IP Library › Granted Patent US 11,413,753
Granted Patent B2
US 11,413,753 · App. 17/110,205 · Granted Aug 16, 2022

Robotic system control method and controller

Inventors: Rosen Nikolaev Diankov (Tokyo, JP); Yoshiki Kanemoto (Tokyo, JP); Denys Kanunikov (Tokyo, JP)
Assignee: MUJIN, Inc.
B25J9/1664B25J9/1661B25J9/1697G01S17/89G06T7/73
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 11,413,753
App. No.
17/110,205
Granted
Aug 16, 2022
Kind
B2
Abstract

A control method includes: deriving an approach location at which the end effector grips an operation object; deriving a scan location for scanning an identifier of the operation object; and based on the approach location and the scan location, creating or deriving a control sequence to instruct the robot to execute the control sequence. The control sequence includes (1) gripping the operation object from a start location; (2) scanning an identifier of the operation object with a scanner located between the start location and a task location; (3) temporarily releasing the operation object from the end effector and regripping the operation object by the end effector to be shifted, at a shift location, when a predetermined condition is satisfied; and (4) moving the operation object to the task location.

Claims (68)

1. A control method of a robotic system that includes a robot having a robotic arm and an end effector, the method comprising:

deriving an approach location at which the end effector grips an operation object;

deriving a scan location for scanning an identifier of the operation object; and

based on the approach location and the scan location, creating or deriving a control sequence to instruct the robot to execute the control sequence,

wherein the control sequence includes:

scanning identification information of the operation object with a scanner located between the start location and a task location;

temporarily releasing the operation object from the end effector and regripping the operation object by the end effector to be shifted, at a shift location, when a predetermined condition is satisfied; and

moving the operation object to the task location.

2. The control method of claim 1 , wherein the predetermined condition is based on a storage efficiency of the operation object at the task location.

3. The control method of claim 2 , wherein the storage efficiency is based on the height of the operation object.

4. The control method of claim 3 , further comprising calculating the height of the operation object from a height location of a top surface of the operation object and a height location of a bottom surface of the operation object measured in a state of being gripped by the end effector.

5. The control method of claim 1 , further comprising:

obtaining imaging data representative of a pick-up area including the operation object;

determining an initial pose of the operation object based on the imaging data;

calculating a confidence measure in relation to an accuracy of the initial pose of the operation object; and

deriving the approach location and the scan location based on the confidence measure.

6. The control method of claim 5 ,

wherein the control sequence further includes

selectively calculating the approach location and the scan location according to a performance metric and/or a scan metric, based on a result of comparing the confidence measure to a sufficiency threshold.

7. The control method of claim 6 ,

wherein for a situation where the confidence measure does not satisfy the sufficiency threshold, the approach location and the scan location are derived based on the scan metric or are derived based on the scan metric with prioritizing the scan metric over the performance metric.

8. The control method of claim 6 ,

wherein for a situation where the confidence measure satisfies the sufficiency threshold, the approach location and the scan location are derived based on the performance metric.

9. The control method of claim 1 ,

wherein the control sequence further includes:

deriving a first scan location for providing identification information of the operation object to the scanner;

deriving a second scan location for providing alternative identification information of the operation object to the scanner; and

moving the operation object (1) to the task location and ignoring the second scan location in a situation where a scan result indicates a successful scan after the operation object is moved to the first scan location, or (2) to the second scan location when a scan result indicates a failed scan after the operation object is moved to the first scan location.

10. A non-transitory computer-readable medium storing processor instructions for performing a control method of a robotic system that includes a robot having a robotic arm and an end effector,

the processor instructions including:

an instruction for deriving an approach location at which the end effector grips an operation object;

an instruction for deriving a scan location for scanning identification information of the operation object; and

an instruction for creating or deriving a control sequence to instruct the robot to execute the control sequence, based on the approach location and the scan location,

wherein the control sequence includes:

scanning an identifier of the operation object with a scanner located between the start location and a task location;

temporarily releasing the operation object from the end effector and regripping the operation object by the end effector to be shifted, at a shift location, when a predetermined condition is satisfied; and

moving the operation object to the task location.

11. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 10 , wherein the predetermined condition is based on a storage efficiency of the operation object at the task location.

12. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 11 , wherein the storage efficiency is based on the height of the operation object.

13. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 11 , wherein the control sequence further includes calculating a height of the operation object from a height location of a top surface of the operation object and a height location of a bottom surface of the operation object measured in a state of being gripped by the end effector.

14. A controller of a robotic system that includes a robot having a robotic arm and an end effector, the controller comprising:

a communication device configured to communicate with a remote device; and

a processor coupled to the communication device, wherein the processor is configured to execute a control method, the control method comprising:

deriving an approach location at which the end effector grips an operation object;

deriving a scan location for scanning an identifier of the operation object; and

based on the approach location and the scan location, deriving a control sequence to instruct the robot to execute the control sequence, wherein the control sequence includes:

scanning identification information of the operation object with a scanner located between the start location and a task location;

temporarily releasing the operation object from the end effector and regripping the operation object by the end effector to be shifted, at a shift location, when a predetermined condition is satisfied; and

moving the operation object to the task location.

15. The controller of claim 14 , wherein the predetermined condition is based on a storage efficiency of the operation object at the task location.

16. The controller of claim 14 , wherein the storage efficiency is based on the height of the operation object.

17. The controller of claim 14 , wherein the control method further includes:

obtaining imaging data representative of a pick-up area including the operation object;

determining an initial pose of the operation object based on the imaging data;

calculating a confidence measure in relation to an accuracy of the initial pose of the operation object; and

deriving the approach location and the scan location based on the confidence measure.

18. The controller of claim 14 , wherein the control sequence further includes:

deriving a first scan location for providing identification information of the operation object to the scanner;

deriving a second scan location for providing alternative identification information of the operation object to the scanner; and

generating commands and/or settings to move the operation object to the task location while bypassing the second scan location when a scan result indicates a successful scan after the operation object is moved to the first scan location.

19. The controller of claim 14 , wherein the control sequence further includes:

deriving a first scan location for providing identification information of the operation object to the scanner;

deriving a second scan location for providing alternative identification information of the operation object to the scanner; and

generating commands and/or settings to move the operation object (1) to the task location and ignoring the second scan location in a situation where a scan result indicates a successful scan after the operation object is moved to the first scan location, or (2) to the second scan location when a scan result indicates a failed scan after the operation object is moved to the first scan location.

20. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 11 , wherein the control sequence further includes:

deriving a first scan location for providing identification information of the operation object to the scanner;

deriving a second scan location for providing alternative identification information of the operation object to the scanner; and

generating commands and/or settings to move the operation object (1) to the task location and ignoring the second scan location in a situation where a scan result indicates a successful scan after the operation object is moved to the first scan location, or (2) to the second scan location when a scan result indicates a failed scan after the operation object is moved to the first scan location.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Dec 3, 2020
From: DIANKOV, ROSEN NIKOLAEV; KANEMOTO, YOSHIKI; KANUNIKOV, DENYS
To: MUJIN, INC.
Reel/Frame 054535/0989 →
Priority Claims (2)
JP JP2019-118678 · Jun 26, 2019 · national
JP JP2019-213029 · Nov 26, 2019 · national
Continuity (5)
Continuation 16752582 · Jan 24, 2020
Continuation In Part 16743313 · Jan 15, 2020
Continuation 16546209 · Aug 20, 2019
Continuation 16258120 · Jan 25, 2019
Related Publication 20210154839A1 · May 27, 2021
Cited By (2)
US 12,194,638 US 12,233,548