IP Library Granted Patent US 12,472,693
Granted Patent B2
US 12,472,693 · App. 16/901,147 · Granted Nov 18, 2025

Additive manufacturing-coupled digital twin ecosystem

Inventors: Stephen Jonathan Davis (Eastleigh, GB); Jonathan Mark Dunsdon (Murphys, CA)
Assignee: General Electric Company
B29C64/393B29C64/171B29C64/188G05B17/02B33Y10/00B33Y30/00B33Y40/10B33Y40/20B33Y50/02
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,472,693
App. No.
16/901,147
Granted
Nov 18, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

There are provided methods and systems for making or repairing a specified part. For example, there is provided a method for creating an optimized manufacturing process to make or repair the specified part. The method includes receiving by a system configured to make or repair the specified part and from a machine communicatively coupled with the system, a set of sensor data and/or inspection data associated with at least one of an additive and a reductive manufacturing or repair process or with at least one of a pre-treatment and a post-treatment step. The method includes creating an optimized manufacturing process to make or repair the specified part, the creating including. The method includes updating, in real time, a surrogate model corresponding with a physics-based model of the specified part, wherein the surrogate model forms a digital twin of the specified part. The method includes further updating the surrogate model with the sensor data and/or inspection data. The method includes executing, based on the digital twin, the optimized manufacturing process to either repair or make the specified part.

Claims (26)

1 . A system for making or repairing a specified part, the system including:

a processor; and

a memory including instructions that, when executed by the processor, cause the processor to perform operations comprising:

receiving, from a machine communicatively coupled with the processor, a set of data including at least one of sensor data or inspection data, the set of data associated with at least one of an additive manufacturing process, a reductive manufacturing process, a repair process, a pre-treatment step, or a post-treatment step, wherein the set of data is for manufactured parts similar to the specified part;

creating an optimized manufacturing process to make or repair the specified part, the creating including:

generating, in real time, a surrogate model corresponding with a physics-based model of the specified part as-manufactured, wherein the surrogate model forms a digital twin of the specified part, wherein the digital twin includes: a first model-including a relationship between the set of data and the physics-based model; and a second model of a spectrum of operating environments and as-operated data acquired from actual performance of the manufactured parts over a lifetime of the manufactured parts as operated while deployed in the field, the as-operated data acquired from actual performance of the manufactured parts similar to the specified part as operated while deployed in the field across the spectrum of operating environments, the operating environments including operational conditions that the manufactured parts similar to the specified part are exposed to in operation in the field; and

determining a process parameter for the optimized manufacturing process based on the surrogate model and a target performance for the specified part as operated in the field; and

executing, based on the digital twin, the optimized manufacturing process to either repair or make the specified part, the optimized manufacturing process implementing the process parameter.

2 . The system as set forth in claim 1 , wherein the operations further include communicating the set of data to a central server.

3 . The system as set forth in claim 2 , wherein the process parameter is a quantity of material to be added to the specified part; and wherein the set of data includes a quantity of material added to the manufactured parts similar to the specified part.

4 . The system as set forth in claim 1 , wherein the operations further include associating the set of data to a unique identifier of the specified part; and wherein the unique identifier is a serial number of a component or a serial number of a batch of components.

5 . The system as set forth in claim 4 , wherein the operations further include associating the set of data from a single process step or multiple process steps.

6 . The system as set forth in claim 5 , wherein the operations further include collating the set of data from the single process step or the multiple process steps.

7 . The system as set forth in claim 2 , wherein the operations further include, collating, by the central server, the set of data to a unique identifier of a component or batch of components of the specified part.

8 . The system as set forth in claim 7 , wherein the operations further include correlating the unique identifier with the as-operated data.

9 . The system as set forth in claim 7 , wherein the operations further include correlating the unique identifier with the surrogate model.

10 . The system as set forth in claim 1 , wherein the operations further include deploying the specified part based on the surrogate model.

11 . The system as set forth in claim 1 , wherein the digital twin is based on at least one of as-manufactured, as-tested, as-designed, and as-simulated data for the specified part.

12 . The system as set forth in claim 1 , wherein the operations further include predicting durability of the specified part based on the digital twin.

13 . The system as set forth in claim 1 , wherein the operations further include receiving data indicative of the spectrum of operating environments.

14 . The system as set forth in claim 13 , wherein the operations further include sorting the specified part based, at least in part, on the spectrum of operating environments.

15 . The system as set forth in claim 1 , wherein the operations further include sorting the specified part according to one or more performance criteria.

16 . The system as set forth in claim 15 , wherein the one or more performance criteria includes robustness.

17 . The system as set forth in claim 16 , wherein the operations further include assigning the specified part to a particular operating environment within the spectrum of operating environments based on the one or more performance criteria.

18 . The system as set forth in claim 1 , wherein the operations further include receiving the as-operated data, wherein the as-operated data is associated with a part of the same type as the specified part.

