IP Library Patent Application 16588985
Patent Application
App. No. 16/588,985

SYSTEMS AND METHODS TO PROVIDE TRAINING GUIDANCE

Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US None
App. No.
16/588,985
Abstract

Systems and methods to provide a training solution for a trainee are disclosed. In some embodiments the method comprises receiving a training requirement comprising a training outcome and a training configuration wherein the training configuration defines a trainee state, determining a training environment based on a relevancy function of the training environment to the training outcome, determining a training content based on a relationship function of the training content to the trainee state and determining a training solution comprising the training environment and the training content. In some embodiments, the relationship function comprises a POMDP model and the relevancy function comprises a best fit curve.

Claims (73)

1 . A computer based method to determine a training solution for a trainee, the method comprising:

receiving a training requirement comprising a training outcome and a training configuration;

the training configuration defining a trainee state;

determining a training environment based on a relevancy function of the training environment to the training outcome;

determining a training content based on a relationship function of the training content to the trainee state; and

determining a training solution comprising the training environment and the training content.

2 . The computer based method of claim 1 wherein:

the training outcome is selected from a plurality of predetermined training outcomes;

the relevancy function defining a relevancy value for each of the predetermined training outcomes to each of a plurality of the training environments; and

determining the training environment based on a relevancy function of the training environment to the training outcome comprises selecting the training environment having the highest relevancy value to the training outcome.

3 . The computer based method of claim 2 wherein the step of selecting the training outcome from a plurality of predetermined training outcomes comprises:

selecting the training configuration from a list of predetermined training configurations;

and

each of the predetermined training configurations having a relevancy value to each of the plurality of training outcomes whereby selecting the training configuration selects the training outcome.

4 . The computer based method of claim 2 wherein the relevancy function comprises a best fit curve.

5 . The computer based method of claim 2 wherein the training requirement comprises one selected from a group of predetermined training requirements consisting of:

a platform;

a role and experience;

a training type; and

an experience.

6 . The computer based method of claim 2 wherein the training outcome comprises one selected from a group of predetermined training requirements consisting of:

a competency;

a knowledge and skill; and

a training content.

7 . The computer based method of claim 2 further comprising:

receiving a performance value of the training solution; and

updating the relevancy function using a machine learning technique and the performance value.

8 . The computer based method of claim 1 wherein:

the training configuration is selected from a plurality of predetermined training configurations;

the relationship function defining a relationship value for each of the predetermined training configurations to each of a plurality of the training contents; and

determining the training content based on a relationship function of the training content to the training configurations comprises selecting the training content having the highest relationship value to the training configuration.

9 . The computer based method of claim 8 wherein:

the highest relationship value to the training configuration is defined by the relationship function of the training content and the training configuration; and

the relationship function comprises a POMDP model.

10 . The computer based method of claim 8 further comprising:

receiving a performance value of the training solution; and

updating the relationship function using a machine learning technique and the performance value.

11 . The computer based method of claim 3 further comprising:

receiving a performance value of the training solution; and

updating the relevancy function using a machine learning technique and the performance value; and

updating the relevancy function using a machine learning technique and the performance value;

wherein the relevancy function comprises a best fit curve;

wherein the relationship function defining a relationship value for each of the predetermined training configurations to each of a plurality of the training contents;

wherein determining the training content based on a relationship function of the training content to the training configurations comprises selecting the training content having the highest relationship value to the training configuration;

wherein the highest relationship value to the training configuration is defined by relationship function of the training content and the training configuration; and

wherein the relationship function comprises a POMDP model.

12 . A computer based method to determine a training content for a trainee, the method comprising:

receiving a training requirement comprising a training outcome and a training configuration;

the training configuration defining a trainee state; and

determining a training content based on a relationship function of the training content to the trainee state.

13 . The computer based method of claim 12 wherein:

the training configuration is selected from a plurality of predetermined training configurations;

the relationship function defining a relationship value for each of the predetermined training configurations to each of a plurality of the training contents; and

determining the training content based on a relationship function of the training content to the training configurations comprises selecting the training content having the highest relationship value to the training configuration.

14 . The computer based method of claim 12 wherein:

the highest relationship value to the training configuration is defined by relationship function of the training content and the training configuration; and

the relevancy function comprises a POMDP model.

15 . The computer based method of claim 12 further comprising:

receiving a performance value of the training solution; and

updating the relevancy function using a machine learning technique and the performance value.

16 . The computer based method of claim 12 further comprising:

receiving a trainee performance value of the trainee;

one of the plurality of predetermined training configurations comprising a trainee state;

and

updating the trainee state to an updated trainee state using the relevancy function and the trainee performance value.

17 . A training guidance system for determining a training solution, the training guidance system comprising:

a processor;

a non-transitory computer readable medium having a computer readable program code embodied therein, said computer readable program code configured to be executed to implement a method comprising:

receiving a training requirement comprising a training outcome and a training configuration;

the training configuration defining a trainee state;

determining a training environment based on a relevancy function of the training environment to the training outcome;

determining a training content based on a relationship function of the training content to the trainee state; and

determining a training solution comprising the training environment and the training content.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Oct 23, 2019
From: MARC, YALE; POEPPELMAN, TIFFANY; SWANSON, LEAH; KEENEY, MICHAEL; WARD, DANIELLE; CARLIN, ALAN; GARRITY, MICHAEL; REYNOLDS, KRISTY
To: APTIMA, INC.
Reel/Frame 050798/0448 →