IP Library Granted Patent US 12,353,958
Granted Patent B2
US 12,353,958 · App. 17/149,407 · Granted Jul 8, 2025

Constructing and programming quantum hardware for quantum annealing processes

Inventors: Masoud Mohseni (Redondo Beach, CA); Hartmut Neven (Malibu, CA)
Assignee: Google LLC
G06N10/70G06F15/82G06F17/11G06N7/01G06N10/00G06N10/20G06N10/40G06N10/60G06N20/00H10N60/12H10N60/128H10N60/805
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,353,958
App. No.
17/149,407
Granted
Jul 8, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

Methods, systems, and apparatus, including computer programs encoded on computer storage media, for constructing and programming quantum hardware for quantum annealing processes.

Claims (305)

1. A computer implemented method comprising:

determining, by a control system of quantum annealing hardware, values of control parameters for programming the quantum annealing hardware to implement a quantum annealing schedule, wherein the control parameters comprise coupling strengths of programmable inductive couplers between superconducting qubits in a quantum system included in the quantum annealing hardware, wherein the superconducting qubits comprise logical superconducting qubits for use in computation and control superconducting qubits for use in assisting the computation without being computational units, the determining comprising:

obtaining information representing energy states of a total Hamiltonian, wherein the total Hamiltonian characterizes dynamics of the quantum system, the quantum system comprising a quantum annealing subsystem and a quantum governor subsystem that comprises the control superconducting qubits;

calculating an average phonon energy of a bath in which the quantum system is located;

selecting a probability mass function for a ground state fidelity of the quantum annealing subsystem;

determining a quantum-governor distribution of an energy spectrum for the quantum governor subsystem based on i) the information representing the energy states of the total Hamiltonian, ii) the average phonon energy, and iii) the probability mass function; and

selecting the values of the control parameters from the quantum-governor distribution; and

programming, by the control system, the quantum system included in the quantum annealing hardware using the determined values of the control parameters, comprising:

initializing the quantum system according to initialization parameters that encode an optimization problem into an energy spectrum of the total Hamiltonian; and

applying a magnetic field along a z direction to adjust the coupling provided by the inductive couplers between the logical superconducting qubits and the control superconducting qubits included in the quantum annealing hardware according to the determined values of the control parameters;

implementing the quantum annealing schedule to drive the quantum system programmed by the determined values of the control parameters to a ground state of the quantum system; and

measuring an energy of the ground state, wherein the energy encodes a solution to the optimization problem.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the information representing the energy states of the total Hamiltonian comprises one or more of energy levels, spacings between energy levels, a distribution of the spacings between energy levels, or an average spacing between energy levels.

3. The method of claim 2 , wherein the average energy level spacing is given by

Δε

(

t

)

_

=

2

i

=

0

N

-

1

"\[LeftBracketingBar]"

ε

i

(

t

)

-

ε

j

(

t

)

"\[RightBracketingBar]"

N

(

N

-

1

)

where ε i (t) represents an energy of an i-th instantaneous eigenstate energy of the total Hamiltonian and N represents a total number of eigenstates of the total Hamiltonian.

4. The method of claim 1 , wherein the information representing the energy states of the total Hamiltonian comprises information representing the energy states of the total Hamiltonian at a time of a quantum phase transition.

5. The method of claim 1 , wherein calculating the average phonon energy of the bath comprises experimentally measuring the average phonon energy of the bath.

6. The method of claim 1 , wherein calculating the average phonon energy of the bath comprises computing kT, where k represents the Boltzmann constant and T represents temperature.

7. The method of claim 1 , wherein the average phonon energy satisfies the following equation:

ω

_

=

0

ω

J

(

ω

)

d

ω

/

(

e

ω

/

kT

-

1

)

0

J

(

ω

)

d

ω

/

(

e

ω

/

kT

-

1

)

,

where J(ω) represents one of an Omhic spectral density:

J

(

ω

)

=

λω

e

-

ω

γ

,

a super-Omhic spectral density:

J

(

ω

)

=

λ

ω

3

e

-

ω

γ

,

a Drude-Lorentz spectral density:

J

(

ω

)

=

2

λ

ω

γ

ω

2

+

γ

2

,

or a flat spectral distribution: J(ω)=1, λ represents a reorganization energy, and γ represents a bath frequency cut-off.

8. The method of claim 1 , wherein calculating the average phonon energy of the bath comprises calculating the average phonon energy using an open quantum system model.