19 . The system as set forth in claim 18 , wherein creating further includes updating the surrogate model based on the as-operated data.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jun 15, 2020
From: DAVIS, STEPHEN JONATHAN; DUNSDON, JONATHAN MARK
To: GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY
Reel/Frame 052936/0785 →
Continuity (3)
Provisional Application 62862011 · Jun 14, 2019
Provisional Application 62862016 · Jun 14, 2019
Related Publication 20200391446A1 · Dec 17, 2020
References Cited (200)
US 6067486A · Aragones · 2000 [cited by applicant]
US 6384847B1 · Rabenhorst · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 6394646B1 · Ringermacher · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 6745153B2 · White · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 6775647B1 · Evans · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 7063991B1 · Zhao · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 7242994B2 · Ishibashi · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 7457762B2 · Wetzer · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 7504838B1 · Zhao · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 7549789B2 · Tralshawala · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 7761200B2 · Avery · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 7966883B2 · Lorraine · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 8209839B1 · Brostmeyer · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 8266066B1 · Wezter · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 8423430B2 · Avery · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 8692887B2 · Ringermacher · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 8694196B1 · Doulatshahi · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 9002501B1 · Rodrigue · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9092592B2 · Perasso · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9146652B1 · Danielsson · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9194376B2 · Ritter · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9817452B2 · Evens · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 9977425B1 · McCann · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 10061300B1 · Coffman · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 10466681B1 · Jones · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10635088B1 · Bandara · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10860013B2 · Dagnino · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10928809B2 · Salapakkam · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 10935964B2 · Ruggiero · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11103927B2 · Tang · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11209345B1 · Madsen · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11280751B2 · Ruggiero · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20030045786A1 · Zhao · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 20030115037A1 · Sumida · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 20030149498A1 · Rebello · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 20050102050A1 · Richey · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 20060129301A1 · Ashby · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 20060142886A1 · Ishibashi · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 20070073429A1 · Rees · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20080103788A1 · Morris · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20090013025A1 · Soejima · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20090030752A1 · Senturk-Doganaksoy · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20090089029A1 · Sturrock · 2009 [cited by examiner]
US 20090138518A1 · Rodgers · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20090297336A1 · Allen · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20100153080A1 · Khan · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20110137575A1 · Koul · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20110153295A1 · Yerramalla · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20110191091A1 · Joshi · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20110202297A1 · Kim · 2011 [cited by examiner]
US 20110295563A1 · McDaniel · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20120078599A1 · Tryon, III · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20130139112A1 · Domke · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20140130459A1 · Lundy · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140257547A1 · Bachrach · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20150169821A1 · Peters · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20170102287A1 · Okerson · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170124448A1 · Engel · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170129254A1 · Nardiello et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170176978A1 · Yagita · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170206510A1 · Horton · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170235848A1 · Van Dusen · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170286572A1 · Hershey · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 20170323231A1 · Johnson · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170323239A1 · Johnson · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170323240A1 · Johnson · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170323274A1 · Johnson · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170323403A1 · Johnson · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170329295A1 · Zahorcak · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170329297A1 · Gilman · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170343984A1 · Czinger · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20180004197A1 · Feenstra · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180005368A1 · Nalladega · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180027190A1 · Srinivasan · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180054376A1 · Hershey et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180088559A1 · Salem · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180102000A1 · Vala · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180137219A1 · Goldfarb · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180144277A1 · Srivastava et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180210436A1 · Burd · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180292815A1 · Byers · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180304370A1 · Myerberg et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180304540A1 · Tobia et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180314234A1 · Zhang · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20190001655A1 · Blom et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190004079A1 · Blom et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190049929A1 · Good et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190094108A1 · Liao · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190146470A1 · Akkaram · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190187679A1 · Strudwicke · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190196449A1 · Zhang · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190212721A1 · Kesler · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20190243933A1 · Roemerman · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20190244309A1 · Ottnad · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20200031055A1 · Schumann · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200042659A1 · Tallman · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200162724A1 · Neser · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200173943A1 · Ruggiero · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200174456A1 · Ruggiero · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200174457A1 · Salapakkam · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200175438A1 · Ruggiero · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200376767A1 · Huang · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20200391446A1 · Davis et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200391447A1 · Davis et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200393822A1 · Davis · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200394351A1 · Roemerman · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20200394618A1 · Davis · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200394681A1 · Cohn et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20220114304A1 · O'Connor · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 20230038395A1 · Davis · 2023 [cited by applicant]
CN 1918573 · 2007 [cited by applicant]
CN 101064025 · 2007 [cited by applicant]
CN 101970153 · 2011 [cited by applicant]
CN 103558102 · 2014 [cited by applicant]
CN 104573908 · 2015 [cited by applicant]
CN 107113551 · 2017 [cited by applicant]
CN 107194826 · 2017 [cited by applicant]
CN 107636704 · 2018 [cited by applicant]
CN 107832497A · 2018 [cited by applicant]
CN 107861478A · 2018 [cited by applicant]
CN 108241909 · 2018 [cited by applicant]
CN 108628595A · 2018 [cited by applicant]
CN 108733868A · 2018 [cited by applicant]
CN 108780314 · 2018 [cited by applicant]
CN 108829933 · 2018 [cited by applicant]
CN 108919760 · 2018 [cited by applicant]
CN 109070200 · 2018 [cited by applicant]
CN 109202074 · 2019 [cited by applicant]
CN 109203478 · 2019 [cited by applicant]
CN 109203479 · 2019 [cited by applicant]
CN 109270899 · 2019 [cited by applicant]
CN 109313440 · 2019 [cited by applicant]
CN 109478053 · 2019 [cited by applicant]
CN 109599039 · 2019 [cited by applicant]
CN 109615113 · 2019 [cited by applicant]
CN 109690589 · 2019 [cited by applicant]
CN 109766566 · 2019 [cited by applicant]
EP 2350966 · 2011 [cited by applicant]
EP 3166052 · 2017 [cited by applicant]
EP 3210697A1 · 2017 [cited by applicant]
EP 3244353 · 2017 [cited by applicant]
EP 3244353A1 · 2017 [cited by applicant]
JP 2007164442 · 2007 [cited by applicant]
JP 2009015460A · 2009 [cited by applicant]
JP 2012155684 · 2012 [cited by applicant]
JP 2018151575 · 2018 [cited by applicant]
WO 2016179455 · 2016 [cited by applicant]
WO 2017091231 · 2017 [cited by applicant]
WO 2017152142A1 · 2017 [cited by applicant]
WO 2017192998 · 2017 [cited by applicant]
WO 2018073422 · 2018 [cited by applicant]
WO 2018073422A2 · 2018 [cited by applicant]
WO 2018183275 · 2018 [cited by applicant]
WO 2019055538 · 2019 [cited by applicant]
WO 2019055576 · 2019 [cited by applicant]
WO 2019055576A1 · 2019 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2019055538A1 · 2019 [cited by examiner]
WO 2019067471 · 2019 [cited by applicant]
WO 2019070644 · 2019 [cited by applicant]
WO 2019070644A2 · 2019 [cited by applicant]
WO 2019080644A1 · 2019 [cited by applicant]
WO 2019103773 · 2019 [cited by applicant]
Malkani, Systems and method for additive manufacture, 2019, google patents, note this is a machine translation of WO2019055538 (Year: 2019). [cited by examiner]
Office Action, dated Nov. 2, 2021, for U.S. Appl. No. 16/901,205, “Additive Manufacturing-Coupled Digital Twin Ecosystem Based on Multi-Variant Distribution Model of Performance,” 22 pages. [cited by applicant]
USPTO; Non-Final Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. No. 16/901,168 mailed Feb. 8, 2022. [cited by applicant]
