IP Library Granted Patent US 11,457,351
Granted Patent B2
US 11,457,351 · App. 17/069,329 · Granted Sep 27, 2022

Flexible signaling of capability of UE processing time in wireless communications

Inventors: Xiu-Sheng Li (Hsinchu, TW); Wenze Qu (Beijing, CN); Pei-Kai Liao (Hsinchu, TW)
H04W8/24H04B7/0413H04W72/042H04W72/0453H04W88/06
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 11,457,351
App. No.
17/069,329
Granted
Sep 27, 2022
Kind
B2
Abstract

Techniques and examples of flexible signaling of capability of use equipment (UE) processing time in wireless communications are described. Accordingly, a UE establishes wireless communication with a network node of a wireless network. The UE also determines whether the UE is capable of operating in a second mode in addition to a first mode. The UE then transmits to the network node a report indicating capability of the UE to operate in the second mode and a condition with respect to a throughput associated with operating in the second mode. The UE performs a task in less time in the second mode than in the first mode.

Claims (45)

1. A method, comprising:

establishing, by a processor of a user equipment (UE), wireless communication with a network node of a wireless network;

determining, by the processor, whether the UE is capable of operating in a second mode in addition to a first mode; and

transmitting, by the processor, to the network node a report indicating capability of the UE to operate in the second mode and a condition with respect to a throughput associated with operating in the second mode,

wherein the UE performs a task in less time in the second mode than in the first mode, and

wherein the report further indicates a parameter related to the throughput of the UE in the second mode.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the report indicates the throughput as a percentage of a maximum number of physical resource blocks (PRBs).

3. The method of claim 2 , wherein the maximum number of PRBs comprises a maximum number of PRBs defined in 3 rd -Generation Partnership Project (3GPP) specification for New Radio (NR).

4. The method of claim 2 , wherein the maximum number of PRBs comprises a maximum number of PRBs of an operating channel bandwidth.

5. The method of claim 1 , wherein the report indicates the throughput as a percentage of a peak throughput of the UE.

6. The method of claim 1 , wherein the report indicates the throughput as a percentage of a maximum number of physical resource blocks (PRBs) per multiple-input-multiple-output (MIMO) layer by a maximum number of MIMO layers for downlink (DL) or uplink (UL) transmissions.

7. The method of claim 1 , wherein the report further indicates a condition with respect to carrier aggregation (CA) associated with operating in the second mode.

8. The method of claim 1 , wherein the first mode comprises a baseline mode, and wherein the second mode comprises an aggressive mode in which the UE completes a task in less time than in the baseline mode.

9. A method, comprising:

establishing, by a processor of a user equipment (UE), wireless communication with a network node of a wireless network;

determining, by the processor, whether the UE is capable of operating in a second mode in addition to a first mode;

transmitting, by the processor, to the network node a report indicating capability of the UE to operate in the second mode and a condition with respect to carrier aggregation (CA) associated with operating in the second mode; and

determining, by the processor, whether a number of configured carriers in a band is less than or equal to a maximum number of configured carriers supported for CA when operating in the second mode indicated in the report,

wherein the UE performs a task in less time in the second mode than in the first mode.

10. The method of claim 9 , wherein the report indicates the condition with respect to CA by indicating a maximum number of configured carriers supported for CA when operating in the second mode.

11. The method of claim 9 , wherein the report further indicates a condition with respect to a throughput associated with operating in the second mode.

12. The method of claim 9 , wherein the first mode comprises a baseline mode, and wherein the second mode comprises an aggressive mode in which the UE completes a task in less time than in the baseline mode.

13. The method of claim 9 , further comprising:

receiving, by the processor, control signaling from the network node that configures a maximum number of configured carriers supported for CA when the UE operates in the second mode or in both the first mode and the second mode.

14. The method of claim 9 , further comprising:

performing, by the processor, either:

operating in the second mode using all of the configured carriers in the band responsive to the number of the configured carriers in the band being less than or equal to the maximum number of configured carriers supported for CA, or

operating in the second mode with a single carrier in the band or in the first mode in the band responsive to the number of the configured carriers in the band being greater than the maximum number of configured carriers supported for CA.

15. An apparatus, comprising:

a transceiver capable of wireless communicating with a network node of a wireless network; and

a processor coupled to the transceiver, the processor capable of:

determining whether the apparatus is capable of operating in a second mode in addition to a first mode;

transmitting, via the transceiver, to the network node a report indicating capability of the apparatus to operate in the second mode and either or both of:

a condition with respect to a throughput associated with operating in the second mode, and

a condition with respect to carrier aggregation (CA) associated with operating in the second mode; and

determining whether a number of configured carriers in a band is less than or equal to a maximum number of configured carriers supported for CA when operating in the second mode,

wherein the apparatus performs a task in less time in the second mode than in the first mode.

16. The apparatus of claim 15 , wherein the report indicates the throughput as a percentage of a maximum number of physical resource blocks (PRBs), and wherein the maximum number of PRBs comprises a maximum number of PRBs defined in 3 rd -Generation Partnership Project (3GPP) specification for New Radio (NR) or a maximum number of PRBs of an operating channel bandwidth.

17. The apparatus of claim 15 , wherein the report indicates the throughput as a percentage of a peak throughput of the apparatus.

18. The apparatus of claim 15 , wherein the report indicates the throughput as a percentage of a maximum number of physical resource blocks (PRBs) per multiple-input-multiple-output (MIMO) layer by a maximum number of MIMO layers for downlink (DL) or uplink (UL) transmissions.

19. The apparatus of claim 15 , wherein the report indicates the condition with respect to CA by indicating a maximum number of configured carriers supported for CA when operating in the second mode.

20. The apparatus of claim 15 , wherein the processor is further capable of performing operations comprising:

performing, by the processor, either:

operating in the second mode using all of the configured carriers in the band responsive to the number of the configured carriers in the band being less than or equal to the maximum number of configured carriers supported for CA, or

operating in the second mode with a single carrier in the band or in the first mode in the band responsive to the number of the configured carriers in the band being greater than the maximum number of configured carriers supported for CA.

Assignments (2)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Mar 10, 2026
From: MEDIATEK INC.
To: HFI INNOVATION INC.
Reel/Frame 075050/0154 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Oct 13, 2020
From: LI, XIU-SHENG; QU, WENZE; LIAO, PEI-KAI
To: MEDIATEK INC.
Reel/Frame 054040/0585 →
Continuity (3)
Continuation In Part 16181290 · Nov 5, 2018
Provisional Application 62583566 · Nov 9, 2017
Related Publication 20210044962A1 · Feb 11, 2021