9. The method of claim 1 , wherein the total Hamiltonian is given by

H

t

o

t

=

I

(

t

)

i

N

σ

i

x

+

G

(

t

)

(

i

=

1

N

G

h

i

G

σ

i

z

+

i

,

j

=

1

N

G

J

ij

G

σ

i

z

σ

j

z

+

i

=

1

N

G

j

=

1

N

A

J

ij

G

A

σ

i

z

σ

j

z

)

+

P

(

t

)

(

-

i

N

h

i

σ

i

z

+

i

j

N

J

ij

σ

i

z

σ

j

z

)

wherein i represents an i th superconducting unit, h i and J ij represent control parameters included in a problem Hamiltonian and take real values that are associated with a coupling strength between superconducting units, h i G , J ij G and J ij GA represent control parameters included in a quantum governor Hamiltonian and take real values that are associated with a coupling strength between superconducting units, I(t), G(t), and P(t) represent time-dependent control parameters, and σ i x , σ i z represent Pauli-x and Pauli-z operators for superconducting unit i.

10. The method of claim 1 , wherein the quantum-governor distribution is represented by an exponential family of random matrixes selected using a random matrix theory model.

11. The method of claim 10 , wherein the exponential family is parameterized with respect to controllable quantum annealing hardware parameters, the parameters comprising coupling between qubits.

12. The method of claim 1 , wherein in a second phase of the quantum annealing schedule, an average energy level spacing of the quantum governor subsystem satisfies » ω where represents a modified average energy level of the quantum annealing subsystem and quantum governor subsystem and ω represents the average phonon energy.

13. The method of claim 1 , wherein in a third phase of the quantum annealing schedule, an average energy level spacing of the quantum governor subsystem satisfies ≈ ω where represents a modified average energy level of the quantum annealing subsystem and quantum governor subsystem and ω represents the average phonon energy.

14. A control system for programming quantum annealing hardware, the control system comprising:

one or more computers; and

one or more computer-readable media coupled to the one or more computers having instructions stored thereon which, when executed by the one or more computers, cause the one or more computers to perform operations comprising:

determining, by a control system of quantum annealing hardware, values of control parameters for programming the quantum annealing hardware to implement a quantum annealing schedule, wherein the control parameters comprise coupling strengths of programmable inductive couplers between superconducting qubits in a quantum system included in the quantum annealing hardware, wherein the superconducting qubits comprise logical superconducting qubits for use in computation and control superconducting qubits for use in assisting the computation without being computational units, the determining comprising:

obtaining information representing energy states of a total Hamiltonian, wherein the total Hamiltonian characterizes dynamics of the quantum system, the quantum system comprising a quantum annealing subsystem and a quantum governor subsystem that comprises the control superconducting qubits;

calculating an average phonon energy of a bath in which the quantum system is located;

selecting a probability mass function for a ground state fidelity of the quantum annealing subsystem;

determining a quantum-governor distribution of an energy spectrum for the quantum governor subsystem based on i) the information representing the energy states of the total Hamiltonian, ii) the average phonon energy, and iii) the probability mass function; and

selecting the values of the control parameters from the quantum-governor distribution; and

programming, by the control system, the quantum system included in the quantum annealing hardware using the determined values of the control parameters, comprising:

initializing the quantum system according to initialization parameters that encode an optimization problem into an energy spectrum of the total Hamiltonian; and

applying a magnetic field along a z direction to adjust the coupling provided by the inductive couplers between the logical superconducting qubits and the control superconducting qubits included in the quantum annealing hardware according to the determined values of the control parameters;

implementing the quantum annealing schedule to drive the quantum system programmed by the determined values of the control parameters to a ground state of the quantum system; and

measuring an energy of the ground state, wherein the energy encodes a solution to the optimization problem.

15. The control system of claim 14 , wherein in a second phase of the quantum annealing schedule, an average energy level spacing of the quantum governor subsystem satisfies » ω where represents a modified average energy level of the quantum annealing subsystem and quantum governor subsystem and ω represents the average phonon energy.

16. The control system of claim 14 , wherein in a third phase of the quantum annealing schedule, an average energy level spacing of the quantum governor subsystem satisfies ≈ ω where represents a modified average energy level of the quantum annealing subsystem and quantum governor subsystem and ω represents the average phonon energy.

