IP Library Granted Patent US 11,102,622
Granted Patent B1
US 11,102,622 · App. 16/723,309 · Granted Aug 24, 2021

Best time to send limited-content text messages to parties

Inventor: Christopher S. Haggerty (Atlanta, GA)
Assignee: Noble Systems Corporation
H04W4/12G06N5/04H04L51/26H04M3/5238
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 11,102,622
App. No.
16/723,309
Granted
Aug 24, 2021
Kind
B1
Abstract

Technologies are disclosed for determining a best time to send a text message to a party over a plurality of contact periods of time to achieve having the party respond to the message with a desired outcome and/or result. Various embodiments of the invention involve determining, for each period of time, an amount of time the party is expected to take to respond to the text message, a cost of sending the message, and a probability of the party responding with the desired outcome and/or result as a result of sending the message during the period of time. A contact attempt value is determined for each period of time based on these variables along with a desirability of sending the message to the party during the period of time. Accordingly, the best time to send the message is identified as the period of time having the highest contact attempt value.

Claims (40)

1. A method for determining a best time to send a text message to a party over a plurality of contact periods of time to achieve having the party respond to the text message with at least one of a desired outcome and a desired result, the method comprising:

for each of the contact periods of time:

determining an amount of time the party is expected to take to respond to the text message as a result of sending the text message to the party during the contact period of time;

determining a cost of sending the text message to the party during the contact period of time;

generating a probability of the party responding to the text message being sent during the contact period of time with at least one of the desired outcome and the desired result; and

generating a contact attempt value based on a desirability of sending the text message to the party during the contact period of time, the probability of the party responding to the text message being sent during the contact period of time with at least one of the desired outcome and the desired result, the resources available for handling at least one of the desired outcome and the desired result during a time in which the party is expected to respond to the text message based on the amount of time the party is expected to take to respond to the text message as the result of sending the text message to the party during the contact period of time, and the cost of sending the text message to the party during the contact period of time; and

identifying the best time to send the text message to the party as the contact period of time from the plurality of contact periods of time having the highest contact attempt value.

2. The method of claim 1 further comprising sending a text message to the party during the best time to send the text message to the party.

3. The method of claim 1 , wherein the contact periods of time for the plurality of contact periods of time comprise consecutive one-hour segments of time.

4. The method of claim 1 , wherein the desired outcome comprises the party placing an inbound call and the desired result comprises the party providing a promise-to-pay on a delinquent payment.

5. The method of claim 1 , wherein the party is one of a plurality of parties to receive text messages over the plurality of contact periods of time and the desirability of sending the text message to the party during the contact period of time is relative to a desirability of sending a text message to each of the plurality of parties during the contact period of time.

6. The method of claim 1 , wherein determining the amount of time the party is expected to take to respond to the text message as the result of sending the text message to the party during the contact period of time comprises predicting the amount of time based on one or more predictive models.

7. The method of claim 1 , wherein the resources comprise personnel to handle at least one of the desired outcome and the desired result and determining the resources available for handling at least one of the desired outcome and the desired result during the time in which the party is expected to respond to the text message involves reviewing schedules to ascertain a number of personnel scheduled to work during the time.

8. A non-transitory, computer-readable medium comprising computer-executable instructions for determining a best time to send a text message to a party over a plurality of contact periods of time to achieve having the party respond to the text message with at least one of a desired outcome and a desired result, the computer-executable instructions when executed by at least one computer processor cause the at least one computer processors to:

for each of the contact periods of time:

determine an amount of time the party is expected to take to respond to the text message as a result of sending the text message to the party during the contact period of time;

determine a cost of sending the text message to the party during the contact period of time;

generate a probability of the party responding to the text message being sent during the contact period of time with at least one of the desired outcome and the desired result; and

generate a contact attempt value based on a desirability of sending the text message to the party during the contact period of time, the probability of the party responding to the text message being sent during the contact period of time with at least one of the desired outcome and the desired result, the resources available for handling at least one of the desired outcome and the desired result during a time in which the party is expected to respond to the text message based on the amount of time the party is expected to take to respond to the text message as the result of sending the text message to the party during the contact period of time, and the cost of sending the text message to the party during the contact period of time; and

identify the best time to send the text message to the party as the contact period of time from the plurality of contact periods of time having the highest contact attempt value.

9. The non-transitory, computer-readable medium of claim 8 , wherein the computer-executable instructions when executed by the at least one computer processor further cause the at least one computer processor to have a text message sent to the party during the best time to send the text message to the party.

10. The non-transitory, computer-readable medium of claim 8 , wherein the contact periods of time for the plurality of contact periods of time comprise consecutive one-hour segments of time.

11. The non-transitory, computer-readable medium of claim 8 , wherein the desired outcome comprises the party placing an inbound call and the desired result comprises the party providing a promise-to-pay on a delinquent payment.

