IP Library Granted Patent US 12,330,329
Granted Patent B2
US 12,330,329 · App. 17/217,226 · Granted Jun 17, 2025

Rotary die cutting device and method for setting a gap dimension of a gap between a die cutting cylinder and a counter pressure cylinder of the rotary die cutting device

Inventors: Charles E. Schomber, Jr. (Catawissa, MO); Travis Turnbough (Rosebud, MO); Md M. Haque (Edmond, OK); Darcy Winter (Oklahoma City, OK); Robert Marvel (Norman, OK); Vladimir V. Mayer (Edmond, OK)
Assignee: Maxcess Americas, Inc.
B26D7/265B26F1/384
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,330,329
App. No.
17/217,226
Granted
Jun 17, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

A method for setting a gap dimension of a gap between a die cutting cylinder and a counter pressure cylinder of a rotary die cutting device includes providing a control system including a controller, at least one sensor, and an adjusting device actuated by the control system. The method further includes actuating the adjusting device in response to the at least one sensor sensing a deviation of a web being processed from a desired state which includes a set of one or more detectable parameters with quantifiable and measurable variables, thereby setting the gap dimension between the rotary die cutting device and the counter pressure cylinder, in which actuating the adjusting device is achieved as a result of the control system operating in a closed feedback loop. The method further includes sensing by the at least one sensor occurring with or without disruption of operation of the rotary die cutting device.

Claims (31)

1. A method for setting a gap dimension of a gap between a die cutting cylinder and a counter pressure cylinder of a rotary die cutting device, comprising:

providing a control system comprising a controller, at least one sensor, and an adjusting device actuated by the control system;

setting a desired trained criterion;

sensing, via the at least one sensor, at least a die cut along a perimeter of a web being processed from a desired state which includes a set of one or more detectable parameters with quantifiable and measurable variables, wherein the at least die cut along the perimeter of the web is compared to the desired state and a deviation or an error is determined, wherein the deviation or error is used to determine a signal to send to the adjusting device to achieve a desired result; and

actuating the adjusting device in response to the at least one sensor sensing the deviation from the desired state, thereby adjusting the gap dimension between the rotary die cutting device and the counter pressure cylinder, wherein actuating the adjusting device is achieved as a result of the control system operating in a closed feedback loop;

wherein subsequent to the deviation being directed between the die cutting cylinder and the counter pressure cylinder, the gap between the die cutting cylinder and the counter pressure cylinder is adjusted to return the web to the desired state pursuant to the trained criterion that was saved and subsequently retrieved to maintain the desired state;

wherein setting the desired trained criterion depends on a change in properties of the web; and

wherein sensing by the at least one sensor occurring with or without disruption of operation of the rotary die cutting device.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the step of actuating the adjusting device includes the deviation from the desired state being a splice joint of at least one of a backing web and an overlying second web of the web.

3. The method of claim 1 , wherein the step of actuating the adjusting device includes the deviation from the desired state being a change in thickness of at least one of a backing web and an overlying second web of the web.

4. The method of claim 1 , wherein the step of actuating the adjusting device includes the deviation from the desired state being at least one of a backing web and an overlying second web of the web and an overlying second web, the overlying second web becoming punched labels and a matrix web subsequent to being directed between the die cutting cylinder and the counter pressure cylinder, a thermal expansion of at least one of the backing web and the overlying second web, a change in humidity of an environment surrounding the rotary die cutting device, a change in a tension gradient of at least one of the backing web and the overlying second web, a cut depth of the punched labels and the matrix web, and an impression quality of the punched labels and the matrix web.

5. The method of claim 1 , wherein the control system employs artificial intelligence methods to control the rotary die cutting device.

6. The method of claim 1 , wherein the control system employs machine learning methods to control the rotary die cutting device.

7. The method of claim 1 , wherein the control system employs deep learning methods to control the rotary die cutting device.

8. The method of claim 1 , wherein a neural network is configured to permit different weightings in a hidden layer portion thereof to accommodate different preferences of different operations.

9. A method for setting a gap dimension of a gap between a die cutting cylinder and a counter pressure cylinder of a rotary die cutting device, comprising:

providing a control system comprising a controller, at least one sensor, and an adjusting device actuated by the control system;

setting a desired trained criterion;

sensing, via the at least one sensor, at least a die cut along a perimeter of a workpiece being processed from a desired state which includes a set of one or more detectable parameters with quantifiable and measurable variables, wherein the at least die cut along the perimeter of the workpiece is compared to the desired state and a deviation or an error is determined, wherein the deviation or error is used to determine a signal to send to the adjusting device to achieve a desired result; and

actuating the adjusting device in response to the at least one sensor sensing the deviation from the desired state, thereby adjusting the gap dimension between the rotary die cutting device and the counter pressure cylinder, wherein actuating the adjusting device is achieved as a result of the control system operating in a closed feedback loop;

wherein subsequent to the deviation being directed between the die cutting cylinder and the counter pressure cylinder, the gap between the die cutting cylinder and the counter pressure cylinder is adjusted to return the workpiece to the desired state pursuant to the trained criterion that was saved and subsequently retrieved to maintain the desired state;

wherein setting the desired trained criterion depends on a change in properties of the workpiece;

wherein during operation of the rotary die cutting device, a backing web and an overlying second web of the workpiece are directed between the die cutting cylinder and the counter pressure cylinder, the second web becoming punched labels and a matrix web of the workpiece subsequent to being directed between the die cutting cylinder and the counter pressure cylinder;

wherein sensing by the at least one sensor occurring in an absence of or prior to separation of the punched labels, the backing web, and the matrix web from one another; and

wherein sensing by the at least one sensor occurring with or without disruption of operation of the rotary die cutting device.

