IP Library Granted Patent US 12,358,088
Granted Patent B2
US 12,358,088 · App. 16/566,031 · Granted Jul 15, 2025

Laser-transmitting tooling

Inventors: Deepak V M Ravindra (Kalamazoo, MI); Sai Kumar Kode (Kalamazoo, MI)
Assignee: Micro-LAM, Inc.
B23P25/006B23B1/00B23B27/14B23C5/16B23K26/064B23K26/0648B23B2226/31B23B2260/092B23C2226/31B23C2260/56B23K26/0093
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,358,088
App. No.
16/566,031
Granted
Jul 15, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

A laser-transmitting machining tool is disclosed. The laser-transmitting machining tool has a plurality of faces including an entrance face, a rake face, a flank face connected to the rake face, a rake side face extending between the entrance face and the rake face, and a flank side face extending between the entrance face and the flank face. The connection of the rake face to the flank face defines a cutting edge. The rake face extends away from the rake side face to define a rake angle. The entrance face is configured to receive and refract a laser beam to the rake face, the flank face, and the cutting edge for causing the laser beam to refract into and heat the workpiece at a compression region extending proximate at least the rake face and a tensile region extending proximate the flank face.

Claims (50)

1. A method comprising:

providing a plurality of workpieces, wherein each workpiece of the plurality of workpieces includes a body defined by a material having a machinable surface defined by: (A) a compressive region having a compressive quality; and (B) a tensile region having a tensile quality, wherein:

the compressive quality is stronger than the tensile quality of at least a first workpiece of the plurality of workpieces; and

the tensile quality is stronger than the compressive quality of at least a second workpiece of the plurality of workpieces;

selecting a workpiece from the plurality of workpieces, wherein the material of the selected workpiece is different from the material of one or more unselected workpieces of the plurality of workpieces;

configuring a plurality of opto-mechanical tools, wherein each opto-mechanical tool of the plurality of opto-mechanical tools has a tool body configured for machining: (A) the compressive region of the machinable surface of the selected workpiece having the compressive quality; and (B) the tensile region of the machinable surface of the selected workpiece having the tensile quality, wherein the tool body of the configured opto-mechanical tool includes a light beam entrance end and a light beam exit end, wherein the light beam exit end includes: (A) a cutting edge; (B) a rake face extending toward the cutting edge at a rake angle that corresponds to the compressive quality of the compressive region of the machinable surface of the selected workpiece; and (C) a flank face extending toward the cutting edge at a flank angle that corresponds to the tensile quality of the tensile region of the machinable surface of the selected workpiece;

selecting an opto-mechanical tool from the plurality of opto-mechanical tools, wherein the rake angle of the selected opto-mechanical tool is a midrange rake angle that is greater than about 136° and less than about 165° that is configured for machining the selected workpiece, wherein the selected workpiece is an inorganic compound selected from the group consisting of zinc selenide, zinc sulfide, calcium fluoride, barium fluoride, and tungsten carbide;

connecting the selected opto-mechanical tool to a tool housing;

arranging the rake face and the flank face adjacent the machinable surface of the selected workpiece for machining the machinable surface of the selected workpiece;

imparting a compressive force to the compressive region of the machinable surface of the selected workpiece;

imparting a tensile force to the tensile region of the machinable surface of the selected workpiece; and

transmitting a light beam through the tool body of the selected opto-mechanical tool from the light beam entrance end of the selected opto-mechanical tool to the light beam exit end of the selected opto-mechanical tool;

refracting the light beam into the machinable surface of the selected workpiece; and

directing the light beam out of the light beam exit end at:

the rake face of the selected opto-mechanical tool and into the machinable surface of the selected workpiece along the compressive region of the machinable surface of the selected workpiece; and

the flank face of the selected opto-mechanical tool and into the machinable surface of the selected workpiece along the tensile region of the machinable surface of the selected workpiece,

wherein the step of directing the light beam further includes:

selectively adjusting one or more of light beam biasing knobs of a plurality of light beam biasing knobs that are connected to the tool housing for biasing the light beam with a selective bias including one of:

a rake bias of the light beam for

selectively biasing the light beam toward the rake face; and

a flank bias of the light beam for

selectively biasing the light beam toward the flank face.

2. The method of claim 1 , further comprising, while machining the machinable surface of the selected workpiece:

directing a fluid, slurry, or etchant from a reservoir, then out of a nozzle, and then upon the light beam exit end of the selected opto-mechanical tool, wherein the fluid, slurry, or etchant is a heat activated fluid or a laser-activated fluid;

chemically reacting the fluid, slurry, or etchant in response to being subjected to heat or exposure to the light beam, wherein the light beam is a laser beam; and

after chemical reaction of the fluid, slurry, or etchant, and, as a result of arranging the rake face and the flank face adjacent the machinable surface of the selected workpiece:

increasing a removal rate of the material from the machinable surface of the selected workpiece.

3. The method of claim 1 further comprising:

providing an anti-reflective coating over the light beam entrance end.

4. The method of claim 1 further comprising:

weakening molecular bonds of the material in the compressive region of the workpiece for

reducing a hardness of the material for

removing some of the material from the machinable surface of the selected workpiece along the compressive region for defining a machined portion of the machinable surface of the selected workpiece.

5. The method of claim 4 further comprising:

promoting, with the rake face arranged adjacent to the machinable surface of the selected workpiece: (A) plastic deformation; (B) thermal softening; and (C) removal of some of the material from the machinable surface of the selected workpiece along the compressive region.

6. The method of claim 4 further comprising:

annealing the machined portion of the machinable surface extending along the tensile region of the selected workpiece after some of the material was removed from the machinable surface by the rake face of the selected opto-mechanical tool.

