IP Library › Granted Patent US 12,462,042
Granted Patent B2
US 12,462,042 · App. 18/533,849 · Granted Nov 4, 2025

Using threat intelligence to manage software fixes

Inventors: Michael F. Angelo (Houston, TX); Alexander Michael Hoole (Vancouver BC, CA); Douglas Max Grover (Rigby, ID)
Assignee: Micro Focus LLC
G06F21/577G06F16/951
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,462,042
App. No.
18/533,849
Granted
Nov 4, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

A defect in the code of a software program is identified. An initial ranking for the defect in the code of the software program is determined. One or more network websites are crawled to identify information associated with the defect in the code of the software program. The information associated with the defect in the defect in the code of the software program is analyzed. In response to analyzing the information associated with the defect in the code of the software program, a second ranking is created for the defect in the code of the software program. The defects in the code of the software program and the second ranking are generated for display in a graphical user interface. By prioritizing which defects are more critical, the quality of the released software improved. In addition, the released software is more secure because critical defects have been removed.

Claims (66)

1 . A system comprising:

a microprocessor; and

a computer readable medium, coupled with the microprocessor and comprising microprocessor readable and executable instructions that, when executed by the microprocessor, cause the microprocessor to:

get a defect in code of a software program;

get an initial ranking for the defect in the code of the software program;

crawl one or more network websites to identify information associated with the defect in the code of the software program, wherein the information associated with the defect in the code of the software program comprises first source code to attack the defect;

analyze the information associated with the defect in the code of the software program;

in response to analyzing the information associated with the defect in the code of the software program, create a second ranking for the defect in the code of the software program;

generate for display, in a graphical user interface, the defect in the code of the software program and the second ranking:

retrieve the first source code to attack the defect;

analyze the first source code to attack the defect using a machine learning algorithm; and

generate, by the machine learning algorithm, second source code to mitigate the first source code to attack the defect.

2 . The system of claim 1 , wherein the microprocessor readable and executable instructions further cause the microprocessor to at least one of:

fix the defect in the code of the software program; and

generate, for display in a graphical user interface, the second source code to mitigate the first source code to attack the defect.

3 . The system of claim 1 , wherein the machine learning algorithm is trained using source code used to attack a plurality of defects and the corresponding fixes.

4 . The system of claim 1 , wherein the microprocessor readable and executable instructions further cause the microprocessor to:

identify a link to a second network website in the information associated with the defect in the code of the software program, wherein the second network website is not one of the one or more network websites; and

in response to identifying the link to the second network website in the information associated with the defect in the code of the software program, crawl the second network website to identify additional information associated with the defect in the code of the software program.

5 . The system of claim 4 , wherein the microprocessor readable and executable instructions further cause the microprocessor to:

determine, if the additional information associated with the defect in the code of the software program meets defect criteria; and

in response to determining that the additional information associated with the defect in the code of the software program meets the defect criteria, save an address of the second network website.

6 . The system of claim 1 , wherein the information associated with the defect in the code of the software program comprises one or more of: a notorious user, an expert user, a fake poster, a semi-legitimate poster, a commentor on a post, users looking at the post, source code to attack the defect, an increase of chatter on a dark web about the defect, a decrease of the chatter on the dark web about the defect, a number of companies impacted by the defect, a number of articles published about the defect, a federal government fix date for the defect, a public posting of private information about the defect, a potential financial impact of the defect, and a number of companies reporting the defect.

7 . The system of claim 1 , wherein analyzing the information associated with the defect in the code of the software program is accomplished by a machine learning algorithm and wherein the microprocessor readable and executable instructions further cause the microprocessor to:

receive, from a graphical user interface, feedback from a user about the second ranking; and

in response to receiving the feedback from the user about the second ranking, providing the information about the second ranking to retrain the machine learning algorithm.

8 . A method comprising:

identifying, by a microprocessor, a defect in code of a software program;

get, by the microprocessor, an initial ranking for the defect in the code of the software program;

crawling, by the microprocessor, one or more network websites to identify information associated with the defect in the code of the software program, wherein the information associated with the defect in the code of the software program comprises first source code to attack the defect;

analyzing, by the microprocessor, the information associated with the defect in the code of the software program;

in response to analyzing the information associated with the defect in the code of the software program, creating, by the microprocessor, a second ranking for the defect in the code of the software program;

generating for display, by the microprocessor, in a graphical user interface, the defect in the code of the software program and the second ranking;

retrieving the first source code to attack the defect;

analyzing the first source code to attack the defect using a machine learning algorithm; and

generating, by the machine learning algorithm, second source code to mitigate the first source code to attack the defect.