10. The method of claim 9 , wherein the step of actuating the adjusting device includes the deviation from the desired state being a splice joint of at least one of the backing web and the overlying second web.

11. The method of claim 9 , wherein the step of actuating the adjusting device includes the deviation from the desired state being a change in thickness of at least one of the backing web and the overlying second web.

12. The method of claim 9 , wherein the step of actuating the adjusting device includes the deviation from the desired state being at least one of a change of material of at least one of the backing web and the overlying second web, the overlying second web becoming punched labels and the matrix web subsequent to being directed between the die cutting cylinder and the counter pressure cylinder, thermal expansion of at least one of the backing web and the overlying second web, a change in humidity of an environment surrounding the rotary die cutting device, a change in a tension gradient of at least one of the backing web and the overlying second web, a cut depth of the punched labels and the matrix web, and an impression quality of the punched labels and the matrix web.

13. The method of claim 9 , wherein the control system employs artificial intelligence methods to control the rotary die cutting device.

14. The method of claim 9 , wherein the control system employs machine learning methods to control the rotary die cutting device.

15. The method of claim 9 , wherein the control system employs deep learning methods to control the rotary die cutting device.

Assignments (4)
MERGER Recorded Mar 29, 2022
From: MAXCESS AMERICAS, INC.
To: MAXCESS INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 059420/0177 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Apr 22, 2021
From: ROTO-DIE COMPANY, INC.
To: MAXCESS AMERICAS, INC.
Reel/Frame 055999/0305 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Apr 12, 2021
From: HAQUE, MD M.; WINTER, DARCY; MARVEL, ROBERT; MAYER, VLADIMIR V.
To: MAXCESS AMERICAS, INC.
Reel/Frame 055891/0670 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Apr 12, 2021
From: SCHOMBER, CHARLES E., JR.; TURNBOUGH, TRAVIS
To: ROTO-DIE COMPANY, INC.
Reel/Frame 055891/0841 →
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20220314481A1 · Oct 6, 2022
References Cited (64)
US 4130042A · Reed · 1978 [cited by examiner]
US 5212647A · Raney et al. · 1993 [cited by applicant]
US 6100989A · Luwa · 2000 [cited by applicant]
US 6112658A · Gunther et al. · 2000 [cited by applicant]
US 6556291B2 · Yonezawa · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 6950547B2 · Floeder et al. · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 7027934B2 · Skeps et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 7333650B2 · Yamamoto et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 8011280B2 · Liebheit · 2011 [cited by examiner]
US 8281694B2 · Okihara · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 8935104B2 · Floeder et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9061435B1 · Proudfoot et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9738004B2 · Ebrecht · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 9969191B2 · Masubuchi et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 10115040B2 · Brauer · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 10346969B1 · Raghu et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10395362B2 · Gupta et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10599951B2 · Bhaskar et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10634621B2 · Kano et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20010031079A1 · Ryder · 2001 [cited by applicant]
US 20020191831A1 · Spoto et al. · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 20080022821A1 · Hendrik · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20080026090A1 · Ehrbar · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20130042771A1 · Alkhagen · 2013 [cited by examiner]
US 20170322186A1 · Su et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20180281218A1 · Urrutia Nebreda et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20190025805A1 · Cella et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190041845A1 · Cella et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190121350A1 · Cella et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190129405A1 · Cella et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190129408A1 · Cella et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190137985A1 · Cella et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190146474A1 · Cella et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190146478A1 · Cella et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190197679A1 · Fang et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190318469A1 · Wang · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20200005070A1 · Ambikapathi et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200005141A1 · Ambikapathi et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200020094A1 · Chang · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200096994A1 · Cella et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200103890A1 · Cella et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200110397A1 · Cella et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200110399A1 · Cella et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200254644A1 · de Natris · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20240109744A1 · Montagnani · 2024 [cited by examiner]
DE 102013208909A1 · 2014 [cited by applicant]
DE 102015116198A1 · 2017 [cited by applicant]
DE 102017122071A1 · 2019 [cited by applicant]
EP 3147089A1 · 2017 [cited by examiner]
WO WO2008043497A1 · 2008 [cited by examiner]
WO 2011095228A1 · 2011 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2011095633A1 · 2011 [cited by examiner]
WO 2016070053A1 · 2016 [cited by applicant]
WO 2018165753A1 · 2018 [cited by applicant]
WO 2019057254A1 · 2019 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2019057839A1 · 2019 [cited by examiner]
WO 2019107614A1 · 2019 [cited by applicant]
WO 2019215746A1 · 2019 [cited by applicant]
WO 2019219598A1 · 2019 [cited by applicant]
WO 2019239283A1 · 2019 [cited by applicant]
WO 2020048119A1 · 2020 [cited by applicant]
WO 2020048248A1 · 2020 [cited by applicant]
WO 2020053139A1 · 2020 [cited by applicant]
WO 2020079568A1 · 2020 [cited by applicant]