IP Library › Granted Patent US 12,252,683
Granted Patent B2
US 12,252,683 · App. 17/040,427 · Granted Mar 18, 2025

Workstation for automated control of an in vitro system

Inventors: Frederic Zenhausern (Chandler, AZ); Matthew W. Barrett (Phoenix, AZ); Carla Brooks (Phoenix, AZ); Peng Chen (Chandler, AZ); Brett M. Duane (Phoenix, AZ); Marie Oceane Parent (Phoenix, AZ); Stanley D. Smith (Phoenix, AZ); Baiju Thomas (Phoenix, AZ); Jianing Yang (Phoenix, AZ)
Assignee: Arizona Board of Regents on Behalf of the University of Arizona
C12M41/48C12M23/16C12M23/34C12M23/46C12M25/02C12M29/00C12M29/10
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,252,683
App. No.
17/040,427
Granted
Mar 18, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

Provided are automated cell culture systems and related in vitro cell culture methods, including for a co-culture of different cell populations having different cell culture conditions. For example, the system may comprise a bioreactor having a plurality of cell culture compartments, the bioreactor having a fluid port fluidly connected to the plurality of cell culture compartments. A pump fluidly connected to the fluid port can provide a cell culture medium to the plurality of culture compartments. A sensor is operably connected to at least one of the plurality of cell culture compartments for measuring at least one cell culture parameter. In this manner, a controller electronically connected the pump and sensor, is configured to automatically adjust a pump flow rate and/or a cell culture gas content to provide a desired steady-state cell culture parameter for facilitating cells interactions and collection of products representative of said interactions.

Claims (53)

1. An automated cell culture system comprising: an insertable and removable bioreactor comprising a plurality of cell culture compartments and formed from a plurality of stacked layers including a middle cell culture compartment, the bioreactor having a fluid port fluidly connected to the plurality of cell culture compartments; a pump fluidly connected to the fluid port for providing a cell culture medium to the plurality of culture compartments; a sensor operably connected to at least the middle cell culture compartment for measuring at least one cell culture parameter; one or more actuators operably connected to the middle cell culture compartment configured to automatically control one or more cell culture parameters in the middle cell culture compartment based on an output from the sensor; and a controller electronically connected to the pump, the actuator, and the sensor, wherein the controller is configured to automatically adjust a pump flow rate, a cell culture gas content with a gas exchanger to provide a desired gas composition comprising an appropriate level of each of carbon dioxide, oxygen and nitrogen, and a cell culture parameter to provide an automated desired steady-state cell culture parameter to achieve ideal or desired cell culture conditions based on the output from the sensor for facilitating automated monitoring of cell growth and functional maintenance, cell communication and collection of products from cell interactions; wherein the insertable and removable bioreactor, pump, sensor, gas exchanger and one or more actuators and controller are modularly connected to provide an integrated and automated modular workstation having the insertable and removable bioreactor integrated into the automated modular workstation for tissue co-culture and configured for subsequent removal and shipment to a remote testing facility; wherein a lid and a base plate are positioned to contain the plurality of stacked layers; a fastener to reliably secure the lid top and base plate and fluidly enclose the bioreactor, wherein the plurality of stacked layers are formed of a compressible material; wherein the fastener comprises a clamp that compresses the plurality of stacked layers upon a clamp actuation; and the lid top and base plates have complimentary relief and recess features configured to provide a uniform force distribution over the plurality of stacked layers and provide a fluid seal with the clamp actuation.

2. The cell culture system of claim 1 , wherein the plurality of stacked layers comprise

a microbial cell culture compartment layer;

an animal cell culture compartment layer, wherein the animal cell culture compartment layer is optionally for culturing human epithelial cells;

wherein a nanoporous membrane separates the microbial cell culture compartment layer from the animal cell culture compartment layer; and

a perfusion microchamber compartment layer, wherein a microporous membrane separates the perfusion microchamber from the animal cell culture component layer;

wherein the lid and/or base plate have one or more connectors to facilitate access by one or more sensors to the microbial and/or animal cell culture compartment layers.

