IP Library › Granted Patent US 11,753,917
Granted Patent B2
US 11,753,917 · App. 17/033,428 · Granted Sep 12, 2023

Real time parent child well interference control

Inventors: Dinesh Ananda Shetty (Sugar Land, TX); William Owen Alexander Ruhle (Denver, CO); Srividhya Sridhar (Bellaire, TX)
Assignee: Halliburton Energy Services, Inc.
E21B43/267E21B49/008
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 11,753,917
App. No.
17/033,428
Granted
Sep 12, 2023
Kind
B2
Abstract

When a child well is hydraulically fractured near the depleted reservoir volume surrounding a previously produced parent well, it is economically efficient to deliver proppant to the formation volume and fractures not reached by the parent well. A fracture length, which is the distance fluid travels from the child well to the depleted region, is calculated as a function of fracture stage. From identified trends in fracture length, fracture length for future stages can be predicted. Based on predicted fracture length, the slurry or treatment volume to cause well interference can be estimated. Proppant concentration or fracturing stage design can be adjusted so that the well interference volume is larger than the treatment volume and proppant is efficiently delivered to the child well fractures.

Claims (60)

1. A method comprising:

determining an interference time for a first hydraulic fracturing stage of a child well based, at least in part, on a measured pressure response in a parent well;

determining an interference volume for the first hydraulic fracturing stage of the child well based, at least in part, on the interference time; and

determining a first fracture length between the child well and a depleted reservoir region of the parent well for the first hydraulic fracturing stage based, at least in part, on the interference volume; and

estimating a distance to a depleted reservoir boundary of the depleted reservoir region based, at least in part, on the first fracture length.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein determining the interference volume further comprises:

determining the interference volume based, at least in part, on an integral of a treatment rate in the child well over the interference time.

3. The method of claim 1 further comprising:

determining a flow-distribution factor for the first hydraulic fracturing stage, wherein the flow-distribution factor is a measure of a uniformity of a fluid transport through the first fracture length.

4. The method of claim 3 , wherein determining the flow-distribution factor comprises determining the flow-distribution factor based on a poro-elastic model.

5. The method of claim 3 , wherein determining the flow-distribution factor comprises determining the flow-distribution factor based on a planar model.

6. The method of claim 3 , wherein determining the first fracture length comprises determining the first fracture length based on the flow-distribution factor.

7. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

predicting a second fracture length for a second hydraulic fracturing stage based, at least in part, on the first fracture length.

8. The method of claim 7 wherein the second hydraulic fracturing stage comprises at least one of a hydraulic fracturing stage in the child well or a hydraulic fracturing stage in a second well.

9. The method of claim 7 , wherein predicting the second fracture length comprises determining a trend within one or more fracture lengths.

10. The method of claim 7 , further comprising:

predicting a volume-to-frac-hit based on the second fracture length.

11. The method of claim 10 , further comprising:

calculating a proppant ramp schedule based on the predicted volume-to-frac hit.

12. The method of claim 11 , further comprising:

adjusting a proppant concentration based, at least in part, on a comparison between the predicted volume-to-frac-hit and a slurry volume, wherein the slurry volume is determined based on the calculated proppant ramp schedule.

13. The method of claim 12 , further comprising:

determining if the adjusted proppant concentration is allowable; and

if the adjusted proppant concentration is not allowable,

increasing the predicted volume-to-frac-hit by adjusting one or more hydraulic fracturing parameters.

14. A non-transitory, computer-readable medium having instructions stored thereon that are executable by a computing device, the instructions to:

determine an interference time for a hydraulic fracturing stage of a child well based, at least in part, on a measured pressure response in a parent well;

determine an interference volume for the hydraulic fracturing stage of the child well based, at least in part, on the interference time and an integral of a treatment rate in the child well; and

determine a fracture length between the child well and a depleted reservoir region of the parent well for the hydraulic fracturing stage based, at least in part, on the interference volume; and

estimate a distance to a depleted reservoir boundary of the depleted reservoir region based, at least in part, on the determined fracture length.

15. The non-transitory, computer-readable medium of claim 14 , wherein the instructions further comprise instructions to:

determine a flow-distribution factor for the hydraulic fracturing stage based on at least one of a poro-elastic model and a planar model, wherein the flow-distribution factor is a measure of a uniformity of a fluid transport through the determined fracture length; and

wherein the instructions to determine the fracture length comprise instructions to determine the fracture length based on the flow-distribution factor.

16. The non-transitory, computer-readable medium of claim 14 , wherein the instructions further comprise instructions to:

predict a fracture length for a future hydraulic fracturing stage based, at least in part, on the determined fracture length for one or more hydraulic fracturing stages;

predict a volume-to-frac-hit based on the predicted fracture length; and

calculate a proppant ramp schedule based on the predicted volume-to-frac hit.

17. The non-transitory, computer-readable medium of claim 16 , wherein the instructions further comprise instructions to:

adjust a proppant concentration based, at least in part, on a comparison between the predicted volume-to-frac-hit and a slurry volume, wherein the slurry volume is determined based on the calculated proppant ramp schedule; and

determine if the adjusted proppant concentration is allowable; and

if the adjusted proppant concentration is not allowable,

increase the predicted volume-to-frac-hit by adjusting one or more hydraulic fracturing parameters for the future hydraulic fracturing stage.

18. An apparatus comprising:

a processor; and

a computer-readable medium having instructions stored thereon that are executable by the processor to cause the apparatus to,

determine an interference time for a hydraulic fracturing stage of a child well based, at least in part, on a measured pressure response in a parent well;

determine an interference volume for the hydraulic fracturing stage of the child well based, at least in part, on the interference time and an integral of a treatment rate in the child well;

determine a flow-distribution factor for the hydraulic fracturing stage based on at least one of a poro-elastic model and a planar model, wherein the flow-distribution factor is a measure of a uniformity of a fluid transport through a fracture; and

determine a fracture length between the child well and a depleted reservoir region of the parent well for the hydraulic fracturing stage based, at least in part, on the interference volume and the flow-distribution factor; and

estimate a distance to a depleted reservoir boundary of the depleted reservoir region based, at least in part, on the determined fracture length.

19. The apparatus of claim 18 , wherein the instructions comprise instructions executable by the processor to cause the processor to:

predict a fracture length for a future hydraulic fracturing stage based, at least in part, on the determined fracture length for one or more hydraulic fracturing stages;

predict a volume-to-frac-hit based on the predicted fracture length; and

calculate a proppant ramp schedule based on the predicted volume-to-frac hit.

20. The apparatus of claim 19 , wherein the instructions comprise instructions executable by the processor to cause the processor to:

adjust a proppant concentration based, at least in part, on a comparison between the predicted volume-to-frac-hit and a slurry volume, wherein the slurry volume is determined based on the calculated proppant ramp schedule; and

determine if the adjusted proppant concentration is allowable; and

if the adjusted proppant concentration is not allowable,

increase the predicted volume-to-frac-hit by adjusting one or more hydraulic fracturing parameters for the future hydraulic fracturing stage.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Dec 21, 2020
From: SHETTY, DINESH ANANDA; RUHLE, WILLIAM OWEN ALEXANDER; SRIDHAR, SRIVIDHYA
To: HALLIBURTON ENERGY SERVICES, INC.
Reel/Frame 054713/0951 →
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20220098963A1 · Mar 31, 2022
Cited By (8)
US 12,410,690 US 12,442,278 US 12,486,747 US 12,509,971 US 12,523,143 US 12,618,313 US 12,662,932 US 12,704,062