Informed de-icing procedures for aircraft flight preparations

1. A method, comprising:

identifying a travel time range for an aircraft from a de-icing station to a runway based on a distance between the de-icing station and the runway, congestion patterns for travel between the de-icing station and the runway, and predicted weather conditions;

identifying a holdover window for the aircraft based on the predicted weather conditions during the travel time range;

estimating a takeoff time for the aircraft based on a takeoff queue for the runway and the travel time range;

in response to the holdover window expiring before the estimated takeoff time, delaying the aircraft from de-icing; and

in response to the travel time range exceeding a fuel use threshold, increasing a fuel load of the aircraft.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein delaying the aircraft from de-icing comprises one or more of:

rescheduling de-icing of the aircraft;

delaying pushback of the aircraft;

delaying pushback of the aircraft to reach the de-icing station and rescheduling de-icing of the aircraft; and

delaying takeoff of the aircraft and rescheduling de-icing of the aircraft.

3. The method of claim 1 , wherein the holdover window is further based on:

an airframe type of the aircraft;

an operator specification for the airframe type; and

a time span to remove accumulation from and apply an anti-ice solution to the aircraft.

4. The method of claim 1 , wherein the travel time range for the aircraft from the de-icing station to the runway is identified based on known taxiing speeds during specific weather conditions.

5. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

identifying a second travel time range for a second aircraft from a second de-icing station to the runway;

identifying a second holdover window for the second aircraft based on predicted weather conditions during the second travel time range;

estimating a second takeoff time for the second aircraft based on the takeoff queue for the runway and the second travel time range; and

in response to the second holdover window expiring after the estimated second takeoff time and within a caution threshold and determining that a push time can be delayed without affecting the second takeoff time:

delaying pushback for the second aircraft from a respective gate to thereby shift the second holdover window closer to the estimated second takeoff time.

6. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

identifying a second travel time range for a second aircraft from a second de-icing station to the runway;

identifying a second holdover window for the second aircraft based on predicted weather conditions during the second travel time range;

estimating a second takeoff time for the second aircraft based on the takeoff queue for the runway and the second travel time range; and

in response to the second holdover window expiring after the estimated second takeoff time and within a caution threshold and determining that a push time cannot be delayed without affecting the second takeoff time:

evaluating an effect of repeating a de-icing operation for the second aircraft on flight operations; and

in response to the effect of repeating the de-icing operation exceeding an impact threshold, delaying the second takeoff time.

7. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

identifying a second travel time range for a second aircraft from a second de-icing station to the runway;

identifying a second holdover window for the second aircraft based on predicted weather conditions during the second travel time range;

estimating a second takeoff time for the second aircraft based on the takeoff queue for the runway and the second travel time range; and

in response to the second holdover window expiring after the estimated second takeoff time and within a caution threshold and determining that a push time cannot be delayed without affecting the second takeoff time:

evaluating an effect of repeating a de-icing operation for the second aircraft on flight operations; and

in response to the effect of repeating the de-icing operation not exceeding an impact threshold, generating an alert to proceed to the de-icing operation as scheduled.

8. A method, comprising:

in response to identifying a first aircraft scheduled for de-icing within a first caution threshold of a first scheduled takeoff time and to determining that a first push time cannot be delayed without affecting the first scheduled takeoff time:

evaluating a first effect of repeating a de-icing operation for the first aircraft on flight operations; and

in response to the first effect of repeating the de-icing operation exceeding an impact threshold, wherein the impact threshold is based on cascade effects of the first aircraft departing later based on a new takeoff time, including missed flights for passengers associated with the aircraft, crew operation schedules associated with the aircraft, and weather conditions at a destination for the aircraft:

delaying the first scheduled takeoff time; and

rescheduling the de-icing operation for the first aircraft based on the new takeoff time.

9. The method of claim 8 , further comprising:

in response to identifying a second aircraft scheduled for de-icing within a second caution threshold of a second scheduled takeoff time and to determining that a second push time can be delayed without affecting the second scheduled takeoff time:

delaying the second push time to a new push time; and

rescheduling a de-icing operation for the second aircraft based on the new push time.