3. The cell culture system of claim 1 , wherein the pump comprises a flow-rate controllable pump, wherein an output from the one or more sensors is used to control a fluid flow rate or pressure from the pump; the cell culture system further comprising a plurality of independently controllable pumps having controlled flow rates of between 1 μL/min to 1 mL/min.

4. The cell culture system of claim 3 , wherein an animal cell compartment pump provides animal cell culture medium to the animal cell compartment and a bacterial cell compartment pump provides bacterial cell culture medium to the bacterial cell compartment.

5. The cell culture system of claim 1 , wherein the sensor is selected from the group consisting of:

a flow sensor;

a temperature sensor;

a gas sensor;

a pH sensor;

a chemical sensor;

an electrical sensor (electrode);

an optical sensor;

a relative humidity sensor; and

an electromagnetic sensor.

6. The cell culture system of claim 5 , comprising a plurality of sensors to measure a plurality of cell culture parameters, wherein the cell culture parameters are selected from the group consisting of one or more of:

flow rate;

temperature;

gas level;

pH level;

chemical level;

electric potential, including a transepithelial electrical resistance (TEER);

optical intensity;

relative humidity;

pressure; and

viscosity.

7. The cell culture system of claim 1 , wherein the sensor is positioned to have direct access to a middle channel of the bioreactor.

8. The cell culture system of claim 1 , wherein the controller is configured to provide automated and/or remote control of the cell culture system.

9. The cell culture system of claim 1 , wherein the one or more actuators in electronic communication with the controller is selected from the group consisting of a heater, an optical light source, a fluid control element, a RF communication component, and a positioning device.

10. The cell culture system of claim 1 , wherein the controller is part of a computer, and output from the one or more sensors are displayed and/or electronically stored.

11. The cell culture system of claim 10 , comprising at least four separate bioreactors having independently controllable pumps controlled by the controller.

12. The cell culture system of claim 1 , further comprising an incubator having an incubation volume, wherein the bioreactor has a size and geometric shape to fit within the incubation volume.

13. The cell culture system of claim 1 , further comprising a first electrode inlaid in the lid and a second electrode in the base plate for continuous monitoring of an electrical resistance in the bioreactor.

14. The cell culture system of claim 1 , the gas exchanger further comprising:

a holder configured to hold a gas permeable tube in a reeled-up geometry, wherein the gas permeable tube is connected to the bioreactor fluid port; and

a gas chamber having an enclosure, wherein the holder is positioned in the enclosure to thereby provide a controlled gas exchange between the gas chamber and a lumen of the gas permeable tube.

15. A method of co-culturing a plurality of distinct cell types, the method comprising the steps of:

providing the cell culture system of claim 1 ;

establishing a first cell culture in a first cell culture compartment;

establishing a second cell culture in a second cell culture compartment, wherein the first cell culture and the second cell culture comprise different cell types;

activating the pump to force fluid medium through the fluid compartments at a first fluid flow rate in the first fluid compartment and a second fluid flow rate in the second fluid compartment;

monitoring a cell culture parameter in each of the first cell culture compartment and the second cell culture compartment with one or more sensors in each of the cell culture compartments;

adjusting the first and/or the second fluid flow rates and/or cell culture gas inflow to maintain the cell culture parameter in each of the first cell culture compartment and the second cell culture compartment;

thereby co-culturing the plurality of distinct cell types.

16. The method of claim 15 , wherein the first cell type comprises an animal cell and the second cell type comprises bacteria.

17. The method of claim 15 , wherein the activating, monitoring and adjusting steps are automatically controlled by a controller receiving output signals from the sensors, wherein the co-culturing occurs for a time period of at least three days without active intervention.

18. The method of claim 15 , wherein the cell culture gas inflow comprises passing culture gas through the gas exchanger.

19. The cell culture of claim 1 , further comprising a top inlaid electrode on a top surface of the middle cell culture compartment and a bottom inlaid electrode on a bottom surface of the middle cell culture compartment for continuous monitoring of transepithelial electrical resistance (TEER) and characterization of oxygen permeation and hypoxia.

