IP Library › Granted Patent US 10,762,255
Granted Patent B2
US 10,762,255 · App. 16/618,197 · Granted Sep 1, 2020

Refinement of finite element model of integrally bladed disk

Inventors: Drew M. Feiner (New Orleans, LA); Jerry H. Griffin (Dunedin, FL)
Assignee: Blade Diagnostices Corporation
G06F30/23G01M7/025G06F30/17G01M15/14
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 10,762,255
App. No.
16/618,197
Granted
Sep 1, 2020
Kind
B2
Abstract

A reduced order model of an integrally bladed turbine disk (IBD) is used with experimental vibrational test data to modify a finite element model (FEM) of the IBD so that the FEM more accurately predicts the vibrational mistuning of the disk. The refined FEM can be used to evaluate a proposed modification of the IBD before the hardware is actually modified, and to evaluate the actual modification if there is a difference between the proposed and actual modifications.

Claims (36)

1. A method comprising using a reduced order model of a component and vibratory test data of the component to refine a finite element model of the component, wherein the component is an integrally bladed disk (IBD), further comprising:

measuring dimensions of the IBD;

constructing a geometrically mistuned finite element model of the IBD to reflect the measured dimensions;

obtaining a reduced order model of the IBD reflecting characteristics of the IBD output from the geometrically mistuned finite element model;

measuring an actual vibratory response of the IBD;

using the actual vibratory response as input to the reduced order model to calculate a residual mistuning of the IBD not predicted by the geometrically mistuned finite element model; and

refining the geometrically mistuned finite element model to reduce the residual mistuning.

2. The method of claim 1 , further comprising using the refined finite element model to evaluate a proposed modification of the component.

3. The method of claim 1 , wherein the step of refining the geometrically mistuned finite element model comprises changing a density of a segment in the geometrically mistuned finite element model.

4. The method of claim 1 , wherein the step of refining the geometrically mistuned finite element model comprises changing a dimension of a segment in the geometrically mistuned finite element model.

5. The method of claim 1 , wherein the step of refining the geometrically mistuned finite element model comprises changing a modulus of a segment in the geometrically mistuned finite element model.

6. The method of claim 1 , further comprising using the refined geometrically mistuned finite element model to evaluate a change in geometry of the IBD.

7. The method of claim 1 , further comprising using the refined geometrically mistuned finite element model to evaluate a change in geometry of the IBD before the change is actually implemented on the IBD.

8. The method of claim 7 , wherein the change in geometry is a blend, and further comprising:

proposing the blend in the IBD;

using the refined geometrically mistuned finite element model to evaluate the IBD with the proposed blend; and

implementing the proposed blend in the IBD only if the evaluation of the IBD with the proposed blend is acceptable.

9. A method comprising using a reduced order model of a component and vibratory test data of the component to refine a finite element model of the component, wherein the component is an integrally bladed disk (IBD), further comprising:

measuring a vibration signature of the IBD responsive to an excitation;

calculating mistuned blade frequencies of the IBD using the vibration signature as an input to a reduced order model of the IBD;

calculating mistuned blade frequencies of the IBD using a finite element model of the IBD;

comparing the mistuned blade frequencies of the IBD calculated with the reduced order model and the mistuned blade frequencies of the IBD calculated with the finite element model to determine a residual mistuning; and

refining the finite element model to reduce the residual mistuning.

10. The method of claim 9 , wherein the step of refining the finite element model comprises changing a density of a segment in the finite element model.

11. The method of claim 9 , wherein the step of refining the finite element model comprises changing a dimension of a segment in the finite element model.

12. The method of claim 9 , wherein the step of refining the finite element model comprises changing a modulus of a segment in the finite element model.

13. The method of claim 9 , further comprising:

constructing a geometrically mistuned finite element model of the IBD to reflect measured dimensions of the IBD;

using the geometrically mistuned finite element model in the step of calculating mistuned blade frequencies of the IBD using the finite element model; and

refining the geometrically mistuned finite element model to reduce the residual mistuning.

14. The method of claim 9 , further comprising using the refined finite element model to evaluate a change in geometry of the IBD.

15. The method of claim 9 , further comprising using the refined finite element model to evaluate a change in geometry of the IBD before the change in geometry is actually implemented on the IBD.

16. The method of claim 15 , wherein the change in geometry is a blend, and further comprising:

proposing the blend in the IBD;

using the refined finite element model to evaluate the IBD with the proposed blend; and

implementing the proposed blend in the IBD only if the evaluation of the IBD with the proposed blend is acceptable.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Nov 29, 2019
From: FEINER, DREW M.; GRIFFIN, JERRY H.
To: BLADE DIAGNOSTICS CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 051137/0642 →
Continuity (2)
Provisional Application 62661656 · Apr 24, 2018
Related Publication 20200159879A1 · May 21, 2020
Cited By (4)
US 12,318,877 US 12,410,711 US 12,523,979 US 12,664,333