IP Library › Granted Patent US 12,350,829
Granted Patent B2
US 12,350,829 · App. 17/154,352 · Granted Jul 8, 2025

Systems and methods for constrained motion control of medical instruments

Inventor: Andrea Bajo (Palo Alto, CA)
Assignee: Auris Health, Inc.
B25J9/1607A61B34/30A61B34/76B25J9/1633B25J9/1664
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,350,829
App. No.
17/154,352
Granted
Jul 8, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

Systems and methods for constrained motion control of medical instruments are provided. In one aspect, a robotic system includes an instrument having an end effector, a robotic arm configured to control movement of the instrument and the end effector, and an input device configured to receive an input for controlling movement of the instrument and end effector. The instrument is capable of moving in a different number of degrees-of-freedom (DOFs) than the input device. The system is configured to determine a Jacobian matrix relating the input to the input device to robotic arm commands for achieving a motion of the end effector indicated by the input, modify the Jacobian matrix via discarding at least one row of the Jacobian matrix, and determine a robotic arm command for achieving the motion of the instrument indicated by the input based on the modified Jacobian matrix.

Claims (54)

1. A robotic system, comprising:

an instrument having an end effector;

a robotic arm configured to control movement of the instrument and the end effector;

an input device configured to receive an input for controlling movement of the instrument and the end effector, wherein the instrument is capable of moving in a fewer number of degrees-of-freedom (DOFs) than the input device, wherein the input device comprises a gimbal configured to receive force feedback that constrains a clinician's hand to move the gimbal in a constrained motion that is constrained to the fewer number of DOFs;

at least one processor; and

at least one computer-readable memory in communication with the at least one processor and having stored thereon computer-executable instructions to cause the at least one processor to:

determine a Jacobian matrix relating the input to robotic arm commands for achieving a motion of the end effector indicated by the input,

modify the Jacobian matrix by discarding at least one row of the Jacobian matrix corresponding to a DOF in which the instrument is incapable of movement, and

determine a robotic arm command for achieving the motion of the end effector indicated by the input based on the modified Jacobian matrix.

2. The robotic system of claim 1 , wherein the input device has 6 DOFs and the instrument has 5 DOFs.

3. The robotic system of claim 1 , wherein:

the input device has n more DOFs than the instrument; and

the modifying of the Jacobian matrix comprises discarding n rows of the Jacobian matrix corresponding to one or more types of movement of which the instrument is incapable of moving.

4. The robotic system of claim 1 , wherein the instrument is a surgical stapler, suction irrigator, straight harmonic tool, or articulating harmonic tool.

5. The robotic system of claim 1 , wherein the instrument comprises a surgical stapler having 5 DOFs.

6. The robotic system of claim 1 , wherein the instrument comprises a suction irrigator having at least 4 DOFs.

7. The robotic system of claim 1 , wherein:

the DOF in which the instrument is incapable of movement is a yaw DOF of the end effector, and

the modifying of the Jacobian matrix comprises discarding a row of the Jacobian matrix corresponding to yaw movement.

8. The robotic system of claim 1 , wherein the input device is capable of movement in the DOF in which the instrument is incapable of movement, and wherein the constrained motion of the gimbal restricts motion of the gimbal in the DOF in which the instrument is incapable of movement.

9. The robotic system of claim 1 , wherein:

the instrument is constrained in movement at a remote center of motion (RCM);

the Jacobian matrix comprises an end effector Jacobian matrix that relates the input to the input device to the robotic arm commands for achieving the motion of the end effector indicated by the input; and

the computer-executable instructions further cause the at least one processor to:

modify the end effector Jacobian matrix based on discarding the at least one row from the end effector Jacobian matrix;

determine an RCM Jacobian matrix relating the input to the input device to the robotic arm commands for maintaining the RCM; and

determine the robotic arm command based on the modified end effector Jacobian matrix and the RCM Jacobian matrix.

10. The robotic system of claim 1 , wherein the Jacobian matrix relates a frame of reference of the end effector to a world frame of reference of the robotic system.

