IP Library › Granted Patent US 11,532,402
Granted Patent B2
US 11,532,402 · App. 16/847,183 · Granted Dec 20, 2022

Methods and systems for providing an episode of care

Inventors: Daniel Farley (Memphis, TN); Sied W. Janna (Memphis, TN); Scott K. Laster (Memphis, TN); Zachary C. Wilkinson (Germantown, TN)
Assignees: Smith & Nephew, Inc.; Smith & Nephew Orthopaedics AG; Smith & Nephew Asia Pacific Pte. Limited
G16H50/50A61B5/4528A61B34/10A61F2/46G06N3/0427G06N3/08G06Q30/0201G16H10/20G16H10/60G16H20/00G16H20/40G16H40/20G16H50/20G16H50/70G16H70/20A61B2034/108A61F2002/4633
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 11,532,402
App. No.
16/847,183
Granted
Dec 20, 2022
Kind
B2
Abstract

Systems and methods for determining a care plan for a patient are disclosed. Data from a one or more databases are received or retrieved and used to determine a preferred care plan used to perform a surgical procedure or otherwise treat a patient. The data may include data pertaining to a patient, a healthcare professional, a healthcare facility, an implant, economic data, simulation data, imaging data, and/or the like. The data may be used to determine a plan that provides a positive outcome and patient satisfaction. The data may be updated over time or in real time to improve or refine the determination of care plans for the current patient or other patients.

Claims (37)

1. A system for optimizing outcomes and patient satisfaction during an episode of care comprising:

one or more processors; and

a non-transitory processor-readable storage medium in operable communication with the one or more processors, comprising one or more instructions that, when executed, cause the one or more processors to:

obtain, from one or more sources, case plan data comprising at least one of: patient data, healthcare professional data, facility data, or healthcare economy data,

perform, using a neural network, a simulation for a new episode of care based on the case plan data, wherein the neural network is trained using at least a first training set comprising historical case data from a database,

generate, based on the simulation, a predictor equation, wherein the predictor equation comprises one or more weighting values associated with at least one implant component and an associated patient anatomy,

receive, from a user input device, at least one user input associated with the new episode of care,

modify, based on the at least one user input, the predictor equation,

determine, based on the modified predictor equation, an optimized case plan comprising a volumetric representation of bone to be removed from the associated patient anatomy, and

train the neural network using a second training set comprising the historical case data and one or more of the case plan data, the optimized case plan, and outcome data associated with the new episode of care.

2. The system of claim 1 , wherein the one or more weighting values are from a weighting matrix.

3. The system of claim 2 , wherein the weighting matrix comprises a homogeneous transformation matrix associated with the at least one implant component and the associated patient anatomy.

4. The system of claim 2 , wherein the one or more instructions further cause the one or more processors to identify, based on the weighting matrix, a Boolean intersection of an implant geometry and the associated patient anatomy, wherein the Boolean intersection creates the volumetric representation of bone to be removed from the associated patient anatomy.

5. The system of claim 1 , wherein the one or more instructions that cause the one or more processors to perform the simulation further include one or more instructions that cause the one or more processors to perform the simulation further based on the historical case data.

6. The system of claim 5 , wherein the one or more instructions further cause the one or more processors to update the historical case data to include the optimized case plan.

7. The system of claim 5 , wherein the historical case data is associated with at least one healthcare provider and at least one patient.

8. The system of claim 5 , wherein the historical case data is categorized according to a type.

9. The system of claim 5 , wherein the historical case data comprises data selected from the group consisting of: activity level data, preexisting condition data, comorbidity data, prehabilitation performance data, health and fitness level data, pre-operative expectation level data, Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA) driven score data, genetic background data, prior injury data, previous joint arthroplasty data, previous trauma procedure data, previous sports medicine procedure data, previous treatment of a contralateral joint data, gait data, biomechanical data, care infrastructure data, expected ideal procedure outcome data, historical procedure outcome data, historical pain level data, historical activity level data, implant size data, implant position data, implant orientation data, implant alignment data, and soft-tissue balance data.

10. The system of claim 1 , wherein the patient data comprises data selected from the group consisting of: activity level data, preexisting condition data, comorbidity data, prehabilitation performance data, health and fitness level data, pre-operative expectation level data, Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA) driven score data, genetic background data, prior injury data, previous joint arthroplasty data, previous trauma procedure data, previous sports medicine procedure data, previous treatment of a contralateral joint data, gait data, biomechanical data, care infrastructure data, and expected ideal procedure outcome data.

11. The system of claim 1 , wherein the healthcare professional data comprises data selected from the group consisting of: known surgical technique data, preferred surgical technique data, level of training data, previous success data, expected range of motion data, expected days of recovery data, and survivorship data.

12. The system of claim 1 , wherein the healthcare professional data is obtained from a source selected from the group consisting of: one or more paper surveys, one or more digital surveys, one or more online surveys, one or more patient specific knee instrument (PSKI) profiles, one or more computer assisted surgical systems, one or more electronic medical records, and one or more mobile applications.

