IP Library Granted Patent US 11,586,523
Granted Patent B2
US 11,586,523 · App. 16/882,551 · Granted Feb 21, 2023

3D model evaluation system

Inventors: Keiko Watanabe (Kanagawa, JP); Eiji Inoue (Kanagawa, JP); Hideaki Hirata (Kanagawa, JP); Isamu Ishii (Kanagawa, JP)
Assignee: FUJIFILM Business Innovation Corp.
G06F11/3447G06F30/20G06F11/3457G06F30/13G06F30/15G06F30/17G06F2119/02
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 11,586,523
App. No.
16/882,551
Granted
Feb 21, 2023
Kind
B2
Abstract

A 3D model evaluation system includes: a loading unit that loads 3D model data created by 3D CAD; a history checking unit that checks a creation history which is added to the 3D model data loaded by the loading unit and which is obtained in a case where the 3D model data is created by the 3D CAD; and an evaluation unit that evaluates a degree of coincidence between the creation history of the 3D model data checked by the history checking unit and a predetermined rule.

Claims (12)

1. A 3D model evaluation system comprising:

a loading unit that loads 3D model data created by 3D CAD;

a history checking unit that checks a creation history which is added to the 3D model data loaded by the loading unit and which is obtained in a case where the 3D model data is created by the 3D CAD; and

an evaluation unit that evaluates a degree of coincidence between the creation history of the 3D model data checked by the history checking unit and a predetermined rule,

wherein the creation history includes a history of creation of the 3D model data, and the evaluation unit evaluates the degree of coincidence between the history of the creation of the 3D model data and the predetermined rule.

2. The 3D model evaluation system according to claim 1 , wherein the evaluation unit evaluates whether a two-dimensional base layout diagram is at a top of the creation history as the creation history obtained in a case where the 3D model data is created by the 3D CAD.

3. The 3D model evaluation system according to claim 2 , wherein the evaluation unit evaluates a ratio at which the 3D model data refers to the base layout diagram.

4. The 3D model evaluation system according to claim 1 , wherein in a case where a design target designed by the 3D CAD is divided into a plurality of functions, the evaluation unit evaluates whether a function-based layout diagram corresponding to each of the plurality of functions is created.

5. The 3D model evaluation system according to claim 4 , wherein the evaluation unit evaluates presence or absence of the 3D model data that is not referred to in the function-based layout diagram.

6. The 3D model evaluation system according to claim 1 , wherein the evaluation unit evaluates an evaluation result as a numerical value for each evaluation item.

7. The 3D model evaluation system according to claim 6 , wherein the evaluation unit evaluates the 3D model data on the basis of at least one or more criteria of a layout utilization criterion for evaluating whether the 3D model data refers to the base layout diagram, a function-based layout criterion for evaluating whether a function-based layout diagram corresponding to each of a plurality of functions is created in a case where a design target designed by the 3D CAD is divided into the plurality of functions, a reference plane utilization criterion for evaluating whether the 3D model data utilizes a reference plane, an indirect solid reference criterion for evaluating whether the 3D model data directly refers to a solid, and a direct feature creation reference criterion for evaluating whether the 3D model data directly refers to an edge or a face of a model shape in a case of creating a feature.

8. The 3D model evaluation system according to claim 7 , wherein the evaluation unit displays, as graphs, evaluation results based on the layout utilization criterion, the function-based layout criterion, the reference plane utilization criterion, the indirect solid reference criterion, and the direct feature creation reference criterion.

Assignments (2)
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded May 13, 2021
From: FUJI XEROX CO., LTD.
To: FUJIFILM BUSINESS INNOVATION CORP.
Reel/Frame 056223/0291 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded May 28, 2020
From: WATANABE, KEIKO; INOUE, EIJI; HIRATA, HIDEAKI; ISHII, ISAMU
To: FUJI XEROX CO., LTD.
Reel/Frame 052769/0490 →
Priority Claims (1)
JP JP2019-192588 · Oct 23, 2019 · national
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20210124670A1 · Apr 29, 2021