IP Library Granted Patent US 10,801,640
Granted Patent B2
US 10,801,640 · App. 16/458,968 · Granted Oct 13, 2020

Overfill prevention valve with remote testing

Inventors: Justin F. Kuehn (Sun Prairie, WI); Michael Christopherson (Monona, WI)
Assignee: Franklin Fueling Systems, LLC
F16K31/18B67D7/365G01M99/008
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 10,801,640
App. No.
16/458,968
Granted
Oct 13, 2020
Kind
B2
Abstract

An overfill-prevention valve system includes a testing mechanism, operable by a user from the inlet end of the drop tube, which can be used to verify proper valve function without actually filling the storage tank. The testing mechanism allows the user to actuate the valve manually using a test probe, such as by elevating a float to simulate a full storage tank. The testing mechanism may be located upstream of the valve to facilitate the testing operation without interfering with the valve body. The mechanism may further provide non-contact functionality, such as with magnetic actuators on either side of the drop tube wall, to eliminate a potential test mechanism leak points. The test probe used to actuate the test mechanism may be shaped to define a desired rotational position at the test location within the drop tube, ensuring proper rotational alignment of the magnetic actuators.

Claims (33)

1. A method of testing an overfill prevention valve, the method comprising:

accessing an inlet end of a conduit, the conduit having an outlet end opposite the inlet end and a valve disposed between the inlet end and the outlet end, the conduit having test portion defining a non-round cross-sectional conduit geometry;

advancing a distal portion of a test probe into the conduit, the distal portion having a non-round cross-sectional probe geometry corresponding to the conduit geometry, such that rotation of the distal portion of the test probe after the advancing step is substantially prohibited;

positioning the distal portion of the test probe into the test portion of the conduit by aligning the distal portion probe geometry with the corresponding conduit geometry;

by said step of positioning the distal portion of the test probe, bringing an interior non-contact coupler fixed to the distal portion of the test probe into a force transferring relationship with an exterior non-contact coupler fixed to a non-contact test mechanism disposed outside the conduit and operably coupled to the valve,

the non-contact test mechanism axially moveable along an outer surface of the conduit between a test position, in which the non-contact test mechanism urges the valve toward a closed position, and a service position, in which the non-contact test mechanism allows the valve to be placed in an open position; and

axially moving the interior non-contact coupler to toggle the non-contact test mechanism between the test position and the service position, such that the valve is selectively moved toward the closed or open positions.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein said step of toggling is performed by axially advancing the interior non-contact coupler through a test stroke within the conduit.

3. The method of claim 2 , wherein said step of toggling is performed by moving the distal portion of the test probe through the test stroke.

4. The method of claim 2 , wherein said step of toggling is performed by actuating a toggle mechanism contained within the distal portion of the test probe.

5. The method of claim 1 , wherein the non-round cross-sectional conduit geometry is sized and configured to prevent rotation of the distal portion of the probe when the non-round cross-sectional probe geometry is engaged therewith.

6. The method of claim 5 , wherein the non-round cross-sectional conduit geometry includes an arrangement of protrusions which interact with the side walls of the non-round cross-sectional probe geometry to prevent the rotation.

7. The method of claim 1 , wherein the non-round cross-sectional conduit geometry is a first mushroom shape and the non-round cross-sectional probe geometry is a second mushroom shape.

8. The method of claim 1 , wherein the interior non-contact coupler and the exterior non-contact coupler are magnets of opposite polarity.

9. The method of claim 8 , wherein the step of bringing the interior non-contact coupler into a force transferring relationship with an exterior non-contact coupler comprises placing the magnets into adjacency with one another.

10. The method of claim 9 , wherein the magnets are rare-earth magnets separated by less than one inch when the magnets are in the adjacency with one another, such that the magnetic attraction force between the magnets is sufficiently strong to toggle the non-contact test mechanism between the test position and the service position.

11. The method of claim 1 , further comprising, after the step of advancing the distal portion of a test probe into the conduit and before the step of positioning the distal portion of the test probe into the test portion of the conduit:

if the non-round cross-sectional probe geometry is misaligned with the non-round cross-sectional conduit geometry, rotating the distal portion of the test probe to align the distal portion probe geometry with the corresponding conduit geometry.

12. The method of claim 11 , wherein the step of rotating the distal portion of the test probe is achieved by rotating a proximal rod connected to the distal test probe.

13. The method of claim 1 , wherein the conduit is a drop tube, and the non-contact test mechanism is a magnetically-operable valve actuator which urges the valve into a closed position blocking the fluid path through the drop tube.

14. A method of testing an overfill prevention valve, the method comprising:

accessing an inlet end of a conduit having an outlet end opposite the inlet end with a valve disposed between the inlet end and the outlet end, the conduit having a non-round cross-sectional conduit geometry;

aligning a non-round portion of a test probe with the non-round cross-sectional conduit geometry;

advancing non-round test probe portion into the conduit, the non-round test probe portion keyed to the non-round cross-sectional conduit geometry such that the test probe is retained in a predetermined rotational relationship with the conduit when the test probe portion is received in the conduit;

bringing an interior non-contact coupler fixed to the test probe into a force transferring relationship with an exterior non-contact coupler fixed to a test mechanism disposed outside the conduit and operably coupled to the valve,

the non-contact test mechanism axially moveable along an outer surface of the conduit between a test position, in which the non-contact test mechanism urges the valve toward a closed position, and a service position, in which the non-contact test mechanism allows the valve to be placed in an open position; and

axially moving the interior non-contact coupler to toggle the non-contact test mechanism between the test position and the service position, such that the valve is selectively moved toward the closed or open positions.

15. The method of claim 14 , wherein the non-round cross-sectional conduit geometry includes an arrangement of protrusions which interact with side walls of the non-round cross-sectional probe geometry to prevent the rotation.

16. The method of claim 15 , wherein the non-round cross-sectional conduit geometry is a first mushroom shape and the non-round cross-sectional probe geometry is a second mushroom shape.

17. The method of claim 14 , wherein the interior non-contact coupler and the exterior non-contact coupler are magnets of opposite polarity.

18. The method of claim 17 , wherein the step of bringing the interior non-contact coupler into a force transferring relationship with an exterior non-contact coupler comprises placing the magnets into adjacency with one another.

19. The method of claim 18 , wherein the magnets are rare-earth magnets separated by less than one inch when the magnets are in the adjacency with one another, such that the magnetic attraction force between the magnets is sufficiently strong to toggle the non-contact test mechanism between the test position and the service position.

20. The method of claim 14 , wherein the conduit is a drop tube, and the non-contact test mechanism is a magnetically-operable valve actuator which urges the valve into a closed position blocking the fluid path through the drop tube.

Assignments (2)
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Oct 12, 2020
From: FRANKLIN FUELING SYSTEMS, INC.
To: FRANKLIN FUELING SYSTEMS, LLC
Reel/Frame 054047/0751 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Sep 4, 2020
From: KEUHN, JUSTIN F.; CHRISTOPHERSON, MICHAEL
To: FRANKLIN FUELING SYSTEMS, INC.
Reel/Frame 053693/0089 →
Continuity (3)
Division 14588710 · Jan 2, 2015
Provisional Application 61923324 · Jan 3, 2014
Related Publication 20190323624A1 · Oct 24, 2019