Dampening token allocations based on non-organic subscriber behaviors
Described processes include: determining portions of instances of a cryptographic token to be allocated to record providers, like providers of an asset indicated by a record, wherein: the portions are determined based on network effects associated with the records the record provider supplied on performance of a computer-implemented network in which both record providers and record consumers participate, patterns indicative of inorganic consumption may be determined from one or more of interactions of individual consumers, interactions of collections of consumers, or consumer interactions in the aggregate for a given provider or record; and the effects on network performance are adjusted responsive to designation of one or more entities as exhibiting inauthentic behavior; and appending to a distributed ledger, records indicating the respective portions, and adjustments, are allocated to record providers.
1. A tangible, non-transitory, machine-readable medium storing instructions that when executed by one or more processors effectuate operations comprising:
obtaining an indication of an amount of instances of a cryptographic token transferred by a content hosting platform to an address during a tracking period exceeding a threshold, the address inoperable to transfer received instances of the cryptographic token to account addresses;
determining, based on the indication, portions of a second amount of instances of the cryptographic token to be allocated to content contributors based on network effect scores determined to be caused by the content contributors on performance of a computer-implemented network in which both the content hosting platform and the content contributors participate, wherein determining the portions comprises:
identifying a first subset of the content contributors based on associated scores indicative of a negative impact on performance of the computer-implemented network;
determining, for each content contributor identified as a member of the first subset, a reduction of a respective portion of the second amount of instances of the cryptographic token to be allocated to the member based on a corresponding score indicative of the negative impact on performance of the computer-implemented network caused by the member; and
determining, for each other content contributor being a member of a second subset, a respective portion of the second amount of instances of the cryptographic token to be allocated to the content contributor based on a corresponding score indicative of a positive impact on performance of the computer-implemented network caused by the content contributor; and
causing, after determining the respective portions of the second amount of instances of the cryptographic token to allocate to the content contributors, an entry indicative of a mint of new instances of the cryptographic token to be appended to a tamper-evident, acyclic, directed graph of cryptographic hash pointers, the appended entry rendering tamper-evident a record of the second amount of instances of the cryptographic token in the mint and the respective portions that are, or are to be, transferred to respective account addresses of the content creators in the mint.
2. The medium of claim 1 , wherein obtaining an indication of an amount of instances of a cryptographic token transferred by a content hosting platform to an address during a tracking period exceeding a threshold comprises:
obtaining records comprising transactions occurring after or not included in a prior tracking period;
identifying, from the obtained records, transactions corresponding to the tracking period, each identified transaction having associated transaction information indicative of an amount of the cryptographic token transferred by the transaction to the address inoperable to transfer received instances of the cryptographic token to the account addresses; and
determining to mint new instances of the cryptographic token for the tracking period in response to identifying a set of transactions corresponding to the tracking period for which an aggregate value based on their transaction information exceeds the threshold.
3. The medium of claim 2 , wherein:
the aggregate value corresponds a sum based on the respective amounts of the cryptographic token transferred by the transactions in the set to the address inoperable to transfer received instances of the cryptographic token to the account addresses.
4. The medium of claim 3 , wherein:
the threshold is a target value based on a measure of central tendency of adjusted aggregate values for other sets of transactions corresponding to historical tracking periods including the prior tracking period and one or more additional prior tracking periods.
5. The medium of claim 2 , wherein:
the portions of the second amount of instances of the cryptographic token to be allocated to the content contributors are determined in response to the determination to mint.
6. The medium of claim 2 , wherein:
the portions of the second amount of instances of the cryptographic token to be allocated to the content contributors are determined based on network effect scores determined to be caused by the content contributors on the performance of the computer-implemented network during the tracking period.
7. The medium of claim 2 , wherein:
the aggregate value corresponds a sum based on the respective amounts of the cryptographic token transferred by the transactions in the set to the address inoperable to transfer received instances of the cryptographic token to the account addresses; and
the threshold is a target value determined based on transaction information associated with transactions corresponding to a trailing number of historical tracking periods including at least the prior tracking period.
8. The medium of claim 1 , wherein determining, based on the indication, portions of a second amount of instances of the cryptographic token to be allocated to content contributors based on network effect scores determined to be caused by the content contributors on performance of a computer-implemented network in which both the content hosting platform and the content contributors participate comprises:
obtaining a graph having:
nodes corresponding to records of content items provided by the content contributors, the records being associated in memory with different content contributors among the plurality of content contributors and the associations in memory indicating which content items were made available by which content contributor, and
edges between nodes indicative of transitions between the records by computing devices of users granted access to the content hosting platform or the content items; and
determining scores based at least in part on user interactions with the content items based on the transitions or lack of transitions between the records in the graph, at least some scores being indicative of negative impact on performance of the computer-implemented network and at least some other score being indicative of positive impact on performance of the computer-implemented network.
9. The medium of claim 8 , wherein identifying a first subset of the content contributors based on associated scores indicative of a negative impact on performance of the computer-implemented network comprises:
identifying, based on the graph and the scores, a content contributor as a member of the first subset based on the transitions of at least one user to or from records made available by the content contributor indicating a negative impact on the computer-implemented network.
