IP Library › Granted Patent US 12,560,944
Granted Patent B2
US 12,560,944 · App. 17/138,285 · Granted Feb 24, 2026

Correlated motion and detection for aircraft

Inventors: Thomas O. Teisberg (Menlo Park, CA); Rohit H. Sant (San Mateo, CA); Matthew O. Derry (Ann Arbor, MI); Michael J. Demertzi (Half Moon Bay, CA); Gavin K. Ananda Krishnan (San Carlos, CA); Keenan A. Wyrobek (Half Moon Bay, CA); Vasumathi Raman (San Francisco, CA); Brendan J.D. Wade (San Francisco, CA); Blair R. Hagen (Pacifica, CA); Randall R. Patterson (Littleton, CO); Philip M. Green (Sunnyvale, CA)
Assignee: SCIENTIFIC APPLICATIONS AND RESEARCH ASSOCIATES, INC.
G05D1/1064G05D1/0094G06N3/02H04R1/326H04R29/005H04R2499/13
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,560,944
App. No.
17/138,285
Granted
Feb 24, 2026
Kind
B2
Abstract

An acoustic detection system of an aircraft receives a first signal, where the first signal is a multichannel audio signal. The multichannel audio signal is determined to be associated with at least one intruding aircraft based on the multichannel audio signal. An avoidance maneuver is commanded for the aircraft based on a track of the intruding aircraft generated based on the multichannel audio signal and a second signal providing additional information about the intruding aircraft.

Claims (39)

1 . A method comprising:

receiving, at an acoustic detection system of an aircraft, audio signals, to provide a multichannel audio signal, wherein the acoustic detection system comprises two or more microphones, and wherein the audio signals are received by the acoustic detection system when the aircraft is traveling along a flight path based on an original flight plan:

determining, by one or more processors of the acoustic detection system, based on the multichannel audio signal, that the multichannel audio signal is associated with at least one intruding aircraft;

detecting, based on the multichannel audio signal, a second signal collected by a sensor of the aircraft, the second signal providing location information about the intruding aircraft;

based on the multichannel audio signal, the second signal, and the flight path, generating a plurality of possible maneuvers for the aircraft;

selecting a maneuver out of the plurality of possible maneuvers for execution by the aircraft to increase information detectable by the acoustic detection system, wherein the information is about the at least one intruding aircraft; and

commanding the maneuver for the aircraft based on the multichannel audio signal and the second signal, wherein the maneuver comprises a change in positioning of the aircraft relative to the intruding aircraft to change characteristics of the multichannel audio signal to obtain additional location information about the intruding aircraft, and wherein the maneuver further comprises a return to the flight path based on the original flight plan.

2 . The method of claim 1 , wherein selecting the maneuver of the plurality of possible maneuvers comprises:

selecting the maneuver for the aircraft using a machine learning model, wherein the machine learning model receives at least a track of the intruding aircraft as input, wherein the track is generated from two or more location estimations of the intruding aircraft.

3 . The method of claim 2 , wherein the machine learning model is a deep learning network generated using simulated flight data for the aircraft.

4 . The method of claim 2 , wherein the track of the intruding aircraft is generated based on an acoustic location estimation for the intruding aircraft, wherein the acoustic location estimation is generated using the multichannel audio signal.

5 . The method of claim 4 , wherein the acoustic location estimation is generated by the machine learning model using an input based on the multichannel audio signal.

6 . The method of claim 1 , wherein determining that the multichannel audio signal is associated with at least one intruding aircraft comprises determining that the multichannel audio signal is associated with the intruding aircraft and a second intruding aircraft, wherein commanding the maneuver is further based on a track of the second intruding aircraft generated based on the multichannel audio signal and additional information about the second intruding aircraft.

7 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the maneuver is selected by the acoustic detection system to increase or maintain a signal to noise ratio of the multichannel audio signal.

8 . The method of claim 1 , wherein generating the plurality of possible maneuvers for the aircraft comprises generating a maneuver configured to avoid the at least one intruding aircraft and gather information of the at least one intruding aircraft.

9 . The method of claim 1 , wherein selecting the plurality of possible maneuvers for the aircraft comprises selecting a maneuver based further on at least one of a weather data, flight condition, airspace restriction, and fuel level of the aircraft.

