IP Library › Granted Patent US 12,214,221
Granted Patent B2
US 12,214,221 · App. 16/623,816 · Granted Feb 4, 2025

Apparatus and method for ultrasound spinal cord stimulation

Inventors: Md. Monzurul Alam (Hong Kong, CN); Yongping Zheng (Hong Kong, CN)
Assignee: THE HONG KONG POLYTECHNIC UNIVERSITY
A61N7/00A61B8/4494A61K9/0019A61K35/12A61N2007/0026A61N2007/0078A61N2007/0095
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,214,221
App. No.
16/623,816
Granted
Feb 4, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

A method for ultrasound stimulation of spinal cord, the method comprising at least two stimulation cycles, each comprising the steps of: a) obtaining a first real-time spinal cord using a first set of ultrasound transducers; b) selecting a pre-determined stimulation area of the spinal cord from the first real-time spinal cord; c) calculating the position and orientation of the selected stimulation area relative to a second set of ultrasound transducers; and d) stimulating the selected stimulation area of the spinal cord at the calculated relative position and orientation using the second set of ultrasound transducers.

Claims (27)

1. An apparatus for ultrasound image guided ultrasound stimulation of spinal cord in a real-time mode, the apparatus comprising:

an imaging module, wherein the imaging module comprises a first set of ultrasound transducers configured to obtain real-time spinal cord images;

an image recognition module, wherein the image recognition module is configured to select a pre-determined stimulation area of the spinal cord from a first real-time spinal cord image of the real-time spinal cord images, and to calculate a position and orientation of the selected stimulation area relative to the first set of ultrasound transducers represented by a first rigid transform matrix;

a stimulating module, wherein the stimulating module comprises atbe second set of ultrasound transducers configured to stimulate the selected stimulation area of the spinal cord at the calculated relative position and orientation subsequent to the selection of the pre-determined stimulation area of the spinal cord from the first real-time spinal cord image; and

a control module, wherein the control module is configured to coordinate the imaging module, the image recognition module and the stimulating module to operate in at least two stimulation cycles, and whereing in each of the at least two stimulation cycles, at the same time of or after ultrasound stimulation is applied to the se;ected stimulation area of the spinal cord by the stimulating module, the following actions are preformed;

the imaging module obtains a second real-time spinal cord image;

the image recognition module recognizes an actual stimulation area of the spinal cord from the second real-time spinal cord image; and

the control module adjusts the recignition module and/or the stimulating module based on the difference between the actua; stimu;ation area and the predetermined stimulation area;

wherein:

the control module further comprises a receiver configured to generate a magnetic field in space;

the imaging module further comprises a first spatial sensor configured to sense the magnetic field;

the stimulating module further comprises a second spatial sensor configured to sense the magnetic field;

the image recognition module is further configured to calculate a position and orientation of the first and second spatial sensors relative to the receiver according to a strength of the magnetic field and a change of magnitude of the magnetic field, to thereby calculate a position and orientation of the first set of ultrasound transducers relative to the second set of ultrasound transducers represented by a second rigid transform matrix; and

the image recognition module is further configured to calculate the position and orientation of the selected stimulation area relative to the second set of ultrasound transducers with the first and second rigid transform matrixes.

2. The apparatus of claim 1 , wherein the first and/or second sets of ultrasound transducers are arranged in one or two dimensions as a transducer array.

3. The apparatus of claim 2 , wherein the transducer array is flexible.

4. The apparatus of claim 1 , wherein the difference comprises a difference in location, contour and/or size between the actual stimulation area and the pre-determined stimulation area.

5. The apparatus of claim 1 , wherein the difference comprises an evoked response of a muscle at the actual stimulation area.

6. The apparatus of claim 1 , wherein adjusting the recognition module comprises at least one of (1) optimizing the image recognition algorithm of the recognition module for selecting the pre-determined stimulation area of the spinal cord from the first real-time spinal cord image; and (2) compensating the calculation of the position and orientation of the selected stimulation area relative to the second set of ultrasound transducers.

7. The apparatus of claim 1 , wherein adjusting the stimulating module comprises adjusting at least one of focus point, focus area, intensity and frequency of an ultrasound beam, and duty cycle, repetition rate and duration of the stimulation cycle.

8. The apparatus of claim 1 , further comprising a feedback module, the feedback module is configured to receive a signal representing muscle contraction from muscle innervated from the pre-determined stimulation area of the spinal cord, and the control module adjusts the recognition module and/or the stimulating module based on the signal.

9. The apparatus of claim 8 , wherein the signal comprises at least one of electromyography, sonomyography, mechanomyography, or electroneurography signal.

