IP Library Granted Patent US 11,558,415
Granted Patent B1
US 11,558,415 · App. 17/122,681 · Granted Jan 17, 2023

Real time application protection system risk identification and mitigation

Inventors: Matthew Thomas McDonald (Callahan, FL); Jeremy W. Long (Herndon, VA); Mitch Moon (Plymouth, MN); Isaiah Adonu (Oro Valley, AZ)
Assignee: Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
H04L63/1433H04L63/1416H04L63/1441H04L63/20
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 11,558,415
App. No.
17/122,681
Granted
Jan 17, 2023
Kind
B1
Abstract

Techniques are described for improving real-time application protection (RTAP) systems (e.g., web application firewalls (WAFs), runtime application self-protection (RASP) systems). In particular, a device within a trusted network may be configured to identify risks of the RTAP systems. For example, the device may compare a plurality of attack signatures, from configuration settings of an application protection system to a plurality of defects from a defect data store; determine that at least one configuration setting of the application protection system corresponding to an application does not include protections for at least one defect of the plurality of defects; and in response to determine that the at least one configuration setting of the application protection system does not include protections for the at least one defect, generate an alert corresponding to the at least one defect.

Claims (40)

1. A computer-implemented method comprising:

comparing a plurality of attack signatures associated with a plurality of known attacks stored in a defect data store to configuration settings of an application protection system;

determining the configuration settings of the application protection system do not include protections for at least one known attack of the plurality of known attacks;

in response to determining the configuration settings of the application protection system do not include protections for the at least one known attack, generating an alert corresponding to the at least one known attack and adding the attack signature associated with the at least one known attack to the configuration settings of the application protection system;

testing a plurality of applications to identify one or more application defects;

correlating the identified one or more application defects to a plurality of defects from the defect data store; and

in response to determining that at least one of the identified one or more application defects does not correlate to one of the plurality of defects from the defect data store, generating a new attack signature for the at least one of the one or more application defects, adding the new attack signature to the configuration settings of the application protection system, and storing the new attack signature in the defect data store.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the respective attack signature includes at least one rule to protect against the at least one defect.

3. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

receiving at least some of the plurality of attack signatures from a third party and adding the at least some of the plurality of attack signatures to the configuration settings.

4. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

obtaining at least some of the plurality of attack signatures from the defect data store and adding the at least some of the plurality of attack signatures to the configuration settings.

5. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

comparing the plurality of attack signatures to the plurality of defects while the application protection system is in a production mode and not in a protection mode.

6. The method of claim 1 , wherein generating the alert corresponding to the at least one defect comprises transmitting the alert to a secondary device.

7. A device comprising:

a memory; and

one or more processors implemented in circuitry and in communication with the memory, the one or more processors configured to:

compare a plurality of attack signatures associated with a plurality of known attacks stored in a defect data store to configuration settings of an application protection system;

determine the configuration settings of the application protection system do not include protections for at least one known attack of the plurality of known attacks

in response to determining the configuration settings of the application protection system do not include protections for the at least one known attack, generate an alert corresponding to the at least one known attack and adding the attack signature associated with the at least one known attack to the configuration settings of the application protection system;

testing a plurality of applications to identify one or more application defects;

correlating the identified one or more application defects to a plurality of defects from the defect data store; and

in response to determining that at least one of the identified one or more application defects does not correlate to one of the plurality of defects from the defect data store, generating a new attack signature for the at least one of the one or more application defects, adding the new attack signature to the configuration settings of the application protection system, and storing the new attack signature in the defect data store.

8. The device of claim 7 , wherein the respective signature includes at least one rule to protect against the at least one defect.

9. The device of claim 7 , wherein the one or more processors are further configured to:

receive at least some of the plurality of attack signatures from a third party and add the at least some of the plurality of attack signatures to the configuration settings.

10. The device of claim 7 , wherein the one or more processors are further configured to:

obtain at least some of the plurality of attack signatures from the defect data store and add the at least some of the plurality of attack signatures to the configuration settings.

11. The device of claim 7 , wherein the one or more processors are further configured to:

compare the plurality of attack signatures to the plurality of defects while the application protection system is in a production mode and not in a protection mode.

12. The device of claim 7 , wherein the one or more processors are further configured to transmit the alert to a secondary device.

13. A non-transitory computer-readable medium storing instructions that, when executed by a computing system, cause one or more processors of the computing system to:

compare a plurality of attack signatures associated with a plurality of known attacks stored in a defect data store to configuration settings of an application protection system;

determine the configuration settings of the application protection system do not include protections for at least one known attack of the plurality of known attacks

in response to determining the configuration settings of the application protection system do not include protections for the at least one known attack, generate an alert corresponding to the at least one known attack and adding the attack signature associated with the at least one known attack to the configuration settings of the application protection system;

testing a plurality of applications to identify one or more application defects;

correlating the identified one or more application defects to a plurality of defects from the defect data store; and

in response to determining that at least one of the identified one or more application defects does not correlate to one of the plurality of defects from the defect data store, generating a new attack signature for the at least one of the one or more application defects, adding the new attack signature to the configuration settings of the application protection system, and storing the new attack signature in the defect data store.

14. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 13 , wherein the respective signature includes at least one rule to protect against the at least one defect.

Assignments (2)
REQUEST FOR ADDRESS CHANGE Recorded Dec 5, 2025
From: WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.
To: WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.
Reel/Frame 073894/0935 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jan 18, 2021
From: MCDONALD, MATTHEW THOMAS; LONG, JEREMY W.; MOON, MITCH; ADONU, ISAIAH
To: WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.
Reel/Frame 054946/0096 →
Continuity (1)
Provisional Application 62972280 · Feb 10, 2020
Cited By (3)
US 12,462,042 US 12,666,310 US 12,671,712