IP Library Granted Patent US 11,694,186
Granted Patent B2
US 11,694,186 · App. 17/178,317 · Granted Jul 4, 2023

Combination payment card and methods thereof

Inventors: Thomas E. Rafferty (Las Vegas, NV); Bryan T. Bailey (Florence, KY); Christopher S. Postell (Columbus, GA)
Assignee: Worldpay, LLC
G06Q20/342G06Q20/20G06Q20/202G06Q20/227G06Q20/28G06Q30/06
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 11,694,186
App. No.
17/178,317
Granted
Jul 4, 2023
Kind
B2
Abstract

Systems and methods for processing payment transactions using combination payment cards. The combination payment card is associated with an open-loop account and one or more closed-loop accounts. Transaction information is received from a point-of-sale device. At least one of the closed-loop and open-loop account is debited.

Claims (53)

1. A computer-implemented method of processing an electronic transaction using a combination transaction vehicle, the computer-implemented method comprising:

receiving, at an acquirer processor over an electronic network and from a point-of-sale device associated with a terminal identifier, electronic transaction data at least identifying an account number for the combination transaction vehicle associated with a pooled closed-loop account and an open-loop account, wherein the account number is cross-referenced against a known list of combination transaction vehicle accounts;

determining, by the acquirer processor, using the terminal identifier, that the electronic transaction data identifies an entity associated with the pooled closed-loop account;

determining, by the acquirer processor, whether to authorize the electronic transaction as a pooled closed-loop transaction, an open-loop transaction, or a combination thereof based, at least in part, on evaluating whether the pooled closed-loop account, the open-loop account, or a combination thereof have funds to complete the electronic transaction;

in response to the determining the pooled closed-loop account and the open-loop account have funds to complete the electronic transaction:

returning, by the acquirer processor, a partial approval of the electronic transaction as the pooled closed-loop transaction to the point-of-sale device without communicating with a sponsoring network or an issuer, based upon determining that the pooled closed-loop account has insufficient funds to complete the electronic transaction;

authorizing, by the acquirer processor, remaining portion of the electronic transaction as the open-loop transaction upon determining the open-loop account has funds to cover an amount of deficiency in the pooled closed-loop account; and

transmitting, by the acquirer processor, an authorization of the electronic transaction to the point-of-sale device.

2. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein evaluating whether the pooled closed-loop account, the open-loop account, or a combination thereof have funds to complete the electronic transaction, further comprising:

returning, by the acquirer processor over the electronic network, a full approval to the point-of-sale device without communicating with the sponsoring network or the issuer, based on determining that the pooled closed-loop account has sufficient funds to complete the electronic transaction.

3. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein determining that the pooled closed-loop account has sufficient funds comprises determining that a closed-loop account of one of multiple merchants associated with the pooled closed-loop account has sufficient funds.

4. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein i) the pooled closed loop account is associated with multiple merchants and ii) each of the multiple merchants is associated with one or more point-of-sale devices.

5. The computer-implemented method of claim 4 , wherein the pooled closed-loop account comprises multiple closed-loop accounts associated with the multiple merchants.

6. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein evaluating whether the pooled closed-loop account, the open-loop account, or a combination thereof have funds to complete the electronic transaction, further comprising:

determining the pooled closed-loop account and the open-loop account have insufficient funds to complete the electronic transaction; and

transmitting, by the acquirer processor over the electronic network, a notification of the insufficient funds to the point-of-sale device requesting a cardholder to provide additional funds to cover the amount of the deficiency to complete the electronic transaction.

7. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein the acquirer processor is a merchant processor.

8. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein the account number is within a range of issuer identification numbers (IINs) identifiable as combination transaction vehicle account numbers.

9. A system for processing an electronic transaction using a combination transaction vehicle, the system comprising:

the combination transaction vehicle i) readable by a plurality of point-of-sale devices and ii) associated with a pooled closed-loop account and an open-loop account;

a point-of-sale device configured to accept the combination transaction vehicle and receive a selection of the pooled closed-loop account via user interface; and

an acquirer processor configured to:

receive, over an electronic network, electronic transaction data at least identifying an account number for the combination transaction vehicle from the point-of-sale device associated with a terminal identifier, wherein the account number is cross-referenced against a known list of combination transaction vehicle accounts;

determine, using the terminal identifier, that the electronic transaction data identifies an entity associated with the pooled closed-loop account;

determine whether to authorize the electronic transaction as a pooled closed-loop transaction, an open-loop transaction, or a combination thereof based, at least in part, on evaluating whether the pooled closed-loop account and the open-loop account have funds to complete the electronic transaction;

in response to the determining the pooled closed-loop account and the open-loop account have funds to complete the electronic transaction:

return a partial approval of the electronic transaction as the pooled closed-loop transaction to the point-of-sale device without communicating with a sponsoring network or an issuer, based upon determining that the pooled closed-loop account has insufficient funds to complete the electronic transaction;

authorize remaining portion of the electronic transaction as the open-loop transaction upon determining the open-loop account has funds to cover an amount of deficiency in the pooled closed-loop account; and

transmit an authorization of the electronic transaction to the point-of-sale device.

10. The system of claim 9 , wherein i) the pooled closed loop account is associated with multiple merchants and ii) each of the multiple merchants is associated with one or more point-of-sale devices.

