Automation logic to proactively isolate layer 1 faults in a leased unmonitored network
A comprehensive integrated system and method includes (i) proactively monitoring a network for degraded service and to proactively make repairs to components before service outages, (ii) identifying the root causes of hard alarms and failures on a layer 1 transport network and generate trouble tickets; and (iii) after repair, verifying that repaired backbone network meets or exceeds performance criteria of Service Level Agreements (SLAs) with customers. A method includes surveilling first equipment in a network wherein the first equipment is in a controlled portion of the network, observing a set of messages wherein the set of messages relate to second equipment in a leased portion of the network, and detecting a fault in the network based on the surveilling step or the observing step. A fault based on the observing step includes the steps of receiving a first message at a first server indicating that a fault was detected in a portion of a leased network, receiving a second message at a second server indicating that the fault was detected in a portion of the leased network, and isolating the fault based on the first message and the second message.
1. A method comprising:
surveilling first equipment in a network wherein the first equipment is in a controlled portion of the network;
observing a set of messages wherein the set of messages relate to second equipment in a leased portion of the network; and
detecting a fault in the network based on the observing step; wherein the fault is detected based on the observing step and wherein the observing step includes receiving a first message at a first server indicating that a fault was detected in a portion of a leased network wherein the first server is upstream of the leased network, receiving a second message at a second server indicating that the fault was detected in a portion of the leased network wherein the second server is downstream of the leased network, and isolating the fault based on the first message and the second message.
2. The method of claim 1 wherein the fault is detected based on the surveilling step and wherein the surveilling step includes monitoring a power level of a laser.
3. The method of claim 1 wherein the fault is detected based on the surveilling step and wherein the surveilling step includes identifying a power level of a laser being outside of a threshold.
4. The method of claim 1 wherein the fault is detected based on the surveilling step and wherein the surveilling step determines a degradation in performance.
5. The method of claim 1 further comprising verifying that after repairs, the network meets pre-determined performance metrics.
6. The method of claim 5 wherein the verifying step includes measuring that Performance Monitoring Data Digital Errors are below pre-determined thresholds and that there is an increase in ethernet traffic.
7. The method of claim 1 wherein the first message is a Line Alarm Indication Signal (LAIS) message and the second message is a first Path Alarm Indication Signal (PAIS) message and the isolating step identifies the fault occurred in a portion of the leased network upstream of the second server.
8. The method of claim 7 method further comprising receiving a third message at the first server and wherein the third message is a Path Remote Detect Indication (“PRDI”) message and the isolating step identifies the fault between the first server and the second server.
9. The method of claim 1 wherein the first message is a Path Alarm Indication Signal (PAIS) message and the second message is a Path Remote Detect Indication (“PRDI”) message, and further comprising receiving a third message at the first server, the third message being a Line Alarm Indication Signal (LAIS) message, and wherein the isolating step identifies the fault between the first server and a line terminating equipment point in the leased network.