11. A method for controlling movement of an end effector of a medical instrument, the method comprising:

receiving, via an input device, an input for controlling movement of the instrument, wherein the instrument has a fewer number of degrees-of-freedom (DOFs) than the input device, wherein the input device comprises a gimbal configured to receive force feedback;

determining a Jacobian matrix relating the input received via the input device to robotic arm commands for achieving a motion of the end effector indicated by the input;

modifying the Jacobian matrix by discarding at least one row of the Jacobian matrix, wherein the row corresponds to a DOF in which the instrument is incapable of movement;

determining a robotic arm command for achieving the motion of the end effector indicated by the input based on the modified Jacobian matrix; and

providing force feedback to the gimbal that constrains a motion of the gimbal to the fewer number of degrees of freedom.

12. The method of claim 11 , wherein the input device has 6 DOFs and the end effector has 5 DOFs.

13. The method of claim 11 , wherein:

the input device has n more DOFs than the instrument; and

the modifying of the Jacobian matrix comprises discarding n rows of the Jacobian matrix corresponding to types of movement of which the instrument is incapable of moving.

14. The method of claim 11 , wherein:

the DOF in which the instrument is incapable of movement is a yaw DOF of the end effector, and

the modifying of the Jacobian matrix comprises discarding a row of the Jacobian matrix corresponding to the yaw DOF.

15. The method of claim 11 , wherein the input device is capable of movement in the DOF in which the instrument is incapable of movement, and wherein the constrained motion of the gimbal restricts motion of the gimbal in the DOF in which the instrument is incapable of movement.

16. A robotic system, comprising:

an instrument having an end effector;

a robotic arm configured to control movement of the end effector;

a gimbal configured to receive an input for controlling movement of the end effector, wherein the end effector has fewer degrees-of-freedom (DOFs) than the gimbal;

at least one processor; and

at least one computer-readable memory in communication with the at least one processor and having stored thereon computer-executable instructions to cause the at least one processor to:

determine a Jacobian matrix relating the input to robotic arm commands for achieving a motion of the end effector indicated by the input,

discard at least one row of the Jacobian matrix based on a DOF in which the gimbal is capable of movement and the end effector is incapable of movement,

determine a robotic arm command for achieving the motion of the instrument indicated by the input based on the Jacobian matrix after the at least one row is discarded, and

provide force feedback to the gimbal that constrains motion of the gimbal to the fewer DOFs of the end effector.

17. The robotic system of claim 16 , wherein the gimbal is capable of movement in the DOF in which the end effector is incapable of movement, and wherein the force feedback restricts motion of the gimbal in the DOF in which the instrument is incapable of movement.

18. The robotic system of claim 16 , wherein the end effector is incapable of yaw movement, and the force feedback restricts yaw movement of the gimbal.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded May 6, 2025
From: BAJO, ANDREA
To: AURIS HEALTH, INC.
Reel/Frame 071034/0760 →
Continuity (2)
Provisional Application 63000093 · Mar 26, 2020
Related Publication 20210299862A1 · Sep 30, 2021
References Cited (17)
US 4980625A · Shimada · 1990 [cited by applicant]
US 8120301B2 · Goldberg et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 8130907B2 · Maurer, Jr. et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 8170716B2 · Coste-Maniere et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 8620473B2 · Diolaiti et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 9333042B2 · Diolaiti et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20110040306A1 · Prisco · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20120245736A1 · Bosscher · 2012 [cited by examiner]
US 20150223897A1 · Kostrzewski et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20160100900A1 · Madhani et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160213435A1 · Hourtash · 2016 [cited by examiner]
US 20190105117A1 · Brisson · 2019 [cited by examiner]
KR 1020140136828A · 2014 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2000060521A1 · 2000 [cited by examiner]
International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/IB2021/050468, dated May 6, 2021, 9 pages. [cited by applicant]
Corke, P. (2017). Manipulator Velocity. In: Robotics, Vision and Control. Springer Tracts in Advanced Robotics, vol. 118. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-54413-7_8. [cited by applicant]
European Extended Search Report and Written Opinion dated Jun. 13, 2024, for Application No. 21777100.5, 14 pages. [cited by applicant]