High integrity protection system for hydrocarbon flow lines

1. A method for safety testing of a high integrity protection system (HIPS), the method comprising:

for a flow line comprising a first subsystem and a second subsystem in a parallel flow configuration in relation to each other,

providing, by a first source of pressure, fluidic pressure in the flow line;

directing fluid flow from the first source of pressure through the first subsystem; and

while directing fluid flow through the first subsystem:

isolating the second subsystem from the first source of pressure and the first subsystem;

providing, by a second source of pressure, fluidic pressure in the second subsystem to at least a predetermined pressure threshold value;

conducting a stroke test on the second subsystem; and

conducting a leak test on the second subsystem.

2. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

directing fluid flow from the first source of pressure through the second subsystem; and

while directing fluid flow through the second subsystem:

isolating the first subsystem from the first source of pressure and the second subsystem;

providing, by the second source of pressure, fluidic pressure in the first subsystem to at least the predetermined pressure threshold value;

conducting a stroke test on the first subsystem; and

conducting a leak test on the first subsystem.

3. The method of claim 2 , wherein:

the first subsystem comprises:

a first surface safety valve (SSV);

a second SSV installed downstream of the first SSV;

a first plurality of pressure sensors installed upstream of the first SSV; and

a first logic solving processor in communication with the first plurality of pressure sensors, the first SSV, and the second SSV, the first logic solving processor configured to perform operations comprising transmitting signals to control the first SSV and the second SSV based on signals received from the first plurality of pressure sensors; and

the second subsystem comprises:

a third SSV;

a fourth SSV installed downstream of the third SSV;

a second plurality of pressure sensors installed upstream of the third SSV; and

a second logic solving processor in communication with the second plurality of pressure sensors, the third SSV, and the fourth SSV, the second logic solving processor configured to perform operations comprising transmitting signals to control the third SSV and the fourth SSV based on signals received from the second plurality of pressure sensors.

4. The method of claim 3 , wherein:

conducting the stroke test on the first subsystem comprises:

transmitting a first close signal to close the first SSV and the second SSV based on detecting pressure in the first subsystem equal to or greater than the predetermined pressure threshold value; and

actuating a first close failure alarm based on determining that any one of the first SSV and the second SSV failed to close upon transmission of the first close signal; and

conducting the stroke test on the second subsystem comprises:

transmitting a second close signal to close the third SSV and the fourth SSV based on detecting pressure in the second subsystem equal to or greater than the predetermined pressure threshold value; and

actuating a second close failure alarm based on determining that any one of the third SSV and the fourth SSV failed to close upon transmission of the second close signal.

5. The method of claim 4 , wherein conducting the leak test on the first subsystem comprises:

detecting, by a first leak sensor installed directly downstream of the first SSV, a first change in fluidic pressure directly downstream of the first SSV;

detecting, by a second leak sensor installed directly downstream of the second SSV, a second change in fluidic pressure directly downstream of the second SSV;

comparing, by the first logic solving processor, the first change in fluidic pressure to a predetermined pressure differential threshold value;

comparing, by the first logic solving processor, the second change in fluidic pressure to the predetermined pressure differential threshold value;

actuating a first leak failure alarm if the first change in fluidic pressure is greater than the predetermined pressure differential threshold value within a predetermined time span after the transmission of the first close signal; and

actuating a second leak failure alarm if the second change in fluidic pressure is greater than the predetermined pressure differential threshold value within the predetermined time span after the transmission of the first close signal.

6. The method of claim 5 , wherein conducting the leak test on the second subsystem comprises:

detecting, by a third leak sensor installed directly downstream of the third SSV, a third change in fluidic pressure directly downstream of the third SSV;

detecting, by a fourth leak sensor installed directly downstream of the fourth SSV, a fourth change in fluidic pressure directly downstream of the fourth SSV;

comparing, by the second logic solving processor, the third change in fluidic pressure to the predetermined pressure differential threshold value;

comparing, by the second logic solving processor, the fourth change in fluidic pressure to the predetermined pressure differential threshold value;

actuating a third leak failure alarm if the third change in fluidic pressure is greater than the predetermined pressure differential threshold value within the predetermined time span after the transmission of the second close signal; and

actuating a fourth leak failure alarm if the fourth change in fluidic pressure is greater than the predetermined pressure differential threshold value within the predetermined time span after the transmission of the second close signal.