IP Library Granted Patent US 11,738,835
Granted Patent B2
US 11,738,835 · App. 16/978,529 · Granted Aug 29, 2023

Distributed decision making

Inventors: Kenneth Solberg (Alesund, NO); Carl Johansson (Alesund, NO); Morten Skogvold (Alesund, NO)
Assignee: KONGSBERG MARITIME AS
B63B79/40B63B43/00B63H21/21G05B23/0275G05D1/0206B63B35/00
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 11,738,835
App. No.
16/978,529
Granted
Aug 29, 2023
Kind
B2
Abstract

The invention relates to marine vessel safety system which ensures that a marine vessel enters a safe state in the event of at least one malfunction in any vessel operation systems and components of the marine vessel. The marine vessel safety system comprises at least one vessel monitoring system, at least one malfunction evaluation system and a safe-state control system.

Claims (89)

1. A marine vessel safety system which ensures that a remote and autonomous marine vessel enters a safe state in the event of at least one malfunction in any vessel operation systems and components of the marine vessel, the marine vessel safety system comprises:

at least one vessel monitoring system, configured to monitor the vessel operation systems and components of the marine vessel,

a plurality of decision-making systems, each comprising at least one malfunction evaluation system configured to detect any malfunction in the vessel operation systems and components of the marine vessel and to evaluate the detected malfunction,

a safe-state control system, configured to be activated by any one of the malfunction evaluation systems in the event where any of the malfunction evaluation systems detect any malfunction in the vessel operation systems and components, and to execute a set of control commands, which forces the vessel in to a safe state.

2. The marine vessel safety system according to claim 1 , wherein at least one of the plurality of decision-making systems is positioned on-board the remote and autonomous marine vessel.

3. The marine vessel safety system according to claim 1 , wherein at least one of the plurality of decision-making systems is at positioned in a location remote from the remote and autonomous marine vessel.

4. The marine vessel safety system according to claim 1 , wherein the at least one malfunction evaluation system comprises a vessel monitoring system.

5. The marine vessel safety system according to claim 4 , wherein the vessel monitoring system is independent from any other system in the marine vessel.

6. The marine vessel safety system according to claim 4 , wherein the vessel monitoring system is autonomous.

7. The marine vessel safety system according to claim 4 , wherein the vessel monitoring system is firmware programmed.

8. The marine vessel safety system according to claim 1 , wherein at least one of the vessel operation systems and components of the marine vessel is chosen from the group comprising:

engine control system,

propeller,

propulsion control system,

communication system,

navigation system,

water cooling system,

dynamic positioning system,

distress signal communication system,

route planning system,

situation awareness system,

collision avoidance system,

mission management system,

equipment health monitoring system,

energy management system,

integrated alarm system,

cyber security system such as intrusion detection system,

steering gear,

autopilot,

position reference systems,

deck machinery systems,

machinery recovery systems, and

artificial chief engineer.

9. The marine vessel safety system according to claim 1 , wherein each state of each of the vessel operation systems and components of the marine vessel is defined by a set of any number, n, of parameters, m.1, m.2, m.3, m.4, . . . , m.n.

10. The marine vessel safety system according to claim 9 , wherein at least one of the parameters, in at least one of the sets of any number of parameters, represents a property of the respective vessel operation system or component of the marine vessel chosen from the group comprising:

pressure,

temperature,

sound,

voltage,

frequency,

gas-concentration,

humidity,

pH,

connectivity capability,

network activity,

software component activity,

CPU load,

memory usage,

connectivity activity,

position, and

latency.

11. The marine vessel safety system according to any of the claim 9 , wherein the vessel monitoring system is configured to:

monitor each set of parameters, m.1, m.2, m.3, m.4, . . . , m.n, defining the state of each of the vessel operation systems and components of the marine vessel.

12. The marine vessel safety system according to claim 11 , wherein the at least one malfunction evaluation system comprises at least one malfunction trigger algorithm.

13. The marine vessel safety system according to claim 12 , wherein the at least one of malfunction trigger algorithm is configured to:

compare each set of parameters m.1, m.2, m.3, m.4, . . . , m.n with a set of allowable threshold values T m.1 , T m.2 , T m.3 , T m.4 , . . . , T m.n defined as a set of ranges, each set of ranges is associated with a particular set of parameters m.1, m.2, m.3, m.4, . . . , m.n, and if any one of the parameter values I m.1 , I m.2 , I m.3 , I m.4 , . . . , I m.n in the set of parameters is outside the corresponding allowable threshold value T m.1 , T m.2 , T m.3 , T m.4 , . . . , T m.n defined in the set of ranges, then send a malfunction signal to a logical comparator, which outputs an activation signal to the safe state control system.

14. The marine vessel safety system according to claim 1 , wherein the malfunction evaluation system, evaluates the detected malfunction in light of the state of at least one other amongst the vessel operation systems and components of the marine vessel.

15. The marine vessel safety system according to claim 1 , wherein the malfunction evaluation system, comprises at least one system chosen from the group comprising:

route planning system,

situation awareness system,

collision avoidance system, and

dynamic positioning system.

16. The marine vessel safety system according to claim 1 , wherein said set of control commands executable by the safe-state control system is chosen based on any of the sets of parameters that defines the states of the vessel operation systems and components of the marine vessel.

17. The marine vessel safety system according to claim 1 , wherein said set of control commands executable by the safe-state control system comprises at least one control command which determines at least one of the following:

vessel rudder position,

vessel propulsion levels,

activation of a dynamic positioning system,

activation of a distress signal communication system,

activation of a route planning system,

activation of a situation awareness system,

activation of a collision avoidance system,

activation of a machinery recovery system,

notification of a remote operator,

activation of a sound signal,

activation of a flashing light signal,

activation of a light signal,

activation of a loudspeaker announcement, and

disconnect remote control.

18. The marine vessel safety system according to claim 1 , wherein at least one safe state is defined amongst the actions chosen from the group comprising:

the marine vessel proceeds to the next waypoint,

the marine vessel stops and enters DP-mode,

the marine vessel returns to the previous waypoint,

the marine vessel navigates back to its last known safe position,

the marine vessel navigates to the nearest available safe position,

the marine vessel drops an anchor,

the marine vessel shuts down some machinery,

the marine vessel shuts down all machinery,

the marine vessel stops propellers and drifts, and

the marine vessel maintains it relative position relative to an object.

Assignments (2)
MERGER AND CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Oct 5, 2021
From: KONGSBERG MARITIME CM AS; KONGSBERG MARITIME AS
To: KONGSBERG MARITIME AS
Reel/Frame 057700/0215 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Feb 2, 2021
From: SOLBERG, KENNETH; JOHANNSON, CARL; SKOGVOLD, MORTEN
To: KONGSBERG MARITIME CM AS
Reel/Frame 055110/0583 →
Priority Claims (1)
NO 20180336 · Mar 7, 2018 · national
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20200398954A1 · Dec 24, 2020