10. The medium of claim 9 , wherein determining, for each content contributor identified as a member of the first subset, a reduction of a respective portion of the second amount of instances of the cryptographic token to be allocated to the member based on a corresponding score indicative of the negative impact on performance of the computer-implemented network caused by the member comprises:
classifying the at least one user as exhibiting inauthentic user behavior; and
reducing the respective portion to be allocated to the member based on an adjustment amount corresponding to the at least one user exhibiting user behavior.
11. The medium of claim 8 , wherein determining, for each other content contributor being a member of a second subset, a respective portion of the second amount of instances of the cryptographic token to be allocated to the content contributor based on a corresponding score indicative of a positive impact on performance of the computer-implemented network caused by the content contributor comprises:
increasing the respective portion based on the corresponding score indicative of the positive impact and an aggregate amount of the reduction of the portions in the first subset.
12. The medium of claim 1 , wherein causing, after determining the respective portions of the second amount of instances of the cryptographic token to allocate to the content contributors, an entry indicative of a mint of new instances of the cryptographic token to be appended to a tamper-evident, acyclic, directed graph of cryptographic hash pointers, the appended entry rendering tamper-evident a record of the second amount of instances of the cryptographic token in the mint and the respective portions that are, or are to be, transferred to respective account addresses of the content creators in the mint comprises:
generating, by a distributed computing system, one or more transactions corresponding to the mint of the cryptographic token on the decentralized computing platform for the tracking period, the respective portions of the second amount of instance of the cryptographic token being transferred to the respective account addresses by the one or more transactions.
13. The medium of claim 12 , wherein the amounts of instances of the cryptographic token transferred by the content hosting platform to the address during the tracking period are identified from a plurality of other transactions in records appended to the tamper-evident, acyclic, directed graph of cryptographic hash pointers prior to the mint of the new instances of the cryptographic tokens.
14. The medium of claim 1 , wherein network effect scores determined to be caused by the content contributors on performance of a computer-implemented network in which both the content hosting platform and the content contributors participate are determined based on:
a report for the content distribution platform, the report being based on network utilization data corresponding to one or more computing devices of content consumers accessing content items available on the content distribution platform; and
network utilization data for a computing device of a content consumer indicates subscription events or login events of the content consumer by which access to content items is granted and transitions indicative of which ones of the content items are accessed by the content consumer after an event or another one of the content items in a given session.
15. The medium of claim 14 , the operations further comprising:
determining a first frequency with which a given content item or given set of content items associated with a content contributor is accessed after an event by a content consumer and a second frequency with which content items associated with other content contributors are accessed; and
determining a network effect score based at least in part on the first frequency and the second frequency.
16. The medium of claim 14 , the operations further comprising:
determining a first occurrence rate of a given content item or given set of content items associated with a content contributor in transitions from an event by a content consumer;
determining a second occurrence rate of other content items associated with other content contributors in other transitions by the content consumer; and
determining a network effect score based at least in part on a ratio of the occurrence rates.
17. The medium of claim 14 , the operations further comprising:
determining a first occurrence rate of a given content item or given set of content items associated with a content contributor in transitions from an event among a subset of content consumers;
determining a second occurrence rate of the given content item or the given set of content items associated with the content contributor in transitions from an event by other content consumers; and
determining a network effect score based at least in part on a ratio of the occurrence rates.
18. The medium of claim 14 , the operations further comprising:
detecting, for at least one content consumer, below a threshold number of transitions in one or more sessions after a subscription event; and
determining a network effect score indicative of a negative performance on the computer-implemented network based at least in part on the one or more transitions.
19. The medium of claim 18 , wherein:
the subscription event is a subscription renewal event; and
below a threshold number of transitions in one or more sessions is identified between the subscription renewal event and a prior subscription event or between the subscription renewal event and an initial subscription event.
20. A computer-implemented method, the method comprising:
obtaining an indication of an amount of instances of a cryptographic token transferred by a content hosting platform to an address during a tracking period exceeding a threshold, the address inoperable to transfer received instances of the cryptographic token to account addresses;
determining, based on the indication, portions of a second amount of instances of the cryptographic token to be allocated to content contributors based on network effect scores determined to be caused by the content contributors on performance of a computer-implemented network in which both the content hosting platform and the content contributors participate, wherein determining the portions comprises:
identifying a first subset of the content contributors based on associated scores indicative of a negative impact on performance of the computer-implemented network;
determining, for each content contributor identified as a member of the first subset, a reduction of a respective portion of the second amount of instances of the cryptographic token to be allocated to the member based on a corresponding score indicative of the negative impact on performance of the computer-implemented network caused by the member; and
determining, for each other content contributor being a member of a second subset, a respective portion of the second amount of instances of the cryptographic token to be allocated to the content contributor based on a corresponding score indicative of a positive impact on performance of the computer-implemented network caused by the content contributor; and
causing, after determining the respective portions of the second amount of instances of the cryptographic token to allocate to the content contributors, an entry indicative of a mint of new instances of the cryptographic token to be appended to a tamper-evident, acyclic, directed graph of cryptographic hash pointers, the appended entry rendering tamper-evident a record of the second amount of instances of the cryptographic token in the mint and the respective portions that are, or are to be, transferred to respective account addresses of the content creators in the mint.