13. The system of claim 1 , wherein the facility data comprises data selected from the group consisting of: facility type data, facility trauma level data, Comprehensive Care for Joint Replacement Program (CJR) data, bundle candidacy data, Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA) driven score data, community data, academic data, non-academic data, and postoperative network access data.

14. The system of claim 1 , wherein the facility data is obtained from a source selected from the group consisting of: one or more paper surveys, one or more digital surveys, one or more online surveys, one or more patient specific knee instrument (PSKI) profiles, one or more computer assisted surgical systems, one or more electronic medical records, and one or more mobile applications.

15. The system of claim 1 , wherein the healthcare economy data comprises data selected from the group consisting of: patient socioeconomic profile data, expected patient reimbursement data, and patient-specific treatment data.

16. The system of claim 1 , wherein the healthcare economy data is obtained from a source selected from the group consisting of: one or more paper surveys, one or more digital surveys, one or more online surveys, direct payer information, and publicly accessible databases of socioeconomic information.

17. The system of claim 1 , wherein the case plan data comprises at least one of:

healthcare professional data comprising one or more of surgical product preference, scheduling information, surgical equipment requirements, and surgical staffing requirements;

complication data comprising one or more of a negative effect of a surgical procedure, a likelihood of occurrence of the negative effect, and a cost of the negative effect; and

performance data comprising one or more of implant information, revision procedure information, and joint flexion information.

18. A method for optimizing outcomes and patient satisfaction during an episode of care comprising:

obtaining, using one or more processors, from one or more sources, case plan data comprising at least one of: patient data, healthcare professional data, facility data, or healthcare economy data;

performing, using a neural network, a simulation for a new episode of care based on the case plan data, wherein the neural network is trained using at least a first training set comprising historical case data from a database;

generating, using the one or more processors, a predictor equation based on the simulation, wherein the predictor equation comprises one or more weighting values associated with at least one implant component and an associated patient anatomy;

receiving, from a user input device, at least one user input associated with the new episode of care;

modifying, using the one or more processors, the predictor equation based on the at least one user input;

determining, using the one or more processors, an optimized case plan based on the modified predictor equation, wherein the optimized case plan comprises a volumetric representation of bone to be removed from the associated patient anatomy; and

training the neural network using a second training set comprising the historical case data and one or more of the case plan data, the optimized case plan, and outcome data associated with the new episode of care.

Assignments (3)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Sep 2, 2021
From: SMITH & NEPHEW, INC.
To: SMITH & NEPHEW, INC.; SMITH & NEPHEW ORTHOPAEDICS AG; SMITH & NEPHEW ASIA PACIFIC PTE. LIMITED
Reel/Frame 057886/0807 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jul 14, 2021
From: FARLEY, DANIEL; LASTER, SCOTT K.
To: SMITH & NEPHEW, INC.
Reel/Frame 056855/0042 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jul 14, 2021
From: JANNA, SIED; WILKINSON, ZACHARY CHRISTOPHER
To: SMITH & NEPHEW, INC.
Reel/Frame 056855/0197 →
Continuity (3)
Continuation PCTUS2019067845 · Dec 20, 2019
Provisional Application 62783858 · Dec 21, 2018
Related Publication 20200243199A1 · Jul 30, 2020
Cited By (75)
US 12,186,623 US 12,191,018 US 12,191,021 US 12,193,751 US 12,217,865 US 12,220,201 US 12,220,202 US 12,224,052 US 12,226,670 US 12,226,671 US 12,230,381 US 12,230,382 US 12,230,383 US 12,246,222 US 12,249,410 US 12,283,356 US 12,285,654 US 12,301,663 US 12,324,961 US 12,327,623 US 12,340,884 US 12,343,180 US 12,347,543 US 12,347,558 US 12,357,195 US 12,367,959 US 12,367,960 US 12,380,984 US 12,380,985 US 12,390,689 US 12,402,804 US 12,402,805 US 12,420,143 US 12,420,145 US 12,424,308 US 12,424,319 US 12,427,376 US 12,433,677 US 12,469,587 US 12,478,837 US 12,495,987 US 12,496,137 US 12,515,104 US 12,537,088 US 12,539,446 US 12,548,656 US 12,548,657 US 12,555,667 US 12,558,593 US 12,558,594 US 12,562,243 US 12,562,271 US 12,589,279 US 12,592,308 US 12,605,613 US 12,614,622 US 12,616,529 US 12,636,082 US 12,648,815 US 12,653,617 US 12,653,618 US 12,658,301 US 12,658,302 US 12,661,133 US 12,661,554 US 12,670,978 US 12,678,173 US 12,702,484 US 12,708,814 US 12,718,923 US 12,718,927 US 12,731,669 US 12,731,670 US 12,731,685 US 12,740,830