherein the processor is further configured to select the detector class by minimizing a probability of detector error.

14. A method of using a multi-layer perceptron (MLP) network to select a low-complexity, reliable detector, the method comprising:

receiving a signal vector and a multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO) channel matrix of resource elements (REs);

extracting channel features from the signal vector and the MIMO channel matrix;

generating a labelled dataset of the channel features and detector labels for each of the RE;

merging classes of a plurality of detector classes based on the generated labelled dataset;

training the MLP network using the generated labelled dataset;

computing a margin associated with a maximum output value from the MLP network, wherein the computed margin is determined based on a conditional probability of detector error being less than or equal to a probability threshold value;

selecting, for an RE, a detector class from the merged plurality of detector classes based on a difference between the maximum output value from the MLP network and a second output value from the MLP network being less than the computed margin; and

detecting symbols in the RE using a MIMO detector corresponding to the selected detector class.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jul 11, 2019
From: KWON, HYUKJOON; CHAUDHARI, SHAILESH; SONG, KEE-BONG
To: SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD.
Reel/Frame 049726/0331 →
Continuity (2)
Provisional Application 62817372 · Mar 12, 2019
Related Publication 20200293894A1 · Sep 17, 2020
References Cited (21)
US 8040959B2 · Waters et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 8638887B1 · Choi et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 9674003B2 · Kant et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 10594729B2 · Kraenzel · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 10637544B1 · Shattil · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 10756790B2 · Shattil · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 10892806B2 · O'Shea · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20100027703A1 · Yeh et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20190273510A1 · Elkind · 2019 [cited by examiner]
Samuel et al., “Deep MIMO Detection” 2017, IEEE , 5 pages. (Year: 2017). [cited by examiner]
Yoon et al., “Implementation of Low-Complexity MIMO Detector and Efficient Soft-Output Demapper for MIMO-OFDM-based Wireless LAN Systems”, 2013, Springer, pp. 1-7. (Year: 2013). [cited by examiner]
Rusek et al., “Scaling up MIMO: Opportunities and Challenges with Very Large Arrays”, 2012, download from https://arxiv.org/ , 30 pages. (Year: 2012). [cited by examiner]
Suh et al., “Reduced-Complexity MIMO Detection via a Slicing Breadth-First Tree Search”, 2017, IEEE, pp. 1536-1276. (Year: 2017). [cited by examiner]
Bertrand M. Hochwald et al., “Achieving Near-Capacity on a Multiple-Antenna Channel”, Aug. 6, 2001, 28 pages. [cited by applicant]
Jungwon Lee et al., “MIMO Maximum Likelihood Soft Demodulation Based on Dimension Reduction”, Globecom 2010, Dec. 8, 2010, 18 pages. [cited by applicant]
Mojtaba Rahmati et al., “Low Complexity Soft Detection of High Order QAM with Prior Information”, IEEE Xplore, 2015, 5 pages. [cited by applicant]
Shailesh Chaudhari et al., “Reliable and Low-Complexity MIMO Detector Selection using Neural Network”, Oct. 11, 2019, 8 pages. [cited by applicant]
3GPP, 3rd Genertion Partnership Project; Technical Specification Group Radio Access Network; NR; Physical Channels and Modulation (Release 15), 3GPP TS 38.211 V15.2.0, Jun. 2018, 91 pages. [cited by applicant]
Juquan Mao et al., “A Low Complexity 256QAM Soft demapper for 5G Mobile System”, Conference Paper, ResearchGate, Jun. 2016, 6 pages. [cited by applicant]
3GPP, 3rd Generation Partnership Project; Technical Specification Group Radio Access Network; NR; Physical Layer Procedures for Data (Relase 15), 3GPP TS 38.214 V15.2.0, Jun. 2018, 95 pages. [cited by applicant]
Roberto Battiti, “Using Mutual Information for Selecting Features in Supervised Neural Net Learning”, IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, Jul. 1994, 14 pages. [cited by applicant]