20. The cell culture of claim 1 , wherein the lid and the base plate are formed from a plastic such as polycarbonate.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Oct 15, 2020
From: ZENHAUSERN, FREDERIC; BARRETT, MATTHEW W.; BROOKS, CARLA; CHEN, PENG; DUANE, BRETT M.; PARENT, MARIE OCEANE; SMITH, STANLEY D.; THOMAS, BAIJU; YANG, JIANING
To: ARIZONA BOARD OF REGENTS ON BEHALF OF THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA
Reel/Frame 054067/0866 →
Continuity (2)
Provisional Application 62650817 · Mar 30, 2018
Related Publication 20210079337A1 · Mar 18, 2021
References Cited (57)
US 6591858B2 · Peterson · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 8268152B2 · Stelzle et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 8647861B2 · Ingber et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 9081003B2 · Park et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 10898896B2 · Zenhausern et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11221966B2 · Zenhausern et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20060127237A1 · Shaw · 2006 [cited by examiner]
US 20070020693A1 · Shuler · 2007 [cited by examiner]
US 20090269841A1 · Wojciechowski · 2009 [cited by examiner]
US 20110124035A1 · Broadley · 2011 [cited by examiner]
US 20150072413A1 · Zenhausern · 2015 [cited by examiner]
US 20150301027A1 · Charest et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20160145554A1 · Ingber et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20170107476A1 · Polley · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 20180155665A1 · Zenhausern et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20190345431A1 · Barrett et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20210030347A1 · Zenhausern et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210199651A1 · Zenhausern et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20220001378A1 · Zenhausern et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
DE 19810901C1 · 1999 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2013139798A1 · 2013 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2013144253A1 · 2013 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2014016379A1 · 2014 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2016189142A1 · 2016 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2018090035A1 · 2018 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2020264385A1 · 2020 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2020264388A1 · 2020 [cited by applicant]
A microfluidics-based in vitro model of the gastrointestinal human-microbe interface, Shah et al., Nature Communications (Year: 2016). [cited by examiner]
Shah et al., A microfluidics-based in vitro model of the gastrointestinal human-microbe interface (Year: 2016). [cited by examiner]
Accuray Research LLP, (Nov. 2016) “Organ-On-Chip Market Analysis & Trends—Organ (Heart-on-chip, Human-on-chip, Intestine-on-chip, Kidney-on-chip, Liver-on- hip, Lung-on-chip), Application—Forecast to 2025,” ReportLinker… [cited by applicant]
Adebiyi et al. (2011) “The use of computational fluid dynamic models for the optimization of cell seeding processes,” Biomaterials, 32(34): 8753-8770. [cited by applicant]
Bilgen et al. (2012) “Modeling of bioreactor hydrodynamic environment and its effects on tissue growth,” In: Liebschner M. (eds) Computer-Aided Tissue Engineering. Methods in Molecular Biology, vol. 868, pp. 237-255. [cited by applicant]
Busek et al. (Feb. 2017) “Microfluidic system for in-vitro hypoxia assays,” Proc. SPIE 10061, Microfluidics, BioMEMS, and Medical Microsystems XV, 1006110. [cited by applicant]
Cremer et al. (Jun. 2017) “Effect of water flow and chemical environment on microbiota growth and composition in the human colon,” Proc Natl Acad Sci USA; 114(25): 6438-6443. [cited by applicant]
Dickman (2013) “Futuristic “human-on-chip” models will drive better predictions for efficacy, safety” Boston Biotech Watch, Nov. 19, 2013. https://bostonbiotechwatch.com/2013/11/19/futuristic-human-on-chip-models-will-d… [cited by applicant]