9 . The method of claim 8 , further comprising at least one of:

fixing the defect in the code of the software program; and

generating, for display in a graphical user interface, the second source code to mitigate the first source code to attack the defect.

10 . The method of claim 8 , wherein the machine learning algorithm is trained using source code used to attack a plurality of defects and the corresponding fixes.

11 . The method of claim 8 , further comprising:

identifying a link to a second network website in the information associated with the defect in the code of the software program, wherein the second network website is not one of the one or more network websites; and

in response to identifying the link to the second network website in the information associated with the defect in the code of the software program, crawling the second network website to identify additional information associated with the defect in the code of the software program.

12 . The method of claim 11 , further comprising:

determining, if the additional information associated with the defect in the code of the software program meets defect criteria; and

in response to determining that the additional information associated with the defect in the code of the software program meets the defect criteria, saving an address of the second network website.

13 . The method of claim 8 , wherein the information associated with the defect in the code of the software program comprises one or more of: a notorious user, an expert user, a fake poster, a semi-legitimate poster, a commentor on a post, users looking at the post, source code to attack the defect, an increase of chatter on a dark web about the defect, a decrease of the chatter on the dark web about the defect, a number of companies impacted by the defect, a number of articles published about the defect, a federal government fix date for the defect, a public posting of private information about the defect, a potential financial impact of the defect, and a number of companies reporting the defect.

14 . The method of claim 8 , wherein analyzing the information associated with the defect in the code of the software program is accomplished by a machine learning algorithm and further comprising:

receiving, from a graphical user interface, feedback from a user about the second ranking; and

in response to receiving the feedback from the user about the second ranking, providing the information about the second ranking to retrain the machine learning algorithm.

15 . A non-transient computer readable medium having stored thereon instructions that cause a microprocessor to execute a method, the method comprising instructions to:

get a defect in code of a software program;

get an initial ranking for the defect in the code of the software program;

crawl one or more network websites to identify information associated with the defect in the code of the software program, wherein the information associated with the defect in the code of the software program comprises source code to attack the defect;

analyze the information associated with the defect in the code of the software program;

in response to analyzing the information associated with the defect in the code of the software program, create a second ranking for the defect in the code of the software program;

generate for display, in a graphical user interface, the defect in the code of the software program and the second ranking;

retrieve a first source code to attack the defect;

analyze the first source code to attack the defect using a machine learning algorithm; and

generate, by the machine learning algorithm, second source code to mitigate the first source code to attack the defect.

16 . The non-transient computer readable medium of claim 15 , wherein the instructions further cause the microprocessor to at least one of:

fix the defect in the code of the software program; and

generate, for display in a graphical user interface, the second source code to mitigate the first source code to attack the defect.

17 . The non-transient computer readable medium of claim 15 , wherein the instructions further cause the microprocessor to:

identify link to a second network website in the information associated with the defect in the code of the software program, wherein the second network website is not one of the one or more network websites; and

in response to identifying a second link to the second network website in the information associated with the defect in the code of the software program, crawl the second network website to identify additional information associated with the defect in the code of the software program.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Nov 21, 2024
From: ANGELO, MICHAEL F.; HOOLE, ALEXANDER MICHAEL; GROVER, DOUGLAS MAX
To: MICRO FOCUS LLC
Reel/Frame 069364/0098 →
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20250190577A1 · Jun 12, 2025
References Cited (12)
US 11558415B1 · McDonald · 2023 [cited by examiner]
US 11770401B2 · Geil · 2023 [cited by examiner]
US 20090240680A1 · Tankovich · 2009 [cited by examiner]
US 20150332053A1 · Bhattacharya · 2015 [cited by examiner]
US 20180113642A1 · Huen · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 20240330354A1 · Alston · 2024 [cited by examiner]
US 20240378309A1 · Bhattacharya · 2024 [cited by examiner]
CN 108848093B · 2021 [cited by examiner]
CISA Gov; Reducing the Significant Risk of Known Exploited Vulnerabilities; CISA Central—[email protected]; An Official Website of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security; 8 pages. [cited by applicant]
GITHUB; ‘Exploitdb’; https://github.com/topics/exploitdb; Dec. 2023; 7 pages. [cited by applicant]
Jay Jacobs, et al; EPSS Exploit Prediction Scoring System;; 2015-2023 by Forum of Incident Response and Security; Mar. 7, 2023, 5 pages. [cited by applicant]
Vasudeva, Weimin; A Knowledge-Based and Collaborative System for Security Assessment of We Applications; 1389/CHINP/2010; Aug. 13, 2010; 14 pages. [cited by applicant]