10 . The method of claim 1 , wherein selecting the maneuver out of the plurality of possible maneuvers for execution by the aircraft to increase information detectable by the acoustic detection system, wherein the information is about the at least one intruding aircraft, comprises:

assigning a score for each maneuver of the plurality of possible maneuvers, wherein a higher score indicates a higher amount of information about the at least one intruding aircraft detectable by the acoustic detection system of the at least one intruding aircraft during execution of the maneuver; and

selecting a maneuver of the plurality of possible maneuvers with the highest generated score.

11 . The method of claim 10 , wherein selecting the maneuver of the plurality of possible maneuvers further comprises:

evaluating whether each maneuver of the plurality of possible maneuvers will cause the aircraft to avoid the at least one intruding aircraft when executed by the aircraft; and

selecting a maneuver of the plurality of possible maneuvers that will cause the aircraft to avoid the at least one intruding aircraft.

12 . The method of claim 10 , wherein assigning the score for each maneuver of the plurality of possible maneuvers comprises assigning the score using a machine learning model, wherein the machine learning model is trained to classify the amount of information detectable by the acoustic detection system, wherein the information is about the at least one intruding aircraft, during execution of a maneuver.

13 . The method of claim 1 , wherein determining that the multichannel audio signal is associated with at least one intruding aircraft comprises:

processing the multichannel audio signal; and determining the location of the source of the multichannel audio signal using a localization machine learning model.

14 . The method of claim 13 , wherein processing the multichannel audio signal comprises transforming the multichannel audio signal to the frequency domain to obtain frequency data of the multichannel audio signal.

15 . The method of claim 13 , wherein the localization machine learning model is trained on labeled multichannel audio and directional data.

16 . The method of claim 1 , wherein determining that the multichannel audio signal is associated with at least one intruding aircraft comprises:

analyzing the multichannel audio signal to determine a class of the at least one intruding aircraft; and

determining a track of the at least one intruding aircraft based on the multichannel audio signal.

17 . The method of claim 16 , wherein analyzing the multichannel audio signal to determine a class of the at least one intruding aircraft comprises:

analyzing multichannel audio signal to determine a probability that the signal is associated with a class of aircraft; and

determining a flight characteristic associated with the class of aircraft.

18 . The method of claim 16 , wherein determining the track of the at least one intruding aircraft comprises:

determining a state estimation of the at least one intruding aircraft based on the multichannel audio signal; and

generating a track of the at least one intruding aircraft based on the state estimation of the at least one intruding aircraft and the class of the at least one intruding aircraft.

19 . The method of claim 16 , wherein determining the track of the at least one intruding aircraft comprises:

generating acoustic directional information corresponding to the at least one intruding aircraft using the multichannel audio signal; and

generating a track of the at least one intruding aircraft using the acoustic directional information and the second signal.