Assignments (3)
CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE CONVEYING PARTY DATA EXECUTION DATE FROM 9/30/2017 TO 9/29/2017 PREVIOUSLY RECORDED ON REEL 55762 FRAME 439. ASSIGNOR(S) HEREBY CONFIRMS THE CHANGE OF NAME. Recorded Apr 28, 2025
From: GOOGLE INC.
To: GOOGLE LLC
Reel/Frame 071097/0001 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jan 20, 2021
From: MOHSENI, MASOUD; NEVEN, HARTMUT
To: GOOGLE INC.
Reel/Frame 054968/0237 →
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Jan 20, 2021
From: GOOGLE INC.
To: GOOGLE LLC
Reel/Frame 055762/0439 →
Continuity (8)
Continuation 16997673 · Aug 19, 2020
Continuation 16853463 · Apr 20, 2020
Continuation 16683149 · Nov 13, 2019
Continuation 15914689 · Mar 7, 2018
Continuation 15109600
Provisional Application 61985348 · Apr 28, 2014
Provisional Application 61924207 · Jan 6, 2014
Related Publication 20210224680A1 · Jul 22, 2021
References Cited (97)
US 6979836B2 · Zagoskin · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 7307275B2 · Lidar · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 7732804B2 · Hollenberg · 2010 [cited by examiner]
US 7788192B2 · Amin et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 8229863B2 · Amin et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 9870277B2 · Berkley · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 9934468B2 · Mohseni et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 10031887B2 · Raymond · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 10068180B2 · Amin · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 10346760B2 · Mohseni et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10510015B2 · Mohseni et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 11263547B2 · Reinhardt · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 11295225B2 · Hoskinson · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 20040000666A1 · Lidar et al. · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 20050101489A1 · Blais et al. · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 20050224784A1 · Amin et al. · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 20060151775A1 · Hollenberg · 2006 [cited by examiner]
US 20070180586A1 · Amin et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20080086438A1 · Amin et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20080162613A1 · Amin et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20090087084A1 · Neigovzen et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20090299947A1 · Amin et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20100258746A1 · Na et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20110060780A1 · Berkley · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20110133770A1 · Przybysz et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20110231462A1 · Macready et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20120023053A1 · Harris et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20120254586A1 · Amin et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20150262073A1 · Lanting · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150310350A1 · Niskanen · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20160071021A1 · Raymond · 2016 [cited by examiner]
US 20160085616A1 · Berkley · 2016 [cited by examiner]
US 20160132785A1 · Amin · 2016 [cited by examiner]
US 20160343932A1 · Mohseni et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20170104493A1 · Goto · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20180218281A1 · Reinhardt · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 20180341874A1 · Puri et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20190019099A1 · Hoskinson · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20240160475A1 · Healy · 2024 [cited by examiner]
CN 1278967 · 2001 [cited by applicant]
CN 101548288A · 2009 [cited by applicant]
CN 102037475A · 2011 [cited by applicant]
CN 102723947 · 2012 [cited by applicant]
CN 103383714 · 2013 [cited by applicant]
JP 2005527902 · 2005 [cited by applicant]
JP 2008539480 · 2008 [cited by applicant]
JP 2009524857A · 2009 [cited by applicant]
JP 2011523757 · 2011 [cited by applicant]
JP 2011524026 · 2011 [cited by applicant]
JP 2011524043 · 2011 [cited by applicant]
JP 2013044901 · 2013 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2003090162 · 2003 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2009075861 · 2009 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2009143166 · 2009 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2012082938 · 2012 [cited by applicant]
Galperin, Y. M. et al. “Low-frequency Noise as a Source of Dephasing of a Qubit” (pp. 141-165), 2004 Springer. < https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/1-4020-2193-3_9> (Year: 2004). [cited by examiner]
Grodecka, Anna et al. “Phonon impact on the coherent control of quantum states in semiconductor quantum dots” (pp. 1-31), Apr. 15, 2004. <https://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0404364> (Year: 2004). [cited by examiner]
Close, Tom et al. “Overcoming phonon-induced dephasing for indistinguishable photon sources”, Nov. 7, 2012, IOP Publishing Ltd. <https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1367-2630/14/11/113004> (Year: 2012). [cited by examiner]