Eain et al. (Feb. 2017) “Engineering Solutions for Representative Models of the Gastrointestinal Human-Microbe Interface,” Engineering, 3, 60-65. [cited by applicant]
Egger et al. (May 2017) “Development and Characterization of a Parallelizable Perfusion Bioreactor for 3D Cell Culture,” Bioengineering, 4(2): 51. [cited by applicant]
Elbrecht et al. (2016) “Transepithelial/endothelial Electrical Resistance (TEER) theory and applications for microfluidic body-on-a-chip devices,” J. Rare Dis. Res. Treat., 1(3), 46-52. [cited by applicant]
Henry et al. (Jun. 2017) “Organs-on-chips with integrated electrodes for trans-epithelial electrical resistance (TEER) measurements of human epithelial barrier function,” Lab Chip, 17(13): 2264-2271. [cited by applicant]
Hoyos-Ruiz et al. (2017) “Implementation of ergonomic aspects throughout the engineering design process: Human-Artefact-Context analysis,” Int. J. Interact. Des. Manuf. IJIDeM, 11(2): 263-277. [cited by applicant]
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Jul. 15, 2019 in International application No. PCT/US2019/025000, 18 pp. [cited by applicant]
Lentle et al. (2008) “Physical characteristics of digesta and their influence on flow and mixing in the mammalian intestine: a review,” J. Comp. Physiol. B, 178(6): 673-690. [cited by applicant]
Lesher-Perez et al. (Sep. 2017) “Dispersible oxygen microsensors map oxygen gradients in three-dimensional cell cultures,” Biomater. Sci., 5(10): 2106-2113. [cited by applicant]
Maguire (2001) “Methods to support human-centred design,” Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Stud., 55(4): 587-634. [cited by applicant]
Maoz et al. (Jun. 2017) “Organs-on-Chips with combined multi-electrode array and transepithelial electrical resistance measurement capabilities,” Lab Chip, 17(13): 2294-2302. [cited by applicant]
Maschmeyer et al. (2015) “A four-organ-chip for interconnected long-term co-culture of human intestine, liver, skin and kidney equivalents,” Lab Chip, 15, 2688-2699. [cited by applicant]
McAlpine (2015) “Human-gut-on-a-chip model offers hope for IBD sufferers,” The Harvard Gazette, Dec. 15, 2015. https://news.harvard.edu/gazette/story/2015/12/human-gut-on-a-chip-model-offers-hope-for-ibd-sufferers/. [cited by applicant]
Nava et al. (2013) “A multiphysics 3D model of tissue growth under interstitial perfusion in a tissue-engineering bioreactor,” Biomech. Model. Mechanobiol. 12(6): 1169-1179. [cited by applicant]
Pasirayi et al. (2011) “Microfluidic bioreactors for cell culturing: A review,” Micro and Nanosystems, 3(2): 137-160. [cited by applicant]
Schuerlein et al. (Aug. 2016) “A versatile modular bioreactor platform for Tissue Engineering,” Biotechnol. J., 12(2): 1600326. [cited by applicant]
Shah et al. (2016) “A microfluidics-based in vitro model of the gastrointestinal human-microbe interface,” Nat. Commun., 7:11535. DOI: 10.1038/ncomms11535. [cited by applicant]
Sokol et al. (Jan. 2018) “The microbiota: an underestimated actor in radiation-induced lesions?” Gut, 67(1): 1-2. [cited by applicant]
Takahashi (2011) “Flow Behavior of Digesta and the Absorption of Nutrients in the Gastrointestine,” J. Nutr. Sci. Vitaminol. (Tokyo), 57(4): 265-273. [cited by applicant]
Tanaka et al. (2006) “Evaluation of effects of shear stress on hepatocytes by a microchip-based system,” Meas. Sci. Technol. 17(12): 3167-3170. [cited by applicant]
Timmerman (Oct. 20, 2016) “Organ-On-A-Chip Startup, Emulate, Grabs $45M to Shake Up Drug Discovery,” ttps://www.forbes.com/sites/luketimmerman/2016/10/20/organ-on-a-chip-startup-emulate-grabs-45m-to-improve-drug-discove… [cited by applicant]
Willaert et al. (2015) “Microfluidic Bioreactors for Cellular Microarrays,” Fermentation Jan. 2015, 38-78; doi: 10.3390/fermentation1010038. [cited by applicant]
Yu et al. (2007) “A 3D analysis of oxygen transfer in a low-cost micro-bioreactor for animal cell suspension culture,” Comput. Methods Programs Biomed., 85(1): 59-68. [cited by applicant]