Autonomous vehicle remote disablement

1. A computer-implemented method for disabling an autonomous vehicle, comprising:

in response to a determination by one or more processors of a remote entity that an autonomous vehicle configured to carry one or more passengers should be disabled because the vehicle is: (i) beginning to malfunction or (ii) driving erratically, receiving, at one or more processors in the vehicle, a communication from the remote entity;

analyzing, at the one or more processors of the vehicle, the communication to determine that the communication comprises instructions to disable the vehicle;

authenticating, at the one or more processors of the vehicle, the instructions by determining that the remote entity is authorized to disable the vehicle; and

causing, by the one or more processors of the vehicle, the vehicle to become disabled based upon the communication and the authentication by ceasing to supply power to a component of an engine of the vehicle.

2. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein:

the remote entity comprises an infrastructure component having the one or more processors of the remote entity;

the one or more processors of the remote entity determine that the vehicle is going to collide with the infrastructure component; and

the communication further comprises time and distance stopping information required to stop the vehicle before the vehicle collides with the infrastructure component.

3. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein:

the remote entity comprises a law enforcement agency; and

the communication further comprises information indicating that the vehicle has not complied with a government regulation.

4. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein:

the remote entity comprises an automobile manufacturer or an automobile parts manufacturer; and

the communication further comprises information indicating that an automobile part of the vehicle makes the vehicle dangerous to operate.

5. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein:

the remote entity comprises an automobile manufacturer or an automobile parts manufacturer; and

the method further comprises:

with the one or more processors of the remote entity: (i) determining that the vehicle has been modified to include a faulty component, and (ii) communicating the determination to an insurance agency to allow the insurance agency to modify or cancel an insurance policy of the vehicle.

6. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein, prior to the receiving the communication:

the one or more processors of the remote entity determine that the vehicle should be disabled because the vehicle is driving erratically.

7. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein the causing of the vehicle to become disabled further comprises:

applying brakes of the vehicle.

8. The computer-implemented method of claim 7 , wherein the causing of the vehicle to become disabled further comprises:

preventing the vehicle from operating in a manual mode; and

locking at least one door of the vehicle from an inside of the vehicle and an outside of the vehicle.

9. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein the causing of the vehicle to become disabled further comprises:

locking at least one door of the vehicle from an outside of the vehicle; and

applying brakes of the vehicle.

10. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , further comprising:

determining, at the one or more processors of the vehicle, that other vehicles should be shut down based upon the analysis of the communication; and

communicating, via the one or more processors of the vehicle, the determination that other vehicles should be shut down to at least one other vehicle.

11. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , further comprising:

determining, by the one or more processors of the remote entity, that the vehicle has: (i) entered an area that the vehicle is not authorized to enter, or (ii) is on a course to enter the area that the vehicle is not authorized to enter; and

in response to the determination by the one or more processors of the remote entity that the vehicle has: (i) entered an area that the vehicle is not authorized to enter, or (ii) is on a course to enter the area that the vehicle is not authorized to enter, sending, by the one or more processors of the remote entity, the communication to the one or more processors of the vehicle.

12. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , further comprising:

determining, by the one or more processors of the remote entity, that the vehicle is on course to enter either an accident area or a construction area; and

the instructions to disable the vehicle comprise instructions to disable the vehicle to prevent the vehicle from entering either the accident area or the construction area.

13. A computer system configured to disable an autonomous vehicle, the computer system comprising one or more local or remote processors, transceivers, and/or sensors configured to:

in response to a determination by one or more processors of a remote entity that an autonomous vehicle configured to carry one or more passengers should be disabled because the vehicle is: (i) beginning to malfunction or (ii) driving erratically, receive a communication from the remote entity;

analyze the communication to determine that the communication comprises instructions to disable the vehicle;

authenticate the instructions by determining that the remote entity is authorized to disable the vehicle; and

cause the vehicle to become disabled based upon the communication and the authentication by ceasing to supply power to a component of an engine of the vehicle.

14. The computer system of claim 13 , wherein:

the remote entity comprises an infrastructure component having the one or more processors of the remote entity;

the one or more processors of the remote entity are configured to determine that the vehicle is going to collide with the infrastructure component; and

the communication further comprises time and distance stopping information required to stop the vehicle before the vehicle collides with the infrastructure component.

15. The computer system of claim 13 , wherein:

the remote entity comprises a law enforcement agency; and

the communication further comprises information indicating that the vehicle has not complied with a government regulation.

16. The computer system of claim 13 , wherein the one or more processors of the remote entity are configured to determine that the vehicle should be disabled because the vehicle is driving erratically.

17. The computer system of claim 13 , wherein to cause the vehicle to become disabled, the one or more local or remote processors, transceivers, and/or sensors are further configured to:

apply brakes of the vehicle.

18. The computer system of claim 17 , wherein to cause the vehicle to become disabled, the one or more local or remote processors, transceivers, and/or sensors are further configured to:

prevent the vehicle from operating in a manual mode; and

lock at least one door of the vehicle so that the at least one door may not be opened from an inside of the vehicle and an outside of the vehicle.

19. The computer system of claim 13 , wherein to cause the vehicle to become disabled, the one or more local or remote processors, transceivers, and/or sensors are further configured to:

lock at least one door of the vehicle from an inside of the vehicle; and

apply brakes of the vehicle.

20. The computer system of claim 13 , wherein the one or more local or remote processors, transceivers, and/or sensors are configured to:

determine that other vehicles should be shut down based upon the analysis of the communication; and

communicate the determination that other vehicles should be shut down to at least one other vehicle.