IP Library Patent Application 17166234
Patent Application
App. No. 17/166,234

SYSTEM, METHOD AND COMPUTER PROGRAM PRODUCT FOR IMPROVED RADAR-BASED OBJECT RECOGNITION

Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US None
App. No.
17/166,234
Abstract

A method for generating data regarding individuals in an area of interest including operating a radar system which may be deployed in the area of interest, to provide a radar image including raw radar data; and/or using a hardware processor configured to store a trained model for analyzing the radar image, thereby to generate object recognition data, wherein the raw radar data generated by the radar system both undergoes signal processing, thereby to generate processed radar data which is used for said training, and is used directly, without signal processing, for training said model.

Claims (42)

1 . A method for generating data regarding individuals in an area of interest including:

operating a radar system, deployed in the area of interest, to provide a radar image including raw radar data; and

using a hardware processor configured to store a trained model for analyzing the radar image, thereby to generate object recognition data,

wherein said raw radar data generated by the radar system both

undergoes signal processing, thereby to generate processed radar data which is used for said training, and

is used directly, without signal processing, for training said model.

2 . A method according to claim 1 wherein said signal processing is performed only every N measurement cycles, thereby to reduce computational effort by a factor of N.

3 . A method according to claim 1 wherein said training includes using a training data set which includes:

“raw” data which has not undergone said signal processing, for every measurement cycle of said radar system, and

said processed radar data, from the processed and constructed source, for only one of every N measurement cycles of said radar system.

4 . A method according to claim 1 wherein said training includes using a training data set which includes:

“raw” data which has not undergone said signal processing, for only one of every M measurement cycles of said radar system; and

said processed radar data, from the processed and constructed source, for only one of every N< >M measurement cycles of said radar system, with a cycle shift K relative to the M measurement cycles.

5 . A method according to claim 1 and also comprising using external sensor measurement to enrich said data.

6 . A method according to claim 1 wherein said radar system comprises a millimeter wave radar whose inherent spatial resolution is coarser than the inherent spatial resolution of an optical camera.

7 . A method according to claim 1 wherein the data comprises a determination of whether or not a given detected individual appears on a given whitelist.

8 . A method according to claim 1 wherein a physical camera is used allowing for correlation between images and radar scans.

9 . A method according to claim 8 , wherein 2D construction of the 2D constructed radar image is performed only every N measurement cycles, thereby to reduce computational resources required for generating data from the radar image.

10 . A method according to claim 1 wherein said radar image comprises at least one of:

a 3D constructed radar image; and

a 2D constructed radar image.

11 . A method according to claim 10 wherein 3D construction of the 3D constructed radar image is performed only every N measurement cycles, thereby to reduce computational resources required for generating data from the radar image.

12 . A method according to claim 1 wherein Ensemble Learning is used to combine raw and constructed radar data.

13 . A method according to claim 12 wherein the raw data being combined comprises at least one spectral measurement including at least one power measurement at a specific frequency.

14 . A method according to claim 13 wherein the constructed data being combined comprises at least one spatial measurement including at least one intensity measurement at a specific pixel.

15 . A method according to claim 13 wherein both power measurements in the frequency domain are used together with intensity measurements of different pixels representing a 2D area.

16 . A method according to claim 13 wherein both power measurements in the frequency domain and intensity measurements of different pixels representing some 2D area are used together for establishing said model.

17 . A computer program product, comprising a non-transitory tangible computer readable medium having computer readable program code embodied therein, said computer readable program code adapted to be executed to implement a method for generating data regarding individuals in an area of interest including:

Receiving a radar image including raw radar data, generated by a radar system deployed in the area of interest,

wherein said raw radar data generated by the radar system both undergoes signal processing, thereby to generate processed radar data which is used for said training, and

is used directly, without signal processing, for training a trained model, and

using the trained model for analyzing the raw radar data, thereby to generate object recognition data.

18 . A system comprising at least one processor configured to carry out the operations of:

Receiving a radar image including raw radar data, generated by a radar system deployed in the area of interest,

wherein said raw radar data generated by the radar system both

undergoes signal processing, thereby to generate processed radar data which is used for said training, and

is used directly, without signal processing, for training a trained model, and

using the trained model for analyzing the raw radar data, thereby to generate object recognition data.

19 . A method according to claim 1 wherein sensor data is used for label tagging the radar measurements for the data collection and training phase of at least one algorithm.

20 . A method according to claim 1 wherein, to know that sensor measurements of a specific individual are related to the radar measurements of the same person, coupling is achieved by event synchronization.

21 . A system according to claim 18 which includes a sensor e.g. weight sensor whose outputs are combined with temporally adjacent outputs of the at least one processor, thereby to yield classification of detected events as presence of an identified one of, or none of, plural objects on a whitelist, at a level of accuracy exceeding an accuracy level which would result from using the system alone, without the sensor, for said classification.

22 . A system according to claim 18 which includes e.g. an optical camera with face recognition functionality which provides a label identifying a recognized face which can be used to tag radar measurements (or radar data) generated by the radar system, thereby to yield tagged training data to be used during said training.

Assignments (3)
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Dec 19, 2023
From: VEEV (ASSIGNMENT FOR THE BENEFIT OF CREDITORS), LLC
To: LEN FW INVESTOR, LLC
Reel/Frame 066076/0711 →
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Feb 7, 2023
From: VEEV GROUP, INC.
To: LEN FW INVESTOR, LLC
Reel/Frame 062669/0279 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Dec 7, 2021
From: COHEN, MATI; GIL, BINYAMIN; KELIN, ISRAEL JAY
To: VEEV GROUP, INC.
Reel/Frame 058321/0865 →