IP Library Granted Patent US 11,618,380
Granted Patent B2
US 11,618,380 · App. 16/621,429 · Granted Apr 4, 2023

Rear pre-crash safety system

Inventors: Gladys Acervo (Kanagawa, JP); Koji Takeuchi (Aichi, JP); Junya Fukuta (Aichi, JP)
Assignees: Continental Automotive GmbH; Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha
B60Q9/008B60R19/483B60R21/0134G01S7/41G01S13/931G08G1/166G01S2013/9321G01S2013/93272
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 11,618,380
App. No.
16/621,429
Granted
Apr 4, 2023
Kind
B2
Abstract

A rear pre-crash system, RPCS, of a subject vehicle comprising a judgement logic adapted to trigger an RPCS warning signal in response to a detected radar signal reflected by a target vehicle approaching the subject vehicle from behind, wherein said judgement logic is configured to modify the triggering of the RPCS warning signal in detected specific traffic scenarios.

Claims (44)

1. A rear pre-crash system (RPCS) of a subject vehicle comprising a judgement logic adapted to trigger an RPCS warning signal in response to a detected radar signal reflected by a target vehicle approaching the subject vehicle from behind,

wherein said judgement logic comprises circuitry configured to:

receive the detected radar signal via a signal line, to control at least one warning light activator via a control signal line based on the RPCS warning signal, and

modify the triggering of the RPCS warning signal in detected specific traffic scenarios, wherein the judgement logic is adapted to suppress the RPCS warning signal where a current distance between the subject vehicle and the target vehicle is smaller than a threshold distance (D<D TH ) and a relative velocity between the subject vehicle and the target vehicle is smaller than a threshold relative velocity (V R <V RTH ) and an absolute acceleration of the target vehicle is smaller than a threshold acceleration (a TV <a TH ).

2. The rear pre-crash system according to claim 1 wherein a specific traffic scenario is detected based on one or more of the following measured parameters:

a velocity of the subject vehicle,

a velocity of the target vehicle,

the relative velocity between the subject vehicle and the target vehicle,

an absolute acceleration of the subject vehicle,

the absolute acceleration of the target vehicle,

a relative acceleration between the subject vehicle and the target vehicle,

the current distance between the subject vehicle and the target vehicle,

a corridor occupancy of the target vehicle, wherein the corridor occupancy measures an extent to which the target vehicle occupies a corridor between corridor lines of a subject lane of the subject vehicle.

3. The rear pre-crash system according to claim 1 wherein the judgement logic is configured to compute a time to collision for the target vehicle to collide with the subject vehicle.

4. The rear pre-crash system according to claim 3 wherein the judgement logic is configured to compute the time to collision in

a first mode when a velocity of the subject vehicle is less than or equal to zero (V SV ≤0) depending on the relative velocity between the subject vehicle and the target vehicle, a relative acceleration between the subject vehicle and the target vehicle and the current distance between the subject vehicle and the target vehicle, and

wherein the judgement logic is further configured to compute the time to collision in a second mode when the velocity of the subject vehicle is more than zero (V SV >0) depending on the relative velocity between the subject vehicle and the target vehicle and depending on the current distance between the subject vehicle and the target vehicle.

5. The rear pre-crash system according to claim 1 wherein said judgement logic is connected to at least one radar sensor device at a rear bumper of the subject vehicle and adapted to detect a radar signal reflected by the target vehicle approaching the subject vehicle from behind.

6. The rear pre-crash system according to claim 5 wherein said judgement logic is connected to a left radar sensor device at a left side of the rear bumper of the subject vehicle and a right radar sensor device at a right side of the rear bumper of the subject vehicle having overlapping field of views to detect radar signals reflected by the target vehicle approaching the subject vehicle from behind.

7. The rear pre-crash system according to claim 1 wherein the judgement logic is configured to issue a RPCS warning signal when a corridor occupancy of the approaching target vehicle occupying a corridor between corridor lines of a subject lane of the subject vehicle exceeds an adjustable corridor occupancy threshold value, wherein the corridor occupancy measures an extent to which the target vehicle occupies the corridor between the corridor lines of the subject lane of the subject vehicle.

8. The rear pre-crash system according to claim 7 wherein the corridor occupancy of the target vehicle is monitored by said judgement logic depending on reflected radar signals detected by a left radar sensor device and by a right radar sensor device provided at a rear bumper of the subject vehicle.