10. The apparatus of claim 8 , wherein adjusting the recognition module comprises at least one of (1) optimizing the image recognition algorithm of the recognition module for selecting the pre-determined stimulation area of the spinal cord from the first real-time spinal cord image; and (2) compensating the calculation of the position and orientation of the selected stimulation area relative to the second set of ultrasound transducers.

11. The apparatus of claim 8 , wherein adjusting the stimulating module comprises adjusting at least one of focus point, focus area, intensity and frequency of an ultrasound beam, and duty cycle, repetition rate and duration of the stimulation cycle.

12. The apparatus of claim 1 , further comprising a stem cell injection module, the stem cell injection module is configured to inject stem cells in the pre-determined stimulation area of the spinal cord so that ultrasound stimulation can be applied to the stem cells at the pre-determined stimulation area of the spinal cord.

13. The apparatus of claim 1 , further comprising a brain signal receiving module in communication with the control module, the brain signal receiving module receives a brain signal representing an intended motor action and sends it to the control module, the control module determines a stimulation area with reference to an established functional mapping of the spinal cord so that ultrasound stimulation can be applied to the determined stimulation area to induce the intended motor action.

14. The apparatus of claim 1 , wherein the apparatus is in a wearable form such that the first and second sets of ultrasound transducers are located on a skin surface of a patient in use.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Dec 18, 2019
From: ALAM, MD. MONZURUL; ZHENG, YONGPING
To: THE HONG KONG POLYTECHNIC UNIVERSITY
Reel/Frame 051312/0904 →
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20200114174A1 · Apr 16, 2020
References Cited (55)
US 5694936A · Fujimoto · 1997 [cited by examiner]
US 8206299B2 · Foley et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 8900146B2 · Zheng et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20030204135A1 · Bystritsky · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 20090112281A1 · Miyazawa · 2009 [cited by examiner]
US 20110009734A1 · Foley · 2011 [cited by examiner]
US 20110275927A1 · Wagner et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20120101366A1 · Ruohonen · 2012 [cited by examiner]
US 20120259252A1 · Thorn-Leeson · 2012 [cited by examiner]
US 20130066239A1 · Mishelevich · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20130178765A1 · Mishelevich · 2013 [cited by examiner]
US 20130184728A1 · Mishelevich · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20130324892A1 · Zhu et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20140296752A1 · Edgerton et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20160016012A1 · Youn et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160045740A1 · Rezai · 2016 [cited by examiner]
US 20170106208A1 · Gauthier · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 20180264291A1 · Rem-Bronneberg · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 20190184206A1 · Nazer · 2019 [cited by examiner]
CN 101152646A · 2008 [cited by applicant]
CN 102164542A · 2011 [cited by applicant]
WO 2012094346A2 · 2012 [cited by applicant]
Office Action of CN2017800941007 issued from the China National Intellectual Property Administration on Mar. 30, 2021. [cited by applicant]
Dimitrijevic MR et al., Evidence for a spinal central pattern generator in humans. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1998, vol. 860:360, p. 76. [cited by applicant]
Gerasimenko Y et al., Sensorimotor regulation of movements: Novel strategies for the recovery of mobility. Human Physiology 2016, vol. 42:90, p. 102. [cited by applicant]
Minassian K and Hofstoetter US, Spinal Cord Stimulation and Augmentative Control Strategies for Leg Movement after Spinal Paralysis in Humans, CNS Neuroscience & Therapeutics 2016, vol. 22:262, p. 270. [cited by applicant]
Edgerton VR and Roy RR, A new age for rehabilitation, Eur. J. Phys. Rehabil. Med. 2012, vol. 48:99, p. 109. [cited by applicant]
Carhart MR et al., Epidural spinal-cord stimulation facilitates recovery of functional walking following incomplete spinal-cord injury, IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng. 2004, vol. 12:1, p. 32-42. [cited by applicant]
Mondello SE et al., Therapeutic intraspinal stimulation to generate activity and promote long-term recovery, Frontiers in Neuroscience 2014, vol. 8:21, p. 1. [cited by applicant]