Assignments (2)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jun 20, 2025
From: ZIPLINE INTERNATIONAL INC.
To: SCIENTIFIC APPLICATIONS AND RESEARCH ASSOCIATES, INC.
Reel/Frame 071463/0888 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Aug 23, 2023
From: TEISBERG, THOMAS O.; SANT, ROHIT H.; DERRY, MATTHEW O.; DEMERTZI, MICHAEL J.; ANANDA KRISHNAN, GAVIN K.; WYROBEK, KEENAN A.; RAMAN, VASUMATHI; WADE, BRENDAN J.D.; HAGEN, BLAIR R.; PATTERSON, RANDALL R.; GREEN, PHILIP M.
To: ZIPLINE INTERNATIONAL INC.
Reel/Frame 064683/0404 →
Continuity (5)
Provisional Application 63082821 · Sep 24, 2020
Provisional Application 63021633 · May 7, 2020
Provisional Application 62984266 · Mar 2, 2020
Provisional Application 62955946 · Dec 31, 2019
Related Publication 20220011786A1 · Jan 13, 2022
References Cited (217)
US 2663518A · Glenn · 1953 [cited by applicant]
US 3444508A · Granfors et al. · 1969 [cited by applicant]
US 3893061A · Slawsky et al. · 1975 [cited by applicant]
US 3964694A · Metzger et al. · 1976 [cited by applicant]
US 4106740A · Lloyd et al. · 1978 [cited by applicant]
US 4509151A · Anderson · 1985 [cited by applicant]
US 4622657A · Clare · 1986 [cited by applicant]
US 4811308A · Michel · 1989 [cited by applicant]
US 4831874A · Daubin et al. · 1989 [cited by applicant]
US 4926171A · Kelley · 1990 [cited by applicant]
US 4974213A · Siwecki · 1990 [cited by applicant]
US 5062085A · Andrews, Jr. · 1991 [cited by applicant]
US 5111400A · Yoder · 1992 [cited by applicant]
US 5150336A · Sullivan et al. · 1992 [cited by applicant]
US 5177316A · Honigsbaum · 1993 [cited by applicant]
US 5410519A · Hall et al. · 1995 [cited by applicant]
US 5477506A · Allen · 1995 [cited by applicant]
US 5563849A · Hall et al. · 1996 [cited by applicant]
US 5575438A · Mcgonigle et al. · 1996 [cited by applicant]
US 5617371A · Williams · 1997 [cited by applicant]
US 5699437A · Finn · 1997 [cited by applicant]
US 5748143A · Melvin, Jr. · 1998 [cited by applicant]
US 5861846A · Minter · 1999 [cited by applicant]
US 5901232A · Gibbs · 1999 [cited by applicant]
US 5909409A · Barber et al. · 1999 [cited by applicant]
US 5995445A · Whitesell et al. · 1999 [cited by applicant]
US 6201482B1 · Schiefele et al. · 2001 [cited by applicant]
US 6288973B1 · Joynes · 2001 [cited by applicant]
US 6588701B2 · Yavnai · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 6621764B1 · Smith · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 6705573B2 · Mcdonnell · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 6760449B1 · Matsuo · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 6795772B2 · Lin et al. · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 6804607B1 · Wood · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 6857601B2 · Akahori · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 6859420B1 · Coney et al. · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 6970796B2 · Tashev · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 7079450B2 · Breed et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 7149147B1 · Goldman et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 7209221B2 · Breed et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 7228232B2 · Bodin et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 7372773B2 · Horak · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 7457619B2 · Ariyur et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 7548488B2 · Horak et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 7606115B1 · Cline · 2009 [cited by examiner]
US 7720232B2 · Oxford · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 7751976B2 · Matuska et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 7818127B1 · Duggan et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 7975959B2 · Perry et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 7991167B2 · Oxford · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 8809755B1 · Patel et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 10032111B1 · Bertram et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 10379534B2 · Visser · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 11262746B1 · Van Duren · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 11659322B1 · Woodworth · 2023 [cited by examiner]
