IP Library › Granted Patent US 12,387,108
Granted Patent B2
US 12,387,108 · App. 17/236,678 · Granted Aug 12, 2025

Enhanced uncertainty management for optical communication systems

Inventors: Rene Marcel Schmogrow (San Jose, CA); Mattia Cantono (San Jose, CA)
Assignee: Google LLC
G06N3/10G06F30/18G06N20/00H04B10/07953
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,387,108
App. No.
17/236,678
Granted
Aug 12, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

Margin hedging in optical communication systems allows for overhead within the optical system. A machine learning model can be trained using the output of a physics based simulation of the optical system as well as the features of the optical system. A trained machine learning model can adjust the results of a physics based simulation of an optical network to more accurately match the adjusted simulation results to the “true” performance of the optical network. The margins of the optical communication system can be more tailored to the true performance of a designed or planned optical system.

Claims (32)

1. A method for predicting link design margins, the method comprising:

using one or more processors configured to control the steps of receiving a plurality of link features in the form of a plurality of values corresponding to respective variables, each value being from a known range or set of values associated with the corresponding variable, the link features being associated with a physical optical link and forming a signature for the physical optical link;

simulating the physical optical link with a first model based on the plurality of link features to produce a first value;

obtaining empirically one or more performance metrics associated with the physical optical link;

calculating a second value based on the one or more performance metrics;

determining one or more prediction error values based on the first value and the second value, wherein the one or more prediction error values are indicative of the accuracy of the simulation of the first value; and

training or updating a machine learning model using the plurality of link features and at least one of the one or more prediction error values or the one or more performance metrics, wherein the training or updating comprises training or updating the machine learning model to output corrections for application to outputs of the first model.

2. The method of claim 1 further comprising providing a predicted link capacity margin for a new physical optical link based on one or more prediction error values.

3. The method of claim 1 further comprises determining variability of each of the one or more prediction error values for each of the plurality of link features.

4. The method of claim 1 wherein the one or more performance metric comprises a generalized signal to noise ratio.

5. A method for predicting link capacity margins, the method comprising:

using one or more processors configured to control the steps of

receiving a plurality of link features in the form of a plurality of values corresponding to respective variables, each value being from a known range or set of values associated with the corresponding variable, the link features being associated with a physical optical link and forming a signature for the physical optical link;

simulating the physical optical link with a first model based on the plurality of link features to produce a first simulated value;

providing to a trained machine learning model the plurality of link features and the first simulated value; and

outputting by the trained machine learning model corrections for application to outputs of the first model and an error range associated with the first simulated value, wherein the error range is indicative of the accuracy of the simulation of the first value.

6. The method of claim 5 further comprising determining a margin based on the output of the trained machine learning model.

7. The method of claim 5 wherein the error range is based on trained variability values.

8. The method of claim 7 further comprising determining a margin for the physical optical link based on the predicted error range.

9. The method claim 5 further comprising providing as an output a relationship between generalized signal to noise ratio and frequency for at least one set of link features.

10. The method of claim 5 wherein the set of link features is one of a multiplexer, amplifier, or optical fiber.

11. A non-transient computer readable medium containing program instructions, the instructions when executed cause one or more processors to control the steps of:

receiving a plurality of link features in the form of a plurality of values corresponding to respective variables, each value being from a known range or set of values associated with the corresponding variable, the link features being associated with a physical optical link and forming a signature for the physical optical link;

simulating the physical optical link with a first model based on the plurality of link features to produce a first simulated value;

providing to a trained machine learning model the plurality of link features and the first simulated value; and

outputting by the trained machine learning model corrections for application to outputs of the first model and an error range associated with the first simulated value, wherein the error range is indicative of the accuracy of the simulation of the first value.

12. The non-transient computer readable medium of claim 11 further comprising determining a margin based on the output of the trained machine learning model.

13. The non-transient computer readable medium of claim 12 wherein the error range is based on trained variability values.

14. The non-transient computer readable medium of claim 11 further comprising providing as an output a relationship between generalized signal to noise ratio and frequency for at least one set of link features.

15. The non-transient computer readable medium of claim 11 further comprising providing as an output a relationship between generalized signal to noise ratio and frequency for at least one set of link features.

16. The non-transient computer readable medium of claim 11 wherein the set of link features contains at least one of a multiplexer, amplifier, or optical fiber.

17. The non-transient computer readable medium of claim 11 wherein the trained machine learning model is trained on a sets of data, each set of data associated with a physical optical network, each set of data comprising (i) a simulated value for the physical optical network, (ii) a set of link features, and (iii) empirical data from the physical optical network.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Apr 23, 2021
From: SCHMOGROW, RENE MARCEL; CANTONO, MATTIA
To: GOOGLE LLC
Reel/Frame 056014/0654 →
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20220343176A1 · Oct 27, 2022
References Cited (19)
US 9509434B2 · Swinkels et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 9838296B2 · Armolavicius et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 10148384B2 · Swinkels et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 10542336B2 · Paraschis · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 10715888B2 · Swinkels · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 11640550B2 · Liu · 2023 [cited by examiner]
US 20190215073A1 · Schmogrow · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20200092026A1 · Birk · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20210081592A1 · Dandy · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20210110299A1 · Bisson-Krol · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20210176146A1 · Vasseur · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20220329033A1 · Demars · 2022 [cited by examiner]
Andrea D'Amico; Stefano Straullu; Antonino Nespola; Ihtesham Khan; Elliot London; Emanuele Virgillito; Stefano Piciaccia; Aberto Tanzi; Gabriele Galimberti; and Vittorio Curri; Using Machine Learning in an Open Optical … [cited by applicant]
Zhilong Wang, Min Zhang, Danshi Wang, Chuang Song, Min Liu, Jin Li, Liqi Lou, and Zhuo Liu; Failure Prediction Using Machine Learning and Time Series in Optical Network; Aug. 7, 2017, vol. 25, No. 16, Optics Express, 13… [cited by applicant]
Christodoulopoulos et al. Toward efficient, reliable, and autonomous optical networks: the Orchestra solution [Invited]. Aug. 15, 2019. Journal of Optical Communications and Networking, IEEE, USA, vol. 11, No. 9. 15 pag… [cited by applicant]
Seve et al. Learning Process for Reducing Uncertainties on Network Parameters and Design Margins. Feb. 1, 2018. Journal of Optical Communications and Networking, vol. 10, No. 2. 9 pages. [cited by applicant]
Musumeci et al. An Overview on Application of Machine Learning Techniques in Optical Networks. Mar. 21, 2018. ARXIV.org, Cornell University Library, 201 Olin Library Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853. 27 pages. [cited by applicant]
Khan et al. Lightpath QoT computation in optical networks assisted by transfer learning. Feb. 10, 2021. Journal of Optical Communications and Networking, IEEE, USA, vol. 13, No. 4. 11 pages. [cited by applicant]
Extended European Search Report for European Patent Application No. 22156400.8 dated Aug. 4, 2022. 14 pages. [cited by applicant]