12. The non-transitory, computer-readable medium of claim 8 , wherein the party is one of a plurality of parties to receive text messages over the plurality of contact periods of time and the desirability of sending the text message to the party during the contact period of time is relative to a desirability of sending a text message to each of the plurality of parties during the contact period of time.

13. The non-transitory, computer-readable medium of claim 8 , wherein the computer-executable instructions when executed by the at least one computer processor cause the at least one computer processor to determine the amount of time the party is expected to take to respond to the text message as the result of sending the text message to the party during the contact period of time by predicting the amount of time based on one or more predictive models.

14. The non-transitory, computer-readable medium of claim 8 , wherein the resources comprise personnel to handle at least one of the desired outcome and the desired result and the computer-executable instructions when executed by the at least one computer processor cause the at least one computer processor to determine the resources available for handling at least one of the desired outcome and the desired result during the time in which the party is expected to respond to the text message involves reviewing schedules to ascertain a number of personnel scheduled to work during the time.

15. A system for determining a best time to send a text message to a party over a plurality of contact periods of time to achieve having the party respond to the text message with at least one of a desired outcome and a desired result, the system comprising:

at least one computer processor configured to:

for each of the contact periods of time:

determine an amount of time the party is expected to take to respond to the text message as a result of sending the text message to the party during the contact period of time;

determine a cost of sending the text message to the party during the contact period of time;

generate a probability of the party responding to the text message being sent during the contact period of time with at least one of the desired outcome and the desired result; and

generate a contact attempt value based on a desirability of sending the text message to the party during the contact period of time, the probability of the party responding to the text message being sent during the contact period of time with at least one of the desired outcome and the desired result, the resources available for handling at least one of the desired outcome and the desired result during a time in which the party is expected to respond to the text message based on the amount of time the party is expected to take to respond to the text message as the result of sending the text message to the party during the contact period of time, and the cost of sending the text message to the party during the contact period of time; and

identify the best time to send the text message to the party as the contact period of time from the plurality of contact periods of time having the highest contact attempt value.

16. The system of claim 15 , wherein the at least one computer processor configured to have a text message sent to the party during the best time to send the text message to the party.

17. The system of claim 15 , wherein the contact periods of time for the plurality of contact periods of time comprise consecutive one-hour segments of time.

18. The system of claim 15 , wherein the desired outcome comprises the party placing an inbound call and the desired result comprises the party providing a promise-to-pay on a delinquent payment.

19. The system of claim 15 , wherein the party is one of a plurality of parties to receive text messages over the plurality of contact periods of time and the desirability of sending the text message to the party during the contact period of time is relative to a desirability of sending a text message to each of the plurality of parties during the contact period of time.

20. The system of claim 15 , wherein the at least one computer processor is configured to determine the amount of time the party is expected to take to respond to the text message as the result of sending the text message to the party during the contact period of time by predicting the amount of time based on one or more predictive models.

21. The system of claim 15 , wherein the resources comprise personnel to handle at least one of the desired outcome and the desired result and the at least one computer processor is configured to determine the resources available for handling at least one of the desired outcome and the desired result during the time in which the party is expected to respond to the text message involves reviewing schedules to ascertain a number of personnel scheduled to work during the time.

Assignments (9)
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Oct 27, 2025
From: JEFFERIES FINANCE LLC, AS COLLATERAL AGENT
To: ALVARIA CAYMAN (WEM); ALVARIA CAYMAN (CXIP)
Reel/Frame 073360/0209 →
PATENT SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Mar 20, 2024
From: ALVARIA CAYMAN (WEM); ALVARIA CAYMAN (CXIP)
To: JEFFERIES FINANCE LLC
Reel/Frame 066850/0334 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Mar 20, 2024
From: NOBLE SYSTEMS, LLC
To: ALVARIA CAYMAN (CX)
Reel/Frame 066850/0556 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Mar 20, 2024
From: JEFFRIES FINANCE LLC
To: ALVARIA, INC.; NOBLE SYSTEMS, LLC
Reel/Frame 066850/0428 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Mar 20, 2024
From: JEFFRIES FINANCE LLC
To: ALVARIA, INC.; NOBLE SYSTEMS, LLC
Reel/Frame 066850/0384 →
CERTIFICATE OF CONVERSION Recorded Mar 12, 2024
From: NOBLE SYSTEMS CORPORATION, A GEORGIA CORPORATION
To: NOBLE SYSTEMS, LLC, A DELAWARE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY
Reel/Frame 066794/0435 →
SECOND LIEN PATENT SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded May 6, 2021
From: NOBLE SYSTEMS CORPORATION; ASPECT SOFTWARE, INC.
To: JEFFERIES FINANCE LLC
Reel/Frame 057674/0664 →
FIRST LIEN PATENT SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded May 6, 2021
From: NOBLE SYSTEMS CORPORATION; ASPECT SOFTWARE, INC.
To: JEFFERIES FINANCE LLC
Reel/Frame 057261/0093 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Dec 20, 2019
From: HAGGERTY, CHRISTOPHER S
To: NOBLE SYSTEMS CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 051347/0616 →