US 20030185410A1 · June et al. · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 20040105557A1 · Matsuo · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 20040165736A1 · Hetherington et al. · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 20040252845A1 · Tashev · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 20050271221A1 · Cerwin · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 20090184862A1 · Stayton et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20100100269A1 · Ekhaguere · 2010 [cited by examiner]
US 20100121574A1 · Ariyur et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20110103612A1 · Chou · 2011 [cited by examiner]
US 20120092208A1 · Lemire et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20150302858A1 · Hearing et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20160068267A1 · Liu · 2016 [cited by examiner]
US 20160091362A1 · Schmitz et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160247405A1 · Paczan · 2016 [cited by examiner]
US 20160247407A1 · Paczan et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20170092138A1 · Trundle et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170219686A1 · Xie · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 20170220036A1 · Visser · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 20170364776A1 · Micks · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 20180018970A1 · Heyl · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 20180095714A1 · Taylor et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20190018130A1 · Griggs · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20190095687A1 · Shaw · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20190114564A1 · Ferguson · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20190341054A1 · Krupka · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20200103499A1 · Preece · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20210192748A1 · Morales Morales · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20210233416A1 · John · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20220122576A1 · John · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 20230028792A1 · Cocaud · 2023 [cited by examiner]
EP 1571875A2 · 2005 [cited by applicant]
EP 1946606B1 · 2010 [cited by applicant]
GB 2309301A · 1997 [cited by applicant]
GB 2350425B · 2003 [cited by applicant]
GB 2380244A · 2003 [cited by applicant]
JP 2002039851A · 2002 [cited by applicant]
JP 2006319789A · 2006 [cited by applicant]
JP 2017501475A · 2017 [cited by applicant]
JP 2018090117A · 2018 [cited by applicant]
JP 2019505047A · 2019 [cited by applicant]
JP 2019105891A · 2019 [cited by applicant]
KR 100520786B1 · 2005 [cited by applicant]
KR 20060011064A · 2006 [cited by applicant]
KR 101879673B1 · 2018 [cited by examiner]
WO 9602905A1 · 1996 [cited by applicant]
WO 2005006009A2 · 2005 [cited by applicant]
WO 2005012079A1 · 2005 [cited by applicant]
WO 2006113104A2 · 2006 [cited by applicant]
WO 2019221613A1 · 2019 [cited by applicant]
Behjat, A., Gabani, K., and Chowdhury, S., “Training Detection-Range-Frugal Cooperative Collision Avoidance Models for Quadcopters via Neuroevolution”, May 31, 2019. doi:10.48550/arXiv.1906.00052. (Year: 2019). [cited by examiner]
Tirtle et al.—The Predator ADTC, A Case Study for Transition Planning to the Formal Acquisition Process, National Defense Research Institute, RAND, 1997 (Year: 1997). [cited by examiner]
Fahy, F. J. et al. and Leighton, T.G.—Fundamentals of Noise and Vibration, Chapter 7: Fundamentals of underwater acoustics. E & FN Spon, 1998 (Year: 1998). [cited by examiner]
Hald et al.—A novel beamformer array design for noise source location from intermediate measurement distances, Bruel & Kjaer Sound & Vibration Measurement A/S, 2002 (Year: 2002). [cited by examiner]
Batel et al.—Noise Source Location Techniques—Simple to Advanced Application, Sound and Vibration, Mar. 2023 (Year: 2003). [cited by examiner]
Shin Jae Choul—English description of KR-101879673-B1 via Espacenet Patent Translate, retrieved Oct. 14, 2025 (Year: 2025). [cited by examiner]
“International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2020/067495”, mailed Mar. 25, 2021. [cited by applicant]
Andersson, Sean et al. “Robot Phonotaxis with Dynamic Sound-source Localization,” Proceedings of the 2004 IEEE, Int'l Conf. on Robotics & Automation, 2004. [cited by applicant]
Barfield, Finley, “Autonomous Collision Avoidance the Technical Requirements,” Proc. of the IEEE 2000, Nat'l Aerospace and Elecs. Conf., 808-813, 2000. [cited by applicant]