De Fang, Yang et al. “Decoherence of flux qubits under Sub-Ohmic bath” (pp. 315-319), Jun. 27, 2013, Trans Tech Publications Ltd. <https://www.scientific.net/AMR.710.315> (Year: 2013). [cited by examiner]
Ignatyuk, V. V. et al. “Bath dynamics in an exactly solvable qubit model with initial qubit-environment correlations” (pp. 1-6), Sep. 25, 2013. <https://doi.org/10.5488/CMP.16.34001> (Year: 2013). [cited by examiner]
AU Office Action in Australian Application No. 2020281055, dated Aug. 24, 2021, 2 pages. [cited by applicant]
JP Office Action in Japanese Application No. 2019-150457, dated Aug. 10, 2021, 6 pages (with English translation). [cited by applicant]
AU Office Action in Australian Appln. No. 2022200224, dated Oct. 31, 2022, 2 pages. [cited by applicant]
Boixo et al., “Quantum annealing with more than one hundred qubits,” arXiv, Jul. 21, 2013, 23 pages. [cited by applicant]
Extended European Search Report in European Appln. No. 22179379.7, dated Oct. 27, 2022, 20 pages. [cited by applicant]
Boixo et al., “Evidence for quantum annealing with more than one hundred quibits,” arXiv, Jul. 2, 2013, 23 pages. [cited by applicant]
Extended European Search Report in European Appln. No. 22162517.1, dated Jun. 24, 2022, 15 pages. [cited by applicant]
Albash et al., “Quantum adiabatic Markovian master equations,” New J Phys, 14, Dec. 11, 2012, 41 pages. [cited by applicant]
Brif et al. “Exploring adiabatic quantum trajectories via optimal control,” arXiv preprint arXiv 1310.3443v1, Oct. 13, 2013, 19 pages. [cited by applicant]
Dash et al. “A note on QUBO instances defined on Chimera graphs,” arXiv preprint arXiv 1306.1202, Jul. 1, 2013, 8 pages. [cited by applicant]
De Vega et al. “Effects of dissipation on an adiabatic quantum search algorithm,” New Journal of Physics, Institute of Physics Publishing, Bristol, GB, vol. 12(12) Dec. 8, 2010, 19 pages. [cited by applicant]
Extended European Search Report issued in Application No. 14876158.8, mailed on Jul. 14, 2017, 9 pages. [cited by applicant]
Extended European Search Report issued in European Application No. 14876050.7, mailed on Aug. 28, 2017, 10 pages. [cited by applicant]
International Preliminary Report on Patentability in International Application No. PCT/US2014/072959, mailed on Jul. 21, 2016, 7 pages. [cited by applicant]
International Preliminary Report on Patentability in International Application No. PCT/US2014/072962, mailed Jul. 21, 2016, 7 pages. [cited by applicant]
International Search Report and Written Opinion in Application No. PCT/US2014/0072959, dated May 27, 2015, 16 pages. [cited by applicant]
International Search Report and Written Opinion in Application No. PCT/US2014/072962, dated Apr. 28, 2015, 10 pages. [cited by applicant]
Kallush and Kolosof, “Quantum governor: Automatic quantum control and reduction of the influence of noise without measuring,” Physical Review A 73.3, Nov. 21, 2005, 12 pages. [cited by applicant]
Makhlin et al., “Josephson-junction qubits with controlled couplings,” Nature 398:307-307, Mar. 25, 1999, 5 pages. [cited by applicant]
Niskanen et al., “Quantum Coherent Tunable Coupling of Superconducting Qubits,” Science 316:723-726, May 4, 2007, 5 pages. [cited by applicant]
SG Office Action in Singapore Application No. 10201706473, dated Jun. 21, 2019, 6 pages. [cited by applicant]
Van der Ploeg et al., “Controllable Coupling of Superconducting Flux Qubits,” Physical review letters 98.5, May 23, 2007, 4 pages. [cited by applicant]
AU Examination Report in Australian Application No. 2019201469, dated Jan. 29, 2020, 2 pages. [cited by applicant]
CN Office Action in Chinese Application No. 201480074978, dated Jan. 19, 2020, 6 pages (with English translation). [cited by applicant]
JP Office Action in Japanese Application No. 2019-150457, dated Oct. 27, 2020, 7 pages (with English translation). [cited by applicant]
JP Office Action in Japanese Application No. 2019-150457, dated Apr. 5, 2021, 5 pages (with English translation). [cited by applicant]
CA Office Action in Canadian Application No. 2,936,112, Nov. 30, 2021, 3 pages. [cited by applicant]
Notice of Allowance in Japanese Appln. No. 2021-214391, dated Mar. 13, 2023, 5 pages (with English translation). [cited by applicant]
Notice of Allowance in Canada Appln. No. 2,936,112, dated Mar. 1, 2023, 1 page. [cited by applicant]
Office Action in Japanese Appln. No. 2023-064372, mailed on May 20, 2024, 4 pages (with English translation). [cited by applicant]
Office Action in European Appln. No. 22162517.1, mailed on Dec. 20, 2023, 9 pages. [cited by applicant]
Office Action in European Appln. No. 22179379.7, mailed on Feb. 19, 2024, 10 pages. [cited by applicant]
Office Action in Australian Appln. No. 202320129.9, mailed on Feb. 2, 2024, 4 pages. [cited by applicant]
Office Action in Australian Appln. No. 2023208179, mailed on Jul. 4, 2024, 3 pages. [cited by applicant]
Office Action in Chinese Appln. No. 202010705398.4, mailed on Jun. 26, 2024, 12 pages (with English translation). [cited by applicant]
Notice of Allowance in Australian Appln. No. 2023201299, mailed on Apr. 3, 2024, 3 pages. [cited by applicant]
Notice of Allowance in Australian Appln. No. 2023208179, mailed on Aug. 9, 2024, 3 pages. [cited by applicant]