10. The method of claim 8 , further comprising:

in response to identifying a second aircraft scheduled for de-icing within a second caution threshold of a second scheduled takeoff time and to determining that a second push time cannot be delayed without affecting the second scheduled takeoff time:

evaluating a second effect of repeating the de-icing operation for the second aircraft on flight operations; and

in response to the second effect of repeating the de-icing operation not exceeding the impact threshold, generating an alert to proceed to the de-icing operation as scheduled for the second aircraft.

11. The method of claim 8 , wherein evaluating the first effect of repeating the de-icing operation for the first aircraft on flight operations to exceed the impact threshold includes:

determining that the first aircraft can complete the de-icing operation a second time before the scheduled takeoff time;

determining that performing the de-icing operation the second time for the first aircraft will delay a second takeoff time for a second aircraft; and

determining that the first aircraft lacks a higher priority for departure over the second aircraft.

12. The method of claim 8 , wherein evaluating the first effect of repeating the de-icing operation for the first aircraft on flight operations to exceed the impact threshold includes:

determining that the first aircraft cannot complete the de-icing operation a second time before the scheduled takeoff time.

13. The method of claim 8 , wherein the impact threshold is based on:

a fuel consumption and an anti-ice solution consumption for repeating the de-icing operation; and

cascade effects of the first aircraft departing later based on the new takeoff time, including missed flights, crew operation schedules, and weather conditions at a destination.

14. A system, comprising:

a processor;

a memory storage device including instructions that when executed by the processor enable performance of an operation comprising:

identifying a first travel time range for a first aircraft from a de-icing station to a runway based on a distance between the de-icing station and the runway, congestion patterns for travel between the de-icing station and the runway, and predicted weather conditions;

identifying a first holdover window for the first aircraft based on the predicted weather conditions during the first travel time range;

estimating a first takeoff time for the first aircraft based on a takeoff queue for the runway and the first travel time range; and

in response to the first holdover window expiring after the estimated first takeoff time and based on a confidence score in a prediction of the first aircraft being able to de-ice and depart on time compared to other aircraft attempting to depart, generating an alert for the first aircraft to proceed to a de-icing operation as scheduled.

15. The system of claim 14 , wherein the operation further comprises:

in response to identifying a second aircraft competing with the first aircraft for use of the de-icing station, wherein the first aircraft is scheduled for de-icing within a first caution threshold of the first takeoff time, wherein the second aircraft is scheduled for de-icing within a second caution threshold of a second takeoff time for the second aircraft, and in response to determining that a second push time for the second aircraft cannot be delayed without affecting the second takeoff time:

evaluating a first effect of repeating the de-icing operation for the first aircraft on flight operations;

evaluating a second effect of repeating the de-icing operation for the second aircraft on the flight operations; and

in response to the second effect of repeating the de-icing operation being greater than the first effect:

delaying the second takeoff time; and

rescheduling the de-icing operation for the second aircraft based on a new takeoff time.

16. The system of claim 14 , wherein the first holdover window is further based on:

an airframe type of the first aircraft;

an operator specification for the airframe type; and

a time span to remove accumulation from and apply an anti-ice solution to the first aircraft.

17. The system of claim 14 , wherein the operation further comprises, in response to the first travel time range exceeding a fuel use threshold, increasing a fuel load of the first aircraft.

18. The system of claim 14 , wherein the operation further comprises:

identifying a second travel time range for a second aircraft from a second de-icing station to the runway;

identifying a second holdover window for the second aircraft based on predicted weather conditions during the second travel time range;

estimating a second takeoff time for the second aircraft based on the takeoff queue for the runway and the second travel time range; and

in response to the second holdover window expiring after the estimated second takeoff time and within a caution threshold and determining that a push time for the second aircraft can be delayed without affecting the second takeoff time:

delaying pushback for the second aircraft from a respective gate to thereby shift the second holdover window closer to the estimated second takeoff time.

19. The system of claim 14 , wherein the de-icing station is co-located with a gate for the first aircraft.