Becker, Gunnar, “Non-Cooperative Helicopter Detection by Acoustical Sensors,” RTO Meeting Proceedings 6, Symposium of the RTO Systems Concepts and Integration Panel (SCI) held in Mannheim, Germany, 1998. [cited by applicant]
Boucek, G. Jr. et al. “Traffic Alert and Collision Avoidance System,” Final Report, U.S. Dep't of Transp., FAA, 1985. [cited by applicant]
Buckingham, Michael et al. “Propeller Noise from a Light Aircraft for Low-Frequency Measurements of the Speed of Sound in a Marine Sediment,” J. Computational Acoustics, 10(4): 445-464, 2002. [cited by applicant]
Carneal, James et al. “Comparison of a Diffracting and a Non-Diffracting Circular Acoustic Array,” 2006 IEEE Int'l Conf. on Acoustics Speech and Signal Processing Proceedings, 2006. [cited by applicant]
Clark, Timothy, “Evaluation of a Two-way Datalink for Airborne Surveillance of and Communication with a Remotely Operated Aircraft Operating in the National Airspace System,” TRACE, Master's Thesis, Univ. of Tenn. 2002. [cited by applicant]
Cross, J. “Y0-3A Acoustics Research Aircraft Systems Manual,” NASA Technical Memorandum 85968, 1984. [cited by applicant]
Cross, Jeffrey et al. “In-Flight Acoustic Testing Techniques Using the Y0-3A Acoustic Research Aircraft,” NASA Technical Memorandum 85895, 1984. [cited by applicant]
Cruz, Nuno et al. “Operations with Multiple Autonomous Underwater Vehicles: the PISCIS Project,” Symposium AINS, 2003. [cited by applicant]
Damarla, Raju et al. “An algorithm for classifying multiple targets using acoustic signatures,” Proc. of SPIE 5429, Signal Processing, Sensor Fusion, and Target Recognition XIII, 5429: 421-427, 2004. [cited by applicant]
Depireux, D. et al. Vehicle Classification Using a Biological Model of Hearing, Insitute for Systems Research University of Maryland College, 2000. [cited by applicant]
Dougherty, Robert, “Extensions of DAMAS and Benefits and Limitations of Deconvolution in Beamforming,” 11th AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference, 2005. [cited by applicant]
Duckworth, Gregory et al. “Acoustic counter-sniper system,” Proc. of SPIE 2938, Command, Control, Communications, and Intelligence Systems for Law Enforcement, 2938: 262-275, 1997. [cited by applicant]
Erzberger, Heinz et al. “Concept for Next Generation Air Traffic Control System,” Air Traffic Control Quarterly, 10(4) 355-378, 2002. [cited by applicant]
Erzberger, Heinz, “Automated Conflict Resolution for Air Traffic Control,” ICAS 2006, 25th Int'l Cong. of the Aeronautical Scis., 2006. [cited by applicant]
Erzberger, Heinz, “Transforming the NAS: The Next Generation Air Traffic Control System,” ICAS 2004, 24th Int'l Cong. of the Aeronautical Scis., 2004. [cited by applicant]
Ferguson, Brian et al. “Detection and Localisation of a Ground Based Impulsive Sound Source using Acoustic Sensors Onboard a Tactical Unmanned Aerial Vehicle,” Battlefield Acoustic Sensing for ISR Applications, 16-1-16-… [cited by applicant]
Ferguson, Brian et al. “Locating far-field impulsive sound sources in air by triangulation,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 111(1), 104-116, 2002. [cited by applicant]
Ferguson, Brian et al. “Turboprop and rotary-wing aircraft flight parameter estimation using both narrow-band and broadband passive acoustic signal-processing methods,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 108, 4, 1763-1771, 2000. [cited by applicant]
Ferguson, Brian. “A ground-based narrow-band passive acoustic technique for estimating the altitude and speed of a propeller-driven aircraft,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 92(3), 1403-1407, 1992. [cited by applicant]
Freitag, Lee et al. “The WHOI Micro-Modem: An Acoustic Communications and Navigation System for Multiple Platforms,” Proc. of OCEANS 2005 MTS/IEEE, 2, 1086-1092, 2005. [cited by applicant]
Gade, S. et al. “190 A Review of Array Techniques for Noise Source Location,” JSAE Spring Convention, 2003. [cited by applicant]
Glegg, Stewart et al. “A Passive Sonar System Based on an Autonomous Underwater Vehicle,” IEEE J. Oceanic Eng'g, 26(4): 700-710, 2001. [cited by applicant]
Gunnar Becker and Alwin Güdesen, Passive sensing with acoustics on the battlefield, Applied Acoustics 59:149-178 (2000). [cited by applicant]
Haering, Edward A. et al. “Preliminary Airborne Measurements for the SR-71 Sonic Boom Propagation Experiment,” NASA Technical Memorandum 104307, 1995. [cited by applicant]