11. The system of claim 10 , wherein the terminal identifier of the point-of-sale device is cross-referenced to one or more terminal identifiers of the one or more point-of-sale devices associated with the multiple merchants to determine that the point-of-sale device belongs to a merchant associated with the pooled closed-loop account.

12. The system of claim 10 , wherein the pooled closed-loop account comprises multiple closed-loop accounts associated with the multiple merchants.

13. The system of claim 9 , wherein the acquirer processor, evaluating whether the pooled closed-loop account, the open-loop account, or a combination thereof have funds to complete the electronic transaction, is further configured to:

determining the pooled closed-loop account and the open-loop account have insufficient funds to complete the electronic transaction; and

transmit, over the electronic network, a notification of the insufficient funds to the point-of-sale device requesting a cardholder to provide additional funds to cover the amount of the deficiency to complete the electronic transaction.

14. The system of claim 9 , wherein the acquirer processor, evaluating whether the pooled closed-loop account, the open-loop account, or a combination thereof have funds to complete the electronic transaction, is further configured to:

return, over the electronic network, a full approval to the point-of-sale device without communicating with the sponsoring network or the issuer, based on determining that the pooled closed-loop account has sufficient funds to complete the electronic transaction.

15. A non-transitory computer readable medium having instructions stored thereon which, when executed by one or more processors, cause the one or more processors to perform operations for processing an electronic transaction using a combination transaction vehicle, the operations comprising:

receiving, at an acquirer processor over an electronic network and from a point-of-sale device associated with a terminal identifier, electronic transaction data at least identifying an account number for the combination transaction vehicle associated with a pooled closed-loop account and an open-loop account, wherein the account number is cross-referenced against a known list of combination transaction vehicle accounts;

determining, by the acquirer processor, using the terminal identifier, that the electronic transaction data identifies an entity associated with the pooled closed-loop account;

determining, by the acquirer processor, whether to authorize the electronic transaction as a pooled closed-loop transaction, an open-loop transaction, or a combination thereof based, at least in part, evaluating whether the pooled closed-loop account, the open-loop account, or a combination thereof have funds to complete the electronic transaction;

in response to the determining the pooled closed-loop account and the open-loop account have funds to complete the electronic transaction:

returning, by the acquirer processor, a partial approval of the electronic transaction as the pooled closed-loop transaction to the point-of-sale device without communicating with a sponsoring network or an issuer, based upon determining that the pooled closed-loop account has insufficient funds to complete the electronic transaction;

authorizing, by the acquirer processor, remaining portion of the electronic transaction as the open-loop transaction upon determining the open-loop account has funds to cover an amount of deficiency in the pooled closed-loop account; and

transmitting, by the acquirer processor, an authorization of the electronic transaction to the point-of-sale device.

16. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 15 , wherein i) the pooled closed loop account is associated with multiple merchants and ii) each of the multiple merchants is associated with one or more point-of-sale devices.

17. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 16 , wherein the terminal identifier of the point-of-sale device is cross-referenced to one or more terminal identifiers of the one or more point-of-sale devices associated with the multiple merchants to determine that the point-of-sale device belongs to a merchant associated with the pooled closed-loop account.

18. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 16 , wherein the pooled closed-loop account comprises multiple closed-loop accounts associated with the multiple merchants.

19. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 15 , wherein the operations for evaluating whether the pooled closed-loop account, the open-loop account, or a combination thereof have funds to complete the electronic transaction, further comprise:

determining the pooled closed-loop account and the open-loop account have insufficient funds to complete the electronic transaction; and

transmitting, by the acquirer processor over the electronic network, a notification of the insufficient funds to the point-of-sale device requesting a cardholder to provide additional funds to cover the amount of the deficiency to complete the electronic transaction.

20. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 15 , the operations further comprise:

returning, by the acquirer processor over the electronic network, a full approval to the point-of-sale device without communicating with the sponsoring network or the issuer, based on determining that the pooled closed-loop account has sufficient funds to complete the electronic transaction.

Assignments (6)
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTERESTS RECORDED AT REEL/FRAMES 066626/0655, 066625/0426, 066625/0347, AND 066625/0276 Recorded Jan 12, 2026
From: WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS NOTES COLLATERAL AGENT
To: WORLDPAY, LLC; WORLDPAY ISO AND ECOMMERCE, LLC; PAYMETRIC, LLC; WORLDPAY US, LLC
Reel/Frame 074314/0622 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RECORDED AT R/F 066624/0719 Recorded Jan 12, 2026
From: JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., AS COLLATERAL AGENT
To: WORLDPAY, LLC
Reel/Frame 074315/0412 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Feb 19, 2024
From: WORLDPAY, LLC
To: JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., AS COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 066624/0719 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Feb 19, 2024
From: WORLDPAY, LLC
To: WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS NOTES COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 066626/0655 →
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Apr 20, 2021
From: VANTIV, LLC
To: WORLDPAY, LLC
Reel/Frame 055970/0681 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Apr 19, 2021
From: RAFFERTY, THOMAS E.; POSTELL, CHRISTOPHER S.; BAILEY, BRYAN T.
To: VANTIV, LLC
Reel/Frame 055958/0534 →
Continuity (4)
Continuation 16057100 · Aug 7, 2018
Continuation 14221420 · Mar 21, 2014
Continuation 13599538 · Aug 30, 2012
Related Publication 20210174340A1 · Jun 10, 2021