7. The method of claim 4 further comprising:

minimizing subsurface damage in the tensile region of the selected workpiece after some of the material was removed from the machinable surface by the rake face of the selected opto-mechanical tool.

8. The method of claim 4 further comprising:

eliminating post-processing polishing of the selected workpiece after some of the material was removed from the machinable surface by the rake face of the selected opto-mechanical tool.

9. The method of claim 1 , wherein the rake angle of one or more unselected opto-mechanical tools of the plurality of opto-mechanical tools is a highly negative rake angle that is greater than about 90° and less than about 135°.

10. The method of claim 1 , wherein the rake angle of one or more unselected opto-mechanical tools of the plurality of opto-mechanical tools is a low-range negative rake angle that is greater than about 166° and less than about 179°.

11. The method of claim 1 , wherein the rake angle of one or more unselected opto-mechanical tools of the plurality of opto-mechanical tools is a zero rake angle that is approximately 180°.

12. The method of claim 11 , wherein the material of an unselected workpiece of the one or more unselected workpieces is a common metal including aluminum, wherein the tensile quality of the tensile region of the common metal stronger than the compressive quality of the compressive region of the common metal.

13. The method of claim 1 , wherein the rake angle of one or more unselected opto-mechanical tools of the plurality of opto-mechanical tools is a positive rake angle that is greater than about 175° and less than about 190°.

14. The method of claim 13 , wherein the material of an unselected workpiece of the one or more unselected workpieces is a metal alloy selected from the group consisting of steel and stainless steel, wherein the tensile quality of the tensile region of the metal alloy is stronger than the compressive quality of the compressive region of the metal alloy.

15. The method of claim 1 , wherein the rake angle of one or more unselected opto-mechanical tools of the plurality of opto-mechanical tools is a positive rake angle that is greater than about 181° and less than about 210°.

16. The method of claim 1 , wherein the material of an unselected workpiece of the one or more unselected workpieces is a polymer including a plastic material.

17. The method of claim 1 , wherein the material of an unselected workpiece of the one or more unselected workpieces is a vertebrate tissue including bone or teeth.

Assignments (2)
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Jan 28, 2025
From: MICRO-LAM, INC.
To: COMERICA BANK
Reel/Frame 070024/0668 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Sep 11, 2019
From: RAVINDRA, DEEPAK VM; KODE, SAI KUMAR
To: MICRO-LAM, INC.
Reel/Frame 050345/0508 →
Continuity (3)
Continuation 15653019 · Jul 18, 2017
Provisional Application 62363448 · Jul 18, 2016
Related Publication 20200016707A1 · Jan 16, 2020
References Cited (28)
US 3764195A · Blank et al. · 1973 [cited by applicant]
US 4229640A · Castellani Longo · 1980 [cited by examiner]
US 4839250A · Cowan · 1989 [cited by applicant]
US 5859405A · Golz · 1999 [cited by examiner]
US 6185019B1 · Hobbs et al. · 2001 [cited by applicant]
US 7002100B2 · Wu et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 8053705B2 · Shin · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 8933366B2 · Patten · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 10183337B2 · Patten · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20040104207A1 · Wu et al. · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 20060101858A1 · Fujii · 2006 [cited by examiner]
US 20060120816A1 · Morimoto · 2006 [cited by examiner]
US 20100065536A1 · Patten · 2010 [cited by examiner]
US 20150217418A1 · Yamashida · 2015 [cited by examiner]
US 20170120345A1 · Patten et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170157712A1 · Doany et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20190375059A1 · Holme et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
Morris et al., Origins of the Ductile Regime in Single-Point Diamond Turning of Semiconductors, 1995. (Year: 1995). [cited by examiner]
Calctool, www.calctool.org/calc/phys/optics/f_na, 2016 (Year: 2016). [cited by examiner]
Rozzi et al., Transient, three-dimensional heat transfer model for the laser assisted machining of silicon nitride: II. Assessment of parametric effects, IJHMT 43, 2000, pp. 1425-1437 (Year: 2000). [cited by examiner]
Ravindra et al., Ductile mode material removal and high-pressure phase transformation in silicon during micro-laser assisted machining, Precision Engineering, pp. 364-367, 2012 (Year: 2012). [cited by examiner]
Maranhao et al., Residual Stresses in Machining Using Fem Analysis—A Review, Rev. Adv. Mater. Sci. 30 (2012), pp. 267-272 (Year: 2012). [cited by examiner]
Mohammadi et al., Experimental work on micro laser-assisted diamond turning of silicon (111), Journal of Manufacturing Processes 19 (2015) 125-128 (Year: 2015). [cited by examiner]
Che et al., Machining of Carbon Fiber Reinforced Plastics/Polymers: A Literature Review, J. Manuf. Sci. Eng. Jun. 2014, 136(3): 034001 (Year: 2014). [cited by examiner]
Little, Evaluating design margin, edge of failure and process, BioPharm International, Issue 9, pp. 46-49, 2014 (Year: 2014). [cited by examiner]
European Search Report for Application No. 17831697.2 dated Mar. 13, 2020. [cited by applicant]
Hossein Mohammadi et al: “Experimental work on micro laser-assisted diamond turning of silicon (111)”, Journal of Manufacturing Processes, vol. 19, Aug. 1, 2015 (Aug. 1, 2015), pp. 125-128, XP055672060, US ISSN: 1526-61… [cited by applicant]
Deepak Ravindra et al: “Ductile mode material removal and high-pressure phase transformation in silicon during micro-laser assisted machining”, Precision Engineering, Elsevier, Amsterdam, NL, vol. 36, No. 2, Dec. 27, 20… [cited by applicant]