9. The rear pre-crash system according to claim 7 wherein the corridor occupancy threshold value is automatically increased when the measured corridor occupancy has overlap with a lane adjacent to the subject lane of the subject vehicle.

10. The rear pre-crash system according to claim 1 wherein the judgement logic is configured to suppress the RPCS warning signal when the absolute acceleration of the target vehicle has decreased from a previous monitoring cycle's value (a TVi+1 <a TVi ) and if the when a velocity of the subject vehicle is less than a threshold velocity (V SV <V TH ) and

an absolute acceleration of the subject vehicle has increased or remains the same as in the previous monitoring cycle (a SVi+1 >a SVi )

for a predetermined number of monitoring cycles.

11. A method for providing an RPCS warning signal by a rear pre-crash system (RPCS) of a subject vehicle, the method comprising:

(a) detecting a radar signal reflected by a target vehicle approaching the subject vehicle from behind by at least one radar sensor device of the subject vehicle;

(b) controlling at least one warning light activator via a control signal line based on the RPCS warning signal; and

(c) modifying triggering of the RPCS warning signal issued by said RPCS of said subject vehicle in detected specific traffic scenarios,

wherein the RPCS warning signal is automatically suppressed,

when a current distance between the subject vehicle and the target vehicle is less than a threshold distance (D<D TH ), a relative velocity between the subject vehicle and the target vehicle is less than a relative threshold velocity (V R <V RTH ) and when an absolute acceleration of the target vehicle is less than a threshold acceleration (a TV <a TH ) for a predetermined number of monitoring cycles.

12. The method according to claim 11 wherein a specific traffic scenario is detected based on one or more of the following measured parameters:

a velocity of the subject vehicle,

a velocity of the target vehicle,

the relative velocity between the subject vehicle and the target vehicle,

an absolute acceleration of the subject vehicle,

the absolute acceleration of the target vehicle,

a relative acceleration between the subject vehicle and the target vehicle,

the current distance between the subject vehicle and the target vehicle,

a corridor occupancy of the target vehicle, wherein the corridor occupancy measures an extent to which the target vehicle occupies a corridor between corridor lines of a subject lane of the subject vehicle.

13. The method according to claim 11 wherein a time to collision for the target vehicle to collide with the subject vehicle is computed

in a first mode when a velocity of the subject vehicle is equal to or less than zero (V SV ≤0) depending on the relative velocity between the subject vehicle and the target vehicle, and a relative acceleration between the subject vehicle and the target vehicle and depending on the current distance between the subject vehicle and the target vehicle, and

wherein the time to collision is calculated in a second mode when the velocity of the subject vehicle is higher than zero (V SV >0) depending on the relative velocity between the subject vehicle and the target vehicle, and the current distance between the subject vehicle and the target vehicle.

14. The method according to claim 11 wherein the RPCS warning signal is automatically suppressed when the absolute acceleration of the target vehicle in a current monitoring cycle is less than the absolute acceleration of the target vehicle in a previous monitoring cycle (a TVi+1 <a TVi ) and a velocity of the subject vehicle is less than a threshold velocity (V SV <V TH ) and an absolute acceleration of the subject vehicle in the current monitoring cycle is higher than the absolute acceleration of the subject vehicle in the previous monitoring cycle (a SVi+1 >a SVi ) for the predetermined number of monitoring cycles.

Assignments (4)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Aug 10, 2026
From: TOYOTA JIDOSHA KABUSHIKI KAISHA
To: AUMOVIO AUTONOMOUS MOBILITY GERMANY GMBH
Reel/Frame 075592/0139 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Aug 8, 2024
From: CONTINENTAL AUTOMOTIVE TECHNOLOGIES GMBH
To: CONTINENTAL AUTONOMOUS MOBILITY GERMANY GMBH
Reel/Frame 068512/0899 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Nov 30, 2023
From: CONTINENTAL AUTOMOTIVE GMBH
To: CONTINENTAL AUTOMOTIVE TECHNOLOGIES GMBH
Reel/Frame 065718/0734 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Apr 2, 2020
From: ACERVO, GLADYS; TAKEUCHI, KOJI; FUKUTA, JUNYA
To: CONTINENTAL AUTOMOTIVE GMBH; TOYOTA JIDOSHA KABUSHIKI KAISHA
Reel/Frame 052300/0753 →
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20200207269A1 · Jul 2, 2020