Hald, J. “An Integrated NAH/Beamforming Solution for Efficient Broad-Band Noise Source Location,” SAE 2005 Noise and Vibration Conference and Exhibition, 2005-01-2537, 2005. [cited by applicant]
Hald, Jørgen et al. “Combined NAH and Beamforming Using the Same Microphone Array,” Sound and Vibration, 2004. [cited by applicant]
He, Zhihai et al. “Vision-Based UAV Flight Control and Obstacle Avoidance,” Proc. of the 2006 Am. Control Conf. 2166-2170, 2006. [cited by applicant]
Hohil, Myron et al. “Vehicle counting and classification algorithms for unattended ground sensors,” Proc. of SPIE 5090, Unattended Ground Sensor Technologies and Applications V, 5090: 99-110, 2003. [cited by applicant]
Hwang, Soojung et al. “Collision Avoidance Maneuver Simulation of Tilt Rotor Unmanned Aerial Vehicle,” 44th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, AIAA 2006-235, 2006. [cited by applicant]
Ikeda, Y. et al. “Automatic Air Collision Avoidance System,” Air Force Research Laboratory, AFRL-VA-WP-TP-2002-317, 2002. [cited by applicant]
Janik, V.M. et al. “A Two-Dimensional Acoustic Localization System for Marine Mammals,” Marine Mammal Science, 16(2): 437-447, 2000. [cited by applicant]
Kaushik, B. et al. “A Review of the Role of Acoustic Sensors in the Modern Battlefield,” 11th AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conf., 26th AIAA Aeroacoustics Conf., May 2005, Monterey, California. [cited by applicant]
Kraft, Robert, “vol. 2: Development of a Ground-Based Acoustic Sensor System for the Detection of Subsonic Jet-Powered Aircraft,” Aircraft IR/Acoustic Detection Evaluation, NASA Contractor Report 189705, 1992. [cited by applicant]
Kuchar, James et al. “A Safety Analysis Process for the Traffic Alert and Collision Avoidance System (TCAS) and See-and-Avoid Systems on Remotely Piloted Vehicles,” AIAA 3rd Unmanned Unlimited Technical Conference, Work… [cited by applicant]
Lacher, Andrew et al. “Unmanned Aircraft Collision Avoidance—Technology Assessment and Evaluation Methods,” MITRE Corp., 2007. [cited by applicant]
Lemon, Stanley, “Towed-Array History,” 1917-2003, IEEE J. Oceanic Eng'g, 29(2): 365-373, 2004. [cited by applicant]
Lo, Kam et al. “Broadband Passive Acoustic Technique for Target Motion Parameter Estimation,” IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, 36(1), 163-175, 2000. [cited by applicant]
Lo, Kam et al. Tactical Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Localization Using Ground-Based Acoustic Sensors, Proceedings of the 2004 Intelligent Sensors, Sensor Networks and Information Processing Conference, ISSNIP 2004, 475-480,… [cited by applicant]
Mann, David et al. “Chapter 9: Active and Passive Acoustics to Locate and Study Fish,” Fish Bioacoustics, 279-309, 2008. [cited by applicant]
Matos, Anibal et al. “Development and Implementation of a Low-Cost LBL Navigation System for an AUV,” OCEANS '99 MTS/IEEE, Riding the Crest into the 21st Century, 1999. [cited by applicant]
Mennitt, Dan et al. “Tracking Noise Sources Using Multiple Mobile Microphone Arrays,” ICSV13—Vienna, 13th Int'l Cong. on Sound and Vibration, 2006. [cited by applicant]
Merlin, Peter, Ikhana Unmanned Aircraft System: Western States Fire Missions, NASA, Monographs in Aerospace History #44, NASA, 2009. [cited by applicant]
Metcalf, Marvin, “Acoustics on the 21st Century Battlefield,” Joint Force Quarterly, Winter 1995-1996. [cited by applicant]
Michel, U. et al. “Investigation of airframe and jet noise in high-speed flight with a microphone array,” 3rd AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conf., 1997. [cited by applicant]
Penney, R. “Collision avoidance within flight dynamics constraints for UAV applications,” Aeronautical J., 193-199, 2005. [cited by applicant]
Pham, Tien et al. “Acoustic Data Collection of Tactical Unmanned Air Vehicles (TUAVs),” Army Research Laboratory, ARL-TR-2749, 2002. [cited by applicant]
Pham, Tien et al. “Acoustic Detection and Tracking of Small, Low-Flying Threat Aircraft,” US Army Research Laboratory, 2002. [cited by applicant]
Pham, Tien et al. “Acoustic Signal Processing Toolbox for Array Processing,” Proc. of SPIE 5096, Signal Processing, Sensor Fusion, and Target Recognition XII, 5096:597-606, 2003. [cited by applicant]
Pham, Tien et al. “Acoustic tracking of ground vehicles using ESPRIT,” Proc. of SPIE 2485, Automatic Object Recognition V, 2485:268-274, 1995. [cited by applicant]
