IP Library Patent Application 17120343
Patent Application
App. No. 17/120,343

SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR TRIGGERING A TRAINING EVENT

Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US None
App. No.
17/120,343
Abstract

A method for triggering a training event in a manufacturing line having at least one automation element, the method including: receiving automation data associated with the at least one automation element; detecting a trigger event based on the automation data; determining a training component associated with the trigger event; and providing access to the training component to an end user. A system for triggering a training event in a manufacturing line having at least one automation element, the system including: a data acquisition module configured to receive automation data associated with the at least one automation element; a data collection device trigger configured to detect a trigger event based on the automation data; a training module configured to determine a training component associated with the trigger event; and a notification module configured to provide access to the training component to an end user.

Claims (53)

1 . A method for triggering a training event in a manufacturing line having at least one automation element, the method comprising:

receiving automation data associated with the at least one automation element;

detecting a trigger event based on the automation data;

determining a training component associated with the trigger event; and

providing access to the training component to an end user.

2 . A method according to claim 1 further comprising: determining feed-back associated with the training component.

3 . A method according to claim 2 wherein determining feed-back comprises:

receiving feed-back associated with the training component from the end user;

determining efficiency data associated with the training component; and

correlating the efficiency data and the feed-back to determine a feed-back score.

4 . A method according to claim 3 wherein the efficiency data comprises at least one of: the a length of time the manufacturing line experienced stoppage, a length of time the end user took to address the trigger event, an amount of the training component reviewed by the end user, scores from tests initiated during the training component, and frequency of the trigger event.

5 . A method according to claim 3 , wherein determining the training component associated with the trigger event comprises:

reviewing the feed-back score associated with the training component; and

if the feed-back score is below a predetermined reject threshold,

disregarding the training component; and

retrieving a further training component associated with the trigger event;

otherwise, providing access to the training component to the end user.

6 . A method according to claim 4 , wherein determining the training component associated with the trigger event comprises:

reviewing the feed-back score associated with the training component; and

if the feed-back score is below a predetermined reject threshold,

disregarding the training component; and

retrieving a further training component associated with the trigger event;

otherwise, providing access to the training component to the end user.

7 . A method according to claim 1 wherein the trigger event is detected via monitoring collected operation data of the manufacturing line.

8 . A method according to claim 1 wherein the trigger event is an event associated with:

machine stoppages, faulty part detection, out of specification operations, a machine not responding within a set time period, a new operator, new equipment, general repair and maintenance, or a combination thereof.

9 . A method according to claim 1 wherein at least one of the trigger event and the training component is determined via machine learning.

10 . A system for triggering a training event in a manufacturing line having at least one automation element, the system comprising:

a data acquisition module configured to receive automation data associated with the at least one automation element;

a data collection device trigger configured to detect a trigger event based on the automation data;

a training module configured to determine a training component associated with the trigger event; and

a notification module configured to provide access to the training component to an end user.

11 . A system according to claim 10 wherein the notification module is further configured to determine feed-back associated with the training component.

12 . A system according to claim 11 wherein determining feed-back via the notification module comprises:

receiving feed-back associated with the training component from the end user;

determining efficiency data associated with the training component; and

correlating the efficiency data and the feed-back to determine a feed-back score.

13 . A system according to claim 12 wherein the efficiency data comprises at least one of: a length of time the manufacturing line experienced stoppage, a length of time the end user took to address the trigger event, an amount of the training component reviewed by the end user, scores from tests initiated during the training component, and frequency of the trigger event.

14 . A system according to claim 12 wherein the training module is further configured to:

review the feed-back score associated with the training component; and

if the feed-back score is below a predetermined reject threshold,

disregard the training component; and

retrieve a further training component associated with the trigger event;

otherwise, provide access to the training component to the end user.

15 . A system according to claim 13 wherein the training module is further configured to:

review the feed-back score associated with the training component; and

if the feed-back score is below a predetermined reject threshold,

disregard the training component; and

retrieve a further training component associated with the trigger event;

otherwise, provide access to the training component to the end user.

16 . A system according to claim 10 wherein the trigger event is detected via monitoring collected operation data of the manufacturing line.

17 . A system according to claim 12 wherein the trigger event is detected via monitoring collected operation data of the manufacturing line.

18 . A system according to claim 10 wherein the trigger event is an event associated with: machine stoppages, faulty part detection, out of specification operations, a machine not responding within a set time period, a new operator, new equipment, general repair and maintenance, or a combination thereof.

Assignments (2)
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Sep 16, 2024
From: ATS AUTOMATION TOOLING SYSTEMS INC.
To: ATS CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 068960/0725 →
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Aug 2, 2023
From: ATS AUTOMATION TOOLING SYSTEMS INC.
To: ATS CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 064466/0005 →