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, Final Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 16/209,918, filed Jun. 24, 2021, 15 pp. [cited by applicant]
Benjamin Schleich et al., “Shaping the Digital Twin for Design and Production Engineering,” CIRP Annals, Elsevier BV, NL, CH, FR, vol. 66, No. 1, Apr. 21, 2017, pp. 141-144. [cited by applicant]
Dennis J. Siedlak et al., “A Digital Thread Approach to Support Manufacturing-Influenced Conceptual Aircraft Design,” Research in Engineering Design, Springer Verlag, London, GB, vol. 29, No. 2, Sep. 13, 2017, pp. 285-3… [cited by applicant]
Doom, Travis R., “Aeroderivative Gas Turbines”, Aug. 31, 2013, American Energy Innovation Council, RL: http://americanenergyinnovation.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/08/Case-Gas-Turbines.pdf, 12 pages. [cited by applicant]
Horlock J. H. et al: “Turbine Blade Cooling: The Blade Temperature Distribution”, Proceedings of The Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part A, Journal of Power and Energy, vol. 220, No. 4, Jun. 1, 2006 (Jun. 1, 2006)… [cited by applicant]
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, Final Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 16/209,918, Jun. 24, 2021, 15 pp. [cited by applicant]
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, Final Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 16/209,884, Jun. 17, 2021, 22 pp. [cited by applicant]
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, Notice of Allowance and Fees Due, U.S. Appl. No. 16/209,884, Nov. 16, 2021, 10 pp. [cited by applicant]
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, Notice of Allowance, U.S. Appl. No. 16/209,905, Oct. 27, 2020, 8 pp. [cited by applicant]
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 16/209,918, Dec. 24, 2020, 17 pp. [cited by applicant]
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 16/209,918, Nov. 9, 2021, 16 pp. [cited by applicant]
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 16/209,884, Jan. 1, 2021, 19 pp. [cited by applicant]
USPTO; U.S. Appl. No. 16/901,168; Non-Final Rejection mailed Jul. 11, 2022; (pp. 1-61). [cited by applicant]
USPTO; U.S. Appl. No. 16/901,205; Notice of Allowance and Fees Due (PTOL-85) mailed May 26, 2022; (pp. 1-5). [cited by applicant]
USPTO; U.S. Appl. No. 16/901,205; Notice of Allowance and Fees Due (PTOL-85) mailed Aug. 29, 2022; (pp. 1-5). [cited by applicant]
USPTO; U.S. Appl. No. 16/901,205; Notice of Allowance and Fees Due (PTOL-85) mailed Dec. 21, 2022; (pp. 1-5). [cited by applicant]
USPTO; U.S. Appl. No. 16/901,220; Non-Final Rejection mailed Oct. 13, 2022; (pp. 1-24). [cited by applicant]
USPTO; U.S. Appl. No. 16/901,220; Non-Final Rejection mailed Aug. 24, 2023; (pp. 1-17). [cited by applicant]
USPTO; U.S. Appl. No. 16/901,220; Final Rejection mailed Nov. 30, 2023; (pp. 1-13). [cited by applicant]
USPTO; U.S. Appl. No. 17/964,681; Non-Final Rejection mailed Dec. 12, 2023; (pp. 1-16). [cited by applicant]
USPTO; U.S. Appl. No. 16/901,220; Final Rejection mailed Nov. 30, 2023; (pp. 1-11). [cited by applicant]
USPTO; U.S. Appl. No. 17/964,681; Final Rejection mailed Jun. 14, 2024; (pp. 1-18). [cited by applicant]
N N: “Commission Regulation (EC) No. 1702/2003”, Sep. 24, 2003 (Sep. 24, 2003), pp. 1-74, XP093160737, https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32003R1702. [cited by applicant]
Majid Rezazadeh Reyhani, et al. “Turbine blade temperature calculation and life estimation—a sensitivity analysis”, Propulsion and Power Research, vol. 2, No. 2, Jun. 1, 2013 (Jun. 1, 2013), pp. 148-161, XP055762513, IS… [cited by applicant]
Horlock J. H. et al: “Turbine Blade Cooling: The Blade Temperature Distribution”, Proceedings of The Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part A,Journal of Power and Energy, vol. 220, No. 4, Jun. 1, 2006 (Jun. 1, 2006),… [cited by applicant]
Jose Rios et al: 11 Framework to support 1-15 the aircraft digital counterpart concept with an industrial design view 11, International Journal of Agile Systems and Management, vol. 9, No. 3, Jan. 1, 2016 (Jan. 1, 2016)… [cited by applicant]
Schleich Benjamin et al: “Shaping the digital twin for design and production engineering”, Cirp Annals, Elsevier BV, NL, CH, FR, vol. 66, No. 1, Apr. 21, 2017 (Apr. 21, 2017), pp. 141-144. [cited by applicant]
Siedlak Dennis J et al: “A digital thread approach to support manufacturing-influenced conceptual aircraft design”, Research in Engineering Design, Springer Verlag, London, GB, vol. 29, No. 2, Sep. 13, 2017 (Sep. 13, 20… [cited by applicant]
Travis R Doom: “Aeroderivative Gas Turbines”, Aug. 31, 2013 (Aug. 31, 2013), XP055690065, URL: http://americanenergyinnovation.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/08/case-gas-turbines.pdf. [cited by applicant]
USPTO; U.S. Appl. No. 16/901,168; Notice of Allowance and Fees Due (PTOL-85) mailed Jan. 24, 2023; (pp. 1-17). [cited by applicant]
USPTO; U.S. Appl. No. 16/901,220; Final Rejection mailed Apr. 26, 2023; (pp. 1-24). [cited by applicant]
Knapp, et al. “Building blocks for a digital twin of additive manufacturing.” Acta Materialia 135 (2017): 390-399. [cited by applicant]
Zhang, et al. “Digital twins for additive manufacturing: a state-of-the-art review.” Applied Sciences 10.23 (2020): 8350, 1-10. [cited by applicant]
Wright, et al. “How to tell the difference between a model and a digital twin.” Advanced Modeling and Simulation in Engineering Sciences 7 (2020), 1-13. [cited by applicant]
Fergani, et al. “A machine learning-based digital twin of the manufacturing process: metal powder-bed fusion case.” (2020), 1-8, DOI: 10.31224/osf.io/736a5; retrieved from the Internet: https://www.researchgate.net/publ… [cited by applicant]