Hofstoetter US et al., Modification of spasticity by transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation in individuals with incomplete spinal cord injury, Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine 2014, vol. 37:2, p. 202-211. [cited by applicant]
Sasada S et al., Volitional walking via upper limb muscle-controlled stimulation of the lumbar locomotor center in man, Journal of Neuroscience 2014, vol. 34:33, p. 11131-11142. [cited by applicant]
Alam M et al., Brain-machine interface facilitated neurorehabilitation via spinal stimulation after spinal cord injury: Recent progress and future perspectives, Brain Res. 2016 vol. 1646, p. 25-33. [cited by applicant]
Mushahwar VK and Horch KW, Muscle recruitment through electrical stimulation of the lumbo-sacral spinal cord, IEEE Trans. Rehab. Eng. 2000, vol. 8, p. 22-29. [cited by applicant]
Pikov V, Clinical Applications of Intraspinal Microstimulation, Proceedings of the IEEE 2008, vol. 96, p. 1120-1128. [cited by applicant]
Toossi A et al., Mechanically Stable Intraspinal Microstimulation Implants for Human Translation, Ann. Biomed. Eng. 2016, p. 1-14. [cited by applicant]
Kumar K et al., Treatment of chronic pain by epidural spinal cord stimulation: a 10-year experience. Journal of Neurosurgery 1991, vol. 75, p. 402-407. [cited by applicant]
Alam M and He J, Lower-Limb Neuroprostheses: Restoring Walking after Spinal Cord Injury. IGI Global 2014, p. 153-180. [cited by applicant]
Edgerton VR and Harkema S, Epidural stimulation of the spinal cord in spinal cord injury: current status and future challenges, Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics 2011, vol. 11, p. 1351-1353. [cited by applicant]
Gerasimenko YP et al., Initiation of locomotor activity in spinal cats by epidural stimulation of the spinal cord, Neurosci. Behav. Physiol. 2003, vol. 33, p. 247-254. [cited by applicant]
Ichiyama RM et al., Hindlimb stepping movements in complete spinal rats induced by epidural spinal cord stimulation, Neuroscience Letters 2005, vol. 383, p. 339-344. [cited by applicant]
Edgerton VR et al., Training locomotor networks, Brain Research Reviews 2008, vol. 57, p. 241-254. [cited by applicant]
Lavrov I et al., Epidural Stimulation Induced Modulation of Spinal Locomotor Networks in Adult Spinal Rats, J. Neurosci. 2008, vol. 28, p. 6022-6029. [cited by applicant]
Harkema S et al., Effect of epidural stimulation of the lumbosacral spinal cord on voluntary movement, standing, and assisted stepping after motor complete paraplegia: a case study, The Lancet 2011, vol. 377, p. 1938-19… [cited by applicant]
Angeli CA et al., Altering spinal cord excitability enables voluntary movements after chronic complete paralysis in humans, Brain 2014, vol. 137, p. 1394-1409. [cited by applicant]
Minassian K et al., Posterior root-muscle reflexes elicited by transcutaneous stimulation of the human lumbosacral cord, Muscle Nerve 2007, vol. 35, p. 327-336. [cited by applicant]
Gerasimenko Y et al., Initiation and modulation of locomotor circuitry output with multisite transcutaneous electrical stimulation of the spinal cord in noninjured humans, Journal of Neurophysiology 2015, vol. 113, p. 8… [cited by applicant]
Gerasimenko YP et al., Noninvasive Reactivation of Motor Descending Control after Paralysis, Journal of Neurotrauma 2016, vol. 32, p. 1968-1980. [cited by applicant]
Minassian K and Hofstoetter US, Spinal Cord Stimulation and Augmentative Control Strategies for Leg Movement after Spinal Paralysis in Humans, CNS Neuroscience & Therapeutics 2016, vol. 22, p. 262-270. [cited by applicant]
Khaled I et al., A Flexible Base Electrode Array for Intraspinal Microstimulation, IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 2013, vol. 60, p. 2904-2913. [cited by applicant]
Minassian K et al., Targeting Lumbar Spinal Neural Circuitry by Epidural Stimulation to Restore Motor Function After Spinal Cord Injury, Neurotherapeutics 2016, vol. 13(2), p. 284-294. [cited by applicant]
Gerasimenko Y et al., Transcutaneous electrical spinal-cord stimulation in humans, Ann. Phys. Rehabil. Med. 2015, vol. 58(4), p. 225-231. [cited by applicant]
Gorodnichev RM et al., Transcutaneous electrical stimulation of the spinal cord: A noninvasive tool for the activation of stepping pattern generators in humans, Human Physiology 2012, vol. 38, p. 158-167. [cited by applicant]
C. Norman Shealy and Elwood Henneman (1962) “Reversible Effects of Ultrasound on Spinal Reflexes” Arch Neurol. May 1962; 6:374-386. [cited by applicant]
Zheng YP et al., Reliability and validity study for Scolioscan: a radiation-free scoliosis assessment system using 3D ultrasound imaging, Scoliosis Spinal Disord. 2016, vol. 11:13, p. 1-15. [cited by applicant]
International Search Report and Written Opinion of PCT application No. PCT/CN2017/089401 issued from the International Search Authority on Mar. 22, 2018. [cited by applicant]