IP Library Granted Patent US 10,932,866
Granted Patent B1
US 10,932,866 · App. 17/030,644 · Granted Mar 2, 2021

Implant based planning, digitizing, and registration for total joint arthroplasty

Inventors: Daniel Patrick Bonny (Fremont, CA); Joel Zuhars (Fremont, CA); Michael E. Hoppe (Fremont, CA)
Assignee: THINK SURGICAL, INC.
A61B34/20A61B17/154A61B17/1675A61B17/1703A61B17/1764A61B34/10A61B34/30A61F2/389A61B17/15A61B2034/102A61B2034/104A61F2002/3069A61F2002/4632A61F2002/4633
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 10,932,866
App. No.
17/030,644
Granted
Mar 2, 2021
Kind
B1
Abstract

A method for removing an implant attached to a bone during revision joint replacement surgery includes a library of implant models. A series of surface points are collected on the implant with a digitizer. A best match is computed between the collected surface points and an implant model in the library of implant models to register the position of the implant model to the implant. A location is computed of a material-implant interface based on the geometry of the implant model and the registered position of the implant model. Material is removed at the material-implant interface to separate the implant from the bone. A computer-assisted surgical system is provided for performing the method.

Claims (21)

1. A method for removing an implant attached to a bone during revision joint replacement surgery comprising:

providing an implant model;

collecting a plurality of surface points on the implant with a digitizer;

computing a best match between the plurality of collected surface points and the implant model to register a position of the implant model to the implant;

computing a location of a material-implant interface based on the geometry of the implant model and the registered position of the implant model; and

removing material at the material-implant interface to separate the implant from the bone.

2. The method of claim 1 wherein the material-implant interface is a bone-implant interface, and the material being removed is bone.

3. The method of claim 1 wherein the material-implant interface is a cement-implant interface, and the material being removed is cement.

4. The method of claim 1 further comprising a computer-assisted surgical system, wherein the library of implant models are stored in the surgical system, coordinates of the plurality of collected surface points are recorded relative to the surgical system, the best match and the location of the material-implant interface are computed by the surgical system, and the removal of the material at the location of the material-implant interface is performed with the aid of the surgical system.

5. The method of claim 4 wherein the computer-assisted surgical system comprises an end-effector, wherein the computer-assisted surgical system maintains the end-effector in the same orientation as the orientation of the computed material-implant interface.

6. The method of claim 5 further comprising computing a plane at the material-implant interface, wherein the computer-assisted surgical system maintains the end-effector at the same orientation as the computed plane.

7. The method of claim 5 wherein the end-effector comprises a cutter.

8. The method of claim 1 wherein the collection of the plurality of points on the implant model comprises tracing the surface of the implant with the digitizer to collect three-dimensional coordinates of the implant.

9. The method of claim 1 wherein the digitizer is at least one of an optically tracked probe, a mechanically tracked probe, or an end-effector of a computer-assisted surgical system.

10. The method of claim 4 further comprising providing feedback information to a user while removing material at the material-implant interface to avoid one or more structures of the implant.

11. The method of claim 10 wherein the feedback information is provided graphically by the computer-assisted surgical system.

12. The method of claim 1 wherein the implant is a tibial tray.

13. The method of claim 10 wherein the implant is a tibial tray and the one or more structures is a tibial keel of the tibial tray.

14. The method of claim 6 further comprising indicating to the surgical system to offset the plane to a lower depth to remove additional material.

15. A computer-assisted surgical system for performing the method of claim 1 .

16. The system of claim 15 wherein the computer-assisted surgical system is a navigated system, a robotic system, or an articulating hand-held system.

Assignments (2)
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Jun 12, 2026
From: THINK SURGICAL, INC.
To: SYMBIOTIC CAPITAL AGENCY LLC, AS COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 075736/0843 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Sep 24, 2020
From: BONNY, DANIEL PATRICK; ZUHARS, JOEL; HOPPE, MICHAEL E.
To: THINK SURGICAL, INC.
Reel/Frame 053869/0664 →
Continuity (3)
Continuation In Part 16215055 · Dec 10, 2018
Continuation 15532284
Provisional Application 62088896 · Dec 8, 2014
Cited By (3)
US 12,343,093 US 12,370,061 US 12,569,306