Pham, Tien et al. “Adaptive Wideband Aeroacoustic Array Processing,” Proceedings of 8th Workshop on Statistical Signal and Array Processing, 295-298, 1996. [cited by applicant]
Pham, Tien et al. “TTCP AG-6: Acoustic Detection and Tracking of UAVs,” Proc. of SPIE 5417, Unattended/Unmanned Ground, Ocean, and Air Sensor Technologies and Applications VI, 5417:24-30, 2004. [cited by applicant]
Phillips, Richard et al. “Determination of West Indian manatee vocalization levels and rate,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 115(1) 422-428, 2004. [cited by applicant]
Piet, J. et al. “Localization of the Acoustic Sources of the A340 with a Large Phased Microphone Array During Flight Tests,” Am. Instr. of Aeronautics and Astronautics Paper 2002-2506, 2002. [cited by applicant]
Rascon, Caleb et al. Localization of sound sources in robots: A review, Robotics and Autonomous Sys., 96, 184-210, 2017. [cited by applicant]
Reeder, C. et al. “Two-Hydrophone Heading and Range Sensor Applied to Formation-Flying for AUVs,” IEEE, 517-523, 2004. [cited by applicant]
Reiff, C. et al. “Acoustic Detection and Localization from a Tethered Aerostat during the NATO TG-53 Test,” Proc. of SPIE, Int'l Soc. For Optical Eng'g, 2006. [cited by applicant]
Robertson, Dale et al. “Acoustic Sensing from small-size UAVs,” Proc. of SPIE 6562, Unattended Ground, Sea, and Air Sensor Technologies and Applications IX, 6656208-1-656208-8, 2007. [cited by applicant]
Robertson, Dale et al. “NATO TG-53: Acoustic Detection of Weapon Firing Joint Field Experiment,” Proc. of SPIE 6231, Unattended Ground, Sea, and Air Sensor Technologies and Applications VIII, 2006. [cited by applicant]
Scanlon, Michael et al. “Acoustic Transient Source Localization from an Aerostat,” ASC, 2006. [cited by applicant]
Scanlon, Michael et al. “Aerostat Acoustic Payload for Transient and Helicopter Detection,” Proc. of SPIE 6538, Sensors, and Command, Control, Communications, and Intelligence (C3I) Technologies for Homeland Security an… [cited by applicant]
Scanlon, Michael et al. “Networked Acoustic Sensor Array's Performance During 2004 Horizontal Fusion—Warrior's Edge Demonstration,” 2004. [cited by applicant]
Shakernia, Omid et al. “Passive Ranging for UAV Sense and Avoid Applications,” Infotech@Aerospace, AIAA 2005-7179, 2005. [cited by applicant]
Sijtsman, Pieter et al. “Determination of Absolute Contributions of Aircraft Noise Components using Fly-Over Array Measurements,” 10th AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference, AIAA 2004-2958, 2004. [cited by applicant]
Sour, Nassy, Back Propagation of Acoustic Signature for Robust Target Identification, Proc. of SPIE 4232, Enabling Technologies for Law Enforcement and Security, 4232: 399-408, 2001. [cited by applicant]
Srour, Nassy et al. “Remote Netted Acoustic Detection System: Final Report,” Army Research Laboratory, ARL-TR-706, 1995. [cited by applicant]
Sundqvist, Bengt-Göran, Auto-ACAS—Robust Nuisance-Free Collision Avoidance, Proc. of the 44th IEEE Conf. on Decision and Control Conference, 2005, pp. 3961-3963. [cited by applicant]
Swihart, Donald et al. “Integration Techniques for Preventing Collisions Between Air Vehicles,” Air Force Research Laboratory, 2002. [cited by applicant]
Valin, Jean-Marc et al. “Robust Sound Source Localization Using a Microphone Array on a Mobile Robot,” Proc. of the 2003 IEEE/RSJ, Int'l Conf. on Intelligent Robots and Sys., 1228-1233, 2003. [cited by applicant]
Washburn, Karl et al. Correlating Noise Sources Identified by Beamforming with Sound Power Measurements, 2005-01-2510, SAE Int'l, 2005. [cited by applicant]
Wellman, Mark et al. “Enhanced Target Identification Using Higher Order Shape Statistics,” Army Research Laboratory, ARL-TR-1723, 1999. [cited by applicant]
Williams, Chad et al. “Method for triangulation on a moving broadband airborne target,” Proc. of SPIE 4393, Unattended Ground Sensor Technologies and Applications III, 4393, 30-39, 2001. [cited by applicant]
Williams, Ross et al. “Passive Acoustic Synthetic Aperture Processing Techniques,” IEEE J. Oceaning Eng'g, 17(1): 8-15, 1992. [cited by applicant]
Yamamoto, Shun'ichi et al. “Real-Time Robot Audition System That Recognizes Simultaneous Speech in the Real World,” Proc. of the 2006 IEEE/RSJ, Int'l Conf. on Intelligent Robots and Sys., 5333-5338, 2006. [cited by applicant]
Young, Stuart et al. “Acoustic Sensors on Small Robots for the Urban Environment,” Proc. of SPIE 5804, Unmanned Ground Vehicle Technology VII, 5804: 97-108, 2005. [cited by applicant]
Young, Stuart et al. “Detection and Localization with an Acoustic Array on a Small Robotic Platform in Urban Environments,” Army Research Laboratory, ARL-TR-2575, 2003. [cited by applicant]
English translation of office action dated Jul. 18, 2023 in connection with Japanese patent application No. 2022-565732, 7 pages. [cited by applicant]
Cline, et al. “The LOW-cost Scout uav Acoustic System (LOSAS)” Scientific Applications & Research Associates, 21 pages. [cited by applicant]
Defendant Zipline International Inc.'s Third Amended Invalidity Contentions, Mar. 15, 2024, 155 pages. [cited by applicant]
Milkie et al. “UAV Acoustic Sensor Concepts of Operation,” Scientific Applications & Research Assoc, Inc (SARA), 19 pages. [cited by applicant]
Muller, et al. “Low Cost Scout UAV Acoustic System (LOSAS): Technology Overview and Demonstration Status,” SARA, 14 pages. [cited by applicant]
Wes, et al. “The LOw-cost Scout uav Acoustic System (LOSAS),” Scientific Applications & Research Associates, 23 pages. [cited by applicant]
Subpoena to Testify at a Deposition in a Civil Action, dated Mar. 14, 2024, Civil Action No. 3:22-cv-04480-JSC, 6 pages. [cited by applicant]
Plaintiff SARA, Inc.'s Notice of Third Party Deposition Subpoena to Dorsey Whitney LLP, Mar. 14, 2024, 9 pages. [cited by applicant]
Supplemental Complaint dated Feb. 9, 2024 in connection with Civil Action No. 3:22-cv-04480-JSC, 178 pages. [cited by applicant]
Exhibit B in Civil Action No. 3:22-cv-04480-JSC, U.S. Pat. No. 7,606,115, 8 pages. [cited by applicant]
Demand for Jury Trial dated Feb. 23, 2024 in connection with Civil Action No. 3:22-cv-04480-JSC, 120 pages. [cited by applicant]
Exhibit 0005 in connection with Civil Action No. 3:22-CV-04480-JSC, Mpep 2001.06, Sources of Information under 37 CFR 1.56, 3 pages. [cited by applicant]
Exhibit 0006 in Civil Action No. 3:22-CV-04480-JSC, U.S. Appl. No. 63/082,838, 4th provisional application, 46 pages. [cited by applicant]
Exhibit 0007 in Civil Action No. 3:22-CV-04480-JSC, U.S. Appl. No. 63/082,832, 5th provisional application, 33 pages. [cited by applicant]
Exhibit 8 in Civil Action No. 3:22-CV-04480-JSC, Zipline Meetings 2020-2022, 9 pages. [cited by applicant]
Exhibit 1 in Civil Action No. 3:22-CV-04480-JSC, U.S. Patent Publication No. 20210225182A1, 23 pages. [cited by applicant]
Exhibit 2 in Civil Action No. 3:22-CV-04480-JSC, US Patent Publication No. US20220011786A1, 20 pages. [cited by applicant]
Exhibit 3 in Civil Action No. 3:22-CV-04480-JSC, US Patent Publication No. US20220053254A1, 21 pages. [cited by applicant]
Exhibit 4 in Civil Action No. 3:22-CV-04480-JSC, US Patent Publication No. US20230396909A1, 22 pages. [cited by applicant]
Exhibit 13 in Civil Action No. 3:22-CV-04480-JSC, Cline I, UAV Acoustic Sensor Technology Demonstrations and Capability Expansion, 20 pages. [cited by applicant]
Exhibit 14 in Civil Action No. 3:22-CV-04480-JSC, Cline II, Unmanned Systems North America Conference 2006, 27 pages. [cited by applicant]
Exhibit 15 in Civil Action No. 3:22-CV-04480-JSC, May 29, 2024 Court Transcript, 51 pages. [cited by applicant]
Exhibit 16 in Civil Action No. 3:22-CV-04480-JSC, Response to 101 Rejection in U.S. Patent Publication US20220011786A1, 2nd Non-Provisional Application, 5 pages. [cited by applicant]
Transcript of Proceedings dated May 29, 2024 in connection with [cited by applicant]
Allen et al., “AIAA 93-4343 Aeroacoustic Probe Design for Microphone to Reduce Flow-Induced Self-Noise,” NASA Ames Research Center, Oct. 25, 1993, 11 pages. [cited by applicant]
Neiset, “Theoretical and Experimental Investigations of Microphone Probes for Sound Measurements in Turbulent Flow,” Journal of Sound and Vibration, Jun. 7, 1974, 39 (3), 371-400. [cited by applicant]
Brown et al. “Acoustic Methods Used in the NASA Glenn 9-by 15-Foot Low-Speed Wind Tunnel,” NASA Glenn Research Center, Jun. 2018, 50 pages. [cited by applicant]
Fields, “An Experimental Investigation of Flow-Induced Oscillations of the Brüel & Kjær In-Flow Microphone,” Thesis, California Polytechnic State University, Jan. 1996, 69 pages. [cited by applicant]
Dassen et al. “Design and testing of a low self-noise aerodynamic microphone forebody,” American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Inc. May 1996, AIAA Paper 96-1711. [cited by applicant]